Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 539–553 | Cite as

Which species to conserve: evaluating children’s species-based conservation priorities

  • H. G. Shapiro
  • K. A. Erickson
  • M. Nils Peterson
  • K. N. Frew
  • K. T. Stevenson
  • R. B. Langerhans
Original Paper

Abstract

We currently have a meager understanding of the species attributes viewed as important for conservation by children, despite the fact that arguments for biodiversity conservation often hinge on the bequest value of species. We conducted a study of children between the ages of 4 and 14 (N = 183) on Andros Island, The Bahamas to determine how they prioritized wildlife species for conservation based on five attributes: endemism, use for hunting and fishing, rapid decline in population size, visibility around their home, and ecological significance. Children tended to rank ecological significance as the most important attribute for prioritizing wildlife for protection, followed closely by endemism, with other attributes being less important and not significantly different from one another. However, participants in a local environmental education program (N = 67) placed greater prioritization to species experiencing rapid population declines. We also found that boys prioritized use for hunting and fishing as more important for conservation than girls, older children placed greater importance on species with declining numbers and less importance on visibility of animals around their house, and children who had previously fished placed greater importance on endemism. These findings help elucidate how children value biodiversity, and suggest children’s conservation priorities may align relatively well with those of conservation biologists, especially after exposure to environmental education. We suggest that better understanding how children prioritize wildlife attributes for conservation can lead to more informed biodiversity conservation decisions and more effective policy implementation, as the perspectives of children can help bridge the gap between public opinion and scientific opinion.

Keywords

Conservation prioritization Endemism Environmental education Human dimensions Threatened species Values 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Forfar Field Station staff, particularly Kate Hammond and Lyndon Rolle, and the Bahamas National Trust, especially Portia Sweeting and Leslie Brace, for facilitating the surveys. We also thank Alayne McKnight and Haley Doty for assistance conducting the surveys.

References

  1. Andros Conservancy and Trust (ANCAT). Available at http://www.ancat.net/index.php
  2. Arponen A (2012) Prioritizing species for conservation planning. Biodivers Conserv 21:875–893. doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0242-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avise JC (2005) Phylogenetic units and currencies above and below the species level. In: Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks T (eds) Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 76–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahamas National Trust (BNT) Discovery Club. http://www.bnt.bs/_m1891/Discovery-Club
  5. Baldacchino G (ed) (2015) Archipelago tourism: policies and practices. Ashgate Publishing Limited, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  7. Bjerke T, Odegardstuen TS, Kaltenborn BP (1998) Attitudes toward animals among Norwegian adolescents. Anthrozoos 11:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bottrill M, Joseph LN, Carwardine J, Bode M, Cook C, Game ET, Grantham H, Kark S, Linke S, McDonald-Madden E, Pressey RL, Walker S, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (2008) Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol Evol 23:649–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bretherton I, Golby B, Cho E (1997) Attachment and the transmission of values. In: Grusec JE, Kuczynski L (eds) Parenting and children’s internalization of values: a handbook of contemporary theory. Wiley, New York, pp 103–134Google Scholar
  10. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1127609 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown JH, Sax DF (2004) An essay on some topics concerning invasive species. Aust Ecol 29:530–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchan KC (2000) The Bahamas. Mar Pollut Bull 41:94–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cincotta RP, Wisnewski J, Engelman R (2000) Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404:990–992. doi: 10.1038/35010105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Conrad KF, Warren MS, Fox R, Parsons MS, Woiwod IP (2006) Rapid declines of common, widespread British moths provide evidence of an insect biodiversity crisis. Biol Conserv 132:279–291. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cumberlidge N, Ng PKL, Yeo DCJ, Magalhaes C, Campos MR, Alvarez F, Naruse T, Daniels SR, Esser LJ, Attipoe FYK, Clotilde-Ba FL, Darwall W, McIvor A, Baillie JEM, Collen B, Ram M (2009) Freshwater crabs and the biodiversity crisis: importance, threats, status, and conservation challenges. Biol Conserv 142:1665–1673. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Curnick DJ, Head CEI, Huang D, Crabbe MJC, Gollock M, Hoeksema BW, Johnson KG, Jones R, Koldewey HJ, Obura DO, Rosen BR, Smith DJ, Taylor ML, Turner JR, Wren S, Redding DW (2015) Setting evolutionary-based conservation priorities for a phylogenetically data-poor taxonomic group (Scleractinia). Anim Conserv 18:303–312. doi: 10.1111/acv.12185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Czech B, Krausman PR, Borkhataria R (1998) Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefit to endangered species. Conserv Biol 12:1103–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Czech B, Devers P, Krausman P (2001) The relationship of gender to species conservation attitudes. Wildl Soc B 29:187–194Google Scholar
  19. De Vreede C, Warner A, Pitter R (2014) Facilitating youth to take sustainability actions: the potential of peer education. J Environ Educ 45:37–56. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2013.805710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delancy G (2011) Research and Statistics Department of the Ministry of Tourism. Tourism Today Network. http://www.tourismtoday.com/services/statistics/stopoversfrequently-requested-statisticstrends
  21. Department of Statistics of The Bahamas (2013) Population Census 2010. http://statistics.bahamas.gov.bs/key.php?cat=13
  22. Desimone LM, Le Floch KC (2004) Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educ Eval Policy Anal 26:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eagles PFJ, Demare R (1999) Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. J Environ Educ 30:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehrhardt NM, Deleveaux VK (2007) The Bahamas Nassau grouper (Epinephelus straitus) fishery-two assessment methods applied to a data-deficient coastal population. Fish Res 81:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eick CJ, Carrier S, Perez K, Keasal DE (2010) Summer methods in summer camps: teaching projects WILD, WET, and learning tree at an outdoor environmental education center. In: Weaver S, Bodzin AM, Shiner Klein B (eds) The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, 16 U.S.C ch. 35 § 1531 et seqGoogle Scholar
  27. Forest F, Grenyer R, Rouget M, Davies TJ, Cowling RM, Faith DP, Balmford A, Manning JC, Proches S, van der Bank M, Reeves G, Hedderson TAJ, Savolainen V (2007) Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445:757–760. doi: 10.1038/nature05587 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Frew K, Peterson MN, Stevenson K (2016). Are we working to save the species our children want to protect? evaluating species attribute preferences among children. Oryx (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Hayes MC, Peterson MN, Heinen-Kay JL, Langerhans RB (2015) Toursim-related drivers of support for protection of fisheries resources on Andros Island, The Bahamas. Ocean Coast Manag 106:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobday AJ, Chambers LE, Arnould JPY (2015) Prioritizing climate change adaptation options for iconic marine species. Biodivers Conserv. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-100-y Google Scholar
  31. Howarth RB, Norgaard RB (1992) Environmental valuation under sustainable development. Am Econ Rev 82:473–477Google Scholar
  32. Hunter M (2011) Impact of ecological disturbance on awareness of urban nature and sense of environmental stewardship in residential neighborhoods. Landsc Urban Plan 101:131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2015) IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.redlist.org
  34. Isaac NJB, Turvey ST, Collen B, Waterman C, Baillie JEM (2007) Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS ONE 2:e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000296 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacobsen JB, Boiesen JH, Thorsen BJ, Strange N (2007) What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus “Iconised” species when valuing biodiversity. Environ Resour Econ 39:247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahn PH (1999) The human relationship with nature. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahn PH, Kellert SR (eds) (2002) Children and nature: psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Kairo M, Ali B, Cheesman O, Haysom K, Murphy S. (2003). Invasive species threats to Caribbean Region. Report to the Nature Conservancy, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Kellert SR, Berry J (1987) Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildl Soc B 15:363–371Google Scholar
  40. Kellert SR, Westervelt MO (1984) Children’s attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors towards animals. Child Environ Q 1:8–11Google Scholar
  41. Krasny M, Delia J (2014) Natural area stewardship as part of campus sustainability. J Clean Prod 106:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larson LR, Castleberry SB, Green GT (2010) Effects of an environmental education program on Environmental orientations of children from different gender, age, and ethnic groups. J Park Recreat Adm 28:95–113Google Scholar
  43. Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature deficit disorder. Algonquin Books, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  44. Marris E (2007) What to let go. Nature 450:152–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Martín-López B, Montes C, Benayas J (2007) The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 13:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martín-López B, Montes C, Benayas J (2008) Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: the meaning of numbers. Conserv Biol 22:624–635CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Martín-López B, Montes C, Ramírez L, Benayas J (2009) What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biol Conserv 142:1370–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCallum ML (2015) Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to a sixth mass extinction. Biodivers Conserv 24:2497–2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meine C, Soule M, Noss RF (2006) “A mission-drive discipline”: the growth of conservation biology. Conserv Biol 20:631–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00449.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Meuser E, Harshaw HW, Mooers AO (2009) Public preference for endemism over other conservation-related species attributes. Conserv Biol 23:1041–1046. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01257.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller KK, McGee CTK (2001) Toward incorporating human dimensions information into wildlife management decision-making. Hum Dimens Wildl 6:205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Montgomery CA (2002) Ranking the benefits of biodiversity: an exploration of relative values. J Environ Manag 65:313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcom TR, Ricketts TH (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9495–9500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707823105 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. National Fishery Sector Overview, the Commonwealth of the Bahamas (2009) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations reportGoogle Scholar
  56. National Museum of The Bahamas (2014) Discovery Club curriculum for Explorers and GuardiansGoogle Scholar
  57. Negev M, Sagy G, Garb Y, Salzberg A, Tal A (2008) Evaluating the environmental literacy of Israeli elementary and high school students. J Environ Educ 39:3–20. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.39.2.3-20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Öhman J, Öhman M (2013) Participatory approach in practice: an analysis of student discussions about climate change. Environ Educ Res 19:324–341. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2012.695012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ojala M (2015a) Hope in the face of climate change: associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. J Environ Educ 46:133–148. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2015.1021662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ojala M (2015b) Climate change skepticism among adolescents. J Youth Stud 18:1135–1153. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2015.1020927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN, Raven PH, Roberts CM, Sexton JO (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:1246752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medellin RA, Master LL, Keith DA (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends Ecol Evol 17:503–507. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02614-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Redding David W, DeWolff CURT, Mooers AØ (2010) Evolutionary distinctiveness, threat status, and ecological oddity in primates. Conserv Biol 24:1052–1058CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Reimer A, Mase A, Mulvaney K, Mullendore N, Perry-Hill R, Prokopy L (2014) The impact of information and familiarity on public attitudes toward the eastern hellbender. Anim Conserv 17:235–243. doi: 10.1111/acv.12085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sealey KS (2004) Large-scale ecological impacts of development on tropical island systems: comparison of developed and undeveloped islands in the central Bahamas. Bull Mar Sci 7:295–320Google Scholar
  66. Shellabarger R, Peterson MN, Sills E, Cubbage F (2012) The influence of place meanings on conservation and human rights in the Arizona Sonora borderlands. Environ Commun 6:383–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sodhi NS, Posa MC, Lee TM, Bickford D, Koh LP, Brook BW (2010) The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 19:317–328. doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9607-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Species at Risk Act (SARA) (2002) Bill C-5, an act respecting the protection of wildlife species at risk in Canada. Statutes of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  69. Stedman R, Diefenback DR, Swope CB, Finley JC, Luloff AE, Zinn HC, San-Julian GJ, Wang GA (2004) Integrating wildlife and human-dimensions research methods to study hunters. J Wildl Manag 68:762–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L (1993) Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ Behav 25:322–348. doi: 10.1177/0013916593255002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD, Mertig AG, Moore SE (2013) Environmental, institutional, and demographic predictors of environmental literacy among middle school children. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.005951
  72. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD, Moore SE, Carrier SJ (2014a) Overcoming skepticism with education: interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Clim Chang 126:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Carrier SJ, Strand RL, Bondell HD, Kirby-Hathaway T, Moore SE (2014b) Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. J Environ Educ 45:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stoner A, Davis M (2010) Queen conch stock assessment, historical fishing grounds, Andros Island, Bahamas, August 2010. The Nature ConservancyGoogle Scholar
  75. Stoner R, Davis M, Booker C (2009) Queen conch stock assessment, proposed MPA and fishing grounds, Berry Islands, Bahamas. Community Conch ReportGoogle Scholar
  76. Tarrant MA, Cordell HK (2002) Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environ Manag 20:692–703. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tisdell C, Nantha HS, Wilson C (2007) Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: how important are they for payments proposed for conservation? Ecol Econ 60:627–633. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Turpie JK (1995) Prioritizing South African estuaries for conservation: a practical example using waterbirds. Biol Conserv 74:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vadala CE, Bixler RD, James JJ (2007) Childhood play and environmental interests: panacea or snake oil? J Environ Educ 39:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH (1991) What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 55:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Veríssimo D, Fraser I, Groombridge J, Bristol R, MacMillan DC (2009) Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study on tropical islands. Anim Conserv 12:549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Waldron A, Mooers AO, Miller DC, Nibbelink N, Redding D, Kuhn TS, Robers JT, Gittleman JL (2013) Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:12144–12148. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221370110 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Weiss EB (1990) Our rights and obligations to future generations for the environment. Am J Int Law 84:198–207. doi: 10.2307/2203020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wells NM, Lekies KS (2006) Nature and the life course: pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Child Youth Environ 16:1–24Google Scholar
  85. White PCL, Bennett AC, Hayes EJV (2001) The use of willingness-to-pay approaches in mammal conservation. Mamm Rev 31:151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wilson KA, McBride MF, Bode M, Possingham HP (2006) Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440:337–340. doi: 10.1038/nature04366 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Zelezny L, Chua P, Aldrich C (2000) Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. J Soc Issues 56:443–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. G. Shapiro
    • 1
  • K. A. Erickson
    • 1
  • M. Nils Peterson
    • 1
  • K. N. Frew
    • 1
  • K. T. Stevenson
    • 1
  • R. B. Langerhans
    • 2
  1. 1.Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology ProgramNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences and W.M. Keck Center for Behavioral BiologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations