Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1977–1991 | Cite as

A Comparison of Predictive Methods in Extinction Risk Studies: Contrasts and Decision Trees

  • Matthew S. Sullivan
  • Martin J. Jones
  • David C. Lee
  • Stuart J. Marsden
  • Alan H. Fielding
  • Emily V. Young
Special Issue: Extinction Risk: Predicting, Assessing, Prioritising and Redressing


Over the last two decades an increasing emphasis has been placed on the importance of controlling for phylogeny when examining cross-species data; so-called comparative methods. These methods are appropriate for testing hypotheses about correlations between evolutionary events in the history of a clade and adaptive responses to those changes. When this approach is applied to extinction risk, possible correlations between evolutionary changes in, for example, body size or habitat specialisation and some measure(s) of current threat status are examined. However, there may be a mismatch here between the results of such studies, and the real, pragmatic needs of species conservation. This kind of approach certainly adds to our knowledge of some fundamental processes, but it is more difficult to see how this can be applied to conservation decision-making. For more practical purposes a decision-tree approach can be extremely useful. This paper illustrates the use of a contrasts based analysis of extinction risk compared with a decision-tree analysis for Galliformes (Aves). While the contrasts analyses concur with some general macroecological trends found in other studies, the decision-tree models provide lists of species predicted to be more at risk than current assessments would suggest. We argue that in practical terms, decision tree models might be more useful than a macroecological linear model-based approach.


Comparative analysis Decision trees Extinction risk Galliformes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Ornithologists’ Union1998Check list of North American birdsAmerican Ornithologists’ UnionWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, J.F. 1999Tree-based methodsFielding, A.H. eds. Machine Learning Methods for Ecological ApplicationsKluwer AcademicBoston, MA and London89106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birdlife international2000Threatened Birds of the WorldLynx Ediciones and Birdlife InternationalBarcelona and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Brashares, J. 2003Ecological, behavioural and life-history correlates of mammal extinctions in West africaConserv. Biol.17733743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brom T.G. and Dekker R.W.R.J. 1992. Current studies on megapode phylogeny. In: Dekker R.W.R.J and Jones D.N. (eds), Proceedings of the First International Megapode Symposium, Christchurch, New Zealand, December 1990. Zoologische Verhandelingen 278: 7–17.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, D.M., Strahl, S.D. 2000Currasows, Guans and Chachalacas: Status, survey and conservation Action Plan for Cracids 2000–2004IUCNGland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKIUCN/SSC Cracid Specialist Group.Google Scholar
  7. Cramp, S., simmons, K.E.L. 1980Handbook of the Birds of Europethe Middle East and North Africa Vol. 2Oxford University PressOxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Dekker, R.W.R.J., Fuller, R.A., Baker, G.C. 2000Megapodes: Status, Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000–2004IUCN and World Pheasant AssociationGland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and Reading, UKWPA/Birdlife/SSC Megapode Specialist Group.Google Scholar
  9. Delacour, J. 1977The pheasants of the world2Spur PublicationsHindhead, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J. 1994Handbook of the Birds of the WorldBarcelonaLynx EdicionesGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunning, J.B.,Jr. 1993CRC Handbook of Avian Body MassesCRC PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein, J. 1985Phylogenies and the comparative methodAm. Nat.125115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher, D.O., Owens, I.P.F. 2004The comparative method in conservation biologyTrend. Ecol. Evol.19391398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuller, R.A., Carroll, J.P., McGowan, P.J.K. 2000Partridges, Quails, Francolins, Snowcocks and Guineafowl: Status, Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000–2004IUCN and the World Pheasant AssociationGland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, and Reading, UKWPA/Birdlife/SSC PartridgeQuail and Francolin Specialist Group.Google Scholar
  15. Fuller, R.A., Garson, P.J. 2000Pheasants: Status, Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000–2004IUCN and the World Pheasant AssociationGland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, and Reading, UKWPA/Birdlife/SSC Pheasant Specialist Group.Google Scholar
  16. Garland, T., Harvey , P.H., Ives, A.R. 1992Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrastsSystematic Biology411832Google Scholar
  17. Grafen, A. 1989The phylogenetic regressionPhilos. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. B326119157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harcourt, A.H., Coppeto, S.A., Parks, S.A. 2002Rarity,specialization and extinction in primatesJ. Biogeogr.29445456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey, P.H., Pagel, M.D. 1991The Comparative Method in Evolutionary BiologyOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Holdaway, R.N. 1999Introduced predators and avifaunal extinction in New ZealandMacPhee, R.D.E. eds. Extinctions in Near Time: Causes, Contexts and ConsequencesPlenum PressNew York189238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howman, K.C.R. 1979Pheasants: Their Breeding and ManagementK. and R. BooksEdlington, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnsgard P.A. 1983. The Grouse of the World. Croom Helm Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Johnsgard, P.A. 1988The Quails, Partridges and Francolins of the WorldOxford University PressOxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnsgard, P.A. 1999Pheasants of the World: Biology and Natural History, 2nd ednSwan Hill PressShrewsbury, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, D.N., Dekker, R.W.R.J., Roselaar, C.S. 1995The MegapodesOxford University PressOxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, K.E., Purvis, A., Gittleman, J.L. 2003Biological correlates of extinction risk in batsAm. Nat.161601614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones M.J., Fielding A.H. and Sullivan M.S. 2005 (this issue). Analysing extinction risk in parrots using decision trees. In: Sullivan M.S. and Marsden S.J. (eds.), 2005. Extinction Risk: Predicting, Assessing, Prioritising and Redressing. Biodiversity and Conservation.Google Scholar
  28. Keane A., de L., Brooke M.D. and Mcgowan P.J.K. (in press). Correlates of extinction risk and hunting pressure in gamebirds (Galliformes). Biol. Conserv. 126 (2): 216–233.Google Scholar
  29. Kimball, R., Braun, E.L., Zwartjes, P.W., Crowe, T.M., Ligon, J.D. 1999A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyleticMol. Phylogenet. Evol.113854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee D.C. and Marsden S.J. 2005 (this issue). Accumulation of knowledge and changes in Red List classifications within the family Galliformes. In: Sullivan M.S. and Marsden S.J. (eds.), 2005. Extinction Risk: Predicting, Assessing, Prioritising and Redressing Biodiversity and Conservation.Google Scholar
  31. Loh, W.-Y., Shih, Y.-S. 1997Split selection methods for classification treesStat. Sinica7815840Google Scholar
  32. Lucchini, V., Hoglund, J., Klaus, S., Swenson, J., Randi, E. 2001Historical biogeography and a mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of grouse and ptarmiganMol. Phylogenet. Evol.20149162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Madge, S., Mcgowan, P.J. 2002Pheasants, Partridges and Grouse: A guide to the Pheasants, Partridges, Quails, GrouseGuineafowl, Buttonquails and Sandgrouse of the WorldChristopher HelmLondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Norris, K., Harper, N. 2004Extinction processes in hot spots of avian biodiversity and the targeting of pre-emptive conservation actionProc. R. Soc, Lond. Ser. B271123130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pagel, M. 1999Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolutionNature401877884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Purvis, A., Rambaut, A. 1995Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative dataCABIOS11247251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Reed, R.N., Shine, R. 2002Lying in wait for extinction? Ecological correlates of conservation status among Australian elapid snakesConserv. Biol.16451461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricklefs, R.E., Cox, G.W. 1978Stage of taxon cyclehabitat distribution, and population density in the avifauna of the West IndiesAm. Nat.112875895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sibley, C.L., Ahlquist, J.E. 1990Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular EvolutionYale University PressNew Haven, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Sibley, C.L., Monroe, B.L.,Jr. 1990Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the WorldYale University PressNew Have, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Sibley, C.L., Monroe, B.L.,Jr. 1993A Supplement to Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the WorldYale University PressNew Haven, USAGoogle Scholar
  42. Storch, I. 2000Grouse: Status, Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000–2004IUCN and the World Pheasant AssociationGland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, and Reading, UKWPA/Birdlife/SSC Grouse Specialist GroupGoogle Scholar
  43. Sullivan, M.S., Gilbert, F., Rotheray, G., Croasdale, S., Jones, M.J. 2000Comparative analyses of correlates of red data book status: a case study using European hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae)Anim. Conserv.39195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Urban, E.K., Fry, C.H., Keith, S. 1986The birds of AfricaAcademic PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Watson, J.E.M., Whittaker, R.J., Dawson, T.P. 2004Habitat structure and proximity to forest edge affect the abundance and distribution of forest-dependent birds in tropical coastal forests of southeastern MadagascarBiol. Conserv.120311327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young, J.R., Braun, C.E., Oyler-McCance, S.J., Hupp, J.W., Quinn, T.W. 2000A new species of Sage-Grouse (Phasianidae: Centrocercus) from south-western ColoradoWilson Bull.112445453CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew S. Sullivan
    • 1
  • Martin J. Jones
    • 1
  • David C. Lee
    • 2
  • Stuart J. Marsden
    • 2
  • Alan H. Fielding
    • 1
  • Emily V. Young
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of Environmental and Geographical SciencesManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  3. 3.Emily V. YoungFitzroy NorthAustralia

Personalised recommendations