References
Akçakaya HR, Ferson S, Burgman MA, Keith DA, Mace GM, Todd CR (2000) Making consistent IUCN classifications under uncertainty. Conserv Biol 14:1001–1013. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99125.x
Brito D (2010) Overcoming the Linnean shortfall: data deficiency and biological survey priorities. Basic Appl Ecol 11:709–713. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2010.09.007
Diniz-Filho J, Loyola R, Raia P, Mooers A, Bini L (2013) Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 28:689–695. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.003
Françoso R, Brandão R, de Campos Nogueira C, Salmona Y, Machado R, Colli G (2015) Habitat loss and the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado biodiversity hotspot. Nat Conserv 13:35–40. doi:10.1016/j.ncon.2015.04.001
Gauthier P, Debussche M, Thompson J (2010) Regional priority setting for rare species based on a method combining three criteria. Biol Conserv 143:1501–1509. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.032
Gauthier P, Foulon Y, Jupille O, Thompson J (2013) Quantifying habitat vulnerability to assess species priorities for conservation management. Biol Conserv 158:321–325. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.012
IUCN (2015) IUCN Red List of threatened species: version 2015:2. http://www.iucnredlist.org/search. Accessed 03 Sept 2015
Kricsfalusy V, Trevisan N (2014) Prioritizing regionally rare plant species for conservation using herbarium data. Biodivers Conserv 23:39–61. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0583-4
Lima R, Mori D, Pitta G, Melito M, Bello C, Magnago L et al (2015) How much do we know about the endangered Atlantic Forest? Reviewing nearly 70 years of information on tree community surveys. Biodivers Conserv 24:2135–2148. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-0953-1
Lõhmus A (2015) Collective analyses on “red-listed species” may have limited value for conservation ecology. Biodivers Conserv 1–3:3151–3153. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-1000-y
Margules C, Pressey R (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253. doi:10.1038/35012251
Mehlman D, Rosenberg K, Wells J, Robertson B (2004) A comparison of North American avian conservation priority ranking systems. Biol Conserv 120:383–390. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.013
Myers N (1997) Rarity. Biodivers Conserv 6:1317–1320
Schmeller D, Bernd G, Budrys E, Framsted EL, Henle K (2008) National responsibilities in european species conservation: a metodological review. Conserv Biol 22:593–601. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00961.x
Xu H, Wu J, Liu Y, Ding H, Zhang M, Wu Y (2008) Biodiversity congruence and conservation strategies: a national test. Bioscience 58:632–639. doi:10.1641/B580710
Acknowledgments
CAPES granted the first author a Master Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by David Hawksworth.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maciel, E.A., Eisenlohr, P.V. On the collective analysis of species: how can Red Lists and lists of regional priorities be combined to assist in decision-making? A reply to Lõhmus (2015). Biodivers Conserv 25, 611–614 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1068-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1068-z