, Volume 112, Issue 1–3, pp 679–693 | Cite as

The importance of amino sugar turnover to C and N cycling in organic horizons of old-growth Douglas-fir forest soils colonized by ectomycorrhizal mats

  • Lydia H. Zeglin
  • Laurel A. Kluber
  • David D. Myrold


Amino sugar dynamics represent an important but under-investigated component of the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles in old-growth Douglas-fir forest soils. Because fungal biomass is high in these soils, particularly in areas colonized by rhizomorphic ectomycorrhizal fungal mats, organic matter derived from chitinous cell wall material (or the monomeric building block of chitin, N-acetylglucosamine (NAG)) could be a significant source of C or N to the soil microbiota, and thus an important driver of microbial C and N processing. This paper reports the results of incubation experiments initiated to measure chitin degradation, NAG utilization, and the contribution of these substrates to soil respiration and N mineralization rates in mat-colonized and non-mat soil organic horizons. Amendments of chitin and NAG stimulated respiration, N mineralization, and biomass accumulation in mat and non-mat soils, and responses to NAG amendment were stronger than to chitin amendment. NAG-induced respiration was consistently two-fold higher in mat soils than non-mat soils, but induced N mineralization was similar between the two soil patch types. Assimilation of both C and N into microbial biomass was apparent, biomass C:N ratio decreased in all treatments, and microbial N use efficiency (treatment means 0.25 ± 0.06–0.50 ± 0.05) was greater than C use efficiency (treatment means 0.12 ± 0.04–0.32 ± 0.02). NAGase enzyme response was non-linear and showed the same pattern in chitin and NAG amendments. Responses to NAG and chitin amendment differed between mat and non-mat soils, indicating different mechanisms driving NAG and chitin utilization or differences in saprotrophic community composition between the two soil patch types. Net chitin and NAG processing rates were 0.08–3.4 times the basal respiration rates and 0.07–14 times the ambient net N mineralization rates, high enough for the turnover of total soil amino sugars to potentially occur in days to weeks. The results support the hypotheses that amino sugars are important microbial C and N sources and drivers of C and N cycling in these soils.


Microbial biomass Amino sugars Forest floor Organic layer soils Ectomycorrhizae Linked C and N cycles 



The H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest and LTER personnel provided site access and collaborative energy, and Rockie Yarwood, Elizabeth Brewer, Calvin Elser and Michele Noble provided valuable laboratory advice and/or assistance. Bruce Caldwell and Bob Sinsabaugh contributed thoughtful discussion on the experimental results, Peter Bottomley provided constructive feedback on the experiments, data and manuscript, and the manuscript was improved by the thoughtful comments of two anonymous reviewers. This project was funded by NSF Grant No. 0348689 to DDM.


  1. Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37(5):937–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amelung W (2001) Methods using amino sugars as markers for microbial residues in soil. In: Lai R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA (eds) Assessment methods for soil carbon. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  3. Amelung W (2003) Nitrogen biomarkers and their fate in soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166(6):677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amelung W, Kimble JM, Samson-Liebig S, Follett RF (2001) Restoration of microbial residues in soils of the conservation reserve program. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(6):1704–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson M, Kjoller A, Struwe S (2004) Microbial enzyme activities in leaf litter, humus and mineral soil layers of European forests. Soil Biol Biochem 36(10):1527–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldrian P (2009) Ectomycorrhizal fungi and their enzymes in soils: is there enough evidence for their role as facultative soil saprotrophs? Oecologia 161(4):657–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowman SM, Free SJ (2006) The structure and synthesis of the fungal cell wall. BioEssays 28(8):799–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brant JB, Myrold DD, Sulzman EW (2006) Root controls on soil microbial community structure in forest soils. Oecologia 148(4):650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bremner JM (1954) Studies on the estimation and decomposition of amino sugars in soil. J Agric Sci 44:152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen—a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17(6):837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cromack K, Sollins P, Graustein WC, Speidel K, Todd AW, Spycher G, Li CY, Todd RL (1979) Calcium-oxalate accumulation and soil weathering in mats of the hypogeous fungus Hysterangium crassum. Soil Biol Biochem 11(5):463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Decock C, Denef K, Bode S, Six J, Boeckx P (2009) Critical assessment of the applicability of gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry to determine amino sugar dynamics in soil. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 23(8):1201–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dimitriu PA, Prescott CE, Quideau SA, Grayston SJ (2010) Impact of reclamation of surface-mined boreal forest soils on microbial community composition and function. Soil Biol Biochem 42(12):2289–2297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixon JJ (2003) Applying GIS to soil-geomorphic landscape mapping in the Lookout Creek valley, Western Cascades, Oregon. Master’s Thesis, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences. Oregon State University, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  16. Doi H, Cherif M, Iwabuchi T, Katano I, Stegen JC, Striebel M (2010) Integrating elements and energy through the metabolic dependencies of gross growth efficiency and the threshold elemental ratio. Oikos 119(5):752–765Google Scholar
  17. Dunham SM, Larsson KH, Spatafora JW (2007) Species richness and community composition of mat-forming ectomycorrhizal fungi in old- and second-growth Douglas-fir forests of the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA. Mycorrhiza 17(8):633–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duo-Chuan L (2006) Review of fungal chitinases. Mycopathologia 161(6):345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Felse PA, Panda T (1999) Regulation and cloning of microbial chitinase genes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51(2):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finlay RD, Frostegard A, Sonnerfeldt AM (1992) Utilization of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources by ectomycorrhizal fungi in pure culture and in symbiosis with Pinus contorta dougl ex. loud. New Phytol 120(1):105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geisseler D, Horwath WR, Joergensen RG, Ludwig B (2010) Pathways of nitrogen utilization by soil microorganisms—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 42(12):2058–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffiths RP, Caldwell BA, Cromack K, Morita RY (1990) Douglas-fir forest soils colonized by ectomycorrhizal mats. 1. Seasonal-variation in nitrogen chemistry and nitrogen-cycle transformation rates. Can J For Res 20(2):211–218Google Scholar
  23. Griffiths RP, Castellano MA, Caldwell BA (1991a) Hyphal mats formed by 2 ectomycorrhizal fungi and their association with Douglas-fir seedlings—a case-study. Plant Soil 134(2):255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffiths RP, Ingham ER, Caldwell BA, Castellano MA, Cromack K (1991b) Microbial characteristics of ectomycorrhizal mat communities in Oregon and California. Biol Fertil Soils 11(3):196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffiths RP, Bradshaw GA, Marks B, Lienkaemper GW (1996) Spatial distribution of ectomycorrhizal mats in coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Plant Soil 180(1):147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guggenberger G, Frey SD, Six J, Paustian K, Elliott ET (1999) Bacterial and fungal cell-wall residues in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(5):1188–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hart SC, Stark JM (1997) Nitrogen limitation of the microbial biomass in an old-growth forest soil. Ecoscience 4(1):91–98Google Scholar
  28. Herron PM, Stark JM, Holt C, Hooker T, Cardon ZG (2009) Microbial growth efficiencies across a soil moisture gradient assessed using C-13-acetic acid vapor and N-15-ammonia gas. Soil Biol Biochem 41(6):1262–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirchman DL, White J (1999) Hydrolysis and mineralization of chitin in the Delaware Estuary. Aquat Microb Ecol 18(2):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kluber LA, Tinnesand KM, Caldwell BA, Dunham SM, Yarwood RR, Bottomley PJ, Myrold DD (2010) Ectomycorrhizal mats alter forest soil biogeochemistry. Soil Biol Biochem 42(9):1607–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kluber LA, Smith JE, Myrold DD (2011) Distinctive fungal and bacterial communities are associated with mats formed by ectomycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 43(5):1042–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lengeler J, Drews G, Schlegel H (1999) Biology of the prokaryotes. Georg Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  33. Means JE, Macmillan PC, Cromack K (1992) Biomass and nutrient content of Douglas-fir logs and other detrital pools in an old-growth forest, Oregon, USA. Can J For Res 22(10):1536–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller M, Palojarvi A, Rangger A, Reeslev M, Kjoller A (1998) The use of fluorogenic substrates to measure fungal presence and activity in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(2):613–617Google Scholar
  35. Niemi RM, Vepsalainen M, Erkomaa K, Ilvesniemi H (2007) Microbial activity during summer in humus layers under Pinus silvestris and Alnus incana. For Ecol Manage 242(2–3):314–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olander LP, Vitousek PM (2000) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry 49(2):175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parham JA, Deng SP (2000) Detection, quantification and characterization of beta-glucosaminidase activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32(8–9):1183–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillips CL, Kluber LA, Martin J, Caldwell BA, Bond BJ (2012) Contributions of ectomycorrhizal fungal mats to forest soil respiration. Biogeosciences 9:1635–1666. doi: 10.5194/bgd-9-1635-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts P, Bol R, Jones DL (2007) Free amino sugar reactions in soil in relation to soil carbon and nitrogen cycling. Soil Biol Biochem 39(12):3081–3092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodriguez-Kabana R, Godoy G, Morganjones G, Shelby RA (1983) The determination of soil chitinase activity—conditions for assay and ecological-studies. Plant Soil 75(1):95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schimel JP, Weintraub MN (2003) The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sinsabaugh RL, Carreiro MM, Repert DA (2002) Allocation of extracellular enzymatic activity in relation to litter composition, N deposition, and mass loss. Biogeochemistry 60(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusak D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP, Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–1264Google Scholar
  44. Six J, Frey SD, Thiet RK, Batten KM (2006) Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(2):555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sollins P, Grier CC, McCorison FM, Cromack K, Fogel R (1980) The internal element cycles of an old-growth Douglas-fir ecosystem in western Oregon. Ecol Monogr 50(3):261–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stevenson FJ (1982) Organic forms of soil nitrogen. In: Stevenson FJ (ed) Nitrogen in agricultural soils, vol 22. ASA, CSSA, pp 67–122Google Scholar
  47. Talbot JM, Allison SD, Treseder KK (2008) Decomposers in disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in ecosystems under global change. Funct Ecol 22(6):955–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thiet RK, Frey SD, Six J (2006) Do growth yield efficiencies differ between soil microbial communities differing in fungal: bacterial ratios? Reality check and methodological issues. Soil Biol Biochem 38(4):837–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19(6):703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vignon C, Plassard C, Mousain D, Salsac L (1986) Assay of fungal chitin and estimation of mycorrhizal infection. Physiol Veg 24(2):201–207Google Scholar
  51. Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN (2008) Emerging tools for measuring and modeling the in situ activity of soil extracellular enzymes. Soil Biol Biochem 40(9):2098–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeglin LH, Stursova M, Sinsabaugh RL, Collins SL (2007) Microbial responses to nitrogen addition in three contrasting grassland ecosystems. Oecologia 154(2):349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang XD, Amelung W (1996) Gas chromatographic determination of muramic acid, glucosamine, mannosamine, and galactosamine in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 28(9):1201–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lydia H. Zeglin
    • 1
  • Laurel A. Kluber
    • 1
    • 2
  • David D. Myrold
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations