Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of topsoil removal in restored heathland on soil fauna, topsoil microstructure, and cellulose decomposition: implications for ecosystem restoration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communities of soil macrofauna, oribatid mites, and nematodes as well as vegetation and soil chemistry were studied on twelve plots representing three replicates of the following treatments: agricultural meadow, heathland, and heathland restored either by partial or complete topsoil removal 15 years earlier. We also studied the effect of soil macrofauna on decomposition and the microstructure of the soil surface layer with litterbags in combination with the analysis of thin soil sections. The communities of soil macrofauna and oribatid mites significantly differed between agricultural meadows and heathlands. The partial and complete topsoil removal plots were more similar to heathlands with respect to macrofauna and to agricultural meadows with respect to oribatid mites. The density and diversity of soil macrofauna was higher in agricultural meadows than in heathlands; in particular, earthworms, litter transformers, root feeders, and microsaprophags were more abundant on meadows. Heathlands, in contrast, contained a much higher diversity of oribatid mites. The community structure of nematodes did not significantly differ among the treatments. Analysis of thin soil sections revealed a thick organic fermentation layer in heathlands, which was absent in agricultural meadows and only weakly developed in the topsoil removal plots. In agricultural meadows, litterbags and thin soil sections indicated that abundant macrofauna, including endogeic earthworms, were very effective in removing the litter from the soil surface and mixing it into the mineral soil. Possible effects of this soil mixing on restoration success are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts R, Berendse F (1988) The effect of increased nutrient avaiability on vegetation dynamics in wet heathlands. Vegetatio 76(1–2):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison M, Ausden M (2004) Successful use of topsoil removal and soil amelioration to create heathland vegetation. Biol Conserv 120:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison M, Ausden M (2006) Effects of removing the litter and humic layers on heathland establishment following plantation removal. Biol Conserv 127:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benckiser G (1997) Fauna in soil ecosystems. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 387 pp

  • Bobbink R, Hornung M, Roelofs JGM (1998) The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural. Eur Veg J Ecol 86:717–738

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen PJ, Scheu S, Hale CM et al (2004) Non-native invasive earthworms as agents of change in northern temperate forests. Front Ecol Environ 2(8):427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock P, Fedoroff N, Jogerius A et al. (1985) Handbook for soil thin section description. Waine Research, Albrighton, 153 pp

  • De Deyn GB, Raaijmakers CE, Zoomer HR (2003) Soil invertebrate fauna enhance grassland succession and diversity. Nature 422:711–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Goede RGM (1996) Effects of sod-cutting on the nematode community of a secondary forest of Pinus sylvestris L. Biol Fertil Soils 22:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Smidt JT (1979) Origen and destruction of northwest European heath vegetation. In: Willmanns O, Tüxen R (eds) Werden und Vergehen von Pflanzengesellschaften. Cramer, Vaduz, pp 411–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Delettre YR, Morvan N, Trehen P et al (2008) Local biodiversity and multi-habitat use in empidoid flies (Insecta : Diptera, Empidoidea). Biodivers Conserv 7:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunger W (1991) Zur Primärsukzession humiphager Tirgrupen auf Bergbauflächen. Zool Jahrb Syst 118:423–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunger W, Voigtlander K (2005) Assessment of biological soil quality in wooded reclaimed mine sites. Geoderma 129:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J (1999) Use of soil dwelling Diptera (Insecta, Diptear) as bioindicators: a review of ecological requirements and response to disturbance. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Keplin B, Pižl V (2001) Soil biota and upper soil layers development in two contrasting post-mining chronosequences. Ecol Eng 17:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Elhottová D, Kuráž V et al (2006) Effect of soil macrofauna on other soil biota and soil formation in reclaimed and non reclaimed post mining sites: a result of field microcosms experiment. Appl Soil Ecol 33:308–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Prach K, Pizl V et al (2008) Interactions between soil development, vegetation and soil fauna during spontaneous succession in post mining sites. Eur J Soil Biol 44:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Háněl L (2003) Soil nematodes in cambisoil agroecosystem of the Czech Republic. Biologia 52:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Härdtle W, Assmann T, van Diggelen R (2009) Renaturierung und Management von Heiden. In: Zerbe S (ed) Renaturierung von Ökosystemen in Mitteleuropa. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Elsevier GmbH (in press)

  • Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Clifs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardol P, Van der Wal A, Brezemer MT et al (2008) Restoration of species-rich grassland on ex arable land: seed addition outweight soil fertility reduction. Biol Conserv 141:2208–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardol P, Brezemer MT, Van der Putten WH (2009) Soil organism and plant introduction in restoration of species rich grassland communities. Restor Ecol 17:258–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupa SV (2003) Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review. Environ pollut 124:179–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P, Bignell D, Lepage M et al (1997) Soil function in changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. Eur J Soil Biol 33:159–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin YC, James R, Dolman PM (2007) Conservation of heathland ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae): the value of lowland coniferous plantations. Biodivers Conserv 16:1337–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez MG, Matesanz MR, Lidon JBJ et al (2003) The effect of Hormogaster elisae (Hormogastridae) on the abundance of soil Collembola and Acari in laboratory cultures. Biol Fertil Soils 37:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, van Dyck H, Vanreusel W et al (2003) Ant communities (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) of Flemish (north Belgium) wet heathlands, a declining habitat in Europe. Eur J Entomol 100:545–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Rieley JP (1962) A modification of a single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oberndorfer EC, Lundholm JT (2009) Species richness, abundance, rarity and environmental gradients in coastal barren vegetation. Biodivers Conserv 18:1523–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponge JF (2003) Humus form in terrestrial ecosystem: a framework to biodiversity. Soil Biol Biochem 35:935–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Power SA, Green ER, Barker CG et al (2006) Ecosystem recovery: heathland response to a reduction in nitrogen deposition. Glob Chang Biol 12:1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusek J (1978) Pedozootishe sucession warend der Entwicklung von Okosystem. Pedobiologie 18:426–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Falca M (2000) The soil food web of two beech forests (Fagus sylvatica) of contrasting humus type: stable isotope analysis of a macro- and a mesofauna-dominated community. Oecologia 123:285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schinner F, Kandeller E, Ohlinger R et al. (1995) Methods in soil biology. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 417 pp

  • Strüve-Kusenberg R (1981) Sukzesion und trophische Struktur der Bodenfauna von Brachlandflachen. Pedobiologia 21:132–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Telfer MG, Eversham BC (1996) Ecology and conservation of heathland Carabidae in eastern England. Ann Zool Fenn 33:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (1998) Canoco reference manual and user guide to Canoco for Windows: software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer power, Ithaca, 352 pp

  • Vandereen LJ, Dueck TA, Berdowksi JJM et al (1991) Influence of NH3 and (NH4)2SO4 on heathland vegetation. Acta Bot Neerl 40(4):281–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergeer P, van den Berg LJL, Baar J et al (2006) The effect of turf cutting on plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal spore recolonisation: implications for heathland restoration. Biol Conserv 129:226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen R, Klooker J, Bakker JP, et al (2001) Restoration success of low-production plant communities on former agricultural soils after top-soil removal. Appl Veg Sci 4:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen R, van Diggelen R (2006) Spatial variation in atmospheric nitrogen deposition on low canopy vegetation. Environ Pollut 144:826–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallwork JA (1976) The distribution and diversity of soil fauna. Academic press, London, 355 p

  • Wanner M, Dunger W (2002) Primary immigration and succession of soil organisms on reclaimed opencast coal mining areas in eastern Germany. Eur J Soil Biol 38:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe FS, Olsen SR (1965) Test for ascorbic acid method for determining phosphates in water and sodium bicarbonate extracts from soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 29:677–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NR (1998) The traditional management of European heathlands. J Appl Ecol 35:987–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Werger MJA, Prantice IC, Helsper HPH (1985) The effect of sod cutting to different depths on caluna hethland regeneration. J Environ Manag 20:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates CW (1998) Feeding in free-living soil nematodes a functional approach. In: Perry RN, Wricht DJ (eds) The physiology and biochemistry of free-living and parasitic nematodes. CABI publishing, Wallingford, pp 245–269

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by research plan AV0Z60660521 given to the Institute of Soil Biology BC AS CR, and by a travel grant given to Jan Frouz. Dr. Bruce Jafee is thanked for linguistic improvements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Frouz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frouz, J., Van Diggelen, R., Pižl, V. et al. The effect of topsoil removal in restored heathland on soil fauna, topsoil microstructure, and cellulose decomposition: implications for ecosystem restoration. Biodivers Conserv 18, 3963–3978 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9692-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9692-5

Keywords

Navigation