The intrinsic value of Amazon biodiversity

Abstract

The intrinsic value of Amazon biodiversity is a key to maintaining Amazonian ecosystems with all of their environmental functions, despite this aspect commonly being ignored or downplayed in both scientific and policy discussions. Although the Amazon forest’s role in climate regulation often takes center stage in arguments for containing deforestation, it is biodiversity that has justified the region’s existing protected areas. The will to take effective measures to contain forest loss derives largely from the intrinsic or existence value of this diversity, rather than from its utilitarian value. This applies both at the national level in Amazonian countries such as Brazil and to international actors such as governments, companies, non-governmental organizations and individuals. The rapidly deteriorating environmental situation in Amazonia shows the inadequacy of the arguments that have been used to justify actions to reverse this deterioration. The intrinsic value of Amazonia’s biodiversity should not be left as an unmentioned “elephant in the room” in these discussions, but instead should be openly recognized as a central issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Arima EY, Richard P, Walker R, Caldas MM (2011) Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ Res Lett 6:Art. 024010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010

  2. Barros HS, Fearnside PM (2019) Soil carbon is decreasing under “undisturbed” Amazonian forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 83:1779–1785. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.12.0489

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brazil, MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente) (2003) Governo prorroga moratória do mogno. 12 February 2003. https://www.mma.gov.br/informma/item/1145-governo-prorroga-moratoria-do-mogno.html. Assessed 20 Nov 2020

  4. CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) (2020) Bigleaf mahogany. CITES, Geneva, Switzerland. https://cites.org/eng/prog/mwg.php. Assessed 20 Nov 2020

  5. Fearnside PM (1997a) Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia. Ecol Econ 20:53–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00066-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fearnside PM (1997b) Protection of mahogany: A catalytic species in the destruction of rain forests in the American tropics. Environ Conserv 24:303–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000404

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fearnside PM (1999) Biodiversity as an environmental service in Brazil’s Amazonian forests: Risks, value and conservation. Environ Conserv 26:305–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892999000429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fearnside PM (2008) Amazon forest maintenance as a source of environmental services. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 80:101–114. https://doi.org/1590/S0001-37652008000100006

  9. Fearnside PM (2017) Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.102

  10. Fearnside PM (2018) Brazil’s Amazonian forest carbon: The key to Southern Amazonia’s significance for global climate. Region Environ Chang 18:47–61. https://doi.org/1007/s10113-016-1007-2

  11. Fitzgerald DB, Perez MHS, Sousa LM, Gonçalves AP, Py-Daniel LR, Lujan NK, Zuanon J, Winemiller KO, Lundberg JG (2018) Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River: Implications for conservation amid large-scale hydroelectric development. Biol Cons 222:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonçalves AP (2011) Ecologia e Etnoecologia de Hypancistrus zebra (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) no Rio Xingu, Amazônia Brasileira. Masters dissertation in aquatic ecology and fisheries, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil. 133 pp. https://bityl.co/4XLC. Assessed 20 Nov 2020

  13. Richards PD, Walker R, Arima EY (2014) Spatially complex land change: The indirect effect of Brazil’s agricultural sector on land use in Amazonia. Glob Environ Change 29:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Proc. 311103/2015-4.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip M. Fearnside.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that he have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity appreciation and engagement.

Communicated by Pedro V. Eisenlohr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fearnside, P.M. The intrinsic value of Amazon biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02133-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Existence value
  • Brazil
  • Amazonia
  • Tropical forest
  • Rainforest
  • Threatened species