Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1851–1865 | Cite as

An analysis of altitudinal behavior of tree species in Subansiri district, Eastern Himalaya

  • Mukunda Dev Behera
  • Satya Prakash Singh Kushwaha
Original Paper

Abstract

Plant species diversity and endemism demonstrate a definite trend along altitude. We analyzed the (i) pattern of tree diversity and its endemic subset (ii) frequency distribution of altitudinal range and (iii) upper & lower distributional limits of each tree species along altitudinal gradients in eastern Himalaya. The study was conducted in Subansiri district of Arunachal Pradesh. Data on the tree species (cbh ≥ 15 cm) were gathered every 200 m steps between 200 m and 2200 m gradients. Tree diversity demonstrated a greater variation along the gradients. A total of 336 species (of which 26 are endemic) were recorded belonging to 185 genera and 78 families. The alpha diversity demonstrated a decreasing pattern with two maxima (i.e., elevational peaks) along the gradients; one in 601–1000 m and the other in 1601–1800 m, corresponding to transition zones between tropical-subtropical and subtropical-temperate forests. Pattern diversity revealed a narrow range along the gradients. Frequency of altitudinal range was distributed between 1 and 41. Only one species (Altingia excelsa) showed widest amplitude, occurring over the entire range. Highest level of species turnover was found in 400–600 m step at lower elevational limit whereas for upper elevational limit, the highest turn over was recorded between 800 and 1000 m. Tree diversity decreased and its endemic subset increased along the gradients. Two maximas in tree diversity pattern correspond to forest transition zones with subtropical-temperate transition is narrower than tropical-subtropical. The pattern observed here could be attributed to varied microclimates or environmental heterogeneity. If altitudinal amplitude of a species is considered as an aspect of its niche breadth, it is clear from these results that niche breadth in these organisms is in fact independent of the diversity of the assemblage in which they occur. This analysis calls for detailed floristic studies to determine the breadth of changes between adjacent forest types and details of local species richness in high diversity areas.

Keywords

Diversity Altitudinal gradient Range Endemism Eastern Himalaya Subansiri 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Dr PS Roy, Deputy Director, NRSA & Project Director Biodiversity Characterization at Landscape Level for his constant support and guidance. We thank Dr A Jeyaram, Head, RRSSC, Kharagpur and Dr VK Dadhwal, Dean, IIRS for their encouragements and Dr PK Hajra, Dr K Haridasan, Dr GD Pal, Mr S Das, Ms S Srivastava, Mr TP Singh and Mr Ashish Kumar for helping with species identification and analysis. We sincerely thank the Reviewer for his critical comments to the earlier versions of this manuscript. This study was undertaken with the financial assistance from Department of Biotechnology and the Department of Space, Government of India in form of a research project on Biodiversity Characterization at Landscape level using remote sensing and GIS techniques. The senior author acknowledges Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi for award of senior research fellowship (No. −9/735/UC/99-EMR-I) to him.

References

  1. Anon. (1998) Statistical Abstract of Arunachal Pradesh. Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, 11–12Google Scholar
  2. Arroyo MTK, Squeo F, Armesto J, Villagran C (1988) Effects of aridity on plant diversity in the northern Chile Andes. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 75:58–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashton PS (2003) Floristic zonation of tree communities on wet tropical mountains revisited. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6(1,2):87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behera MD (2000) Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using remote sensing and GIS in Subansiri district of Arunachal Pradesh (Eastern Himalaya). Ph.D. Thesis. Gurukul Kangri University, HardwarGoogle Scholar
  5. Behera MD, Kushwaha SPS, Roy PS (2001) Forest vegetation characterization and mapping using IRS-1C satellite images in Eastern Himalayan region. Geocarto Int 16:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behera MD, Kushwaha SPS, Roy PS (2002) High plant endemism in Indian Hotspot – Eastern Himalaya. Biodivers Conserv 11:669–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behera MD, Kushwaha SPS, Roy PS (2005) Geo-spatial modeling for rapid biodiversity assessment in Eastern Himalayan region. Forest Ecol Manage 207:363–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benewal BS, Haridasan K (1992) Natural distribution and status of Gymnosperms in Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Forester, February, 96–101Google Scholar
  9. Bhattarai RK, Vetaas OR (2003) Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown J (2001) Mammals on mountainsides: elevational pattern of diversity, Global Ecol Biogeogr 10:101–109Google Scholar
  11. Brown JH, Lomolino MV (1998) Biogeography 2nd edn. SinauerGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowell RK, Hurtt GC (1994) Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoport effects. Am Nat 144:570–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fram JP, Gradstein SR (1991) An altitudinal zonation of tropical rain forests using bryophytes. J␣Biogeogr 18:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentry AH (1988) Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 75:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Givinish TJ (1999) On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. J Ecol 87:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grytnes JA (2002) Species richness patterns of vascular plants along seven altitudinal transects in Norway. Ecography 26:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grytnes JA, Vetaas OR (2002) Species richness and altitude: a comparison between simulation models and interpolated plant species richness along the Himalayan altitude gradient, Nepal. Am Nat 159:294–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hajra PK, Verma DM, Giri GS (eds) (1996) Materials for the Flora of Arunachal Pradesh, vol I. Botanical Survey of India, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartshorn G, Peralta R (1988) Preliminary description of primary forests along the La Selva-Volcan Barva altitudinal transect, Costa Rica. Almeda F, CM Pringle (eds) Tropical rainforests: diversity and conservation. California Academy of Sciences, San Fransisco, CA, pp 281–295Google Scholar
  22. Kaul RN, Haridasan K (1987) Forest types of Arunachal Pradesh – A preliminary study. J Econ Taxon Bot 9:379–389Google Scholar
  23. Kessler M (2000) Altitudinal zonation of Andean cryptogram communities. J Biogeogr 27:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korner C (2000) Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains might hold the answer. Trends Ecol Evol 15:513–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lieberman D, Lieberman M, Peralta R, Hartshorn GS (1996) Tropical forest structure and composition on a large scale altitudinal gradient in Costa Rica. J Ecol 84:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lomolino MV (2001) Elevational gradients of species-density: historical and perspective views. Global Ecol Biogeogr 10:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology, patterns in the distribution of species, Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
  28. Major J (1988) Endemism: a botanical perspective. In: Myers AA, Giller PS (eds) Analytical biogeography. An integrated approach to the study of animal and plant distributions. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 117–146Google Scholar
  29. McCoy ED (1990) The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos 58:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Myers N (1988) Threatened biotas: ‘hotspots’ in tropical forestry. The Environmentalist 8:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Odland A, Birks HJB (1999) The altitudinal gradient of vascular plant species richness in Aurland, western Norway. Ecography 22:548–566Google Scholar
  32. Rahbek C (1997) The relationship among area, elevation and regional species richness in neotropical birds. Am Nat 149:875–902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rao RR (1974) Vegetation and phytogeography of Assam–Burma. In: Mani MS (ed) Ecology and biogeography of India. Dr. W. Junk B.V. Publishers, The Hague, pp 204–246Google Scholar
  34. Rodgers WA, Panwar SH (1988) Biogeographical classification of India. New Forest, DehraDunGoogle Scholar
  35. Roy PS, Behera MD (2005) Biological Richness assessment along the eastern Himalayan altitudinal zones in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Curr Sci 88:250–257Google Scholar
  36. Shipley B, Keddy PA (1987) The individualistic and community-unit concepts as falsifiable hypothesis. Vegetatio 69:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shmida A, Wilson MW (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. J Biogeogr 12:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shrestha TB, Joshi RM (1996) Rare, endemic and endangered plants in Nepal. WWF Nepal Program, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh JS, Singh SP (1992) Forests of Himalaya: structure, functioning and impact of man. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Naini Tal IndiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh SP, Adhakari BS, Zobel DB (1994) Biomass, productivity, leaf longevity and forest structure in the central Himalaya. Ecol Monogr 64:401–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takhtajan A (1969) Flowering plants, origin and dispersal. Tr. Jeffrey, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  42. Vazquez JA, Givinish TJ (1998) Altitudinal gradients in tropical forest composition, structure and diversity in the Sierra de Manantlan. J Ecol 86:999–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vetaas OR, Grytnes JA (2002) Distribution of vascular plant species richness and endemic richness along the Himalayan elevational gradient in Nepal. Global Ecol Biogeogr 11:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whittaker RH (1956) Vegetation of the great smoky mountains. Ecol Monogr 26:1–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 28:453–470Google Scholar
  46. Whittaker RH, Niering WA (1975) Vegetation of the Santa Catalina mountains, Arizona. V. biomass, production and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56:771–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whittaker RJ, Willis KJ, Field R (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity J Biogeogr 28:453–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mukunda Dev Behera
    • 1
  • Satya Prakash Singh Kushwaha
    • 2
  1. 1.Regional Remote Sensing Service CentreIndian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)KharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Forestry & Ecology DivisionIndian Institute of Remote SensingDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations