Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing local attitudes and perceptions of non-native species to inform management of novel ecosystems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formation of novel ecosystems by non-native species poses management challenges that are both socially and ecologically complex. Negative attitudes towards non-native species can complicate management in cases where non-native species provide ecosystem service benefits. Due to their intentional introduction over a century ago, non-native mangroves in Hawai’i present a unique case study. Although some have called for eradication of mangroves from Hawai’i, an active management approach may ultimately offer the greatest benefits to both the ecosystem and society by allowing mangroves to persist in locations where they provide habitat and crabbing access, while limiting their extent in other locations to protect native bird habitat and allow for beach and ocean access. We evaluated (1) attitudes and perceptions about non-native mangroves, (2) factors influencing these attitudes, and (3) support for different management approaches by surveying residents of Moloka’i, Hawai’i (n = 204). Negative attitudes towards mangroves were influenced by a lack of reliance on mangroves for benefit and a concern about threats to Moloka’i’s coast. Active management was supported by 88% of residents, while 41% supported eradication. Among the 88% in favor of active management, 24% of written in responses expressed a need for maintaining the benefits of mangroves and 67% described reducing the negative impacts, while 4% acknowledged both the benefit and harm the species has on the environment. As successful non-native species management may be dependent on local support, we emphasize that understanding human attitudes and perceptions is beneficial for non-native species managers in any location. Results from our study highlight the importance of understanding social attitudes towards non-native species management strategies from propagation to eradication. We conclude with a framework for integrating stakeholder attitudes and beliefs into novel ecosystem management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Action control. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–39

  • Ajzen I (2001) Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu Rev Psychol 52:27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen J (1998) Mangroves as alien species: the case of Hawaii. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:61–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badola R, Barthwal S, Hussain SA (2012) Attitudes of local communities towards conservation of mangrove forests: a case study from the east coast of India. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 96:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balram S, Dragićević S (2005) Attitudes toward urban green spaces: integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements. Landsc Urban Plan 71:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley DK, Edwards-Jones G (2007) Invasive species policy and climate change: social perceptions of environmental change in the Mediterranean. Environ Sci Policy 10:230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow KA, Alspach K, Lohle R, et al (1989) Assessment of mangrove ecosystem of West Moloka’i, Hawai’i, with additional site surveys of Moanui Beach Park and Ualapu’e Fishpond. In: Marine option program. University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, Hawai’i

  • Blake DE (2001) Contextual effects on environmental attitudes and behavior. Environ Behav 33:708–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner A, Park K (2007) Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biol Conserv 139:306–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL, Berntson GG (1997) Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 1:3–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell ML, Hewitt CL (2018) Which values do non-native marine species affect? A case-study exploration of perceived values at threat in Micronesia. Front Mar Sci 5:247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles H, Dukes JS (2007) Impacts of invasive species on ecosystem services. In: Nentwig W (ed) Biological invasions. Springer, Berlin, pp 217–237

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chimner RA, Fry B, Kaneshiro MY, Cormier N (2006) Current extent and historical expansion of introduced mangroves on O’ahu, Hawai’i. Pac Sci 60(3):377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Iorio M (2008) Invasive mangroves and coastal change on Moloka’i. In: Field ME, Cochran SA, Logan JB, Storlazzi CD (eds) The coral reef of south Moloka’i, Hawai’i: portrait of a sediment-threatened fringing reef. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5101, pp 129–134

  • Dawes RM (1972) Fundamentals of attitude measurement. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Demopoulos A, Smith C (2010) Invasive mangroves alter macrofaunal community structure and facilitate opportunistic exotics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 404:51–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demopoulos AWJ, Fry B, Smith CR (2007) Food web structure in exotic and native mangroves: a Hawaii-Puerto Rico comparison. Oecologia 153:675–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0751-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D, Smith REW (2006) Exotic species, fisheries and conservation of freshwater biodiversity in tropical Asia: the case of the Sepik River. Papua New Guinea 16:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1998) Attitude structure and function. In: The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Estévez RA, Anderson CB, Pizarro JC, Burgman MA (2015) Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conserv Biol 29:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evers CR, Wardropper CB, Branoff B et al (2018) The ecosystem services and biodiversity of novel ecosystems: a literature review. Glob Ecol Conserv 13:e00362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.e00362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviner VT, Garbach K, Baty JH, Hoskinson SA (2012) Measuring the effects of invasive plants on ecosystem services: challenges and prospects. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-11-00095.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel JJ, Putz FE (2004) A place for alien species in ecosystem restoration. Front Ecol Environ 2:354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel K, Twilley R, Ong JIN (1998) Different kinds of mangrove forests provide different goods and services. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field ME, Cochran SA, Logan JB, Storlazzi CD (2007) The coral reef of South Moloka’i Hawai’i: Portrait of a sediment-threatened fringing reef. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report

  • Fischer A, Van Der Wal R (2007) Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird–the construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. Biol Conserv 135:256–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social cognition, 2nd edn. Sage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser W (2001) Introduced wildlife in New Zealand: a survey of general public views. In: Landcare reserach science series no. 23. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln

  • Fraser A (2006) Public attitudes to pest control: a literature review. Science & Technical Pub., Department of Conservation

  • García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, González JA et al (2008) Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: implications for management. Biol Conserv 141:2969–2983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi P (2007) Limits and potentialities of eradication as a tool for addressing biological invasions. In: Nentwig W (ed) biological invasions. Springer, Berlin, pp 385–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn TF (2000) A space for place in sociology. Annu Rev Sociol 26:463–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham S, Lee PC (1999) The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environ Conserv 26:218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goecke SD, Carstenn SM (2017) Fish communities and juvenile habitat associated with non-native Rhizophora mangle L. in Hawai‘i. Hydrobiologia 803:209–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3182-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough A (2010) Are the ecological impacts of alien species misrepresented? A review of the “native good, alien bad” philosophy. Community Ecol 11:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.1.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Padilla DK (2004) Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol 19:470–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J et al (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Hall CM et al (2014) Managing the whole landscape: historical, hybrid, and novel ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 12:557–564. https://doi.org/10.1890/130300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iftekhar MS, Takama T (2008) Perceptions of biodiversity, environmental services, and conservation of planted mangroves: a case study on Nijhum Dwip Island, Bangladesh. Wetl Ecol Manag 16:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MJ, Marks CA (1997) Attitudinal survey on vertebrate pest management in Victoria. Department of Natural Resources and Environment Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsanevakis S, Wallentinus I, Zenetos A et al (2014) Impacts of invasive alien marine species on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a pan-European review. Aquat Invasions 9:391–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhan VC, Lavalle PD (2002) Use of loglinear models to assess factors influencing concern for the natural environment. Environ Manag 30:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicka M (2005) Ways to make people active: the role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. J Environ Psychol 25:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokocz E, Ryan RL, Sadler AJ (2011) Motivations for land protection and stewardship: exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts. Landsc Urban Plan 99:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell SJ, Stone SF, Fernandez L et al (2006) The economic impacts of aquatic invasive species: a review of the literature. Agric Resour Econ Rev 35:195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE (2004) The outcome of alien tree invasions in Puerto Rico. Front Ecol Environ 2:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE, Carlo TA, Wunderle JM (2012) Natural mixing of species: novel plant–animal communities on Caribbean Islands. Anim Conserv 15:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00523.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie R, Kryss C (2013) Impacts of exotic mangroves and chemical eradication of mangroves on tide pool fish assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 472:219–237. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maris V, Béchet A (2010) From adaptive management to adjustive management: a pragmatic account of biodiversity values. Conserv Biol 24:966–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mcleod E, Chmura GL, Bouillon S et al (2011) A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front Ecol Environ 9:552–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta JN, Kellert SR (1998) Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environ Conserv 25:320–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson LA, Mooney HA (2007) Invasive alien species in an era of globalization. Front Ecol Environ 5:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener WK, Blood ER, Bildstein KL et al (1997) Climate change, hurricanes and tropical storms, and rising sea level in coastal wetlands. Ecol Appl 7:770–801. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007%5b0770:CCHATS%5d2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen-Pincus M, Sussman P, Bennett DE et al (2017) the influence of place on the willingness to pay for ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour 30:1423–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1347976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG, Hannon B (1997) Environmental values: a place-based theory. Environ Ethics 19:227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Integrating Ecol Econ Control Bioinvasions IEECB SI 52:273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J et al (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reaser JK (2001) Invasive alien species prevention and control: the art and science of managing people. In: McNeely JA (ed) The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species. IUCN, pp 89–104

  • Ribe RG (2002) Is scenic beauty a proxy for acceptable management? The influence of environmental attitudes on landscape perceptions. Environ Behav 34:757–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts LM (2000) Historical changes in land use in relation to land erosion and sedimentation on the reefs of South Molokai. In: 9th Pacific congress on marine science and technology. Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 167–176

  • Roberts LM, Field ME (2008) People, land, and the reefs of south Moloka’i. In: Field ME, Cochran SA, Logan JB, Storlazzi CD (eds) The coral reef of south Moloka’i, Hawai’i: portrait of a sediment-threatened fringing reef. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5101, pp 123–128

  • Rodewald AD (2012) Spreading messages about invasives. Divers Distrib 18:97–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00817.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 21:129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD (2011) The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conserv Biol 25:428–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01646.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz PW, Zelezny L (1999) Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. J Environ Psychol 19:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Bohner G (2001) The construction of attitudes. Intrapersonal processes. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 436–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Selge S, Fischer A, van der Wal R (2011) Public and professional views on invasive non-native species–a qualitative social scientific investigation. Biol Conserv 144:3089–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp RL, Larson LR, Green GT (2011) Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management. Biol Conserv 144:2097–2104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2005) The politics of assessing risk for biological invasions: the USA as a case study. Trends Ecol Evol 20:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siple MC, Donahue MJ (2013) Invasive mangrove removal and recovery: food web effects across a chronosequence. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 448:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin LB (2001) The good, the bad and the reified. Evol Ecol Res 3:91–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding M, Kainuma M, Collins L (2010) World atlas of mangroves. Earthcan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern MJ (2008) Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: the role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environ Conserv 35:200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg JC, Chew MK, Nagler PL, Glenn EP (2009) Changing perceptions of change: the role of scientists in Tamarix and river management. Restor Ecol 17:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweetman AK, Middelburg JJ, Berle AM et al (2010) Impacts of exotic mangrove forests and mangrove deforestation on carbon remineralization and ecosystem functioning in marine sediments. Biogeosciences 7:2129–2145. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2129-2010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tassin J, Kull CA (2015) Facing the broader dimensions of biological invasions. Land Use Policy 42:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakol M, Dennick R (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2:53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tittensor DP, Walpole M, Hill SLL et al (2014) A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346:241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Truitt AM, Granek EF, Duveneck MJ et al (2015) What is novel about novel ecosystems: managing change in an ever-changing world. Environ Manage 55:1217–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0465-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Kobrin KC (2001) Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. J Environ Educ 32:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel T, Wanke M (2016) Attitudes and attitude change. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wald DM, Nelson KA, Gawel AM, Rogers HS (2018) The role of trust in public attitudes toward invasive species management on Guam: A case study. J Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.047

  • Walther G-R, Roques A, Hulme PE et al (2009) Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24:686–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wester L (1981) Introduction and spread of mangroves in the Hawaiian Islands. Yearb Assoc Pac Coast Geogr 43:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Joey Peters, Raymond Leimana Naki, Ka Honua Momona, fishpond owners, and Colette Machado for assistance with survey distribution; Shelby Oliver for data entry; and 204 Moloka’i residents for their contribution to this project.

Funding

This work was supported by a Portland State University Faculty Enhancement Grant (to EFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science and Management, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR, 97207, USA

    Casey L. Lewis, Elise F. Granek & Max Nielsen-Pincus

Authors
  1. Casey L. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elise F. Granek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Max Nielsen-Pincus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casey L. Lewis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

Portland State University Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved survey materials and methods (#153446).

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix: Survey instrument

Appendix: Survey instrument

figure afigure afigure afigure afigure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewis, C.L., Granek, E.F. & Nielsen-Pincus, M. Assessing local attitudes and perceptions of non-native species to inform management of novel ecosystems. Biol Invasions 21, 961–982 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1875-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1875-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation