Seasonal and geomorphic controls on N and P removal in riparian zones of the US Midwest
- 510 Downloads
Riparian zones are an important strategy to mitigate N and P export to streams. However, their efficiency with respect to nitrate (NO3 −), ammonium (NH4 +), or soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) in groundwater remains uncertain in the US Midwest. This study investigates water table fluctuations and NO3 −, NH4 +, and SRP concentration dynamics in two riparian zone types (outwash vs. glacial till) common in the upper US Midwest. During low water table periods, NO3 − removal was 93 % at WR (outwash site), and 75 % at LWD (glacial till site); but during high water table periods, NO3 − removal efficiencies dropped to 50 % at WR, and 14 % at LWD. Median seasonal mass fluxes of NO3 − removed at WR (9.4–21.7 mg N day−1 m−1 of stream length) and LWD (0.4–1.9 mg N day−1 m−1) were small compared to other riparian zones in glaciated landscapes. The WR site was a small SRP sink (0.114 and 0.118 mg day−1 m−1 during the dry period and wet period, respectively), while LWD acted as a small SRP source to the stream (0.004 mg day−1 m−1 during the dry period; 0.075 mg day−1 m−1 during the wet period). Both LWD and WR acted as sources of NH4 + to the stream with mass fluxes ranging from 0.17 to 7.75 mg N day−1 m−1. Although riparian zones in the US Midwest provide many ecosystem services, results suggest they are unlikely to efficiently mitigate N and P pollution in subsurface flow.
KeywordsNitrate Ammonium Phosphorus Fluxes Riparian zone Removal
This work was supported by a U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Institute of Food and Agriculture grant (USDA–NIFA Grant # 2009-35112-0524) to P. Vidon, P.A. Jacinthe and M.E. Baker. Thanks are also due to landowners, Mr. Douglas Johnston (WR site) and Mr. Jeffrey Phares (LWD site) for granting access to the study sites.
- Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Climatology of the United States (2002) Monthly station normals of temperature, precipitation, and heating and cooling degree days 1971–2000: Indiana. Published by the US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, Washington, DC, p 81Google Scholar
- Correll DL, Jordan TE, Weller DE (1997) Failure of agricultural riparian buffers to protect surface waters from ground-water nitrate contamination. In: Gibert J, Mathieu J, Fournier F (eds) Groundwater/surface water ecotones: biological and hydrological interactions and management options. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 162–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dillaha TA, Sherrard JH, Lee D, Mostaghimi S, Shanholtz VO (1988) Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots. J Water Pollut 60:1231–1238Google Scholar
- Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeo Electron 4(1):1–9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014
- Krovang B, Grant R, Laubel AL (1997) Sediment and phosphorus export from a lowland catchment: quantification of sources. Water Air Soil Pollut 99:465–476Google Scholar
- NOAA (2005) Climatological Data, Indianapolis. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, Washington, DC. http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ind/climatenormals.txt. Accessed Jan 16, 2005
- Passeport E, Vidon P, Forshay K, Harris L, Lazar J, Kaushal SS, Kellogg DQ, Mayer PM, Stander E (2013) Ecological engineering practices for the reduction of non-point source N in human influenced landscapes: a guide for watershed managers. Environ Manag J 51:392–413. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9970-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanders LL (1998) A manual of field hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Vought LBM, Dahl J, Pedersen CL, Lacoursiere JO (1994) Nutrient retention in riparian ecotones. Ambio 23:342–348Google Scholar