Advertisement

Biodegradation

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 521–538 | Cite as

A real-scale soil phytoremediation

  • Cristina Macci
  • Serena Doni
  • Eleonora Peruzzi
  • Simone Bardella
  • Giorgio Filippis
  • Brunello Ceccanti
  • Grazia Masciandaro
Original Paper

Abstract

In the present investigation, a phytoremediation process with a combination of different plant species (Populus nigra (var.italica), Paulownia tomentosa and Cytisus scoparius), and natural growing vegetation has been proposed at real-scale (10.000 m2) to bioremediate and functionally recover a soil historically contaminated by heavy metals and hydrocarbons. In the attempts to assess both effectiveness and evolution of the remediation system towards a natural soil ecosystem, besides the pollution parameters, also parameters describing the efficiency of the microbiological components (enzyme activities), were investigated. In 3 years, the total content of hydrocarbons and heavy metals in soil decreased with time (40 % and 20–40 %, respectively), reaching concentrations under the limit of National legislation and making the site suitable for environmental reusing. The reduction in pollutants was probably the reason of the increase in dehydrogenase (indicator of overall microbial activity), β-glucosidase and phosphatase activities, enzymes related to C and P cycles, respectively. However, this trend was obviously due also to the increase of chemical nutrients, acting as substrate of these enzymes. Moreover, a phytotest carried out with Raphanus sativus, showed, after 3 years, a significant increase in percentage of plant growth, confirming a reduction in soil toxicity and an improvement in soil nutritional state. Therefore, this phytoremediation system seems very promising to perform both decontamination and functional recovery of a polluted soil at real-scale level.

Keywords

Bioremediation Heavy metals Hydrocarbons Enzyme activities Soil quality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was carried out within the framework of a project financed by San Giuliano Terme Municipality and Tuscany region. The authors would like to thank Fernando Di Giovanni and Manuele Scatena for the assistance in samples collection and preparation and Daniele Baesso for his assistance in the laboratory assays.

References

  1. Adam G, Duncan HJ (1999) Effect of diesel fuel on growth of selected plant species. Environ Geochem Health 21:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aebersold R, Mann M (2003) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422:198–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkorta I, Hernandez-Allica J, Becerril JM, Amezaga I, Albizu I, Garbisu C (2004) Recent findings on the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with environmentally toxic heavy metals and metalloids such as zinc, cadmium, lead, and arsenic. Environ Sci Biotechnol 3:71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson TA, Guthrie EA, Walton BT (1993) Bioremediation in the rhizosphere. Environ Sci Technol 27:2630–2636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. APAT (2002) Guida tecnica su metodi di analisi per il suolo e i siti contaminati: utilizzo di indicatori ecotossicologici e biologici. RTI CTN_SSC 2/2002Google Scholar
  6. Bastida F, Moreno JL, Hernandez T, Garcia C (2006) Microbiological degradation index of soils in a semiarid climate. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3463–3473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bastida F, Moreno JL, Nicolás C, Hernández T, Garcia C (2009) Soil metaproteomics: a review of an emerging environmental science. Significance, methodology and perspectives. J Soil Sci 60:845–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bastida F, Nicolás C, Moreno JL, Hernández T, Garcia C (2010) Tracing Changes in the microbial community of a hydrocarbon-polluted soil by culture-dependent proteomics. Pedoshere 20:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baud-Grasset F, Baud-Grasset S, Safferman SI (1993) Evaluation of the bioremediation of a contaminated soil with phytotoxicity tests. Chemosphere 26:1365–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benndorf D, Balcke GU, Harms H, Von Bergen M (2007) Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater. The ISME J 1:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bentham H, Harris JA, Birch P, Short KC (1992) Habitat classification and soil restoration assessment using analysis of soil microbiological and physicochemical characteristics. Biol Fertil Soils 29:711–718Google Scholar
  12. Brady NC, Weill RR (1996) The nature and properties of soils. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  13. Cao B, Nagarajan K, Loh KC (2009) Biodegradation of aromatic compounds: current status and opportunities for biomolecular approaches. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:207–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll S, Goonetilleke A, Dawes L (2004) Framework for soil suitability evaluation for sewage effluent renovation. Environ Geol 46:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ceccanti B, Garcia C, Masciandaro G, Macci C, Doni S (2006) Soil Bioremediation: combination of earthworms and compost for the ecological remediation of a hydrocarbon polluted soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 177:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chauhan A, Jain RK (2010) Biodegradation: gaining insight through proteomics. Biodegradation 21:861–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chourey K, Jansson J, VerBerkmoes N, Shah M, Chavarria KL, Tom LM, Brodie EL, Hettich RL (2010) Direct cellular lysis/protein extraction protocol for soil metaproteomics. J Proteome Res 9:6615–6622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Lonardo S, Capuana M, Arnetoli M, Gabbrielli R, Gonnelli C (2011) Exploring the metal phytoremediation potential of three Populus alba L. clones using an in vitro screening. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dick RP (1992) A review: long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters. Agric Ecosystems Environ 40:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dick R (1996) Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrative microbiological indicators. In: Doran J, Jones A (eds) Methods for assessing soil quality. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 121–156Google Scholar
  21. Dick WA, Tabatabai MA (1993) Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Blaine F (ed) Soil microbial ecology. Application in Agricultural and Environmental Management, Marcel Dekker, pp 95–127Google Scholar
  22. Doni S, Macci C, Peruzzi E, Arenella M, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G (2012) In situ phytoremediation of a historically contaminated soil by metals, hydrocarbons and polychlorobiphenyls. J Environ Monit 14:1383–1390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Doumett S, Lamperi L, Checchini L, Azzarello E, Mugnai S, Mancuso S, Petruzzelli G, Del Bubba M (2008) Heavy metal distribution between contaminated soil and Paulownia tomentosa, in a pilot-scale assisted phytoremediation study: influence of different complexing agents. Chemosphere 72:1481–1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eapen S, D’Souza SF (2005) Prospects of genetic engineering of plants for phytoremediation of toxic metals. Biotechnol Adv 23:97–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eldor P (2007) Soil Microbiology, Ecology, and Biochemistry. In: Eldor P (ed) Tercera. Academic Press, Chennai, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  26. EPA (2000) Introduction to Phytoremediation. EPA 600-R-99-107, Office of Research and Development. http://clu-in.org/download/remed/introphyto.pdf
  27. Ferro AM, Rock SA, Kennedy J, Herrick JJ, Turner DL (1999) Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with wood preservatives: greenhouse and field evaluations. Int J Phytorem 1:289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fogarty G, Facelli JM (1999) Growth and competition of Cytisus scoparius, an invasive shrub, and Australian native shrubs. Plant Ecol 144:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frick CM, Farrell RE, Germida JJ (1999) Assessment of phytoremediation as an in-situ technique for cleaning oil-contaminated sites. PTAC Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada Calgary, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  30. Fuentes M, Govaerts B, De Leon F, Hidalgo C, Dendooven L, Sayre KD, Etchevers J (2009) Fourteen years of applying zero and conventional tillage, crop rotation and residue management systems and its effect on physical and chemical soil quality. Eur J Agron 30:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti C, Gianni A (1993) Hydrolases in the organic matter fractions of sewage sludge: changes with compostine. Bioresour Technol 45:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garcia G, Zanuzzi AL, Faz A (2005) Evaluation of heavy metal availability prior to an in situ soil phytoremediation program. Biodegradation 16:187–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gerhardt KE, Huang XD, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2009) Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: potential and challenges. Plant Sci 176:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gianfreda L, Rao MA, Piotrowska A, Palumbo G, Colombo C (2005) Soil enzyme activities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: intensive agricultural practices and organic pollution. Sci Total Environ 34:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gudin C, Syratt WJ (1975) Biological aspects of land rehabilitation following hydrocarbon contamination. Environ Pollut 8:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gurska J, Wang WX, Gerhardt KE, Khalid AM, Isherwood DM, Huang XD, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2009) Three year field test of a plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhanced phytoremediation system at a land farm for treatment of hydrocarbon waste. Environ Sci Technol 43:4472–4479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henner P, Schiavon M, Druelle V, Lichtfous E (1999) Phytotoxicity of ancient gaswork soils. Effect of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on plant germination. Org Geochem 30:963–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu ZY, Zhu YG, Li M, Zhang LG, Cao ZH, Smith FA (2007) Sulfur (S)-induced enhancement of iron plaque formation in the rhizosphere reduces arsenic accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Environ Pollut 147:387–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. HUJI (2006) The Protein Purification Facility, Protein Precipitation Protocols.The Wolfson Centre for Applied Structural Biology, the Hebrew University ofJerusalem. Available from: http://wolfson.huji.ac.il
  40. Hutchinson SL, Schwab AP, Banks MK (2003) Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere. In: McCutcheon S, Schnoor J (eds) Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, pp 355–386Google Scholar
  41. Iannelli R, Bianchi V, Macci C, Peruzzi E, Chiellini C, Petroni G, Masciandaro G (2012) Assessment of pollution impact on biological activity and structure of seabed bacterial communities in the Port of Livorno (Italy). Sci Total Environ 426:56–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Indorante SJ, Follmer LR, Hammer RD, Koenig PG (1990) Particle-size analysis by a modified pipette procedure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:560–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jalali M, Khanlari ZV (2008) Effect of aging process on the fractionation of heavy metals in some calcareous soils of Iran. Geoderma 143:26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Joner EJ, Leyval C (2001) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on clover and ryegrass grown together in a soil spiked with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Mycorrhiza 10:155–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaasalainen M, Yli-Halla M (2003) Use of sequential extraction to assess metal partitioning in soils. Environ Pollut 126:225–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kacalkova L, Tlusto P (2011) The uptake of persistent organic pollutants by plants. Cent Eur J Biol 6:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Keith LH, Telliard WA (1979) Priority pollutants is a perspective view. Environ Sci Technol 13:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu YJ, Zhu YG, Ding H (2007) Lead and cadmium in leaves of deciduous trees in Beijing, China: development of a metal accumulation index (MAI). Environ Pollut 145:387–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lu A, Zhang S, Shan XQ (2005) Time effect on the fractionation of heavy metals in soils. Geoderma 125:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luo CL, Shen ZG, Li XD (2008) Root exudates increase metal accumulation in mixed cultures: implications for naturally enhanced phytoextraction. Water Air Soil Pollut 193:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Macci C, Doni S, Peruzzi E, Masciandaro G, Mennone C, Ceccanti B (2012) Almond tree and organic fertilization for soil quality improvement in southern Italy. J Environ Manage 95:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Macek T, Mackova M, Kas J (2000) Exploitation of plants for the removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotechnol Adv 18:23–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Manns HR, Maxwell CD, Emery RJN (2007) The effect of ground cover or initial organic carbon on soil fungi, aggregation, moisture and organic carbon in one season with oat (Avena sativa) plots. Soil Tillage Res 96:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Margesin R, Zimmerbauer A, Schinner F (2000) Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities. Chemosphere 40:339–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Ronchi V, Bauer C (2000) Kinetic parameter of dehydrogenase in the assessment of the response of soil to vermicompost and inorganic fertilisers. Biol Fertil Soils 32:479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Masciandaro G, Fantoni E, Macci C, Doni S, Peruzzi E, Ceccanti B (2009) A preliminar ecological approach in the design and operation of a full-scale bioremediation system. Bull Sci Inf 17:59–65Google Scholar
  58. Matsunaga A, Yashuhara A (2003) Complete dechlorination of 1-chloronaphthalene by electrochemical reduction with naphthalene radical anion as mediator. Environ Sci Technol 37:3435–3441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Meagher RB (2000) Phytoremediation of toxic elemental and organic pollutants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:153–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mocko A, Waclawek W (2004) Three-step extraction procedure for determination of heavy metals availability to vegetables. Anal Bioanal Chem 380:813–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moreno B, Nogales R, Macci C, Masciandaro G, Benitez E (2011) Microbial eco-physiological profiles to estimate the effectiveness of rhizoremediation of trichloroethylene-contaminated soils. Ecol Indic 11:1563–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nannipieri P (2006) Role of stabilised enzymes in microbial ecology and enzyme extraction from soil with potential applications in soil proteomics. In: Nannipieri P, Smalla K (eds) Nucleic acids and proteins in soil. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 75–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Cervelli S, Matarese E (1980) Extraction of phosphatase, urease, proteases, organic carbon and nitrogen from soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:1011–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Grego S (1990) Ecological significance of biological activity in soil. In: Bollag JM, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 293–355Google Scholar
  66. Nedunuri KV, Govindaraju RS, Banks MK, Schwab AP, Chen Z (2000) Evaluation of phytoremediation for field-scale degradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons. J Environ Eng 126:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Newman EI (1985) The rhizosphere: carbon sources and microbial populations. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB (eds) Ecological interactions in soil: plants. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, Microbes and Animals, pp 107–121Google Scholar
  68. Nielsen M, Winding A (2002) Microorganisms as indicators of soil health. National Environmental Research Institute, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  69. Nowack B, Schulin R, Luster J (2010) Metal fractionation in a contaminated soil after reforestation: temporal changes versus spatial variability. Environ Pollut 158:3272–3278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Palmroth MRT, Koskinen PEP, Kaksonen AH, Munster U, Pichtel J, Puhakka JA (2007) Metabolic and phylogenetic analysis of microbial communities during phytoremediation of soil contaminated with weathered hydrocarbons and heavy metals. Biodegradation 18:769–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Perrin-Ganier C, Schiavon F, Morel JL, Schiavon M (2001) Effect of sludge-amendment or nutrition addition on the biodegradation of the herbicide isoproturon in soil. Chemosphere 44:887–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pule BO, Mmualefe LC (2012). Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil with Agilent Bond Elut QuEChERS AOAC Kit and HPLC-FLD. Publication Part Number 5990-5452EN http://www.chem.agilent.com (accessed 13 Apr 2012)
  73. Pulford ID, Watson C (2003) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees. Environ Int 29:529–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Reilley KA, Banks MK, Schwab AP (1996) Organic chemicals in the environment: dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere. J Environ Qual 25:212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Salt DE, Blaylock M, Kumar PBAN, Dushenkov V, Ensley BD, Chet I, Raskin I (1995) Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Biotechnology 13:468–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schneider T, Riedel K (2010) Environmental proteomics: analysis of structure and function of microbial communities. Proteomics 10:785–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Siggins A, Gunnigle E, Abram F (2012) Exploring mixed microbial community functioning: recent advances in metaproteomics. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80:265–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Susarla S, Medina VF, McCutcheon SC (2002) Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic chemical contamination. Ecol Eng 18:647–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tyers M, Mann M (2003) From genomics to proteomics. Nature 422:193–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Van Dillewijn P, Caballero A, Paz JA, Gonzalez-Perez MM, Oliva JM, Ramos JL (2007) Bioremediation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene under field conditions. Environ Sci Technol 41:1378–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Epps A (2006) Phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Environmental Protection Agency, U.SGoogle Scholar
  82. Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J, Adriaensen K, Ruttens A, Thewys T, Vassilev A, Meers E, Nehnevajova E, van der Lelie D, Mench M (2009) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:765–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Villar P, Callejon M, Alonso E, Jimenez J, Guiraúm A (2004) Optimization and validation of a new method of analysis for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sewage sludge by liquid chromatography after microwave assisted extraction. Anal Chim Acta 524:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Violante P (2000) Metodi di analisi chimica del suolo. Franco Angeli Editore Milan, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  85. Wetzel SC, Banks MK, Schwab AP (1997) Rhizosphere effects on the degradation of pyrene and anthracene in soil. In: Kruger EL,. Anderson TA, Coats JR (eds) Phytoremediation of soil and water contaminants. ACS Symposium 664. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 254–262Google Scholar
  86. Wilmes P, Bond PL (2004) The application of two dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and downstream analyses to a mixed community of prokaryotic microorganisms. Environ Microbiol 6:911–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wilson SC, Jones KC (1993) Bioremediation of soil contaminated with polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. Environ Pollut 81:229–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yang H, Cho Y, Eum H, Kim E (2007) Destruction of chlorinated organic solvents in a two stage molten salt oxidation reactor system. Chem Eng Sci 68:5137–5143Google Scholar
  89. Yeomans JC, Bremner JM (1988) A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Commun Soil Sci Plan 19:1467–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zapusek U, Lestan D (2009) Fractionation, mobility and bio-accessibility of Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb and Ni in aged artificial soil mixtures. Geoderma 154:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhou QX, Song YF (2004) Principles and methods of contaminated soil remediation. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Macci
    • 1
  • Serena Doni
    • 1
  • Eleonora Peruzzi
    • 1
  • Simone Bardella
    • 1
  • Giorgio Filippis
    • 1
  • Brunello Ceccanti
    • 1
  • Grazia Masciandaro
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto per lo Studio degli Ecosistemi (ISE), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR)PisaItaly

Personalised recommendations