Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1589–1606 | Cite as

Subpopulation range estimation for conservation planning: a case study of the critically endangered Cross River gorilla

  • Sarah C. Sawyer
Original Paper


Measuring and characterizing the area utilized by a population or species is essential for assessment of conservation status and for effective allocation of habitat to ensure population persistence. Yet population-level range delineation is complicated by the variety of available techniques coupled with a lack of empirical methods to compare the relative value of these techniques. This study assesses the effect of model choice on resulting subpopulation range estimation for the critically endangered and patchily distributed Cross River gorilla, and evaluates the conservation conclusions that can be drawn from each model. Models considered range from basic traditional approaches (e.g. minimum convex polygon) to newer home range techniques such as local convex hull (LoCoH). Overlap analysis comparing sub-sampled to complete data sets are used to evaluate the robustness of various modeling techniques to data limitations. Likelihood cross validation criterion is employed to compare core range model performance. Results suggest that differing LoCoH models produce similar range estimates, are robust to data requirements, provide a good fit for core habitat estimation, and are best able to detect unused habitat within the subpopulation range. LoCoH methods may thus be useful for studies into habitat selection and factors limiting endangered species distributions. However, LoCoH models tend to over-fit data, and kernel methods may provide similar information about animal space use while supporting protection of larger swaths of critical habitat. Subpopulation range analyses for conservation/management planning should therefore explore multiple modeling techniques, and employ both qualitative and quantitative assessments to select the best models to inform decision making for species of conservation concern.


Conservation planning Cross River gorilla Cross validation criterion Home range analysis Local convex hull 



Financial support for this project was provided by United States Fish and Wildlife Service and two grants from the Rocca scholars program (UC Berkeley). Logistical support was generously provided by The Wildlife Conservation Society, Cameroon and the North Carolina Zoo. The author was supported by a Chancellor’s fellowship from the University of California, Berkeley. A debt of gratitude is owed particularly to Justin Brashares, Aaron Nicholas, Ymke Warren, Richard Bergl, Okon Felix, Eyong Pius, the WCS Limbe staff, the Brashares lab group, and the village of Nga for all of their support. Thanks also to Wayne Getz and two anonymous reviewers for aid in improving the manuscript. This research was conducted with the permission of the Ministry of Forests and Wildlife and the Ministry of Scientific and Technical Research.


  1. Akaike H (1973) Maximum likelihood identification of gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika 60:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asaha S, Fru M (2005) Socio-economic survey of livelihood activities of the communities in and around the Mone Forest Reserve and the Mbulu forest area, South West Province of Cameroon. A consultancy report for the Wildlife Conservation Society/Cameroon–Nigeria Transboundary ProjectGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergl RA, Vigilant L (2007) Genetic analysis reveals population structure and recent migration within the highly fragmented range of the Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli). Mol Ecol 16:501–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergl RA, Bradleys BJ, Nsubuga A, Vigilant L (2008) Effects of habitat fragmentation, population size and demographic history on genetic diversity: the Cross River gorilla in a comparative context. Am J Primatol 70(9):848–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergl RA, Warren Y, Nicholas A, Dunn A, Imong I, Sunderland-Groves JL, Oates JF (2011) Remote sensing analysis reveals habitat, dispersal corridors and expanded distribution for the Critically Endangered Cross River gorilla, Gorilla gorilla diehli. Oryx. doi: 10.1017/S0030605310001857
  6. Bermejo M (2004) Home-range use and intergroup encounters in western gorillas (Gorilla g. gorilla) at Lossi forest, north Congo. Am J Primatol 64:223–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biebouw K (2009) Home range size and use in Allocebus trichotis in Analamazaotra Special Reserve, central eastern Madagascar. Int J Primatol 30:367–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borger L, Franconi N, De Michele G, Gantz A, Meschi F, Manica A, Lovari S, Coulson T (2006) Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. J Anim Ecol 75:1393–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulanger JG, White GC (1990) A comparison of home-range estimators using Monte-Carlo simulation. J Wildl Manag 54:310–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyle SA, Lourenco WC, da Silva LR, Smith AT (2009) Home range estimates vary with sample size and methods. Folia Primatol 80:33–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burgman MA, Fox JC (2003) Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Anim Conserv 6:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burt WH (1943) Territorially and homo range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal Baltimoro 24:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldecott J, Ferriss S, Miles L (2005) Gorilla overview. World atlas of great apes and their conservation, pp 97–104Google Scholar
  14. Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cipolletta C (2004) Effects of group dynamics and diet on the ranging patterns of a Western Gorilla group (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at Bai Hokou, Central African Republic. Am J Primatol 65:192–205Google Scholar
  16. De Solla SR, Bonduriansky R, Brooks RJ (1999) Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. J Anim Ecol 68:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Vere RA, Warren Y, Nicholas A, Mackenzie ME, Higham JP (2011) Nest site ecology of the Cross River gorilla at the Kagwene Gorilla Sanctuary, Cameroon, with special reference to anthropogenic Influence. Am J Primatol 73(3):253–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doran DM, McNeilage A, Greer D, Bocian C, Mehlman P, Shah N (2002) Western lowland gorilla diet and resource availability: new evidence, cross-site comparisons, and reflections on indirect sampling methods. Am J Primatol 58(3):91–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doran-Sheehy DM, Greer D, Mongo P, Schwindt D (2004) Impact of ecological and social factors on ranging in Western Gorillas. Am J Primatol 64:207–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fieberg J (2007) Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. Ecology 88:1059–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forboseh PF, Eno-Nku M, Sunderland TCH (2007) Priority setting for conservation in south-west Cameroon based on large mammal surveys. Oryx 41:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ganas J, Ortmann S, Robbins MM (2008) Food preferences of wild mountain gorillas. Am J Primatol 70(10):927–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geisser S (1975) The predictive sample reuse method with applications. J Am Stat Assoc 70:320–328Google Scholar
  24. Getz WM, Wilmers CC (2004) A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions. Ecography 27:489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Getz WM, Fortmann-Roe S, Cross PC, Lyons AJ, Ryan SJ, Wilmers CC (2007) LoCoH: nonparameteric kernel methods for constructing home ranges and utilization distributions. PLoS ONE 2:e207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldsmith ML (1999) Ecological constraints on the foraging effort of Western Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at Bai Hokou, Central African Republic. Int J Primatol 20:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grueter CC, Li D, Ren B, Wei F (2009) Choice of analytical method can have dramatic effects on primate home range estimates. Primates 50:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris S, Cresswell WJ, Forde PG, Trewhella WJ, Woollard T, Wray S (1990) Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data—a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Rev 20:97–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris GM, Russell GJ, van Aarde RI, Pimm SL (2008) Rules of habitat use by elephants Loxodonta africana in southern Africa: insights for regional management. Oryx 42:66–75Google Scholar
  30. Hayward MW, Hayward GJ, Druce DJ, Kerley GIH (2009) Do fences constrain predator movements on an evolutionary scale? Home range, food intake and movement patterns of large predators reintroduced to Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 18:887–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hemson G, Johnson P, South A, Kenward R, Ripley R, Macdonald D (2005) Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home-range analyses with least-squares cross-validation. J Anim Ecol 74:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodgson JA, Thomas CD, Wintle BA, Moilanen A (2009) Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics. J Appl Ecol 46:964–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horne JS, Garton EO (2006a) Selecting the best home range model: an information-theoretic approach. Ecology 87:1146–1152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horne JS, Garton EO (2006b) Likelihood cross-validation versus least squares cross-validation for choosing the smoothing parameter in kernel home-range analysis. J Wildl Manag 70:641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horne JS, Garton EO, Rachlow JL (2008) A synoptic model of animal space use: simultaneous estimation of home range, habitat selection, and inter/intra-specific relationships. Ecol Model 214:338–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. IUCN (2001) IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN, Gland, ii + 20 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kenward RE, Clarke RT, Hodder KH, Walls SS (2001) Density and linkage estimators of home range: nearest-neighbor clustering defines multinuclear cores. Ecology 82:1905–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuhl H, Maisels F, Ancrenaz M, Williamson EA (2008) Best practice guidelines for surveys and monitoring of great ape populations. Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission 36, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  40. Laver PN, Kelly MJ (2008) A critical review of home range studies. J Wildl Manag 72:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lawson EJG, Rogers AR (1997) Differences in home-range size computed in commonly used software programs. Wildl Soc Bull 25:721–729Google Scholar
  42. Lira PK, dos Santos F, Fernando A (2009) A comparison of trapping- and radiotelemetry-based estimates of home range of the neotropical opossum Philander frenatus. Mammalian Biol 74:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martinez-Meyer E, Peterson AT, Servin JI, Kiff LF (2006) Ecological niche modeling and prioritizing areas for species reintroductions. Oryx 40:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McFarland KL (2007) Ecology of Cross River gorillas (Gorilla gorilla diehli) on Afi Mountain, Cross River State, Nigeria. PhD thesis, City University of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. McNeilage A, Robbins MM, Gray M, Olupot W, Babaasa D, Bitariho R, Kasangaki A, Rainer H, Asuma S, Mugiri G, Baker J (2006) Census of the mountain gorilla Gorilla beringei beringei population in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Oryx 40:419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Millspaugh JJ, Nielson RM, McDonald L, Marzluff JM, Gitzen RA, Rittenhouse CD, Hubbard HW, Sheriff SL (2006) Analysis of resource selection using utilization distributions. J Wildl Manag 70:384–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nilsen EB, Pedersen S, Linnell JDC (2008) Can minimum convex polygon home ranges be used to draw biologically meaningful conclusions? Ecol Res 23:635–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nku EM (2004) Assessment of large and medium size mammals of the Mone River Forest Reserve, South West Province, Cameroon. Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Cameroon–Nigeria Transboundary Surveys Project Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  49. Oates JF, McFarland KL, Groves JL, Bergl RA, Linder JM, Disotell TR (2003) The Cross River gorilla: natural history and status of a neglected and critically endangered subspecies. In: Taylor AB, Goldsmith ML (eds) Cambridge studies in biological and evolutionary anthropology, vol 35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 472–497Google Scholar
  50. Oates J, Sunderland-Groves J, Bergl R, Dunn A, Nicholas A, Takang E, Omeni F, Imong I, Fotso R, Nkembi L et al (2007) Regional action plan for the conservation of the Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli). Regional action plan for the conservation of the Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli)Google Scholar
  51. Pimley ER, Bearder SK, Dixson AF (2005) Home range analysis of Perodicticus potto edwardsi and Sciurocheirus cameronensis. Int J Primatol 26:191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  53. Riley SPD, Sauvajot RM, Fuller TK, York EC, Kamradt DA, Bromley C, Wayne RK (2003) Effects of urbanization and habitat fragmentation on bobcats and coyotes in southern California. Conserv Biol 17:566–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robbins MM, McNeilage A (2003) Home range and frugivory patterns of mountain gorillas in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, uganda. Int J Primatol 24:467–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rogers ME, Abernethy K, Bermejo M, Cipolletta C, Doran D, McFarland K, Nishihara T, Remis M, Tutin CEG (2004) Western gorilla diet: a synthesis from six sites. Am J Primatol 64(2):173–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryan SJ, Knechtel CU, Getz WM (2006) Range and habitat selection of African buffalo in South Africa. J Wildl Manag 70:764–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sarmiento EE (2003) The Cross River gorilla: the most endangered gorilla subspecies. Primate Conserv 19:65–72Google Scholar
  58. Schaller GB (1963) The mountain gorilla: ecology and behaviour. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  59. Schoener TW (1968) Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49:123Google Scholar
  60. Seaman DE, Powell RA (1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77:2075–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ, Gitzen RA (1999) Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J Wildl Manag 63:739–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sekercioglu CH, Loarie SR, Brenes FO, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2007) Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conserv Biol 21:482–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Silverman BW (1982) Kernel density-estimation using the fast Fourier-transform. Appl Stat 31:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stone M (1974) Cross-validation and multinomial prediction. Biometrika 61:509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sunderland-Groves JL, Ekinde A, Mboh H (2009) Nesting behavior of Gorilla gorilla diehli at Kagwene Mountain, Cameroon: implications for assessing group size and density. Int J Primatol 30(2):253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swihart RK, Slade NA (1985) Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home-range size. J Wildl Manag 49(4):1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Trovati RG, de Brito BA, Duarte JMB (2010) Habitat use and home range of brown-nosed coati, Nasua nasua (Carnivor: Procyonidae) in the Brazilian Cerrado biome. Revista de biología tropical 58:1069–1077PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Winkle W (1975) Comparison of several probabilistic home range models. J Wildl Manag 39:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williamson EA (1988) Behavioural ecology of western lowland gorillas in Gabon. PhD thesis, University of StirlingGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilson RR, Hooten MB, Strobel BN, Shivik JS (2010) Accounting for individuals, uncertainty, and multiscale clustering in core area estimation. J Wildl Manag 74:1343–1352Google Scholar
  71. Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Worton BJ (1995) Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. J Wildl Manag 59:794–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Policy and ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations