Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 10, pp 2377–2395 | Cite as

Threat Assessment and Conservation Prioritization of the Herpetofauna of El Salvador

  • Eli Greenbaum
  • Oliver Komar
Article

Abstract

We applied the IUCN Red List method for threat assessment to the amphibians and reptiles of El Salvador, the smallest Central American country. Seventy-six out of 130 species were found to be threatened or endangered at the national level. In general, most threatened taxa were aquatic organisms in lowland habitats or cloud-forest specialists in highland areas. The IUCN method was biased by collecting effort and was unable to classify 25 species that were categorized as ȁ8data deficientȁ9. We used the number and distribution of threatened species and a complementarity analysis to identify departments in El Salvador that require higher priority for conservation action. We applied a method for evaluating inventory completeness to our data set, and used species from reasonably well-surveyed taxonomic groups (Anura and Sauria) to carryout the complementarity analysis. The anurans (frogs) and saurians (lizards) had been inventoried relatively completely in 10 of 14 departments. The department with the most threatened species (35 of 76 threatened amphibians and reptiles) is Santa Ana, where many threatened species occur in pine-oak and cloud forest in Montecristo National Park.

Key words

Amphibian Complementarity El Salvador Herpetofauna Inventory completeness IUCN Red List categories Museum data Reptile 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barinaga, M. 1990Where have all the froggies gone?Science24710331034Google Scholar
  2. Blaustein, A.R., Hokit, D.G., Oȁ9Hara, R.K., Holt, R.A. 1994Pathogenic fungus contributes to amphibian losses in the Pacific NorthwestBiol. Conserv.67251254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J.H. 1984On the relationship between species abundance and distribution of speciesAm. Nat.124255279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J.H., Mehlman, D.W., Stevens, G.C. 1995Spatial variation in abundanceEcology7620282043Google Scholar
  5. Burgman, M.A., Ferson, S., Akçakaya, H.R. 1993Risk Assessment in Conservation BiologyChapman & HallNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J.A. 1999Distribution patterns of amphibians in Middle AmericaDuellman, W.E. eds. Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: A Global PerspectiveThe Johns Hopkins University PressBaltimore, Maryland111210Google Scholar
  7. Daugherty, H.E. 1972The impact of man on the zoogeography of El SalvadorBiol. Conserv.4273278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duellman, W.E. 1999Global distribution of amphibians: patterns, conservation, and future challengesDuellman, W.E. eds. Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: A Global PerspectiveThe Johns Hopkins University PressBaltimore, Maryland130Google Scholar
  9. Duellman, W.E. 2001The Hylid Frogs of Middle America2nd edSociety for the Study of Amphibians and ReptilesIthaca, New yorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Gärdenfors, U., Rodríguez, J.P., Hilton-Taylor, C., Hyslop, C., Mace, G., Molur, S., Poss, S. 1999Draft guidelines for the application of IUCN Red List criteria at national and regional levelsSpecies31–325870Google Scholar
  11. Godown, M.E., Peterson, A.T. 2000Preliminary distributional analysis of US endangered bird speciesBiodiv. Conserv.913131322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gómez de Silva, H., Medellín, R.A. 2001Evaluating completeness of species lists for conservation and macroecology: a case study of Mexican land birdsConserv. Biol.1513841395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, D.M. 2003The ecology of extinction: population fluctuation and decline in amphibiansBiol. Conserv.111331343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenbaum E. 2004. A new species of Bolitoglossa (Amphibia: Caudata: Plethodontidae) from montane forests in Guatemala and El Salvador. J. Herpetol. 38: 411–421. Google Scholar
  15. Holmes, E.E. 2001Estimating risks in declining populations with poor dataProc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA9850725077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. IUCN2001IUCN Red List Categories, Version 3.1. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival CommissionIUCNGland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. IUCN 2002. 2002 IUCN Red List of threatened species. < http://www.redlist.org. Downloaded 6 May 2003.Google Scholar
  18. IUCN Conservation International & Nature Serve 2004. Global Amphibian Assessment. www.globalamphibians.org Accessed 11 December 2004.Google Scholar
  19. Jorgeda Silva, N.,Jr., Sites, J.W.,Jr. 1995Patterns of diversity of neotropical squamate reptile species with emphasis on the Brazilian Amazon and the conservation potential of indigenous reservesConserv. Biol.9873901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirkpatrick, J.B. 1983An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from TasmaniaBiol. Conserv.25127134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Köhler, G. 2000Reptilien und Amphibien Mittelamerikas. Band 1: Krokodile. Schildkröten, EchsenHerpeton VerlagOffenbach, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  22. Köhler, G. 2001Reptilien und Amphibien Mittelamerikas. Band 2: Schlangen, DoppelschleichenHerpeton VerlagOffenbach, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  23. Köhler, G. 2003Reptiles of Central AmericaHerpeton VerlagOffenbach, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  24. Köhler G., Veselý M. and Greenbaum E. The Amphibians and Reptiles of El Salvador. Krieger Publishing Company, Melbourne, Florida, in press.Google Scholar
  25. Komar, O. 2002Priority conservation areas for birds in El SalvadorAnim. Conserv.5173183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laurance, W.F., McDonald, K.R., Speare, R. 1996Epidemic disease and the catastrophic decline of Australian rain forest frogsConserv. Biol.10406413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawton, R.O., Nair, U.S., Pielke, R.A.,Sr., Welch, R.M. 2001Climatic impact of tropical lowland deforestation on nearby montane cloud forestsScience294584587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lunney, D., Curtin, A., Ayers, D., Cogger, H.G., Dickman, C.R. 1996An ecological approach to identifying the endangered fauna of New South WalesPac. Conserv. Biol.2212231Google Scholar
  29. Marsh, D.M. 2001Fluctuations in amphibian populations: a meta-analysisBiol. Conserv.101327335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marsh, D.M., Trenham, P.C. 2001Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservationConserv. Biol.154049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martínez-Solano, I., Bosch, J., García-París, M. 2003Demographic trends and community stability in a montane amphibian assemblageConserv. Biol.17238244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCranie, J.R., Wilson, L.D. 1993A review of the Bolitoglossa dunni group (Amphibia: Caudata) from Honduras with the description of three new speciesHerpetologica49115Google Scholar
  33. McCranie, J.R., Wilson, L.D. 2002The Amphibians of Honduras. Society for the Study of Amphibians and ReptilesIthacaNew yorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería.1998Listado Oficial de Las Especies de Fauna Vertebrada Amenazada y en Peligro de Extinción en El SalvadorDirección General de Recursos Naturales y Renovables, Servicio de Parques Nacionales y Vida SilvestreSoyapangoSan SalvadorEl SalvadorGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería.2004Listado oficial de especies de fauna silvestre amenazada o en peligro de extinción en El SalvadorDiario Oficial (San SalvadorEl Salvador)363527Google Scholar
  36. Mittermeier, R.A. 1970Turtles in Central American marketsInt. Turtle Tortoise Soc. J.42026Google Scholar
  37. Morrison, C., Hero, J.-M. 2003Geographic variation in life-history characteristics of amphibians: a reviewJ. Anim. Ecol.72270279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parmesan, C., Yohe, G. 2003A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systemsNature4213742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pechmann, J.H.K., Scott, D.E., Semlitsch, R.D., Caldwell, J.P., Vitt, L.J., Gibbons, J.W. 1991Declining amphibian populations: the problem of separating human impacts from natural fluctuationsScience253892895Google Scholar
  40. Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, B.C., Gibbons, D.W. 1993Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategiesNature365335337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raxworthy, C.J., Nussbaum, R.A. 2000Extinction and extinction vulnerability of amphibians and reptiles in MadagascarAmphibian Reptile Conserv.21523Google Scholar
  42. Remsen, J.V.,Jr. 1994Use and misuse of bird lists in community ecology and conservationAuk111225227Google Scholar
  43. Root, T.L., Price, J.T., Hall, K.R., Schneider, S.H., Rosenzweig, C., Pounds, J.A. 2003Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plantsNature4215760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Samways, M.J. 2003Marginality and national Red Listing of speciesBiodiv. Conserv.1225232525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stephan, T., Ulbrich, K., Grosse, W.-R., Meyer, F. 2001Modelling the extinction risk of isolated populations of natterjack toad Bufo calamitaWeb Ecol.24756Google Scholar
  46. van Jaarsveld, A.S., Freitag, S., Chown, S.L., Muller, C., Koch, S., Hull, H.,  et al. 1998Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategiesScience27921062108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C., Pressey, R. 1996A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birdsConserv. Biol.10155174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson, E.O. 1992The Diversity of LifeHarvard University PressCambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson, L.D., McCranie, J.R. 2003The conservation status of the herpetofauna of HondurasAmphibian Reptile Conserv.3633Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural History Museum & Biodiversity Research Center and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary BiologyThe University of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.SalvaNATURA, Programa de Ciencias para la ConservaciónSan Salvador, El SalvadorUSA

Personalised recommendations