Abstract
The main effects of habitat loss and fragmentation have been addressed through changes in diversity patterns at different spatial levels. Species richness and diversity are the most used descriptors to assess the effect of changes in land use on tropical communities. However, other biological responses such as richness and diversity of trophic guilds may also provide a better understanding about the robustness and resilience of tropical environments to disturbance. In this study, we evaluated how changes in local and landscape characteristics associated to habitat loss and fragmentation affect: (i) species richness and Shannon diversity as well as (ii) trophic guild richness and diversity of leaf litter ants in human-modified tropical rainforest landscapes in Mexico. For this, we sampled ants in 16 sampling sites and recorded a series of descriptors at both local (i.e. elevation, temperature, relative humidity, soil pH, canopy cover, litter volume and vegetation structure) and landscape level (i.e. landscape heterogeneity, forest cover and connectivity). Overall, we observed that increasing primary forest cover within the sampling sites positively influenced richness and diversity of species and trophic guilds. In addition, at the local level, we found that only richness and diversity of ant species were negatively associated with tree density (i.e. number of trees, litter volume and canopy cover). These findings suggest that opportunistic species can be favored in environments with low tree density. In short, our complementary approach highlights the importance of environmental variability and primary forest cover in the maintenance of ant biodiversity in primary rainforest remnants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen A (1997) Using ants as bioindicators: multiscale issues in ant community ecology. Conserv Ecol 1:8
Andersen AN, Hoffmann BD, Müller WJ, Griffiths AD (2002) Using ants as bioindicators in land management: simplifying assessment of ant community responses. J Appl Ecol 39:8–17
Asner GP, Rudel TK, Aide TM, Defries R, Emerson R (2009) A contemporary assessment of change in humid tropical forests. Conserv Biol 23:1386–1395
Assis DS, Dos Santos IA, Ramos FN, Barrios-Rojas KE, Majer JD, Vilela EF (2018) Agricultural matrices affect ground ant assemblage composition inside forest fragments. PLoS ONE 13:e0197697
Badano EI, Regidor HA, Nunez HA, Acosta R, Gianoli E (2005) Species richness and structure of ant communities in a dynamic archipelago: effects of island area and age. J Biogeogr 32:221–227
Bartón K (2016) Package “MuMIn: Multi-model inference”. R package version 1.5.6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
Beattie A, Hughes L (2002) Ant–plant interactions. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant–animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Great Britain, pp 211–235
Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R, 6th edn. Springer, New York, p 306
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information and theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 1229
Campbell KU, Crist TO (2017) Ant species assembly in constructed grasslands is structured at patch and landscape levels. Insect Conserv Divers 10:180–191
Carvalho KS, Vasconcelos HL (1999) Forest fragmentation in central Amazonia and its effects on litter-dwelling ants. Biol Conserv 91:151–157
Chao A, Jost L (2012) Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93:2533–2547
Coelho LFM, Ribeiro MC, Pereira RAS (2014) Water availability determines the richness and density of fig trees within Brazilian semideciduous forest landscapes. Acta Oecol 57:109–116
Corro EJ, Ahuatzin DA, Aguirre A, Favila ME, Ribeiro MC, Acosta JCL, Dáttilo W (2019) Forest cover and landscape heterogeneity shape ant-plant co-occurrence networks in human-dominated tropical rainforests. Landscape Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0747-4
Crist TO, Wiens JA (1994) Scale effects of vegetation on forager movement and seed harvesting by ants. Oikos 69:37–46
Cross SL, Cross AT, Merritt DJ, Dixon KW, Andersen AN (2016) Biodiversity responses to vegetation structure in a fragmented landscape: ant communities in a peri-urban coastal dune system. J Insect Conserv 20:485–495
Dauber J, Hirsch M, Simmering D, Waldhardt R, Otte A, Wolters V (2003) Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:321–329
Dauber J, Purtauf T, Allspach A, Frisch J, Voigtländer K, Wolters V (2005) Local vs. landscape controls on diversity: a test using surface-dwelling soil macroinvertebrates of differing mobility. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:213–221
De la Mora A, Murnen CJ, Philpott SM (2013) Local and landscape drivers of biodiversity of four groups of ants in coffee landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 22:871–888
Debuse VJ, King J, House AP (2007) Effect of fragmentation, habitat loss and within-patch habitat characteristics on ant assemblages in semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia. Landsc Ecol 22:731–745
Del Toro I, Silva RR, Ellison AM (2015) Predicted impacts of climatic change on ant functional diversity and distributions in eastern North American forests. Divers Distrib 21:781–791
Devictor V, Clavel J, Julliard R, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, Venail P, Villéger S, Mouquet N (2010) Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J Appl Ecol 47:15–25
Di Giulio M, Edwards PJ, Meister E (2001) Enhancing insect diversity in agricultural grasslands: the roles of management and landscape structure. J Appl Ecol 38:310–319
Dormann CF et al (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:001–020
Duelli P, Obrist MK (2003) Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:87–98
Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515
Fahrig L (2013) Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr 40:1649–1663
Fahrig L (2017) Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 48:1–23
Falcão JCF, Dáttilo W, Díaz-Castelazo C, Rico-Gray V (2017) Assessing the impacts of tramp and invasive species on the structure and dynamics of ant-plant interaction networks. Biol Conserv 209:517–523
Fayle TM, Turner EC, Snaddon JL, Chey VK, Chung AY, Eggleton P, Foster WA (2010) Oil palm expansion into rain forest greatly reduces ant biodiversity in canopy, epiphytes and leaf-litter. Basic Appl Ecol 11:337–345
Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280
García-Martínez MÁ, Martínez-Tlapa DL, Pérez-Toledo GR, Quiroz-Robledo LN, Castaño-Meneses G, Laborde J, Valenzuela-González JE (2015) Taxonomic, species and functional group diversity of ants in a tropical anthropogenic landscape. Trop Conserv Sci 8:1017–1032
García-Martínez MÁ, Martínez-Tlapa DL, Pérez-Toledo GR, Quiroz-Robledo LN, Valenzuela-González JE (2016) Myrmecofauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) response to habitat characteristics of tropical montane cloud forests in central Veracruz, Mexico. Fla Entomol 99:248–256
García-Martínez MÁ, Valenzuela-González JE, Escobar-Sarria F, López-Barrera F, Castaño-Meneses G (2017) The surrounding landscape influences the diversity of leaf-litter ants in riparian cloud forest remnants. PLoS ONE 12:e0172464
Gerlach J, Samways M, Pryke J (2013) Terrestrial invertebrates as bioindicators: an overview of available taxonomic groups. J Insect Conserv 17:831–850
González-Soriano E, Dirzo R, Vogt R (1997) Historia natural de los Tuxtlas. UNAM. Instituto de Biología, Mexico, p 647
Grimbacher PS, Edwards W, Liddell MJ, Nelson PN, Nichols C, Wardhaugh CW, Stork NE (2018) Temporal variation in abundance of leaf litter beetles and ants in an Australian lowland tropical rainforest is driven by climate and litter fall. Biodivers Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1558-2
Grinnell J (1917) The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. Auk 34:427–433
Groc S, Delabie JH, Fernandez F, Leponce M, Orivel J, Silvestre R, Vasconcelos H, Dejean A (2014) Leaf-litter ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a pristine Guianese rainforest: stable functional structure versus high species turnover. Myrmecol News 19:43–51
Hadley AS, Betts MG (2016) Refocusing habitat fragmentation research using lessons from the last decade. Curr Landsc Ecol Rep 1:55–66
Helms JA (2018) The flight ecology of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 26:19–30
Hemmings Z, Andrew NR (2017) Effects of microclimate and species identity on body temperature and thermal tolerance of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Austral Entomol 56:104–114
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vander-Meer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35
Hsieh T, Ma K, Chao A (2016) Package “iNEXT: iNterpolation and EXTrapolation for species diversity”. R package version 2.0. 12 URL http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/blog/software-download
Johnson JT, Adkins JK, Rieske LK (2014) Canopy vegetation influences ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) communities in headwater stream riparian zones of Central Appalachia. J Insect Sci 14:1–5
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375
Jost L (2007) Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–2439
Kareiva P (1994) Special feature: space: the final frontier for ecological theory. Ecology 75:1-1
Klimes P, Idigel C, Rimandai M, Fayle TM, Janda M, Weiblen GD, Novotny V (2012) Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests? J Anim Ecol 81:1103–1112
Laska MS (1997) Structure of understory shrub assemblages in adjacent secondary and old growth tropical wet forests, Costa Rica. Biotropica 29:29–37
Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2004) Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27:157–164
Leal IR, Filgueiras BK, Gomes JP, Iannuzzi L, Andersen AN (2012) Effects of habitat fragmentation on ant richness and functional composition in Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biodivers Conserv 21:1687–1701
Liu C, Dudley KL, Zheng-Hui X, Economo EP (2018) Mountain metacommunities: climate and spatial connectivity shape ant diversity in a complex landscape. Ecography 41:101–112
Longino JT, Branstetter MG, Valenzuela J (2017) Ants of Los Tuxtlas biological station, Veracruz, Mexico. ADMAC. https://sites.google.com/site/admacsite/reports/2016-mexico/ants-of-los-tuxtlas Accessed: 05 February 2017
Martello F, de Bello F, de Castro Morini MS, Silva RR, de Souza-Campana DR, Ribeiro MC, Carmona CP (2018) Homogenization and impoverishment of taxonomic and functional diversity of ants in Eucalyptus plantations. Sci Rep 8:3266
McCary MA, Minor E, Wise DH (2018) Covariation between local and landscape factors influences the structure of ground-active arthropod communities in fragmented metropolitan woodlands. Landsc Ecol 33:225–239
McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) Fragstat: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
Mendes ES, Fonseca C, Marques SF, Maia D, Pereira MJR (2017) Bat richness and activity in heterogeneous landscapes: guild-specific and scale-dependent? Landsc Ecol 32:295–311
Mendoza E, Fay J, Dirzo R (2005) A quantitative analysis of forest fragmentation in Los Tuxtlas, southeast Mexico: patterns and implications for conservation. Rev Chil His Nat 78:451–467
Miranda F, Hernández E (1963) Los tipos de vegetación de México y su clasificación. Bol Soc Bot México 28:29–179
Mostacedo B, Fredericksen T (2000) Manual de métodos básicos de muestreo y análisis en ecología vegetal. Proyecto de manejo forestal sostenible (BOLFOR). El País. Bolivia, pp 10–11
Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62
Newbold T et al (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50
Oksanen J et al (2017) “vegan: Community Ecology Package”. R Package 2.4-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Pacheco R, Vasconcelos HL (2012) Habitat diversity enhances ant diversity in a naturally heterogeneous Brazilian landscape. Biodivers Conserv 21:797–809
Paolucci LN, Solar RR, Sobrinho TG, Sperber CF, Schoereder JH (2012) How does small-scale fragmentation affect litter-dwelling ants? The role of isolation. Biodivers Conserv 21:3095–3105
Philpott SM, Foster PF (2005) Nest-site limitation in coffee agroecosystems: artificial nests maintain diversity of arboreal ants. Ecol Appl 15:1478–1485
R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Radford JQ, Bennett AF, Cheers GJ (2005) Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biol Conserv 124:317–337
Reynolds C et al (2017) Inconsistent effects of landscape heterogeneity and land-use on animal diversity in an agricultural mosaic: a multi-scale and multi-taxon investigation. Landscape Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0595-7 in press
Ribas CR, Schoereder JH, Pic M, Soares SM (2003) Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecol 28:305–314
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675
Schoereder JH, Sobrinho TG, Ribas CR, Campos RBF (2004) Colonization and extinction of ant communities in a fragmented landscape. Austral Ecol 29:391–398
Sebastián-González E, Dalsgaard B, Sandel B, Guimarães PR (2015) Macroecological trends in nestedness and modularity of seed-dispersal networks: human impact matters. Global Ecol Biogeogr 24:293–303
Silva RR, Brandão CRF (2014) Ecosystem-wide morphological structure of leaf-litter ant communities along a tropical latitudinal gradient. PLoS ONE 9:e93049
Simberloff D, Dayan T (1991) The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 22:115–143
Sobrinho TG, Schoereder JH (2007) Edge and shape effects on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) species richness and composition in forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 16:1459–1470
Solar RR et al (2015) How pervasive is biotic homogenization in human-modified tropical forest landscapes? Ecol Lett 18:1108–1118
Solar RR, Barlow J, Andersen AN, Schoereder JH, Berenguer E, Ferreira JN, Gardner TA (2016) Biodiversity consequences of land-use change and forest disturbance in the Amazon: a multi-scale assessment using ant communities. Biol Conserv 197:98–107
Soto M (2006) El Clima. In: Guevara SS, Laborde DJ, Sánchez-Ríos G (eds) Los Tuxtlas: El paisaje de la sierra. Instituto de Ecología, A. C. y Unión Europea, Mexico, pp 195–200
Spiesman BJ, Cumming GS (2008) Communities in context: the influences of multiscale environmental variation on local ant community structure. Landsc Ecol 23:313–325
Stevens RD, Cox SB, Strauss RE, Willig MR (2003) Patterns of functional diversity across an extensive environmental gradient: vertebrate consumers, hidden treatments and latitudinal trends. Ecol Lett 6:1099–1108
Syrbe RU, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 21:80–88
Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92
Tiede Y, Schlautmann J, Donoso DA, Wallis CI, Bendix J, Brandl R, Farwig N (2017) Ants as indicators of environmental change and ecosystem processes. Ecol Indic 83:527–537
Tscharntke T et al (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87:661–685
Turner IM (1996) Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. J Appl Ecol 33:200–209
Underwood EC, Fisher BL (2006) The role of ants in conservation monitoring: if, when, and how. Biol Conserv 132:166–182
Van der Wal J, Falconi L, Januchowski D, Shoo L, Storlie C (2012) SDMTools: species distribution modelling tools: tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. R package version 1.1-13
Vasconcelos HL, Vilhena J, Magnusson WE, Albernaz AL (2006) Long-term effects of forest fragmentation on Amazonian ant communities. J Biogeogr 33:1348–1356
Vasconcelos HL, Leite MF, Vilhena J, Lima AP, Magnusson WE (2008) Ant diversity in an Amazonian savanna: relationship with vegetation structure, disturbance by fire, and dominant ants. Austral Ecol 33:221–231
Vavrek MJ (2015) Package “fossil”. R Package Version 0.3.7. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/fossil/
Von Thaden JJ, Laborde J, Guevara S, Venegas-Barrera CS (2018) Forest cover change in the Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve and its future: the contribution of the 1998 protected natural area decree. Land Use Policy 72:443–550
Wiezik M, Svitok M, Wieziková A, Dovčiak M (2015) Identifying shifts in leaf-litter ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) across ecosystem boundaries using multiple sampling methods. PLoS ONE 10:e0134502
Woodcock P, Edwards DP, Fayle TM, Newton RJ, Khen CV, Bottrell SH, Hamer KC (2011) The conservation value of South East Asia’s highly degraded forests: evidence from leaf-litter ants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:3256–3264
Worthen WB (1996) Community composition and nested-subset analyses: basic descriptors for community ecology. Oikos 76:417–426
Yanoviak SP, Kaspari M (2000) Community structure and the habitat templet: ants in the tropical forest canopy and litter. Oikos 89:259–266
Acknowledgements
The authors thank to Praxedis Sinaca Colín and Karla Selene Andalco Cid for their help during the fieldwork of this study. Our appreciation and deep gratitude is given to the staff of the “Los Tuxtlas” Tropical Biology Field Station, for their support and hospitality. We also wish to thank to the owners of the tropical forest fragments for allowing us to carry out this study within their properties. We are very grateful to the staff of the Entomological Collection IEXA, Dora L. Martínez Tlapa, Miguel Ángel García Martínez and Gibran Renoy Pérez Toledo, for the unconditional support and their valuable help identifying the collected specimens. We are thankful to José G. García Franco, Federico Escobar Sarria and Sebastian Sendoya for their comments and suggestions to this manuscript. DAA gratefully acknowledges the award of a graduate studies scholarship from CONACyT (No. 416583). AA and WD received financial contribution by PO-INECOL (20030-11315) and PO-INECOL (20030-11581), respectively. RMF was supported by CNPq (grant 302462/2016-3). MCR was funded by FAPESP (2013/50421-2), PROCAD/CAPES (project # 88881.068425/2014-01) and CNPq UNIVERSAL (425746/2016-0) and receives research grants from the Brazilian Council of Research and Scientific Development (CNPq) (312045/2013-1; 312292/2016-3). Finally, we thank the reviewers, whose constructive suggestions have improved the quality of this research paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Andreas Schuldt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Forest and plantation biodiversity.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahuatzin, D.A., Corro, E.J., Jaimes, A.A. et al. Forest cover drives leaf litter ant diversity in primary rainforest remnants within human-modified tropical landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 28, 1091–1107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01712-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01712-z