Prioritization of fish assemblages with a view to conservation and restoration on a large scale European basin, the Loire (France)
- 187 Downloads
The hierarchical organization of important sites for the conservation or the restoration of fish communities is a great challenge for managers, especially because of financial or time constraints. In this perspective, we developed a methodology, which is easy to implement in different locations. Based on the fish assemblage characteristics of the Loire basin (France), we created a synthetic conservation value index including the rarity, the conservation status and the species origin. The relationship between this new synthetic index and the Fish-Based Index allowed us to establish a classification protocol of the sites along the Loire including fish assemblages to be restored or conserved. Sites presenting disturbed fish assemblages, a low rarity index, few threatened species, and a high proportion of non-native species were considered as important for the restoration of fish biodiversity. These sites were found mainly in areas where the assemblages are typical of the bream zone, e.g. with a higher number of eurytopic and limnophilic species. On the contrary, important sites for conservation were defined as having an important conservation potential (high RI, a lot of threatened species, and few non-natives fish species) and an undisturbed fish assemblage similar to the expected community if habitats are undisturbed. Important sites for conservation were found in the Loire basin’s medium reaches which host assemblages typical for the grayling and the barbell zones, e.g. with a higher number of rheophilic species. The synthetic conservation value index could be adapted and completed with other criteria according to management priorities and capacities.
KeywordsHierarchical organization Ichthyofauna Disturbance Rarity index Origin index Conservation status
We are grateful to the National French Fishing Council (ONEMA) which provided data. The study was supported by DIREN and Region Pays-de-la-Loire and by the Loire-Bretagne Water Agency.
- Canard A, Ysnel F (2000) Practical use of a single index to estimate the global range of rarity spider communities in western France. European Arachnology, Aarhus University Press, pp 171–176Google Scholar
- Chovanec A, Hofer R, Schiemer F (2003) Fish as bioindicators. In: Markert BA, Breure AM, Zechmeiser HG (eds) Bioindicators and biomonitors, pp 639–675Google Scholar
- Copp GH, Bianco PG, Bogutskaya NG, Eros T, Falka I, Ferreira MT, Fox MG, Freyhof J, Gozlan RE, Grabowska J, Kovac V, Moreno-Amich R, Naseka AM, Penaz M, Povz M, Przybylski M, Robillard M, Russell IC, Stakenas S, Sumer S, Vila-Gispert A, Wiesner C (2005) To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish? J Appl Ichtyol 21:242–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kondolf GM, Boulton AJ, O’Daniel S, Poole GC, Rachel FJ, Stanley EH, Wohl E, Bang A, Carlstrom J, Cristoni C, Huber H, Koljonen S, Louhi P, Nakamura K (2006) Process-based ecological river restoration: Visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecol Soc 11:5Google Scholar
- Pawar S, Koo MS, Kelley C, Ahmed MF, Chaudhuri S, Sarkar S (2007) Conservation assessment and prioritization of areas in Northeast India: priorities for amphibians and reptiles. Biol Conserv. (in press) doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.12.012
- Szöllosi-Nagy A, Najilis P, Björklund G (1998) Assessing the world’s freshwater resources. Nat Resour 34:8–18Google Scholar
- Verneaux J (1981) Fish and the quality of streams. An Sci Univ F Comté biol Anim 4(2):33–41Google Scholar