Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 443–452 | Cite as

Countryside Stewardship Scheme and Butterflies: A Study of Plant and Butterfly Species Richness

  • R. G. Field
  • T. Gardiner
  • C. F. Mason
  • J. Hill
Article

Abstract

Butterfly and plant species richness were recorded from 1997 to 2000 on 2 and 6 m grass margins created at three farms in Essex which had entered the Countryside Stewardship Scheme (CSS) in October 1996. On both the 2 and 6 m margins there was a significant relationship between the length of hedgerow and the number of plant species observed on the margins, but the seed mixtures used may not have been ideal and natural regeneration should not have been used on the clay soils of Essex. Butterfly species richness was significantly greater on the 2 m margins than on the control sections, and was greater when a higher number of grass species were included in the original seed mixture. Plant species richness was greater on the 6 m margins when established by natural regeneration. CSS grass margins could be improved as butterfly habitats if they are linked to existing habitats such as hedgerows, are sown with a better range of native grasses and herbs and are managed in a way more conducive to wildlife. These changes to the policy of establishment of CSS margins could help combat habitat loss and fragmentation within the countryside.

Keywords

Agri-environment schemes Butterflies Butterfly species richness Countryside Stewardship Scheme Field margins Habitats Nectar sources Plant species richness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, J., Warren, M., Fox, R., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G., Jeffcoate, S. 2001The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and IrelandOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker A.M. and Reynolds C.J. 1999. The value of planted grass field margins as a habitat for sawflies and other chick-food insects. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne pp.109 – 116.Google Scholar
  3. Bullock, J. 1996PlantsSutherland, W.J. eds. Ecological Census Techniques: A HandbookCambridge University PressCambridge111137Google Scholar
  4. Buys J.C. 1995. Kansen voor natuur bij braakegging van perceelranden. Akkerranden in Nederland, In: de Snoo G.R., Rotteveel A.J.W. and Heemsbergen H. (eds), Wageningen, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
  5. Buys J.C., Oosterveld E.B. and Ellenbroek F.M. 1996. Kansen voor natuur bij braak II verslag van een tweejarig praktijkonderzoek. (No CLM 253 – 1996). Centrum voor Landbouw en Milieu.Google Scholar
  6. Carreck, N.L., Williams, I.H., Oakley, J.N. 1999Enhancing farmland for insect pollinators using flower mixturesIn Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and PolicyAssociation of Applied BiologistsWellesbourne101108Google Scholar
  7. Cowling, D.W., Lockyer, D.R. 1968A comparison of the yield of three grass species at various levels of nitrogenous fertiliser grown alone or in a mixtureJournal of Agricultural Science71127136Google Scholar
  8. Snoo, G.R., Udo Haes, H.A. 1994Onbespoten akkerranden voor natuur, milieu en bedrijfLandschap111732Google Scholar
  9. Dover, J.W. 1994Arable Field Margins: factors affecting butterfly distribution and abundanceBoatman, N. eds. BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservationBritish Crop Protection CouncilWarwick109116Google Scholar
  10. Dover, J.W. 1999Butterflies and field marginsAspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and PolicyAssociation of Applied BiologistsWellesbourne109116Google Scholar
  11. Dunn, O.J. 1964Multiple comparisons using rank sumsTechnometrics6241252Google Scholar
  12. English Nature1995Rebuilding the English CountrysideEnglish NaturePeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  13. Feber, R.H., Smith, H. 1995Butterfly conservation on arable farmlandPullen, A.S. eds. Ecology and Conservation of ButterfliesChapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Feber, R.H., Smith, H., Macdonald, D.W. 1994The effects of field margin restoration on the Meadow Brown butterfly (Maniola jurtina)Boatman, N. eds. BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservationBritish Crop Protection CouncilWarwick295300Google Scholar
  15. Feber, R.H., Smith, H., MacDonald, D.W. 1996The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fieldsJournal of Applied Ecology3311911205Google Scholar
  16. Field, R.G. 2002A study of butterflies on FarmlandUniversity of EssexColchesterUnpublished Ph.D thesisGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopkins A. and Feber R.E. 1997. Management for plant and butterfly species diversity on organically farmed grassland field margins. In Management for grassland diversity. Proceedings of International. Symposium of the European Grassland Federation, pp.69 – 73.Google Scholar
  18. Kirkham F.W., Sherwood A.J., Oakley J.N. and Fielder A.G. 1999. Botanical composition and invertebrate populations in sown grass and wildflower margins. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54, Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and PolicyAssociation of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp.291 – 298.Google Scholar
  19. Luken, J.O. 1990Directing Ecological SuccessionChapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  20. MAFF1999The Countryside Stewardship Scheme: Information and how to applyMAFFLondonGoogle Scholar
  21. MAFF2000Agricultural Statistics in Great Britain in 1999MAFFLondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Marshall, E.J.P 1998Guidelines for the siting, establishment and management of arable field margins, beetle banks, cereal conservation headlands and wildlife seed mixturesIACRLong AshtonIssue no 2.Google Scholar
  23. Marshall E.J.P., Baudry J., Moonen C., Fevre E. and Thomas C.F.G. 1996. Factors affecting the floral diversity in European field margins networks. In: Simpson I. and Dennis P. (eds), The Spatial Dynamics of Biodiversity Proceedings 5th Annual IALE (UK) Conference. IALEUK, pp. 97–104.Google Scholar
  24. Marshall, E.J.P., Moonen, C. 1998A Review of Field Margin Conservation Strips in EuropeIACRLong AshtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall, E.J.P., Nowakowski, M. 1995Successional changes in the flora of a sown field margin strip managed by cutting and herbicide applicationBrighton Crop Protection Conference – Weeds, BCPCFarnham973978Google Scholar
  26. Murphy, D.D., Launer, A.E., Ehrlich, P.R. 1983The role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha)Oecologica56257263Google Scholar
  27. Pollard, E. 1977A method for assessing the abundance of butterfliesBiological Conservation12115134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pollard, E., Yates, T. 1993Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and ConservationChapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, H., Feber, R.E., Johnson, P.J., McCallum, K., Jensen, S.P., Younes, M., MacDonald, D.W. 1993The Conservation Management of Arable Field MarginsEnglish NaturePeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, H., Feber, R.E., MacDonald, D.W. 1994The role of wildflower seed mixtures in field margin restorationBoatman, N. eds. BCPC Monograph no 58, Field Margins: Integrating agriculture and conservationBritish Crop Protection CouncilWarwick289294Google Scholar
  31. Smith, H., Feber, R.E., MacDonald, D.W. 1999Sown field margins: why stop at grass?In: Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones Ecology, Management and PolicyAssociation of Applied BiologistsWellesbourne291298Google Scholar
  32. Smith, H., McCallum, K., MacDonald, D.W. 1997Experimental comparison of the nature conservation valueproductivity and ease of management of a conventional and a more species-rich grass leyJournal of Applied Ecology345364Google Scholar
  33. Spedding, C.R.W., Diekmahns, E.W. 1972Grasses and Legumes in British AgricultureBulletin of the Commonwealth Bureau of Pasture and Field Crops No. 49. Royal Commonwealth Agriculture BureauFarnhamGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomas J.A. 1984. The Conservation of Butterflies in Temperate Countries: Past efforts and lessons for the future. In: The Biology of Butterflies. Sypm. of the Royal Entomological Society of London 11: 333 – 353.Google Scholar
  35. Warren, M.S. 1992Butterfly populationsDennis, R.L.H. eds. The Ecology of Butterflies in BritainOxford University PressOxford7392Google Scholar
  36. Watt, W.B., Hoch, P.C., Mills, S.G. 1974Nectar resource use by Colias butterfliesOecologia14353374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. West T.M. and Marshall E.J.P. 1996. Managing sown flower margin strips on contrasted soil types in three Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In Aspects of Applied Biology, 44, Vegetation Management in Forestry, Amenity and Conservation Areas. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 269 – 276.Google Scholar
  38. West T.M., Marshall E.J.P, Westbury D.B. and Arnold G.M. 1999. Vegetation development on sown and unsown field boundary strips established in three Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In Aspects of Applied Biology 54: Field Margins and Buffer Zones: Ecology, Management and Policy. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp. 235 – 240.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. G. Field
    • 1
    • 4
  • T. Gardiner
    • 1
  • C. F. Mason
    • 2
  • J. Hill
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Environment and Rural AffairsWrittle CollegeWrittleEssex
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of EssexColchesterEssex
  3. 3.Department of ScienceWrittle CollegeWrittleEssex
  4. 4.R.G. FieldNorthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations