, Volume 81, Issue 3, pp 361–373 | Cite as

Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem processes

  • Steven D. Allison
General Paper


In most ecosystems, the degradation of complex organic material depends on extracellular enzymes produced by microbes. These enzymes can exist in bound or free form within the soil, but the dynamics of these different enzyme pools remain uncertain. To address this uncertainty, I determined rates of enzyme turnover in a volcanic soil with and without added enzymes. I also tested whether or not soil minerals and humic acids would alter enzyme activity. In soils that were gamma-irradiated to stop enzyme production, 35–70% of the enzyme activity was stable throughout the 21-day incubation. The remaining enzyme fraction decayed at rates ranging from  − 0.032 to  − 0.628 day−1. In both the irradiated soils and in soils with added enzymes, addition of the mineral allophane had a strong positive effect on most enzyme activities. Another added mineral, ferrihydrite, had a weak positive effect on some enzymes. Added humic acids strongly inhibited enzyme activity. These findings suggest that minerals, especially allophane, enhance potential enzyme activities in young volcanic soils. However, the actual activity and function of these enzymes may be low under field conditions if stabilization results in less efficient enzyme-substrate interactions. If this is the case, then much of the measured enzyme activity in bulk soil may be stabilized but unlikely to contribute greatly to ecosystem processes.


Allophane Decomposition Extracellular enzyme Ferrihydrite Microbe Sorption 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



I thank Kathleen Treseder, Peter Vitousek, and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that improved the manuscript. This research was funded by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship.


  1. Allison SD (2005) Cheaters, diffusion, and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8:626–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison SD (2006) Brown ground: a soil carbon analogue for the Green World Hypothesis? Am Nat 167:619–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison SD, Jastrow JD (2006) Activities of extracellular enzymes in physically isolated fractions of restored grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem. DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.04.011Google Scholar
  4. Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2004) Extracellular enzyme activities and carbon chemistry as drivers of tropical plant litter decomposition. Biotropica 36:285–296Google Scholar
  5. Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns RG (1982) Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 14:423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler JHA, Ladd JN (1971) Importance of the molecular weight of humic and fulvic acids in determining their effects on protease activity. Soil Biol Biochem 3:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chevallier T, Muchaonyerwa P, Chenu C (2003) Microbial utilisation of two proteins adsorbed to a vertisol clay fraction: toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis and bovine serum albumin. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1211–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chróst RJ (1991) Environmental control of the synthesis and activity of aquatic microbial ectoenzymes. In: Chróst RJ (ed) Microbial enzymes in aquatic environments. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 29–59Google Scholar
  10. Crews TE, Kitayama K, Fownes J, Herbert D, Mueller-Dombois D, Riley RH, Vitousek PM (1995) Changes in soil phosphorus and ecosystem dynamics across a␣long soil chronosequence in Hawaii. Ecology 76:1407–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ensminger LE, Gieseking JE (1942) Resistance of clay-adsorbed proteins to proteolytic hydrolysis. Soil Sci 53:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garzillo AMV, Badalucco L, de Cesare F, Grego S, Buonocore V (1996) Synthesis and characterization of an acid phosphatase-polyresorcinol complex. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1155–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gianfreda L, Bollag J-M (1996) Influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on enzyme activity in soil. In: Stotsky G, Bollag J-M (eds) Soil biochemistry. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 123–193Google Scholar
  14. Gianfreda L, Rao MA, Violante A (1991) Invertase (B-fructosidase): effects of montmorillonite, Al-hydroxide and Al(OH)x-montmorillonite complex on activity and kinetic properties. Soil Biol Biochem 23:581–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gianfreda L, Rao MA, Violante A (1992) Adsorption, activity and kinetic properties of urease on montmorillonite, aluminum hydroxide, and Al(OH)x-montmorillonite complexes. Soil Biol Biochem 24:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kandeler E, Stemmer M, Klimanek E-M (1999) Response of soil microbial biomass, urease and xylanase within particle size fractions to long-term soil management. Soil Biol Biochem 31:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kobayashi Y, Aomine S (1967) Mechanism of inhibitory effect of allophane and montmorillonite on some enzymes. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13:189–194Google Scholar
  18. Ladd JN (1978) Origin and range of enzymes in soil. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, London, pp 51–96Google Scholar
  19. Ladd JN (1985) Soil enzymes. In: Vaughan D, Malcolm RE (eds) Soil organic matter and biological activity. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 175–221Google Scholar
  20. Ladd JN, Butler JHA (1969) Inhibition and stimulation of proteolytic enzyme activities by soil humic acids. Aust J Soil Res 7:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ladd JN, Paul EA (1973) Changes in enzymic activity and distribution of acid-soluble, amino acid-nitrogen in soil during nitrogen immobilization and mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 5:825–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marx M-C, Kandeler E, Wood M, Wermbter N, Jarvis SC (2005) Exploring the enzymatic landscape: distribution and kinetics of hydrolytic enzymes in soil particle-size fractions. Soil Biol Biochem 37:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moorhead DL, Linkins AE (1997) Elevated CO2 alters belowground exoenzyme activities in tussock tundra. Plant Soil 189:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Naidja A, Huang PM, Bollag JM (2000) Enzyme–clay interactions and their impact on transformations of natural and anthropogenic organic compounds in soil. J Environ Qual 29:677–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nannipieri P, Sequi P, Fusi P (1996) Humus and enzyme activity. In: Piccolo A (ed) Humic substances in terrestrial ecosystems. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, pp 293–328Google Scholar
  26. Olander LP, Vitousek PM (2000) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry 49:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olk DC, Cassman KG, Fan TWM (1995) Characterization of two humic acid fractions from a calcareous vermiculitic soil: implications for the humification process. Geoderma 65:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quiquampoix H, Servagent-Noinville S, Baron M (2002) Enzyme adsorption on soil mineral surfaces and consequences for the catalytic activity. In: Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 285–306Google Scholar
  29. Rao MA, Violante A, Gianfreda L (2000) Interaction of acid phosphatase with clays, organic molecules and organo-mineral complexes: kinetics and stability. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1007–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rasmussen C, Southard RJ, Horwath WR (2006) Mineral control of organic carbon mineralization in a range of temperate conifer forest soils. Glob Change Biol 12:834–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarkar JM, Burns RG (1984) Synthesis and properties of β-d-glucosidase-phenolic copolymers as analogs of soil humic-enzyme complexes. Soil Biol Biochem 16:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sarkar JM, Leonowicz A, Bollag J-M (1989) Immobilization of enzymes on clays and soils. Soil Biol Biochem 21:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SAS Institute (2004) SAS, version 9.0. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  34. Schimel JP, Bennett J (2004) Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85:591–602Google Scholar
  35. Schimel JP, Weintraub MN (2003) The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwertmann U, Taylor RM (1989) Iron oxides. In: Dixon JB, Weld SB (eds) Minerals in soil environments. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 379–438Google Scholar
  37. Shoji S, Nanzyo M, Dahlgren RA (1993) Volcanic ash soils. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinsabaugh RL (1994) Enzymic analysis of microbial pattern and process. Biol Fertil Soils 17:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sinsabaugh RL, Antibus RK, Linkins AE, McClaugherty CA, Rayburn L, Repert D, Weiland T (1993) Wood decomposition: nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in relation to extracellular enzyme activity. Ecology 74:1586–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sinsabaugh RL, Carreiro MM, Repert DA (2002) Allocation of extracellular enzymatic activity in relation to litter composition, N deposition, and mass loss. Biogeochemistry 60:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sinsabaugh RL, Moorhead DL (1994) Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production: a model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1305–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sinsabaugh RL, Saiya-Cork K, Long T, Osgood MP, Neher DA, Zak DR, Norby RJ (2003) Soil microbial activity in a Liquidambar plantation unresponsive to CO2-driven increases in primary production. Appl Soil Ecol 24:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stemmer M, Gerzabek MH, Kandeler E (1999) Invertase and xylanase activity of bulk soil and particle-size fractions during maize straw decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 31:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swift RS (1996) Organic matter characterization. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part III. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1011–1069Google Scholar
  45. Tietjen T, Wetzel RG (2003) Extracellular enzyme–clay mineral complexes: enzyme adsorption, alteration of enzyme activity, and protection from photodegradation. Aquat Ecol 37:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Torn MS, Trumbore SE, Chadwick OA, Vitousek PM, Hendricks DM (1997) Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature 389:170–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verma L, Martin JP, Haider K (1975) Decomposition of carbon-14-labeled proteins, peptides, and amino acids; free and complexed with humic polymers. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vetter YA, Denning JW, Jumars PA, Krieger-Brockett BB (1998) A predictive model of bacterial foraging by means of freely releasedextracellular enzymes. Microb Ecol 36:75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vitousek PM, Chadwick OA, Crews TE, Fownes JH, Hendricks DM, Herbert D (1997) Soil and ecosystem development across the Hawaiian Islands. GSA Today 7:1–8Google Scholar
  50. Vuorinen AH, Saharinen MH (1996) Effects of soil organic matter extracted from soil on acid phosphomonoesterase. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1477–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wada K (1989) Allophane and immogolite. In: Dixon JB, Weld SB (eds) Minerals in soil environments. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 1051–1087Google Scholar
  52. Wada SI, Eto A, Wada K (1979) Synthetic allophane and immogolite. J Soil Sci 30:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL (2004) Microbial community response to nitrogen deposition in northern forest ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1443–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wetzel RG (1991) Extracellular enzymatic interactions: storage, redistribution, and interspecific communication. In: Chróst RJ (ed) Microbial enzymes in aquatic environments. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 6–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Earth System ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations