Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1917–1925 | Cite as

Mapping the geographic distribution of Aglaia bourdillonii Gamble (Meliaceae), an endemic and threatened plant, using ecological niche modeling

  • M. Irfan-Ullah
  • Giriraj Amarnath
  • M. S. R. Murthy
  • A. Townsend Peterson
Original Paper

Abstract

Aglaia bourdillonii is a plant narrowly endemic to the southern portion of the Western Ghats (WG), in peninsular India. To understand its ecological and geographic distribution, we used ecological niche modeling (ENM) based on detailed distributional information recently gathered, in relation to detailed climatic data sets. The ENMs successfully reconstructed key features of the species’ geographic distribution, focusing almost entirely on the southern WG. Much of the species’ distributional potential is already under protection, but our analysis allows identification of key zones for additional protection, all of which are adjacent to existing protected areas. ENM provides a useful tool for understanding the natural history of such rare and endangered species.

Keywords

Aglaia bourdillonii GARP Niche modeling Southern Western Ghats Species distribution modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the Indo-US Science and Technology Forum, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India. The Ford Foundation and Hewlett Packard. The Authors 2 and 3 thank Director NRSA, for extending his support and encouragement, The Author 2 also acknowledges Rufford Small Grant, Rufford Foundation U.K. for financial support.

References

  1. Ahmedullah M, Nayar MP (1987) Endemic plants of the Indian region. Botanical Survey of India, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson RP, Peterson AT, Gómez-Laverdem M (2002) Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice. Oikos 98:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson RP, Lew D, Peterson AT (2003) Evaluating predictive models of species distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol Model 162:211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin MP, Nicholls AO, Margules CR (1990) Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species. Ecol Monogr 60:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colding J, Folke C (1997) The relations among threatened species, their protection, and taboos. Conserv Ecol [online] (Available from the Internet: http://wwwconsecolorg /vol1/iss1./art6/) 1Google Scholar
  6. Csuti B (1996) Mapping animal distribution areas for gap analysis. In: Scott JM, Tear TH, Davis FW (eds) Gap analysis: a landscape approach to land management issues. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 135–145Google Scholar
  7. Cutler R, Edwards TC, Alegria JJ, McKenzie D (2002) A sample design framework for Survey and Manage species under the Northwest Forest Plan. In: Proceedings of the section on statistics and environment, 2001 joint statistical meeting. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, Virginia, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher RA (1958) The Genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Ganesh T, Ganesan R, Devy MS, Davidar P, Bawa KS (1996) Assessment of plant biodiversity at a mid-elevation evergreen forest of Kalakad-Mudanthurai Tiger Reserve, Western Ghats, India. Curr Sci 71:379–392Google Scholar
  11. Giriraj A (2005) Spatial characterization and conservation priortization in tropical evergreen forests of Southern Western Ghats using Geoinformatics. Ph.D. thesis, Barathidasan University, ThirunelveliGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottfried M, Pauli H, Reiter K, Grabherr G (1999) A Fine-Scaled Predictive model for changes in species distribution patterns of high mountain plants induced by climate warming. Divers Distribut 5:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grinnell J (1917) Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. Am Nat 51:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henry AN, Chandrabose M, Swaminathan MS, Nair NC (1984) Agasthyamalai and its environs: a potential area for Biosphere Reserve. J Bombay Nat History Soc 81:282–290Google Scholar
  15. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2004) The WorldClim interpolated global terrestrial climate surfaces. Version 1.3Google Scholar
  16. Holt RD, Gaines MS (1992) Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: Implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evol Ecol 6:433–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubbell SP (2005) Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct Ecol 19:166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchinson MF, Nix HA, McMahon J (2000) ANUCLIM User’s Guide. Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  19. Kerr JT, Ostrovsky M (2003) From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol Evol 18:299-305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krishtalka L, Humphrey PS (2000) Can natural history museums capture the future? Bioscience 50:611–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manel S, Dias JM, Buckton ST, Ormerod SJ (1999a) Alternative methods for predicting species distribution: an illustration with Himalayan river birds. J Appl Ecol 36:734–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manel S, Dias JM, Ormerod SJ (1999b) Comparing discriminant analysis, neural networks and logistic regression for predicting species distributions: a case study with a Himalayan river bird. Ecol Model 120:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller RI (eds) (1994) Mapping the diversity of nature. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Myers N, Mittermeir RA, Mittermeir CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nix HA (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Australian Elapid Snakes. In: Longmore R (ed) Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia. Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra, p 415Google Scholar
  26. Pannell CM (1998) Aglaia bourdillonii. In: IUCN 2004: Red List of Threatened Species  <http://wwwredlistorg/>  Downloaded on 05 July 2005Google Scholar
  27. Pascal JP (1988) Wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India, ecology, structure, floristic composition and succession, 1st edn. Institut francais de Pondichery, p 345Google Scholar
  28. Peterson AT (2001) Predicting species’ geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. The Condor 103:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peterson AT, Vieglais DA (2001) Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modelling. BioScience 51:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peterson AT, Soberón J, Sanchez-Cordero V (1999) Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265–1267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson AT, Ball LG, Cohoon KC (2002a) Predicting distributions of Mexican birds using ecological niche modelling methods. Ibis 144:e27–e32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peterson AT, Stockwell DRB, Kluza DA (2002b) Distributional prediction based on ecological niche modeling of primary occurrence data. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 617–623Google Scholar
  33. Ramesh BR, Pascal JP (1997) Atlas of endemics of the Western Ghats (India). French Institute, PondicherryGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramesh BR, Pascal JP, De Franceschi D (1991) Distribution of endemic, arborescent evergreen species in the Western Ghats. In: Proceedings of the rare, endangered, and endemic plants of the Western Ghats, Thiruvananthapuram, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  35. Ramesh BR, Menon S, Bawa Kamaljit S (1997) A vegetation based approach to biodiversity gap analysis in the Agastyamalai region, Western Ghats, India. Ambio XXVI:529–536Google Scholar
  36. Roy PS (2002) Biodiversity characterization at landscape level in Western Ghats using satellite remote sensing and geographic information system. A report by: Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS-NRSA), Department of Space, Dehradun IndiaGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott JM, Davis F, Csuti B, Noss R, Butterfield B, Groves C, Anderson H, Caicco S, D’Erchia F, Edwards Jr TC, Ullman J, Wright RG (1993) Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monogr 123:1–41Google Scholar
  38. Scott JM, Tear TH, Davis FW (eds) (1996) Gap analysis: a landscape approach to biodiversity planning. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Haufler JB, Morrison M, Raphael MG, Wall WB, Samson F (eds) (2002) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Soberón J, Peterson AT (2004) Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philos Trans, Roy Soc 359:689–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soberón J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species distributional areas. Biodivers Inform 2:1–10Google Scholar
  42. Stockwell DRB, Noble IR (1992) Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis. Math Comput Simul 33:385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stockwell DRB, Peters D (1999) The GARP modeling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 13:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stockwell DRB, Peterson AT (2002a) Controlling bias in biodiversity data. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 537–546Google Scholar
  45. Stockwell DRB, Peterson AT (2002b) Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol Model 148:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tucker K, Rushton SP, Sanderson RA, Martin EB, Blaiklock J (1997) Modeling bird distributions—a combined GIS and Bayesian rule-based approach. Landscape Ecol 12:77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. USGS (2001) HYDRO1k Elevation Derivative Database. U.S. Geological Survey, http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/hydro/, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker PA, Cocks KD (1991) HABITAT: a procedure for modelling a disjoint environmental envelope for a plant or animal species. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett 1:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Irfan-Ullah
    • 1
  • Giriraj Amarnath
    • 2
  • M. S. R. Murthy
    • 2
  • A. Townsend Peterson
    • 3
  1. 1.Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE)BangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Forestry and Ecology DivisionNational Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA)HyderabadIndia
  3. 3.Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research CenterThe University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations