Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 531–541 | Cite as

Effects of habitat fragmentation on the movement patterns and dispersal ability of the brown spiny rat (Maxomys rajah) in the Planted Forest Zone of Sarawak, Eastern Malaysia

Original Paper


Brown spiny rats (Maxomys rajah) were translocated from continuous secondary forest to small isolated patches of remnant native forest embedded within Acacia mangium plantation in the Planted Forest Zone of Sarawak, East Malaysia, and fitted with tracking spools to monitor behaviours in novel environments and to record responses to a range of habitat edge features. Forest roads, large clearings and acacia plantation compartments were found to pose barriers to dispersal of brown spiny rats over short temporal scales, whereas old regenerating haul trails were readily crossed on 50% of the encounters. Downed woody debris accounted for a greater proportion of the travel route compared with brown spiny rats tracked in secondary and primary forest in Sabah, which may represent heightened predator avoidance in new environments. Provision of downed woody debris within plantation compartments may improve the dispersal ability of brown spiny rats in this modified landscape, and thus promote metapopulation dynamics and colonisation of vacant habitat patches.


Brown spiny rat Maxomys rajah Spool and line Acacia mangium Habitat fragmentation Translocation Reintroduction Planted forests Sarawak 



Much thanks to Wayne Wooff and the management of Grand Perfect Conservation (GP Con) for allowing us the opportunity to work with them and their team in the Planted Forest Zone, for organizing the field expeditions, and for all the invaluable information and advice offered. We also wish to thank the GP Con team and all of the field staff for their hard work and patience in the field. Thanks also go to the Sarawak Timber Association (STA), and particularly to Barney Chan and Peter Kho for their parts in giving us the opportunity to carry out research work in Sarawak, and especially for their continued support and hospitality. Thank you to our supervisory team: Hamish Cochrane, David Norton and Robert Stuebing. Finally, we also wish to thank the University of Canterbury Scholarships Office, the New Zealand Postgraduate Study Abroad Award and to the McKelvey Fund (School of Forestry) for their generous funding, without which this ongoing research program would not be possible.


  1. Bakker VJ (2006) Microhabitat features influence the movements of red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) on unfamiliar ground. J Mamm 87(1):124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boitani L, Catullo G, Marzetti I, Masi M, Rulli M, Savini S (2006) The Southeast Asian mammal databank; a tool for conservation and monitoring mammal diversity in Southeast Asia. Instituto di Ecologia Applicata, RomaGoogle Scholar
  3. Brinkerhoff RJ, Haddad NM, Orrock JL (2005) Corridors and olfactory predator cues affect small mammal behavior. J Mamm 86(4):662–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan B, Kho PCS, Lee HS (1998) In: Proceedings of planted forests in Sarawak; an international conference. Forest Department Sarawak, Sarawak Timber Association, Sarawak Development InstituteGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman CA, Naughton-Treves L, lawes MJ, Wasserman MD, Gillespie TR (2007) Population declines of colobus in Western Uganda and conservation value of forest fragments. Int J Primatol 28:513–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debinski DM, Holt RD (1999) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14(2):342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desrochers A, Hanski IK, Selonen V (2003) Siberian flying squirrel responses to high- and low-contrast forest edges. Landsc Ecol 18:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diffendorfer JE, Gaines MS, Holt RD (1995) Habitat fragmentation and movement of three small mammals–Sigmodon, Microtus and Peromyscus. Ecology 76(3):827–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fahrig L, Merriam G (1994) Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv Biol 8:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrington GN, Freeman AND, Crome FHJ (2001) The effects of fragmentation of an Australian tropical rain forest on populations and assemblages of small mammals. J Trop Ecol 17:225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hin HK, Lading E (2000) Development of Lanjak-Entiman wildlife sanctuary as a totally protected area, phase II; a species inventory of small mammals for the development of Lanjak-Entiman wildlife sanctuary. ITTO Workshop ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  12. Innes J, Watts C, Fitzgerald N, Thornburrow D, Burns B, Mackay J, Speedy C (2007) Behaviour of invader ship (roof, black) rats behind pest-proof fences. Xclude It; Issue 3. Xcluder Pest Proof Fencing Company, Cambridge, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacquemyn H, Butaye J, Hermy M (2003) Impacts of restored patch density and distance from natural forests on colonization success. Restor Ecol 11(4):417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maryanto I, Kartono AP, Sinaga MAH (2000) Survey of mammals on different land use types. In: Gillison AN (ed) Above ground biodiversity assessment working group summary report 1996–1999: impact of different land uses on biodiversity and social indicators. ASB Working Group Report, ICRAF, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  15. McAdam AG, Kramer DL (1998) Vigilance as a benefit of intermittent locomotion in small mammals. Animal Behav 55:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McConkey KR (2005) Influence of faeces on seed removal from gibbon droppings in a dipterocarp forest in Central Borneo. J Trop Ecol 12:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miura S, Yasuda M, Ratnam LC (1997) Who steals the fruits? Monitoring frugivory of mammals in a tropical rain forest. Malay Nat J 50:183–193Google Scholar
  18. Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakagawa M, Miguchi H, Sato K, Nakashizuka T (2007a) A preliminary study of two sympatric Maxomys rats in Sarawak, Malaysia: spacing patterns and population dynamics. Raffles Bull Zool 55(2):381–387Google Scholar
  20. Nakagawa M, Miguchi H, Sato K, Sakai S, Nakashizuka T (2007b) Population dynamics of arboreal and terrestrial small mammals in a tropical rainforest, Sarawak, Malaysia. Raffles Bull Zool 55(2):389–395Google Scholar
  21. Oderdonk DA, Chapman CA (2000) Coping with forest fragmentation: the primates of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Int J Primatol 21(4):587–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Padoch C, Peluso NL (2003) Borneo people and forests in transition: an introduction. In: Padoch C, Peluso NL (eds) Borneo in transition: people, forests, conservation and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Payne J, Francis CM (2005) A field guide to the mammals of Borneo. The Sabah Society, Kota Kinabalu, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  24. Salwasser H, Schonewald-Cox C, Baker R (1996) The role of interagency cooperation in managing for viable populations. In: Soule ME (ed) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Silvertown J (1990) Introduction to plant population ecology, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Spellerberg IF, Sawyer JWD (1999) An introduction to applied biogeography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Stuebing RB (2005) Wildlife conservation in the planted forests of Sarawak: blind ambition? In: Tuen AA, Das I (eds) Wallace in Sarawak–150 years later. An international conference on biogeography and biodiversity. Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia, Sarawak, Kota SamarahanGoogle Scholar
  28. Stuebing RB, Gasis J (1989) A survey of small mammals within a Sabah tree plantation in Malaysia. J Trop Ecol 5:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Waldien DL, Hayes JP, Huso MMP (2006) Use of downed wood by Townsend’s chipmunks (Tamias townsendii) in Western Oregon. J Mamm 87(3):454–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wells KL (2005) Impacts of rainforest logging on non-volant small mammal assemblages in Borneo. Thesis, Department of Experimental Ecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  31. Wells K, Pfeiffer M, Lakim MB, Linsenmair KE (2004) Use of arboreal and terrestrial space by a small mammal community in a tropical rain forest in Borneo, Malaysia. J Biogeogr 31:641–652Google Scholar
  32. Wheatley M, Fisher JT, Larsen K, Litke J, Boutin S (2005) Using GIS to relate small mammal abundance and landscape structure at multiple spatial extents: the northern flying squirrel in Alberta, Canada. J Appl Ecol 42:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Woon WC, Norini H (2002) Trends in Malaysian forest policy. Policy Trend Report 2002, pp 12–28Google Scholar
  34. Yasuda M, Miura S, Nor Azman H (2000) Evidence for food hoarding behaviour in terrestrial rodents in Pasoh Forest Reserve, a Malaysian lowland rain forest. J Trop For Sci 12(1):164–173Google Scholar
  35. Yasuda M, Ishii N, Okuda T, Nor Azman H (2003) Small mammal community: habitat preference and effects after selective logging. In: Okuda T, Manokaran N, Matsumoto Y, Niiyama K, Thomas SC, Ashton PS (eds) Pasoh: ecology of a lowland rain forest in Southeast Asia. Springer–Verlag, Tokyo, pp 533–546Google Scholar
  36. Zollner PA, Crane KJ (2003) Influence of canopy closure and shrub coverage on travel along coarse woody debris by eastern chipmunks (Tamais striatus). Am Midl Nat 150:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ForestryUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Grand Perfect Sdn BhdBintuluMalaysia

Personalised recommendations