Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1253–1269 | Cite as

Towards a traditional ecological knowledge-based monitoring scheme: a proposal for the case of edible mushrooms

  • Luis Pacheco-Cobos
  • Marcos F. Rosetti
  • Adriana Montoya Esquivel
  • Robyn Hudson
Original Paper

Abstract

Monitoring wild edible fungi over long periods is essential to understand how environmental or cultural factors influence fruiting patterns. Since conventional sampling methods are time and resource intensive, alternatives providing reliable ecological information could be useful for assessments of fungal management. Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) can be used as a sampling alternative in a cost-effective manner. Thus, in this paper we aim to: (1) illustrate how GPS-recorded information on mushroom gatherers’ pathways can be used to describe fungal diversity and distribution patterns, and (2) outline a TEK-monitoring proposal that can provide communities and researchers with high-quality ecological data on edible mushrooms. Using information from 32 trips (55 GPS-tracked pathways) we were able to describe the frequency, abundance, diversity and spatial distribution of edible fungi at different sites. We recorded the collection of 6,905 sporocarps, representing 20 species and 6 genera, which were collected or identified at 2,683 locations. In addition to collections, we suggest consistent recording of fungal encounters defined as memory, exploration, traces, and failed collection, as these also provide ecological information. The most gathered species, Turbinellus floccosus and Clitocybe gibba, were also among the mushrooms most frequently listed by local people. Finally, we propose combining our GPS-tracking method with a thorough TEK investigation and participatory research in order to develop adaptive co-management strategies that allow local people to manage and conserve their forests through the integration of traditional and scientific knowledge.

Keywords

GPS-tracking Local knowledge Participatory research Conservation La Malinche National Park 

Notes

Acknowledgments

All the mushroom gatherers who shared treasured knowledge with us. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT; Repatriación 2013-1, 203604).

Supplementary material

10531_2014_856_MOESM1_ESM.doc (107 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 107 kb)

References

  1. Anadon JD, Gimenez A, Ballestar R, Perez I (2009) Evaluation of local ecological knowledge as a method for collecting extensive data on animal abundance. Conserv Biol 23:617–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01145.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnolds E (1991) Decline of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 35:209–224. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(91)90052-Y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12:1–42Google Scholar
  4. Balice RG, Jarmie N, Rogers FJ (1997) Distribution and diversity of fungal species in and adjacent to the Los Alamos National Laboratory. DOE Technical Report LA–13385-MS. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/564129. Accessed August 2014
  5. Baxter JW, Dighton J (2005) Diversity-functioning relationships in ectomycorrhizal fungal communities. In: Dighton J, White JF Jr, Oudemans P (eds) The Fungal Community: Its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem. Mycology Series, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 383–398Google Scholar
  6. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomez-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B (2014) rgdal: Bindings for the geospatial data abstraction library. R package version 0.8-16. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal Accessed August 2014
  9. Boa E (2004) Wild edible fungi a global overview of their use and importance to people. FAO Document Repository. http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5489e/y5489e00.htm. Accessed August 2014
  10. Brook RK, McLachlan SM (2008) Trends and prospects for local knowledge in ecological and conservation research and monitoring. Biodivers Conserv 17:3501–3512. doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9445-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cannon PF (1997) Strategies for rapid assessment of fungal diversity. Biodivers Conserv 6:669–680. doi: 10.1023/a:1018362002273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheveau M, Imbeau L, Drapeau P, Belanger L (2008) Current status and future directions of traditional ecological knowledge in forest management: a review. For Chron 84:231–243. doi: 10.5558/tfc84231-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453. doi: 10.2307/1931034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cressie N, Wikle CK (2011) Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data. John Wiley & Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  15. Crona B, Bodin Ö (2006) What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management. Ecol Soc 11(2):7Google Scholar
  16. Davis A, Wagner J (2003) Who knows? On the importance of identifying “experts” when researching local ecological knowledge. Hum Ecol 31:463–489. doi: 10.1023/A:1025075923297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Ávila A (2008) La diversidad lingüística y el conocimiento etnobiológico. In: Soberón J, Halffter G, Llorente-Bosques J (eds) Capital natural de México, vol I., Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidadComisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México, pp 497–556Google Scholar
  18. de Gruijter J, Brus DJ, Bierkens MFP, Knotters M (2006) Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring. Springer, NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diemont SAW, Martin JF (2009) Lacandon Maya ecosystem management: sustainable design for subsistence and environmental restoration. Ecol Appl 19:254–266. doi: 10.1890/08-0176.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Egli S (2011) Mycorrhizal mushroom diversity and productivity—an indicator of forest health? Ann For Sci 68:81–88. doi: 10.1007/s13595-010-0009-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Etkin NL, Ticktin T, McMillen HL (2011) Ethnoecological approaches to integrating theory and method in ethnomedical research. In: Anderson EN, Pearsall DM, Hunn ES, Turner NJ (eds) Ethnobiology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 231–247. doi: 10.1002/9781118015872.ch14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fraser DJ, Coon T, Prince MR, Dion R, Bernatchez L (2006) Integrating traditional and evolutionary knowledge in biodiversity conservation: a population level case study. Ecol Soc 11(2):4Google Scholar
  24. Garibay-Orijel R, Córdova J, Cifuentes J, Valenzuela R, Estrada-Torres A, Kong A (2009) Integrating wild mushrooms use into a model of sustainable management for indigenous community forests. For Ecol Manag 258:122–131. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2010) Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:16732–16737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910275107 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilmore MP, Eshbaugh WH (2011) From researcher to partner: ethical challenges and issues facing the ethnobiological researcher. In: Anderson EN, Pearsall DM, Hunn ES, Turner N (eds) Ethnobiology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 51–63. doi: 10.1002/9781118015872.ch4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gordon JE, Newton AC (2006) The potential misapplication of rapid plant diversity assessment in tropical conservation. J Nat Conserv 14:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2006.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawksworth DL (2003) Monitoring and safeguarding fungal resources worldwide: the need for an international collaborative MycoAction Plan. Fung Divers 13:29–45Google Scholar
  29. Hawksworth DL, Mueller GM (2005) Fungal communities: their diversity and distribution. In: Dighton J, White JF Jr, Oudemans P (eds) The Fungal Community: Its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem. Mycology Series, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. He J, Zhou Z, Weyerhaeuser H, Xu J (2009) Participatory technology development for incorporating non-timber forest products into forest restoration in Yunnan, Southwest China. For Ecol Manag 257:2010–2016. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. He J, Zhou Z, Yang H, Xu J (2011) Integrative management of commercialized wild mushroom: a case study of Thelephora ganbajun in Yunnan, Southwest China. Environ Manag 48:98–108. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9691-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hellier A, Newton AC, Ochoa Gaona S (1999) Use of indigenous knowledge for rapidly assessing trends in biodiversity: a case study from Chiapas, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 8:869–889. doi: 10.1023/A:1008862005556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jajuga K, Walesiak M (2000) Standardisation of data set under different measurement scales. In: Decker R, Gaul W (eds) Classification and Information Processing at the Turn of the Millennium. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, pp 105–112. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-57280-7_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (2008) Agglomerative nesting (program AGNES). Finding Groups in Data. Wiley, An introduction to cluster analysis. New York, pp 199–252. doi: 10.1002/9780470316801.ch5 Google Scholar
  35. Ladio AH, Lozada M (2009) Human ecology, ethnobotany and traditional practices in rural populations inhabiting the Monte region: resilience and ecological knowledge. J Arid Environ 73:222–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. LaRiviere CM, Crawford SS (2013) Indigenous principles of wild harvest and management: an Ojibway community as a case study. Hum Ecol 41:947–960. doi: 10.1007/s10745-013-9568-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lodge DJ, Ammirati JF, O’Dell TE et al (2004) Terrestrial and lignicolous macrofungi. In: Mueller GM, Bills GF, Foster (eds) Biodiversity of Fungi. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 127–172. doi: 10.1016/B978-012509551-8/50011-8 Google Scholar
  38. Magurran A (1988) Choosing and interpreting diversity measures. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 61–80. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manoharachary C, Sridhar K, Singh R, Adholeya A, Suryanarayanan TS, Rawat S, Johri BN (2005) Fungal biodiversity: distribution, conservation and prospecting of fungi from India. Curr Sci 89:58–71Google Scholar
  40. McIntosh RP (1967) An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology 48:392–404. doi: 10.2307/1932674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Montoya A, Estrada-Torres A, Caballero J (2002) Comparative ethnomycological survey of three localities from La Malinche volcano, México. J Ethnobiol 22:103–131Google Scholar
  42. Montoya A, Hernández-Totomoch O, Estrada-Torres A, Kong A, Caballero J (2003) Traditional knowledge about mushrooms in a Nahua community in the state of Tlaxcala, México. Mycologia 95:793–806CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Montoya A, Kong A, Estrada-Torres A, Cifuentes J, Caballero J (2004) Useful wild fungi of La Malinche National Park, Mexico. Fungal Divers 17:115–143Google Scholar
  44. Montoya A, Kong A, Garibay-Orijel R, Méndez-Espinoza C, Tulloss RE, Estrada-Torres A (2014) Availability of wild edible fungi in La Malinche National Park, México. J Mycol. doi: 10.1155/2014/241806 Google Scholar
  45. Mueller G, Halling R, Carranza J, Mata M, Schmit J (2006) Saprotrophic and ectomycorrhizal macrofungi of Costa Rican oak forests. In: Kappelle M (ed) Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Oak Forests. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–68. doi: 10.1007/3-540-28909-7_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nettle D, Gibson MA, Lawson DW, Sear R (2013) Human behavioral ecology: current research and future prospects. Behav Ecol 24:1031–1040. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ars222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Dell TE, Smith JE, Castellano M, Luoma D (1996) Diversity and conservation of forest fungi. In: Pilz D, Molina R (eds) Managing forest ecosystems to conserve fungus diversity and sustain wild mushroom harvests. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-371, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR, USGoogle Scholar
  48. Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED et al (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51:933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pacheco-Cobos L (2010) Análisis de las trayectorias de búsqueda de recursos forestales: el caso de la recolección de hongos en San Isidro Buensuceso, Tlaxcala. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  50. Pacheco-Cobos L, Rosetti M, Hudson R (2009) A new method for tracking pathways of humans searching for wild, edible fungi. Micol Apl Int 21:77–88Google Scholar
  51. Pacheco-Cobos L, Rosetti M, Cuatianquiz C, Hudson R (2010) Sex differences in mushroom gathering: men expend more energy to obtain equivalent benefits. Evol Hum Behav 31:289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pebesma EJ, Bivand RS (2005) Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5:9–13Google Scholar
  53. Pilz D, Molina R (1996) Managing forest ecosystems to conserve fungus diversity and sustain wild mushroom harvests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-371. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR, USGoogle Scholar
  54. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed August 2014
  55. Rossman AY, Tulloss RE, O’Dell TE, Thorn RG (1998) Protocols for an All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory of Fungi in a Costa Rican Conservation Area. Parkway Publishers, BooneGoogle Scholar
  56. Sarukhán J, Koleff P, Carabias J et al (2009) Capital natural de México. Síntesis: conocimiento actual, evaluación y perspectivas de sustentabilidad. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  57. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syste Tech J 27:379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith DA (2003) Participatory mapping of community lands and hunting yields among the Bugle of western Panama. Hum Organ 62:332–343Google Scholar
  59. Smith RC, Benavides M, Pariona M, Tuesta E (2003) Mapping the past and the future: geomatics and indigenous territories in the Peruvian Amazon. Hum Organ 62:357–368Google Scholar
  60. Swift MJ (2005) Human impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services: an overview. In: Dighton J, White JF Jr, Oudemans P (eds) The Fungal Community: Its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem. Mycology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 627–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Toledo VM, Ortiz-Espejel B, Cortés L, Moguel P, de Jesús Ordoñez M (2003) The multiple use of tropical forests by indigenous peoples in Mexico: a case of adaptive management. Conserv Ecol 7:9Google Scholar
  62. Uprety Y, Asselin H, Bergeron Y, Doyon F, Boucher J-F (2012) Contribution of traditional knowledge to ecological restoration: practices and applications. Ecoscience 19:225–237. doi: 10.2980/19-3-3530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Villers-Ruiz L, Rojas-García F, Tenorio-Lezama P (2006) Guía botánica del Parque Nacional Malinche, Tlaxcala-Puebla. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  64. Zak JC, Willig MR (2004) Fungal biodiversity patterns. In: Mueller GM, Bills GF, Foster (eds) Biodiversity of Fungi. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 59–75. doi: 10.1016/B978-012509551-8/50008-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Pacheco-Cobos
    • 1
  • Marcos F. Rosetti
    • 2
  • Adriana Montoya Esquivel
    • 3
  • Robyn Hudson
    • 2
  1. 1.Facultad de Biología-XalapaUniversidad VeracruzanaXalapaMexico
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigaciones BiomédicasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MexicoCiudad De MexicoMexico
  3. 3.Centro de Investigación de Ciencias BiológicasUniversidad Autónoma de TlaxcalaIxtacuixtlaMexico

Personalised recommendations