Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 149–170 | Cite as

Mapping biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for the Euro-Mediterranean headwater ecosystems, as inferred from diversity and distribution of a water beetle lineage

  • Marco Trizzino
  • Francesco Bisi
  • Luigi Maiorano
  • Adriano Martinoli
  • Marco Petitta
  • Damiano G. Preatoni
  • Paolo Audisio
Original Paper


Euro-Mediterranean running water ecosystems represent a highly threatened habitat due to draining, construction, agriculture, eutrophication, pollution and climate changes. Thereby, the associated biodiversity is often more threatened compared to any other ecosystem and the identification of biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for running water fauna is therefore a primary target. Here we focused on invertebrates, as important indicators of ecosystem functions, modelling a lineage of water beetles and investigating the conservation status of Euro-Mediterranean headwater ecosystems. We selected the “Haenydra” lineage (Hydraenidae, genus Hydraena) as representative taxon (92 species overall, known to occur from Iberian Peninsula to W Iran), analysing a geographic database including literature, field-collecting and Museums data in order to map the distribution of biodiversity hotspots in Euro-Mediterranean headwater systems and locate the running water sites potentially important for invertebrates conservation. We hence assessed the conservation priorities assigning IUCN threat Categories—following IUCN guidelines—to all the species of the lineage, together with a herein introduced Conservation Score (CS) computed using a procedure tailored specifically for water beetles, also analysing historical series. We found that threatened categories (VU or higher), with high CSs, should be assigned to >70 % of the species, suggesting that, considering this lineage a representative model, the headwaters conservation status in Euro-Mediterranean areas is alarming. Cantabria, Pyrenees, Alps and Central Apennines were identified as biodiversity hotspots, whereas the combination of IUCN categories and CSs revealed that the areas with highest conservation concern are distributed in W-Alps, E-Alps, Apennines, Central Spain, Greece and N-Turkey. Our analyses suggested a dramatic worsening of running water ecosystems in several Mediterranean regions and in particular in Italy, Greece and Turkey. The comparison between the IUCN categories and the newly introduced CSs evidenced the importance of taking into account the ecological, hydro-geological and historical features when assessing conservation strategies for running water organisms.


Hotspots distribution Freshwater biodiversity Conservation scores Hydraenidae IUCN threat categories 



We are indebted to Lucilla Carnevali (Rome, Italy) for preliminary georeferentiation of many “Haenydra” localities and Stefano De Felici (Rome, Italy) for preliminary analyses and suggestions. We thank Ignacio Ribera (Barcelona, Spain) for suggestions and for providing information about Iberian “Haenydra”. We are grateful to all water beetle specialists that shared ecological and distributional data on “Haenydra” species, and in particular M. Jäch (NMW, Wien, Austria), J.A. Delgado (Murcia, Spain), L.F. Valladares (Leon, Spain), D. Bilton (Plymouth, UK), J.A. Díaz (Santiago de Compostela, Spain), J. Garrido (Vigo, Spain), C.E. Sainz Cantero (Granada, Spain) and F. Angelini (Francavilla Fontana, Brindisi, Italy). A special thank to our friend and colleague Giorgio Ferro (Treviso, Italy), recently passed away. We thank all the curators of all the museums visited by PA and MT and all the colleagues helping us in collecting beetles (Appendix S2) and especially Alessio De Biase (Rome, Italy). Thanks to two anonymous reviewers for suggestions and criticisms to early version of the manuscript. A visit of the first author to the NMW was supported by Synthesys (Application AT–TAF–53).

Supplementary material

10531_2014_798_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (120 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 119 kb)
10531_2014_798_MOESM2_ESM.xls (54 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLS 54 kb)
10531_2014_798_MOESM3_ESM.xls (646 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLS 646 kb)
10531_2014_798_MOESM4_ESM.xls (166 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLS 166 kb)
10531_2014_798_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (62 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 61 kb)


  1. Abellán P, Sánchez-Fernández D, Velasco J, Millán A (2005a) Assessing conservation priorities for insects: status of water beetles in southeast Spain. Biol Conserv 121(1):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abellán P, Sànchez-Fernández D, Velasco J, Millán A (2005b) Conservation of freshwater biodiversity: a comparison of different area selection methods. Biodiv Conserv 14(14):3457–3474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abellán P, Sánchez-Fernàndez D, Velasco J, Millán A (2007) Effectiveness of protected area networks in representing freshwater biodiversity: the case of a Mediterranean river basin (south-eastern Spain). Aquatic Conserv 17:361–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abellán P, Sánchez-Fernández D, Picazo F, Millán A, Lobo JM, Ribera I (2013) Preserving the evolutionary history of freshwater biota in Iberian National Parks. Biol Conserv 162:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alofs KM, Liverpool EA, Taphorn DC, Bernard CR, López-Fernández H (2014) Mind the (information) gap: the importance of exploration and discovery for assessing conservation priorities for freshwater fish. Divers Distrib 20:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson DJ, Vondracek B (1999) Insects as indicators of land use in three ecoregions in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 19:648–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audisio P (2013) Quante sono e dove sono le specie in Italia. Lecture 22. In: Primack R & Boitani L (eds) Biologia della Conservazione Zanichelli ed, Bologna,p 38–39Google Scholar
  8. Audisio P, Trizzino M, De Biase A, Mancini E, Antonini G (2009) A new species of Hydraena (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) of the H evanescens complex from Sardinia. Zootaxa 2318:281–289Google Scholar
  9. Audisio P, Alonzo-Zarazaga MA, Slipinski A, Nilsson A, Jelínek J, Vigna Taglianti A, Turco F, Otero C, Canepari C, Kral D, Liberti G, Sama G, Nardi GL, Loebl I, Horak J, Kolibac J, Hava J, Sapiejewski M, Jäch M, Bologna MA, Biondi M, Nikitsky NB, Mazzoldi P, Zahradnik P, Wegrzynowicz P, Constantin R, Gerstmeier R, Zhantiev R, Fattorini S, Tomaszewska W, Rucker WH, Vazquez-Albalate X, Cassola F, Angelini F, Johnson C, Schawaller W, Regalin R, Baviera C, Rocchi S, Cianferoni F, Beenen R, Schmitt M, Sassi D, Kippenberg H, Zampetti MF, Trizzino M, Chiari S, Carpaneto GM, de Yong Y (2014) Fauna Europaea—Coleoptera 2 (excl. Elateriformia, Scarabaeiformia, Staphyliniformia). Biodiversity Data Journal, in pressGoogle Scholar
  10. Baldari F, Audisio P, Belfiore C (1983) Dati sugli insetti bentonici dei fiumi Salinello e Tordino (Abruzzo, Teramo). Atti XII Congr Naz Ital Entomol Roma 2:139–153Google Scholar
  11. Baldi A (2003) Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Cole-optera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic Appl Ecol 4:589–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balint M, Domisch S, Engelhardt CHM, Haase S, Lehrian J, Sauer K, Theissinger S, Pauls U, Nowak C (2011) Cryptic biodiversity loss linked to global climate change. Nature Clim Change 1:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Batzer DP, Wissinger SA (1996) Ecology of insect communities in nontidal wetlands. Annu Rev Entomol 41:75–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Batzer DP, Rader RB, Wissinger SA (1999) Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North America: ecology and Management. Wiley, New York, p 1120Google Scholar
  15. Bennas N, Sánchez-Fernández D, Abellán P, Millán A (2009) Analysis of the vulnerability of the aquatic beetles in the south mediterranean side: the case of the rif region (Morocco). Ann Soc Entomol France 45(3):309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bilton D (2013) Hydraena lotti sp. nov., a new member of the “Haenydra” lineage from the Peloponnese (Greece), with additional records of Hydraena species in the region (Coleoptera, Hydraenidae). Zootaxa 3637(1):029–038Google Scholar
  17. Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomez-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R, Second edition. Springer, NY http://www.asdar-bookorg/
  18. Cardoso P, Borges PAV, Triantis KA, Ferrández MA, Martín JL (2011) Adapting the IUCN Red List criteria for invertebrates. Biol Conserv 144:2432–2440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cianfrani C, Le Laya G, Maiorano L, Satizábalc HF, Loyd A, Guisana A (2011) Adapting global conservation strategies to climate change at the European scale: the otter as a flagship species. Biol Conserv 144:2068–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Compin A, Céréghino R (2003) Sensitivity of aquatic insect species richness to disturbance in the Adour-Garonne stream system (France). Ecol Indic 3:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. D’Amen M, Pietrangeli B, Bologna MA (2010) Human-provoked amphibian decline in central Italy and the efficacy of protected areas. Wildlife Res 37:447–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies N, Gramotnev G, Seabrook L, Bradley A, Baxter G, Rhodes J, Lunney D, McAlpine C (2013) Movement patterns of an arboreal marsupial at the edge of its range: a case study of the koala. Mov Ecol 1(8):1–15Google Scholar
  23. de Szalay FA, Resh VH (1997) Responses of wetland invertebrates and plants important in waterfowl diets to burning and mowing of emergent vegetation. Wetlands 17:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Domisch S, Jähnig SC, Haase P (2011) Climate-change winners and loosers: stream macroinvertebrates of a submontane region in Central Europe. Freshw Biol 56:2009–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Domisch S, Araújo MB, Bonada N, Pauls SU, Jähnig SC, Haase P (2013) Modelling distribution in european stream macroinvertebrates under future climates. Global Change Biol 19:752–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elliott JM, Humpesch UH (2010) Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera) of Britain and Ireland: keys and a review of their ecology. Freshawater Biological Association Scientific Publications, Ambleside, p 152Google Scholar
  27. Euliss NH, Jarvis RL, Gilmer DS (1991) Feeding ecology of waterfowl wintering on evaporation ponds in California. Condor 93:582–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fattorini S (2014) Relations between species rarity, vulnerability, and range contraction for a beetle group in a densely populated region in the Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot. Conserv Biol 28(1):169–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fontaine B, van Achterberg K, Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Araujo R, Aspöck H, Aspöck U, Audisio P, Aukema B, Bailly N, Balsamo M, Bank RA, Belfiore C, Bogdanowicz W, Boxshall G, Burckhardt D, Deharveng L, Dubois A, Enghoff H, Fochetti R, Fontaine C, Gargominy O, Gomez Lopez MS, Goujet D, Harvey MS, Heller KG, van Helsdingen P, Hoch H, de Jong Y, Karsholt O, Los W, Magowski W, Massard JA, Mcinnes SJ, Mendes LF, Mey E, Michelsen V, Minelli A, Nieto Nafria JM, van Nieukerken EJ, Pape T, de Prins W, Ramos M, Ricci C, Roselaar C, Rota E, Segers H, Timm T, van Tol J, Bouchet P (2012) New species in the old world: Europe as a frontier in biodiversity exploration, a test bed for twenty first century taxonomy. PLoS Biol 7(5):e36881Google Scholar
  30. Fortin MJ, Keitt TH, Maurer BA, Taper ML, Kaufman DM, Blackburn TM (2005) Species’ geographic ranges and distributional limits: pattern analysis and statistical issues. Oikos 108:7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaston KJ (1994) Measuring geographic range sizes. Ecography 17(2):198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2009) The sizes of species’ geographic ranges. J Appl Ecol 46:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gove AD, Dunn RR, Majer JD (2008) The importance of species range attributes and reserve configuration for the conservation of angiosperm diversity in Western Australia. Biodiv Conserv 17:817–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1968) The variation of drainage density within a catchment. Hydrol Sci J 13(2):61–68Google Scholar
  35. Haidekker A, Hering D (2008) Relationship between benthic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera) and temperature in small and medium-sized streams in Germany: a multivariate study. Aquat Ecol 42:463–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heiner M, Higgins J, Li X, Baker B (2011) Identifying freshwater conservation priorities in the Upper Yangtze River Basin. Freshw Biol 56:89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J (2013) Dismo: species distribution modeling R package version 08-11. http://www.CRANR-projectorg/package=dismo
  38. Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hynes HBN (1976) Biology of Plecoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 21:135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Inclán DJ, Cerretti P, Marini L (2014) Interactive effects of area and connectivity on the diversity of tachinid parasitoids in highly fragmented landscapes. Landsc Ecol 29(5):879–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jäch MA (1992) New and little known Palearctic species of the genus Hydraena (sl) Kugelann (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Koleopter Rundschau 62:77–125Google Scholar
  42. Jäch MA (2004) Hydraenidae. In: Löbl I, Smetana A (eds) Catalogue of palaearctic coleoptera volume 2: Hydrophiloidea—Histeroidea—Staphylinoidea. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, pp 102–122Google Scholar
  43. Jäch MA, Díaz JA (2012) New and little known Palearctic species of the genus Hydraena (sl) Kugelann. Descriptions of four new species from southern Europe and taxonomic review of the H subintegra species complex (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Koleopter Rundschau 82:95–113Google Scholar
  44. Keiper JB, Walton WE, Foote BA (2002) Biology and ecology of higher Diptera from freshwater wetlands. Annual Rev Entomol 47:207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keith P, Marion L (2002) Methodology for drawing up a Red List of threatened freshwater fish in France. Aquatic Conserv 12:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kostoski G, Albrecht C, Trajanovski S, Wilke T (2010) A freshwater biodiversity hotspot under pressure—assessing threats and identifying conservation needs for ancient Lake Ohrid. Biogeosci Discuss 7:5347–5382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Landolt P, Sartori M (eds) (1997) Ephemeroptera and plecoptera: biology-ecology-systematics. Musée Cantonal de Zoologie, Lausanne, p 569Google Scholar
  48. Leira M, Dalton C, Chen G, Irvine K, Taylor D (2009) Patterns in freshwater diatom taxonomic distinctness along an eutrophication gradient. Freshw Biol 54:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Linke S, Turak E, Nel J (2011) Freshwater conservation planning: the case for systematic approaches. Freshw Biol 56:6–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Millán A, Moreno JL, Velasco J (2002) Estudio faunístico y ecológico de los coleópteros y eterópteros acuáticos y semiacuáticos de la provincia de Albacete. Instituto de Estudios Albacetenses, AlbaceteGoogle Scholar
  51. Minelli A, Ruffo S, La Posta S (1993–1995) Checklist delle specie della fauna italiana. Fascicoli 1–110, Edizioni Calderini, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  52. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands. Wiley, New York 920 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. National Research Council (NRC) (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, p 552Google Scholar
  54. Nijboer RC, Johnson RK, Verdonschot PFM, Sommerhouses M, Buffagni A (2004) Establishing reference conditions for European streams. Hydrobiologia 516:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pearson DL (1994) Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Phil Trans Royal Soc London B 345:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pebesma EJ, Bivand RS (2005) Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5 (2), http://www.cranr-projectorg/doc/Rnews/
  57. Picazo FJ, Moreno L, Millàn A (2010) The contribution of standing waters to aquatic biodiversity: the case of water beetles in southeastern Iberia. Aquatic Ecol 44:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pullin AS (2002) Conservation biology. University Press, Cambridge 355 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. QGIS Development Team (2014) QGIS geographic information system. Open source geospatial foundation project. http://www.qgisosgeoorg
  60. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria URL http://www.R-projectorg/
  61. Reaka-Kudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO (1997) Biodiversity II: understanding and protecting our biological resources. Joseph Henry Press, Washington 560 ppGoogle Scholar
  62. Revenga C, Brunner J, Henninger N, Kassem K, Payne R (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: freshwater systems. Published by World Resources Institute, Washington, p 78Google Scholar
  63. Ribera I (2000) Biogeography and conservation of Iberian water beetles. Biol Conserv 92:131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ribera I, Hernando C, Aguilera P (1998) An annotated checklist of the Iberian water beetles (Coleoptera). Zapateri 8:43–111Google Scholar
  65. Ribera I, Castro A, Díaz JA, Garrido J, Izquierdo A, Jäch MA, Valladares LF (2011) The geography of speciation in narrow endemics of the “Haenydra” lineage (Coleoptera, Hydraenidae, Hydraena). J Biogeogr 38(3):502–516Google Scholar
  66. Rodriguez JP, Rodriguez-Clark K, Baillie JE, Ash N, Benson J, Boucher T, Brown C, Burgess ND, Collen B, Jennings M, Keith DA, Nicholson E, Revenga C, Reyers B, Rouget M, Smith T, Spalding M, Taber A, Walpole M, Zager I, Zamin T (2011) Establishing IUCN red list criteria for threatened ecosystems. Conserv Biol 25:21–29PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sánchez-Fernández D, Abellán P, Mellado A, Velasco J, Millán A (2006) Are water beetles good indicators of biodiversity in Mediterranean aquatic ecosystems? The case of the Segura river basin (SE Spain). Biodiv Conserv 15:4507–4520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sánchez-Fernández D, Bilton DT, Abellán P, Ribera I, Velasco J, Millán A (2008a) Are the endemic water beetles of the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands effectively protected? Biol Cons 141:1612–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sánchez-Fernández D, Lobo JM, Abellán P, Ribera I, Millán A (2008b) Bias in freshwater biodiversity sampling: the case of Iberian water beetles. Divers Distrib 14:754–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Santoul F, Figuerola J, Mastrorillo S, Céréghino R (2005) Patterns of rare fish and aquatic insects in a southwestern French river catchment in relation to simple physical variables. Ecography 28:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sauer J, Domisch S, Nowak C, Haase P (2011) Low mountain ranges: summit traps for montane freshwater species under climate change. Biodiv Conserv 20:3133–3146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saunders D, Meeuwig J, Vincent AJ (2002) Freshwater protected areas: strategies for conservation. Conserv Biol 16:30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Silveri L (2008) Plecoptera in Trentino: distribution and ecology. PhD Dissertation, Parma UniversityGoogle Scholar
  74. Sondergaard M, Jeppesen E (2007) Anthropogenic impacts on lake and stream ecosystems, and approaches to restoration. J Appl Ecol 44:1089–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Standards and Petitions Working Group (2014) Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria version 11. Prepared by the standards and petitions working group of the IUCN SSC biodiversity assessments sub-committee in February 2014Google Scholar
  76. Stanković VM, Jäch MA (2012) Description of a new species of the “Haenydra” lineage (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) from the Republic of Macedonia. Zootaxa 3503:82–88Google Scholar
  77. Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, Snoo GR, Eden P (2001) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manag 29:337–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stoch F (2000) How many endemic species? Species richness assessment and conservation priorities in Italy. Belgian J Entomol 2:125–133Google Scholar
  79. Tierno de Figueroa JM, Lopez-Rodrıguez MJ, Fenoglio S, Sanchez-Castillo P, Fochetti R (2013) Freshwater biodiversity in the rivers of the Mediterranean Basin. Hydrobiologia 719:137–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tilman D, Naeem S, Knops J, Reich P, Siemann E, Wedin D, Ritchie M, Lawton J (1997) Biodiversity and ecosystem properties. Science 278:1866–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trizzino M, Audisio P, Antonini G, Mancini E, Ribera I (2011a) Molecular phylogeny and diversification of the “Haenydra” lineage (Hydraenidae, genus Hydraena) a north-Mediterranean endemic-rich group of rheophilic Coleoptera. Mol Phyl Evol 61:772–783Google Scholar
  82. Trizzino M, Jäch MA, Audisio PA, Ribera I (2011b) Molecular and morphological analyses reveal two new species of the Hydraena saga–emarginata complex (Coleoptera Hydraenidae, Hydraeninae) from Spain and France. Zootaxa 2760:29–38Google Scholar
  83. Trizzino M, Valladares LF, Garrido J, Audisio P (2012) Morphological reply to a DNA call: a new cryptic species of Hydraena from Western Europe, with a complete overview of the H gracilis complex (Coleoptera, Hydraenidae, ”Haenydra“ lineage). J Nat Hist 46:1065–1078Google Scholar
  84. Trizzino M, Jäch MA, Audisio P, Alonso R, Ribera I (2013a) A molecular phylogeny of the cosmopolitan hyperdiverse genus Hydraena (Coleoptera, Hydraenidae). Syst Entomol 38(1):192–208Google Scholar
  85. Trizzino M, Carnevali L, De Felici S, Audisio P (2013b) A revision of the Hydraena species of the “Haenydra” lineage. Zootaxa 3607(1):1–173Google Scholar
  86. Tucker GE, Bras RL (1998) Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology. Water Resour Res 12:2751–2764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Waldron JL, Bennett SH, Welch SM, Dorcas ME, Lanham JD, Kalinowsky W (2006) Habitat specificity and home-range size as attributes of species vulnerability to extinction: a case study using sympatric rattlesnakes. Anim Conserv 9:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Trizzino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francesco Bisi
    • 2
  • Luigi Maiorano
    • 3
  • Adriano Martinoli
    • 2
  • Marco Petitta
    • 4
  • Damiano G. Preatoni
    • 2
  • Paolo Audisio
    • 3
  1. 1.Istituto OikosConservazione delle Risorse Naturali e Sviluppo SostenibileMilanItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze Teoriche e ApplicateUniversità dell’InsubriaVareseItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “C. Darwin”Sapienza Università degli Studi di RomaRomeItaly
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Scienze della TerraSapienza Università degli Studi di RomaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations