Advertisement

Assessing habitat/landscape predictors of bird diversity in managed deciduous forests: a seasonal and guild-based approach

  • Enrico Caprio
  • Ivan Ellena
  • Antonio Rolando
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study we focused on deciduous managed forests in northwest Italy and investigated relationships between bird diversity and forest descriptors both at the habitat and landscape level through a seasonal, guild-based approach. Birds were censused by point counts in randomly selected plots of 50 m radius. Each census plot was described in habitat structure terms by using the Bitterlich variable plot–radius method. Landscape metrics (both at class- and landscape-level, according to Fragstats’ terminology) were measured within 500 m radius circle of each plot using an existing GIS database. We first identified specialist and generalist species according to the presence/absence of each species in relation to habitat structure measurements using generalized additive models (GAMs), then we tested for the effects of habitat and landscape variables on guild parameters (namely, bird species richness, Shannon diversity and abundance) using generalized linear models (GLMs). Our analyses showed that several habitat and landscape predictors affected bird diversity. However, in general, guild parameters relative to specialists were especially influenced by oak biomass (a habitat predictor) and oak core area (a class-level predictor) irrespective of the season, while parameters of generalists were influenced by oak core area in winter and perimeter/area ratio of oak patches in spring. Landscape-level predictors significantly affected winter bird abundance only. Results clearly showed that the retention of native oaks both at the habitat and the landscape level is the key-factor for the conservation of diversity of specialist bird species in deciduous, originally oak-dominated woods. Results also suggest that studies focusing on different periods should be preferred to mono-season surveys and that a guild-based approach should be preferred to an holistic one taking into account all species.

Keywords

Bird diversity Deciduous forest management Seasonal differences Black locust Oak Habitat Landscape Specialists Generalists Diversity conservation 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank IPLA s.p.a. and Regione Piemonte for providing access to land use GIS database. We are very grateful to G. Blanchard for his help in planning habitat structure methods. We thank an anonymous referee for useful suggestions.

Supplementary material

10531_2008_9478_MOESM1_ESM.doc (188 kb)
(DOC 187 kb)

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petran BN, Csari F (eds) International symposium on information theory, 2nd edn. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:55–366. doi: 10.2307/3545823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelstam P, Pettersson B (1997) Principles of present Swedish forest biodiversity management. Ecol Bull 46:191–203Google Scholar
  4. Angermeier PL, Karr JR (1994) Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives: protecting biotic resources. Bioscience 44:690–697. doi: 10.2307/1312512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques, 2nd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop JA, Mayers WL (2005) Associations between avian functional guild response and regional landscape properties for conservation planning. Ecol Indic 5:33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2004.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitterlich W (1947) Die winkelzahlmessung. Allegemeine Forst-und Holzwirtschaftliche Zeitung 58:94–96Google Scholar
  8. Bitterlich W (1948) Die winkelzahlprobe. Allegemeine Forst-und Holzwirtschaftliche Zeitung 59(1/2):4–5Google Scholar
  9. Blake JG, Karr JR (1987) Breeding birds of isolated woodlots: area and habitat relationships. Ecology 68:1724–1734. doi: 10.2307/1939864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks RP, O’Connell TJ, Wardrop DH, Jackson LE (1998) Towards a regional index of biological integrity: the example of forested riparian ecosystems. Environ Monit Assess 51:131–143. doi: 10.1023/A:1005962613904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Castellani C, Scrinzi GF, Tabacchi G, Tosi V (1984) Inventario forestale nazionale (I.F.N.). Tavole di cubatura a doppia entrata. Ministero dell’Agricoltura e delle Foreste. Istituto Sperimentale per l’Assestamento Forestale e per l’Alpicoltura, Trento, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  13. DeGraaf R, Miller RI (1996) Conservation of faunal diversity in forested landscapes. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Doherty PF Jr, Grubb TC Jr (2000) Habitat and landscape correlates of presence, density, and species richness of birds wintering in forest fragments in Ohio. Wilson Bull 112:388–394. doi: 10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0388:HALCOP]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donald PF, Haycock D, Fuller RJ (1997) Winter bird communities in forest plantations in western England and their response to vegetation, growth stage and grazing. Bird Study 44:206–219Google Scholar
  16. Dudley N, Gilmour D, Jeanrenaud J-P (1996) Forests for life. WWF International and IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. ESRI (2004) ArcGIS, version 9.1. http://www.esri.com. Accessed July 2007
  18. Ferry C, Frochot B (1990) Bird communities of the forests of Butgundy and the Jura (eastern France). In: Keast A (ed) Biogeography and ecology of forest bird communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 183–194Google Scholar
  19. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2002) The conservation value of paddock trees for birds in a variegated landscape in southern New South Wales. 2. Paddock trees as stepping stones. Biodivers Conserv 11:833–849. doi: 10.1023/A:1015318328007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Fortin MJ, Gurevitch J (1993) Mantel tests: spatial structure in field experiments. In: Sheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Freemark K, Collins B (1992) Landscape ecology of birds breeding in temperate forest fragments. In: Hagan JM, Johnson DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 443–454Google Scholar
  23. Galli AE, Leck CF, Forman RTT (1976) Avian distribution patterns within different sized forest islands in central New Jersey. Auk 93:356–365Google Scholar
  24. Gaunch HG Jr (1984) Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Graber RR, Graber JW (1979) Severe winter weather and bird populations in southern Illinois. Wilson Bull 91:88–103Google Scholar
  26. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Helle P, Mönkkönen M (1990) Forest succession and bird communities: theoretical aspects and practical implications. In: Keast A (ed) Biogeography and ecology of forest bird communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 299–331Google Scholar
  28. Heywood V (1995) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Hruska K (1991) Human impact on the forest vegetation in the western part of the Pannonic plain (Yugoslavia). Vegetation 92:161–166Google Scholar
  30. IPLA—Regione Piemonte (2005a) Studio per il Piano Forestale Territoriale dell’Area Forestale 53-Basso Monferrato AstigianoGoogle Scholar
  31. IPLA—Regione Piemonte (2005b) Studio per il Piano Forestale Territoriale dell’Area Forestale 54-Alto Monferrato AstigianoGoogle Scholar
  32. Jelinski DE, Wu J (1996) The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 11:129–140. doi: 10.1007/BF02447512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jongman RHG, Ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Keller JK, Richmond ME, Smith CR (2002) An explanation of patterns of breeding bird species richness and density following clearcutting in northeastern USA forest. For Ecol Manag 174:541–564. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00074-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King DI, DeGraaf RM (2000) Bird species diversity and nesting success in mature, clearcut and shelterwood forest in northern New Hampshire, USA. For Ecol Manag 129:227–235. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00167-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koenig WD (1999) Spatial autocorrelation of ecological phenomena. Trends Ecol Evol 14:22–26. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01533-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Koenig WD, Knops JMH (1998) Testing for spatial autocorrelation in ecological studies. Ecography 21:423–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00407.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lack D, Lack E (1951) Further changes in birdlife caused by afforestation. J Anim Ecol 20:173–179. doi: 10.2307/1536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laiolo P, Caprio E, Rolando A (2003) Effects of logging and non-native tree proliferation on the birds overwintering in the upland forests of north-western Italy. For Ecol Manag 179:441–454. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00542-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laiolo P, Caprio E, Rolando A (2004) Can forest management have season-dependent effects on bird diversity? Biodivers Conserv 13:1925–1941. doi: 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000035874.22210.8d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee M, Fahrig L, Freemark K, Currie DJ (2002) Importance of patch scale vs. landscape scale on selected forest birds. Oikos 96:110–118. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960112.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673. doi: 10.2307/1939924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam (2nd English edition)Google Scholar
  44. Li H, Wu J (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landsc Ecol 19:389–399. doi: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000030441.15628.d6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lindenmayer DB, McIntyre S, Fischer J (2003) Birds in eucalypt and pine forests: landscape alteration and its implications for research models of faunal habitat use. Biol Conserv 110:45–53. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00174-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Loehle C, Wigley TB, Rutzmoser S, Gerwin JA, Keyser PD, Lancia RA et al (2005) Managed forest landscape structure and avian species richness in the southeastern US. For Ecol Manag 214:279–293. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4. MJM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  48. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed August 2007
  49. Mills GS, Dunning JB Jr, Bates JM (1991) The relationship between breeding bird density and vegetation volume. Wilson Bull 103:468–479Google Scholar
  50. Moss D (1978) Diversity of woodland song-bird populations. J Anim Ecol 47:521–527. doi: 10.2307/3798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Noss RF (1993a) Sustainable forestry or sustainable forests? In: Aplet GH, Johnson N, Olson JT, Sample VA (eds) Defining sustainable forestry. Island, Washington, pp 17–43Google Scholar
  53. Noss RF (1993b) A conservation plan for the Oregon coast range: some preliminary suggestions. Nat Areas J 13:276–290Google Scholar
  54. Noss RF, Cooperrider A (1994) Saving nature’s legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Defenders of Wildlife and Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Connell TJ, Jackson LE, Brooks RP (2000) Bird guilds as indicators of ecological condition in the central Appalachians. Ecol Appl 10:1706–1721. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1706:BGAIOE]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Palik K, Engstrom RT (1999) Species composition. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 65–95Google Scholar
  57. Price OF, Woinarski JCZ, Robinson D (1999) Very large area requirements for frugivorous birds in monsoon rainforests of the northern territory, Australia. Biol Conserv 91:169–180. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00081-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available on line at: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed August 2007
  59. Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP et al (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc Ecol 10:23–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00158551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Santos T, Telleria JL, Carbonell R (2002) Bird conservation in fragmented Mediterranean forests of Spain: effects of geographical location, habitat and landscape degradation. Biol Conserv 105:113–125. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00210-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmidt KA, Whelan CJ (1999) Effects of exotic Lonicera and Rhamnus on songbird nest predation. Conserv Biol 13:1502–1506. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.99050.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Severinghaus WD (1981) Guild theory development as a mechanism for assessing environmental impact. Environ Manag 5:187–190. doi: 10.1007/BF01873277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  64. Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Wilson JD (1998) Variation in the survival rates of some British passerines with respect to their population trends on farmland. Bird Study 45:276–292Google Scholar
  65. Sjoberg K, Danell K (2001) Introduction of lodgepole pine in Sweden—ecological relevance for vertebrates. For Ecol Manag 141:143–153. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00497-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Spencer R (1982) Birds in winter—an outline. Bird Study 29:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. SPSS Inc. (2003) SPSS for windows, version 12.0.1. SPSS Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  68. Stanners D, Bourdeau P (1995) Europe’s environment. The Dobris assessment. European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  69. Telleria JL, Santos T (1995) Effects of forest fragmentation on a guild of wintering passerines: the role of habitat selection. Biol Conserv 71:61–67. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00021-H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Telleria JL, Virgós E, Carbonell R, Pérez-Tris J, Santos T (2001) Behavioural responses to changing landscapes: flock structure and anti-predator strategies of tits wintering in fragmented forests. Oikos 95:253–264. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950207.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thompson ID, Hogan HA, Montevecchi WA (1999) Avian communities of mature balsam fir forests in Newfoundland: age-dependence and implications for timber harvesting. Condor 101:311–323. doi: 10.2307/1369994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tobler W (1988) Resolution, resampling, and all that. In: Mounsey H, Tomlin R (eds) Building databases for global science. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 129–137Google Scholar
  73. Tubelis DP, Lindenmayer DB, Cowling A (2007) Bird populations in native forest patches in south-eastern Australia: the roles of patch width, matrix type (age) and matrix use. Landsc Ecol 22:1045–1058. doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9090-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turcotte Y, Desrochers A (2005) Landscape-dependent distribution of northern forest birds in winter. Ecography 28:129–140. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04047.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vander Haegen WM, Dobler FC, Pierce DJ (2000) Shrubsteppe bird response to habitat and landscape variables in Eastern Washington, USA. Conserv Biol 14:1145–1160. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99293.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Van Drop D, Opdam PFM (1987) Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landsc Ecol 1:59–73. doi: 10.1007/BF02275266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Verner J, Larson TA (1989) Richness of breeding bird species in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada. Auk 106:447–463Google Scholar
  78. Villard MA, Trzcinski MK, Merriam G (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv Biol 13:774–783. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98059.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Welsh DA (1987) The influence of forest harvesting on mixed coniferous–deciduous boreal bird communities in Ontario. Acta Oecol 8:247–252Google Scholar
  80. Wilson SD, Belcher JW (1989) Plant and bird communities of native prairie and introduced Eurasian vegetation in Manitoba, Canada. Conserv Biol 3:39–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00222.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wood S, Augustin N (2002) GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling. Ecol Model 157:157–177. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00193-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landsc Ecol 19:125–138. doi: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000021711.40074.ae CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Young TP (2000) Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Biol Conserv 92:73–83. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00057-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zurita GA, Rey N, Varela DM, Villagra M, Bellocq MI (2006) Conversion of the Atlantic forest into native and exotic tree plantations: effects on bird communities from the local and regional perspectives. For Ecol Manag 235:164–173. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell’UomoUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations