Correction to: Biol Invasions https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-01992-0

In the original publication of this article, Figs. 2 and 3 were published incorrectly.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Estimated population structure from STRUCTURE analysis for eight lionfish populations (excluding P. antennata) with a K = 3 using 52,742 polymorphic loci. Each color corresponds to a genetic cluster and each individual is represented by a vertical bar. Structure harvester supports a K = 3 Here BZ = Belize, BA = Bahamas, GOM = Gulf of Mexico, Bocas = Panama, HON = Honduras, CPH = Philippines, TWN = Taiwan, and SL = Sri Lanka. BZ, BA, GOM, Bocas, and HON are from the Lionfish invasive range, CPH and TWN are Lionfish from the native range identified in the field as P. volitans, and SR are Lionfish from the native range identified as P. miles. All invasive populations and TWN (except for one individual) were assigned to one cluster, SL and one TWN individual were assigned to a second, and CPH individuals comprised the third

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Graphical representation of the seven putative P. volitans populations using 44,190 polymorphic loci, where the first five populations are from the invasive range (BZ = Belize, BA = Bahamas, GOM = Gulf of Mexico, Bocas = Panama, HON = Honduras) and the last two are from the native range (CPH = Philippines, TWN = Taiwan). a Visual output from STRUCTURE analysis with a K = 2 and K = 3. Structure harvester supported a K = 2, and we included the representation for three clusters to highlight the putatively misidentified individual from Taiwan (TWN). All invasive populations and TWN except for the one individual were assigned to the same cluster. CPH individuals were all assigned to a second cluster, to which the TWN individual was also assigned when K = 2. When K = 3, the one TWN individual was unique from all others. b Visual output using Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) analysis with 10 principal components, chosen to avoid overfitting the data, and cross-validation of 95 iterations. The DAPC analysis shows that CPH is genetically distinct from the invasive and TWN populations. The invaded range populations overlap each other

Full size image

Figure 2 should be the STRUCTURE plot that includes 8 populations (see figure). It should not be a second copy of the map that is found in Fig. 1. Figure 3 should be two parts: 3a, which is two STRUCTURE plots for the two population settings, and 3b, which is a DAPC plot (see figure). They should not be a single STRUCTURE plot as in the online version.

The corrected Figs. 2 and 3 are given in this correction.