Abstract
North western Argentina, the southernmost portion of the tropical Andes, contains one of the main areas of endemism within the Southern Cone, as well as one of the main diversity hotspots of the country. Historically its reserve area systems have been located in the richest ecoregion of the area; the Southern Andean Yungas. We evaluated the effectiveness of the current protected areas in preserving the endemic flora of the region. The distributions of 505 endemic species were either modeled or included as observed data to determine endemism hotspots in each ecoregion. The endemic species were mainly found in arid ecoregions such as the High Monte and the Central Andean Puna, as well as in the transition zones between these regions and the Southern Andean Yungas. We found that more than 1/3 of the endemic species are unprotected in their entire ranges by the current system, while nearly half of the species are protected in only 5 % of their distribution ranges. New priority areas were chosen to increase the effectiveness based on the irreplaceability concept. We show that adding 251 new cells of 100 km2 each would improve the protection values and convert the system to effective. The present paper highlights that priorities set on the basis of species richness may not successfully conserve areas of high plant endemism. However, zoologist would have to realize similar assessments in the endemic fauna in order to find the optimal designed of protected areas system to conserve both the endemic flora and fauna in the Southern Central Andes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aagesen L, Szumik CA, Zuloaga F, Morrone O (2009) Quantitative biogeography in the South America highlands-recognizing the Altoandina, Puna and Prepuna through the study of Poaceae. Cladistics 25:295–310
Aagesen L, Bena MJ, Nomdedeu S, Panizza A, López R, Zuloaga F (2012) Areas of endemism in the Southern Central Andes. Darwiniana 50:218–251
Administracion de Parques Nacionales (APN) (2007) Sistema de Información de Biodiversidad. (http://www.sib.gov.ar). Accessed Apr 2012
Antonelli A, Nylander JAA, Persson C, Sanmartin I (2009) Tracing the impact of the Andean uplift on Neotropical plant evolution. PNAS 106:9749–9754
Benoit I (1996) Representación ecológica del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Silvestres Protegidas del Estado. In: Muñoz M, Nuñez H, Yañez J (eds) Libro rojo de los sitios prioritarios para la conservación de la diversidad biológica en Chile. Santiago
Bianchi AR, Yañez CE (1992) Las precipitaciones en el noroeste argentino. INTA, Salta
Birch CPD, Oom SP, Beecham JA (2007) Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology. Ecol Model 206:347–359
Cabrera AL (1976) Regiones Fitogeográficas Argentinas. In: Kugler WF (ed) Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería, Buenos Aires
Carvalho SB, Brito JC, Pressey RL, Crespo E, Possingham HP (2010) Simulating the effects of using different types of species distribution data in reserve selection. Biol Conserv 143:426–438
Cowling R (2001) Endemism. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, vol. 2. Academic Press, San Diego
Diaz-Gomez JM (2007) Endemism in liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the Argentinian Puna. South Am J Herpetol 2:59–68
Donato M, Posadas P, Miranda-Esquivel DR, Jaureguizar EO, Cladera G (2003) Historical biogeography of the Andean region: evidence from listroderina (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Rhytirrhinini) in the context of the South American geobiotic scenario. Biol J Linnean Soc 80:339–352
Elith J et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions form occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151
Ezcurra E (2006) Natural history and evolution of the world’s deserts. In: Ezcurra E (ed) Global deserts outlook. UNEP, Denmark, pp 2–26
Game ET, Grantham HS (2008) Marxan user manual: for marxan version 1.8.10. Univ. of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, and Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association, Vancouver. (http://www.uq.edu.au/marxan/index.html)
Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London
Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2009) The sizes of species’ geographic ranges. J Applied Ecol 46:1–9
Gaston KJ, Rodrigues ASL, Van Rensburg BJ, Koleff P, Chown SL (2001) Complementary representation and zones of ecological transition. Ecol Lett 4:4–9
Gonzales JA (2009) Climatic change and other anthropogenic activities are affecting environmental services on the Argentina Northwest (ANW). Earth Environ Sci 6:1–2
Gonzáles JA (2005) Los ambientes naturales en áreas montañosas del Noroeste Argentino (NOA), su interrelación con países limítrofes, recuperación y conservación. In: Serie Conservación de la Naturaleza, No. 15. Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán
Grau RH, Gasparri IN, Aide MT (2005) Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of north-west Argentina. Environ Conserv 32:140–148
Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29:773–785
Hernández-Hernández T, Hernandez HM, De-Nova AJ, Puente R, Eguiarte L, Magallón S (2011) Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophyllales, Eudicotyledoneae). Am J Bot 98:44–61
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis, A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. (http://www.worldclim.org)
Ibisch PL, Beck SG, Gerkmann B, Carretero A (2003) Diversidad Biológica: Ecoregiones y ecosistemas. In: Ibisch P, Merida G (eds) Biodiversidad: La riqueza de Bolivia. Editorial FAN, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, pp 73–75
Izquierdo AE, Grau HR (2009) Agriculture adjustment, land-use transition and protected areas in Northwestern Argentina. J Environ Manage 90:858–865
Jennings MD (2000) Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landsc Ecol 15:5–20
Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ (2009) Maxent modelling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia. J Ecol and Nat Environ 1:94–98
Lamoreux JF, Morrison JC, Ricketts TH, Olson DM, Dinerstein E, McKnight MW (2006) Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature 440:212–214
Larrea-Alcázar DM, López RP, Quintanilla M, Vargas A (2010) Gap analysis of two savanna-type ecoregions: a two-scale floristic approach applied to the Llanos de Moxos and Beni Cerrado, Bolivia. Biodivers Conserv 19:1769–1783
Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28:385–393
López RP, Zambrana-Torrelio C (2006) Representation of Andean dry ecoregions in the protected areas of Bolivia: the situation in relation to the new phytogeographical findings. Biodivers Conserv 15:2163–2175
Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253
Minetti JL (2005) El clima del noroeste argentino. San Miguel de Tucumán, Magna, p 449
Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, Da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520
Mourelle C, Ezcurra E (1996) Species richness of Argentine cacti: a test of biogeographic hypotheses. J Veg Sci 7:667–680
Mourelle C, Ezcurra E (1997) Differentiation diversity of Argentine cacti and its relationship to environmental factors. J Veg Sci 8:547–558
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GBA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858
Navone S, Abraham E (2006) State and trends of the world’s deserts. In: Ezcurra E (ed) Global deserts outlook. UNEP, Denmark, pp 73–87
Nhancale BA, Smith RJ (2011) The influence of planning unit characteristics on the efficiency and spatial pattern of systematic conservation planning assessments. Biodivers Conserv 20:1821–1835
Olson DM et al (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the World: a new map of life on Earth. BioSci 51:933–938
Orme CDL et al (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019
Ortega-Baes P et al (2012) Intensive field surveys in conservation planning: priorities for cactus diversity in the Saltenian Calchaquíes Valleys (Argentina). J Arid Environ 82:91–97
Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT (2008) Modeling ecological niches and predicting geographic distributions: a test of six presence-only methods. Rev Mex de Biodivers 79:205–216
Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model 133:225–245
Pearson RG (2007) Species distribution modeling for conservation educators and practitioners. Synthesis, Am Museum Nat Hist. (http://ncep.amnh.org)
Peterson TA, Watson DM (1998) Problems with areal definitions of endemism: the effects of spatial scaling. Divers Distrib 4:189–194
Phillips S, Anderson R, Schapire R (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259
Reid WV (1998) Biodiversity hotspots. Trend Ecol Evol 13:275–280
Ricketts TH (2001) Aligning conservation goals: are patterns of species richness and endemism concordant at regional scales? Anim Biodivers Conserv 24:91–99
Rodrigues ASL et al (2004a) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643
Rodrigues ASL et al (2004b) Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. BioSci 54:1092–1100
Roig FA, Roig-Juñent S, Corbalán V (2009) Biogeography of the Monte Desert. J Arid Environ 73:164–172
Solano E, Feria PT (2007) Ecological niche modeling and geographic distribution of the genus Polianthes L. (Agavacea) in Mexico: using niche modeling to improve assessment of risk status. Biodiv Conserv 16:1885–1900
Swenson JJ et al (2012) Plant and animal endemism in the eastern Andean slope: challenges to conservation. BMC Ecol 12:1–18
Szumik C, Aagesen L, Casagranda D, Arzamendia V, Baldo D (2012) Detecting areas of endemism with a taxonomically diverse dataset: plants, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, birds and insects from Argentina. Cladistics 28:317–329
Villamil CB, De Villalobos AE, Scoffield RL (2009–2010) Plantas endémicas de Argentina. http://www.lista-planear.org. Accessed Jul–Jun 2012
Wieczorek J, Guo Q, Hijmans RJ (2004) The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculation associated uncertainty. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 18:745–767
Xu H, Wu J, Liu Y (2008) Biodiversity congruence and conservation strategies: a national test. BioSci 58:632–639
Young KR, Ulloa Ulloa C, Luteyn JL, Knapp S (2002) Plant evolution and endemism in Andean South America: an introduction. Bot Rev 68:4–21
Zuloaga FO, Morrone O, Rodriguez D (1999) Análisis de la biodiversidad en plantas vasculares de la Argentina. Kurtziana 27:17–167
Zuloaga FO, Morrone, O, Belgrano MJ (2008) Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Cono Sur. Monogr Syst Bot Missouri Bot Gard 107:609–967. (http://www2.darwin.edu.ar)
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Dr. Fernando O. Zuloaga for helpful discussions and observations on earlier versions of this paper. We furthermore thank the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas (CONICET) for provided financial support through a PhD grant for ACG-B. Finally to the Instituto de Botánica Darwinion (IBODA) for providing the software and place to develop the corresponding research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Appendix Table 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godoy-Bürki, A.C., Ortega-Baes, P., Sajama, J.M. et al. Conservation priorities in the Southern Central Andes: mismatch between endemism and diversity hotspots in the regional flora. Biodivers Conserv 23, 81–107 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0586-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0586-1