Advertisement

Biogeochemistry

, Volume 118, Issue 1–3, pp 453–469 | Cite as

An exploratory analysis of phosphorus transformations in tropical soils using structural equation modeling

  • A. C. Gama-Rodrigues
  • M. V. S. Sales
  • P. S. D. Silva
  • N. B. Comerford
  • W. P. Cropper
  • E. F. Gama-Rodrigues
Article

Abstract

In the tropics, highly weathered soils with high phosphorus (P) fixation capacities predominate, reducing the P availability to plants. For this reason, understanding the cycle of P in the soil is important to develop management strategies that increase P availability to plants, especially in low-input production systems. The aim of this study was to apply structural equation modeling with latent variables, at an exploratory level, to test hypothetical models of the P cycle using data from the Hedley extraction method. Specifically, we evaluated interactions between the pools of P, and identified which pools act as a sink or source of P in unfertilized soils. The models of the P cycle for the tested soil were able to distinguish between the direct and indirect effects of labile and stable P on the available P pool. This approach led to a proposed distinction of functional P pools in the soil, and identifying the processes of P transformation in the soil between the pools based on a source–sink relationship. Based on these analyses, the organic pool consists of the bicarbonate organic phosphate (Po), hydroxide Po, and sonic Po fractions. The bicarbonate inorganic phosphate (Pi) and hydroxide Pi fractions formed the inorganic pool. The hydrochloride (HCl) Phot and residual P fractions formed the occluded pool, the HCl Pi fraction formed the primary mineral pool, and the resin Pi fraction constituted the most available P pool. Organic P pool was the major source to the available P pool.

Keywords

P fractionation Soil organic P Soil P cycling Factor analysis Structural models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the award of an overseas research fellowship to Antonio Carlos Gama-Rodrigues stay at the University of Florida and the Research Foundation from Rio de Janeiro State (FAPERJ), Brazil, for the financial support.

References

  1. Agbenin JO, Goladi JT (1998) Dynamics of phosphorus fractions in a savanna Alfisol under continuous cultivation. Soil Use Manag 14:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison VJ, Yermakov Z, Miller RM, Jastrow JD, Matamala R (2007) Using landscape and gradients to decouple the impact of correlated environmental variables on soil microbial community composition. Soil Biol Biochem 39:505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo MSB, Schaefer CEGR, Sampaio EVSB (2004) Soil phosphorus fractions from toposequences of semi-arid Latosols and Luvisols in northestern Brazil. Geoderma 119:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arhonditsis GB, Stow CA, Steinberg LJ, Kenney MA, Lathrop RC, Mcbride SJ, Reckhow KH (2006) Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis. Ecol Model 192:385–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck MA, Sanchez PA (1994) Soil phosphorus fraction dynamics during 18 years of cultivation on a Typic Paleudult. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1424–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardoso IM, Janssen BH, Oenema O, Kuyper TW (2003) Phosphorus pools in Oxisols under shade and unshaded coffee systems on farmer’s fields in Brazil. Agrofor Syst 58:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cross AF, Schlesinger WH (1995) A literature review and evaluation of the Hedley fractionation: application to the biogeochemical cycle of soil phosphorus in natural ecosystems. Geoderma 64:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doblas-Miranda E, Sánchez-Piñero F, González-Megías A (2009) Different structuring factors but connected dynamics shape litter and belowground soil macrofaunal food webs. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2543–2550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frizano J, Johnson AH, Vann DR, Scatena FN (2002) Soil phosphorus fractionation during forest development on landslide scars in the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico. Biotropica 34:17–26Google Scholar
  10. Frizano J, Vann DR, Johnson AH, Johnson CM, Vieira ICG, Zarin DJ (2003) Labile phosphorus in soils of forest fallows and primary forest in the Bragantina region, Brazil. Biotropica 35:2–11Google Scholar
  11. Frossard E, Condrom LM, Oberson A, Sinaj S, Fardeau JC (2000) Processes governing phosphorus availability in temperate soils. J Environ Qual 29:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garci-Montiel DC, Neill C, Melillo J, Thomas S, Steudler PA, Cerri CC (2000) Soil phosphorus transformations following forest clearing for pasture in the Brazilian Amazon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1792–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giardina CP, Sanford RL, Dockersmith IC (2000) Changes in soil phosphorus and nitrogen during slash-and-burn clearing of a dry tropical forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gijsman AJ, Oberson A, Tiessen H, Friesen DK (1996) Limited applicability of the CENTURY model to highly weathered tropical soils. Agron J 88:894–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grace JB (2006) Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grace JB, Bollen KA (2008) Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: the role of composite variables. Environ Ecol Stat 15:191–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grierson PF, Smithson P, Nziguheba G, Radersma S, Comerford NB (2004) Phosphorus dynamics and mobilization by plants. In: van Noordwisk M, Cadisch G, Ong CK (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems: concepts and models with multiple plant components. CABI International, Wallingford, pp 127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hair JF, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, p 785Google Scholar
  19. Harrison AF (1987) Soil organic phosphorus: a review of world literature. CAB International, Wallingford, p 257Google Scholar
  20. Hedley MJ, Stewart WB, Chauhan BS (1982) Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:970–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6:53–60Google Scholar
  22. Kenny DA (2012) Measuring model fit. (http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm)
  23. Kitayama K, Majalap-Lee N, Aiba S (2000) Soil phosphorus transformation and phosphorus-use efficiencies of tropical rainforests along altitudinal gradients of Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Oecologia 123:342–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New York 366pGoogle Scholar
  25. Lehmann J, Günther D, Mota MS, Almeida MP, Zech W, Kaiser K (2001) Inorganic and organic soil phosphorus and sulfur pools in an Amazonian multistrata agroforestry system. Agrofor Syst 53:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leite FP (2001) Relações nutricionais e alterações de características químicas de solos da região do Vale do Rio Doce pelo cultivo do eucalipto. Viçosa, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, p 67 (Ph.D. Thesis)Google Scholar
  27. Lilienfein J, Wilcke W, Ayarza MA, Vilela L, Lima SC, Zech W (2000) Chemical fractionation of phosphorus, sulphur, and molybdenum in Brazilian savannah Oxisols under different land use. Geoderma 96:31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linquist BA, Singleton PW, Cassman KG (1997) Inorganic and organic phosphorus dynamics during a build-up and decline of available phosphorus in an Ultisol. Soil Sci 162:254–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malaeb ZA, Summers JK, Pugesek BH (2000) Using structural equation modeling to investigate relationships among ecological variables. Environ Ecol Stat 7:93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mardia KV (1974) Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Indian Stat Inst 36:115–128Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell RJ (1992) Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modeling. Funct Ecol 6:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Möller A, Kaiser K, Amelung W, Niamskul C, Udomsri S, Puthawong M, Haumaier L, Zech W (2000) Forms of organic C and P extracted from tropical soils as assessed by liquid-state 13C- and 31P-NMR spectroscopy. Aust J Soil Res 38:1017–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mulaik SA (2009) Linear causal modeling with structural equations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Negassa W, Leinweber P (2009) How does the Hedley sequential phosphorus fractionation reflect impacts of land use and management on soil phosphorus: a review. J. Plant Nutr Soil 172:305–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neufeldt H, Silva JE, Ayarza MA, Zech W (2000) Land-use effects on phosphorus fractions in Cerrado oxisols. Biol Fertil Soils 31:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newbery DMcC, Alexander IJ, Rother JA (1997) Phosphorus dynamics in a lowland African rain forest: the influence of ectomycorrhizal trees. Ecol Monogr 67:367–409Google Scholar
  37. Novais RF, Smyth TJ (1999) Fósforo em solo e planta em condições tropicais. Viçosa, UFV 399 pGoogle Scholar
  38. Oberson A, Friesen DK, Rao IM, Bühler S, Frossard E (2001) Phosphorus transformations in an Oxisol under contrasting land use systems: the role of the soil microbial biomass. Plant Soil 237:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olander LP, Bustamante MM, Asner GP, Telles E, Prado Z, Camargo PB (2005) Surface soil change following selective logging in an eastern Amazon forest. Earth Interact 9:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prober SM, Wiehl G (2011) Relationships among soil fertility, native plant diversity and exotic plant abundance inform restoration of forb-rich eucalypt woodlands. Divers Distrib 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00872.x
  41. Reed SC, Townsend AR, Taylor PG, Cleveland CC (2011) Phosphorus cycling in tropical forests growing on highly weathered soils. In: Bünemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) Phosphorus in action: biological processes in soil phosphorus cycling. Springer, Berlin, pp 339–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sato S, Comerford NB (2006) Organic anions and phosphorus desorption and bioavailability in a humid Brazilian Ultisol. Soil Sci 171:695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharpley AN, Tiessen H, Cole CV (1987) Soil phosphorus forms extracted by soil tests as a function of pedogenesis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:362–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smeck NE (1985) Phosphorus dynamics in soils and landscapes. Geoderma 36:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solomon D, Lehmamn J (2000) Loss of phosphorus from soil in semi-arid northern Tanzania as result of cropping: evidence from sequential extraction and 31P-NMR spectroscopy. Euro J Soil Sci 51:699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solomon D, Lehmamn J, Mamo T, Fritzsche F, Zech W (2002) Phosphorus compounds and dynamics as influenced by land use changes in the sub-humid Ethiopian highlands. Geoderma 105:21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Szott LT, Melendez G (2001) Phosphorus availability under annual cropping, alley cropping, and multistrata agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 53:125–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tchienkoua M, Zech W (2003) Chemical and spectral characterization of soil phosphorus under three land uses from an Andic Palehumult in West Cameroon. Agric Ecosyst Environ 100:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tiessen H, Moir JO (1993) Characterisation of available P by sequential extraction. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of soil analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 75–86Google Scholar
  50. Tiessen H, Stewart WB, Cole CV (1984) Pathways of phosphorus transformations in soils of differing pedogenesis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tiessen H, Salcedo IH, Sampaio EVSB (1992) Nutrient and soil organic matter dynamics under shifting cultivation in semi-arid northeastern Brazil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 38:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Travis SE, Grace JB (2010) Predicting performance for ecological restoration: a case study using Spartina alterniflora. Ecol Appl 20:192–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner BL, Engelbrecht BMJ (2011) Soil organic phosphorus in lowland tropical rain forests. Biogeochemistry 103:297–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams WA, Jones MB, Demment MW (1990) A concise table for path analysis statistics. Agron J 82:1022–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zheng Z, Simard RR, Lafond J, Parent LE (2002) Pathways of soil phosphorus transformations after 8 years of cultivation under contrasting cropping practices. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Gama-Rodrigues
    • 1
  • M. V. S. Sales
    • 1
  • P. S. D. Silva
    • 2
  • N. B. Comerford
    • 3
  • W. P. Cropper
    • 4
  • E. F. Gama-Rodrigues
    • 1
  1. 1.Soil LaboratoryNorth Fluminense State University Darcy RibeiroCampos dos GoytacazesBrazil
  2. 2.Mathematics LaboratoryNorth Fluminense State University Darcy RibeiroCampos dos GoytacazesBrazil
  3. 3.North Florida Research and Education CenterUniversity of FloridaQuincyUSA
  4. 4.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations