The conservation status of African vertebrates is unrelated to environmental and spatial patterns in their geographic ranges
Statistical predictions of the impact of climate change on biodiversity assume that the environmental and spatial characteristics of contemporary species’ distributions reflect the conditions needed for their continued and prolonged existence. Here we explore this assumption by testing whether a species’ threatened status is associated with the amount of variation in its distribution range attributable to environmental and spatial patterns. Using a variation partitioning approach, we decomposed variation in the distribution ranges of 4423 vertebrate species in sub-Saharan Africa into components attributable exclusively to environmental variables (E|S), exclusively to spatial variables (S|E) or to the collinearity between environmental and spatial variables (E∩S). We found that species’ threatened status was unrelated to E|S, S|E or E∩S variation components, but that unexplained variation was higher for species threatened with extinction. This suggests that spatio-environmental patterns in species’ ranges likely underestimate the overall extinction threat caused by climate change. We also found clear geographic patterns in the strength of E|S, S|E or E∩S that differed amongst biogeographical regions, but no component was over- or underrepresented in the present-day protected area network. While there may be benefits to tailoring protected area expansion to differences between biogeographical regions, this should aim to incorporate species-specific information wherever possible.
KeywordsBiogeography Extinction threat Protected areas Sub-Saharan Africa Variation partitioning
This work was supported by a EUROSA Erasmus Mundus action 2 PhD Scholarship. We would also like to thank Raquel Garcia and two anonymous referees for comments that improved this manuscript.
- BirdLife International, NatureServe (2011) Bird species distribution maps of the world. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK and NatureServe, Arlington, USA. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/spcdownload
- Brooker L, Brooker M, Cale P (1999) Animal dispersal in fragmented habitat: measuring habitat connectivity, corridor use, and dispersal mortality. Ecol Soc 3: Art. 4Google Scholar
- Buschke FT, Brendonck L, Vanschoenwinkel B (2014) Differences between regional and biogeographic species pools highlight the need for multi-scale theories in macroecology. Front Biogeogr 6:173–184. ISSN 1948-6596Google Scholar
- Franklin J (2009) Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Hannah L, Midgley G, Andelman S, Araújo M, Hughes G, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R, Williams P (2007) Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front Ecol Environ 5:131–138. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[131:PANIAC]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
- Imhoff ML, Bounoua L, Ricketts T, Loucks C, Harriss R, Lawrence WT (2004a) HANPP collection: global patterns in net primary productivity (NPP). Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). doi: 10.7927/H40Z715X
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2014) The IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2014.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2014) The world database on protected areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. www.protectedplanet.net
- Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical ecology, 3rd English edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614–2625. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
- Trabucco A, Zomer RJ (2009) Global aridity index (global-aridity) and global potential evapo-transpiration (Global-PET) geospatial dataset. CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information. CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal. http://www.csi.cgiar.org