Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 1493–1516 | Cite as

Wildlife trade, consumption and conservation awareness in southwest China

Original Paper


Commercial trade in wildlife is the major cause of species endangerment and a main threat to animal welfare in China and its neighboring countries. Driven by consumptive use for food and traditional medicine, the large volume of both legal and illegal trade in wildlife has caused great destruction to ecosystems and pushed many species to the brink of extinction. Data gathered from trading hubs at ports, boundary markets, city markets and stores, indicates the large amount of wildlife traded in the region of Guangxi, Yunnan and Qinghai provinces, a direct result of the numerous wildlife markets available. In a survey distributed in various trading places, while about half of the respondents agreed that wildlife should be protected, 60% of them had consumed wildlife at some point in the last 2 years. The results also indicated that law and regulation on wildlife trade control is insufficient. Wildlife trade controls are very limited because of bias on the utilization of wildlife as a natural resource to be exploited by the government agencies. The survey also shows that the current situation of wildlife consumption in key cities in China is serious, especially the consumption for food. The main consumption groups in China are male and young people with high education levels and good incomes. The key in public awareness publicity and education is to give them more information on the negative impacts of wildlife consumption and knowledge of protection.


Wildlife trade Consumption Conservation awareness China 



We are grateful for the grant from Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) to support this project. We thank the support of CITES Management Authority of China, and its Kunming, Guangxi and Sichuan Branch Offices. We are grateful to Chun Li, Fang Zhou, and all participants in the field trade survey, and the Horizonkey Information and Consulting Co., Ltd. who conducted and implemented the public awareness survey for this project. We are also grateful for Xue Wang, Stacy Vynne, Clare Sierawski and Chantal Elkin for reviewing the English language of the manuscript.


  1. Biodiversity Working Group of China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, BWG/CCICED (1999) The 3rd annual report to China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  2. Dinerstein E, Loucks C, Wikramanayake E et al (2007) The fate of wild tiger. Bioscience 57(6):508–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Karesh W, Cook R, Bennett E, Newcomb J (2005) Wildlife trade and global disease emergence. Emerg Infect Dis 11(7):1000–1002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lau M, Ades G, Goodyer N, Zhou F (1995) Wildlife trade in southern China including Hong Kong and Macao. Report to China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  5. Lau S, Woo P, Li K, Huang Y, Tsoi H, Wong B, Wong S, Leung S, Chan K, Yuen K (2005) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:14040–14045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee K, Lau M, Chan B (2004) Wild animal trade monitoring at selected markets in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, south China, 2002–2003. Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden Technical Report No.2. KFBG, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  7. Li Y, Li D (1997) Survey of cross-border trade in live wildlife between China-Vietnam. Protect China’s Biodivers 1:159–175Google Scholar
  8. Li C, Zhang L (2003) Guide book on wildlife import and export management. China Forestry Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  9. Li W, Fuller T, Wang S (1996) A survey on wildlife trade in Guangxi and Guangdong, China. TRAFFIC Bull 16:9–16Google Scholar
  10. Li W, Shi Z, Yu M, Ren W, Smith C, Epstein J, Wang H, Crameri G, Hu Z, Zhang H, Zhang J, McEachern J, Field H, Daszak P, Eaton B, Zhang S, Wang L (2005) Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science 310:676–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mills J, Chan S, Ishihara A (1995) The bear facts: the east Asian market for bear gall bladder. TRAFFFIC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Morgan D (2000) Chinese medicine raising wildlife concerns. Reuters News Agency. Cited 17 Dec 2000
  13. Nooren H, Claridge G (2001) Wildlife trade in Laos: the end of the game. Netherlands Committee for IUCN, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Qinghai Wildlife Conservation Association (2005) Unpublished report on Wildlife trade survey in Qinghai ProvinceGoogle Scholar
  15. Qinghai Wildlife Management Bureau (2005) Unpublished report on wildlife trade and enforcement in Qinghai ProvinceGoogle Scholar
  16. Sain-Ley-Berry C (2000) New campaign launched to fight illegal wildlife trade. Earth Times News Service. Cited 14 Dec 2000
  17. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia (2004) Armored but endangered. Asian Geographic 4:64–71Google Scholar
  18. Wan Z (2004) Wildlife trade management and enforcement. China Forestry Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang Z, Wu D, Chen H (2001a) Preliminary study of border trade in wildlife in Yunnan. Protect China’s Biodivers 2:158–167Google Scholar
  20. Wang Z, Chen H, Wu D (2001b) Status of live wildlife trade in Yunnan border area. Protecting China’s Biodiversity 2:168–183Google Scholar
  21. World Wildlife Fund-United Kingdom (2001) Souvenir alert highlights deadly trade in endangered species. Cited 29 May, 2006
  22. Xie Z (1999) Breeding techniques for turtles. China Agriculture Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang Q, Chen J, Bai Z, Deng X, Liu Z (2000) Trade of wild animals and plants in China-Laos border areas: status and suggestion for effective management. Chin Biodivers 8(3):284–296Google Scholar
  24. Zhou F (1997) Captive breeding of economic wildlife. Guangxi Science and Technology Press, NanningGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Conservation InternationalBeijingChina
  3. 3.International Fund for Animal WelfareBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations