, Volume 86, Issue 1, pp 63–75 | Cite as

The flux of carbon from rivers: the case for flux from England and Wales

Original Paper


This study uses the extensive monitoring datasets of the Environment Agency of England and Wales to calculate the flux of dissolved organic carbon (DOC); particulate organic carbon (POC); and excess dissolved CO2 through English and Welsh rivers. The innovation of this study’s approach is to account for the losses of carbon within the fluvial system as well as fluxes at the catchment outlet. In order to make this assessment this study considers: the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) as a measure of the degradation of DOC; and the dissolved CO2 concentration of groundwater as calculated and apportioned into surface waters on the basis of Ca concentrations. The study shows that the best estimate of carbon export, via rivers, from England and Wales is 10.34 Mg C/km2/year, with 4.19 Mg C/km2/year of this going to the atmosphere. The mapping of the carbon export shows that there are regional hotspots of carbon export and in a small number of cases rivers could be net sinks of carbon due to their low dissolved CO2 content relative to the atmosphere. The flux calculated by this approach is probably still an underestimate of the carbon flux through fluvial systems but the scale of the export is greater than that previously reported and there is evidence that the fluvial flux of carbon is increasing on a decadal scale.


Carbon Rivers DOC POC Dissolved CO2 


  1. Abril G, Etcheber H, Borges AV, Frankignoulle M (2000) Excess atmospheric carbon dioxide transported by rivers into the Scheldt estuary. CR Acad Sci Paris Sciences de la Terre et des Plantes 330:761–768Google Scholar
  2. Arnett RR (1978) Regional disparities in the denudation rate of organic sediments. Z Geomorph Supple Bd 29:169–179Google Scholar
  3. Blake S (1983) Accuracy of determination of total suspended solids in river waters—analytical quality control in the harmonised monitoring scheme. Analyst 108:1365–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cannell MGR, Milne R, Hargreaves KJ, Brown TAW, Cruickshank MM, Bradley RI, Spencer T, Hope D, Billett MF, Adger WN, Subak S (1999) National inventories of terrestrial carbon sources and sinks: the UK experience. Climatic Change 42:505–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christophersen N, Hooper RP (1992) Multivariate analysis of stream water chemical data: the use of principal component analysis for the end-member mixing problem. Water Resources Research 28:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole JJ, Caraco NF, Kling GW, Kratz TK (1994) Carbon dioxide supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes. Science 265:1568–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corin N, Backlund P, Kulovaara M (1996) Degradation products formed during UV-irradiation of humic waters. Chemosphere 33:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson JC, Billet MF, Neal C, Hill S (2002) A comparison of particulate, dissolved and gaseous carbon in two contrasting upland streams in the UK. J Hydrol 257:226–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Vries A, Klavers HC (1994) Riverine fluxes of pollutants: monitoring strategies first, calculation methods second. Eur Water Polln Contr 4:12–17Google Scholar
  10. Duan N (1983) Smearing estimate: a non = parametric retransformation method. J Am Stat Soc 78:605–610Google Scholar
  11. Evans MG, Warburton J, Yang J (2006) Eroding blanket peat catchments: global and local implications of upland organic sediment budgets. Geomorphology 79(1–2):45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman C, Evans CD, Montieth DT, Reynolds B, Fenner N (2001) Export of organic carbon from peat soils. Nature 412:785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hillier S (2001) Particulate composition and origin of suspended sediment in the R. Don, Aberdeenshire, UK. Science of the Total Environment 265:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hongve D (1994) Sunlight degradation of aquatic humic substances. Acta Hydrochimica Hydrobiologica 22:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hope D, Billett MF, Milne R, Brown TAW (1997) Exports of organic carbon in British rivers. Hydrol Process 11:325–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hope D, Palmer SM, Billet MF, Dawson JC (2001) Carbon dioxide and methane oxidation evasion from a temperate peatland stream. Limnol Oceanogr 46:847–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Houghton JA, Meira Filho LG, Lim B, Treanton K, Mamaty I, Bonduki Y, Griggs DJ, Callander BA (1996) Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Greenhouse gas inventory reporting instructions, vol 1, 2 and 3. (IPCC, OECD and IEA), IPCC WGI Technical Support Unit, Met Office, Bracknell, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Hulme M (1998) The climate in the UK from November 1994 to October 1995. Weather 53:242–257Google Scholar
  19. Jones JB, Mulholland PJ (1998) Carbon dioxide variation in a hardwood forest stream: an integrative measure of whole catchment soil respiration. Ecosystems 1:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalbitz K, Schmerwitz J, Schwesig D, Matzner E (2003) Biodegradation of soil-derived dissolved organic matter as related to its properties. Geoderma 113:273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kempe S (1982) Long term records of CO2 pressure fluctuations in fresh waters. In: Degens ET (ed) Transport of carbon and minerals in major world rivers, vol 52. University of Hamburg, pp 169–212Google Scholar
  22. Littlewood IG (1995) Hydrological regimes, sampling strategies, and assessment of errors in mass load estimates for United Kingdom rivers. Environ Int 21(2):211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Littlewood IG, Watts CD, Custance JM (1998) Systematic application of United Kingdom river flow and quality databases for estimating annual river mass loads (1975–1994). Sci Total Environ 210:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lock MA (1981) River epilithon a light and organic energy transducer. In: Lock MA, Williams DD (eds) Perspectives in running water ecology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 3–40Google Scholar
  25. Mantoura RFC, Woodward EMS (1983) Conservative behaviour of dissolved organic carbon in the Severn Estuary: chemical and geological implications. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47:1293–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meybeck M (1982) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus transport in world rivers. Am Jour Sci 282:401–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meybeck M (1993) Riverine transport of atmospheric carbon sources, global typology and budget. Water Air Soil Pollut 70:443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morel FMM, Hering J (1993) Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry. Wiley-Interscience, New York, p 374Google Scholar
  29. Naden PS, McDonald AT (1989) Statistical modelling of water colour in the uplands: the upper Nidd catchment 1979–1987. Environ Pollut 60:141–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neal C (2003) Dissolved and acid available particulate beryllium in eastern UK surface waters. Sci Total Environ 314:185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neal C, House WA, Down K (1998a) An assessment of excess carbon dioxide partial pressure in natural waters based on pH and alkalinity measurements. Sci Total Environ 210/211:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neal C, Harrow M, Williams R (1998b) Dissolved carbon dioxide and oxygen in the River Thames: spring-summer 1997. Sci Total Environ 210/211:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OSPAR Commission 2004 Data report on the comprehensive study of riverine inputs and direct discharges (RID) in 2002. OSPAR Commission, ParisGoogle Scholar
  34. Schlesinger WH, Melack JM (1981) Transport of organic carbon in the worlds’s rivers. Tellus 33:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sempere R, Charriere B, Van Wambeke F, Cauwet G (2001) Carbon inputs of the Rhone river to the Mediterranean sea: biogeochemical implications. Global Biogeochem Cycles 14:669–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simpson EA (1980) The harmonization of the monitoring of the quality of rivers in the United Kingdom. Hydrol Sci Bull 25:13–23Google Scholar
  37. Thurman EN (1985) Organic geochemistry of natural waters. Kluwer Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Watts CD, Naden PS, Machall J, Banks J (2001) Long term variation in water colour from Yorkshire catchments. Sci Total Environ 278:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Webb BW, Zhang Y (1999) Water temperatures and heat budgets in Dorset chalk water courses. Hydrological Processes 13:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Webb BW, Phillips JM, Walling DE, Littlewood IG, Watts CD, Leeks GJL (1997) Load estimation methodologies for British rivers and their relevance to the LOIS RACS(R) programme. Sci Total Environ 194–195:379–389Google Scholar
  41. Webb BW, Phillips JM, Walling DE (2000) A new approach to deriving “best-estimate” chemical fluxes for rivers draining the LOIS study area. Sci Total Environ 251–252: 45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Worrall F, Burt TP (2004) Time series analysis of long term river DOC records. Hydrological Processes 18:893–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Worrall F, Burt TP (2005a) Reconstructing long-term records of dissolved CO2. Hydrological Processes 19:1791–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Worrall F, Burt TP (2005b) Predicting the future DOC flux form upland peat catchments. J Hydrol 300:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Worrall F, Lancaster A (2005) The release of CO2 from riverwaters—the contribution of excess CO2 from groundwater. Biogeochemistry 76:299–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Worrall F, Harriman R, Evans CD, Watts C, Adamson JK, Neal C, Tipping E, Burt TP, Grieve I, Montieth D, Naden PS, Reynolds B, Stevens P (2004) Trends in dissolved organic carbon in UK rivers and lakes. Biogeochemistry 70:369–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Worrall F, Swank WT, Burt TP (2005a) Fluxes of inorganic carbon from forested catchments. Hydrological Processes 19:3021–3035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Worrall F, Burt TP, Adamson J (2005b) Fluxes of dissolved carbon dioxide and inorganic carbon from an upland peat catchment: implications for soil respiration. Biogeochemistry 73:515–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesScience LaboratoriesDurhamUK
  2. 2.Environment AgencyNational Data UnitBathUK
  3. 3.Environment AgencyNational Data CentreTwertonUK

Personalised recommendations