Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 1033–1047 | Cite as

Fish invasion alters ecosystem function in a small heterotrophic stream

Original Paper

Abstract

The strength of trophic cascade effects in aquatic ecosystems depend, in part, on the identity of the top predator involved. We examined whether an invasive benthic fish (round goby, Neogobius melanostomus) altered the strength of cascade effects in a heterotrophic stream and in a controlled mesocosm experiment relative to the effects of a functionally similar, native fish. In the stream, the introduced fish had a direct effect on grazer and shredder abundance which led to a significant increase in periphyton chlorophyll a, a significant reduction in leaf breakdown rate, an increase in leaf biomass remaining, but no change in periphyton ash-free dry mass. In mesocosms, native and introduced fish similarly reduced shredder abundance, but this did not lead to an indirect effect on leaf breakdown rates or biomass remaining at the end of the experiment. Indirect effects of introduced fish on periphyton biomass and chlorophyll a in mesocosms were both significant and were stronger than in the field, but were the result of grazer behavioral modification and not reduced grazer abundance. Collectively, these results suggest non-native fish have the ability to initiate trophic cascades in heterotrophic streams, and that both fish identity and environmental context are important in determining the strength of cascades.

Keywords

Neogobius melanostomus Trophic cascade Leaf litter decomposition Periphyton 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Parts of this research were supported by an NSF, URM award (DEB No. 0731582) to CMP and supporting CEJ. Special thanks to the BSC Field Station manager, Mark Clapsadl, for securing the mesocosm location and logistics.

References

  1. Acquistapace P, Hazlett BA, Gherardi F (2003) Unsuccessful predation and learning of predator cues by crayfish. J Crust Biol 23:364–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balshine S, Verma A, Chant V, Theysmeyer T (2005) Competitive interactions between round gobies and logperch. J Gt Lakes Res 31:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks PB, Dickman CR (2007) Alien predation and the effects of multiple levels of prey naiveté. Trends Ecol Evol 22:229–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton DR, Reagan A, Johnson J, Campbell L, Petruniak J, Patterson M (2005) Effects of round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) on dreissenid mussels and other invertebrates in Eastern Lake Erie, 2002–2004. J Gt Lakes Res 31(Suppl. 2):252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Murakami M, Chapman PL (2004) Fish invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology 85:2656–2663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benfield EF (2007) Decomposition of leaf material. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2009) Large predators and trophic cascades in terrestrial ecosystems of the western United States. Biol Conserv 142:2401–2414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biggs JF, Francoeur SN, Huryn AD, Young R, Arbuckle CJ, Townsend CR (2000) Trophic cascades in streams: effects of nutrient enrichment on autotrophic and consumer benthic communities under two different fish predation regimes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1380–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bode RW, Novak MA, Abele LE, Heitzman DL, Smith AJ, Carlson D (2002) Ellicott Creek biological assessment, 2001 survey. Stream Biomonitoring Unit, Bureau of Watershed Assessment and Research, Division of Water, NY Dept of Environmental Conservation. 43 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Anderson KE, Blanchette CA, Broitman B, Cooper SD, Halpern BS (2005) What determines the strength of a trophic cascade? Ecology 86:528–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown GE (2003) Learning about danger: chemical alarm cues and local risk assessment in prey fishes. Fish Fish 4:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buria L, Alboariño R, Díaz Villanueva V, Modenutti B, Balseiro E (2010) Does predation by the introduced rainbow trout cascade down to detritus and algae in a forested small stream in Patagonia? Hydrobiologia 651:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carman SM, Janssen J, Jude DJ, Berg MB (2006) Diel interactions between prey behaviour and feeding in an invasive fish, the round goby, in a North American river. Freshw Biol 51:742–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience 35:634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casini M, Hielm J, Molinero JC, Lövgren J, Cardinale M, Bartolino V, Belgrano A, Kornilovs G (2009) Trophic cascades promote threshold-like shifts in pelagic marine ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:197–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chalcraft DR, Resetarits WJ Jr (2003) Predator identify and ecological impacts: functional redundancy or functional diversity? Ecology 84:2407–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1998) Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator–prey systems: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5:338–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper SD, Smith DW, Bence JR (1985) Prey selection by freshwater predators with different foraging strategies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:1720–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper SD, Walde SJ, Peckarsky BL (1990) Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. Ecology 71:1503–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Copp GH, Bianco PG, Bogutskaya N, Erös T, Falka I, Ferreira MT, Fox MG, Freyhof J, Gozlan RE, Grabowska J, Kováč V, Moreno-Amich R, Naseka AM, Peňáz M, Povž M, Przybylski M, Robillard M, Russell IC, Stakénas S, Šumer S, Vila-Gispert A, Wiesner C (2005) To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish? J Appl Ichthyol 21:242–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Corkum LD, Sapota MR, Skora KE (2004) The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Biol Invasion 6:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cox JG, Lima SL (2006) Naiveté and an aquatic–terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol Evol 21:674–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Daskalov GM, Grishin AN, Rodionov S, Mihneva V (2007) Trophic cascades triggered by overfishing reveal possible mechanisms of ecosystem regime shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:10518–10523CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Dick J, Platvoet D (1996) Intraguild predation and species exclusions in amphipods: the interaction of behaviour, physiology and environment. Freshw Biol 36:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dill LM, Fraser AGH (1997) The worm returns: hiding behavior of a tube dwelling marine polychaete, Serpula vermicularis. Behav Ecol 8:186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer AM (2014) Effects of round goby presence on invertebrate and microbial communities in decaying leaf matter of a Lake Erie tributary stream. Biology Theses 12. http://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/biology_theses/12
  27. Fuller P, Benson A, Maynard E, Neilson M, Larson J, Fusaro A (2017) Neogobius melanostomus. USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL. https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=713. Revision date 1/7/2016
  28. Greig HS, McIntosh AR (2006) Indirect effects of predatory trout on organic matter processing in detritus-based stream food webs. Oikos 112:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gutowsky LFG, Fox MG (2011) Occupation, body size, and sex ratio of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in established and newly invaded areas of an Ontario river. Hydrobiologia 671:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harter HL (1961) Expected values of normal order statistics. Biometrika 48:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoverman JT, Auld JR, Relyea RA (2005) Putting prey back together again: integrating predator-induced behavior, morphology, and life history. Oecologia 144:481–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator–prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kipp R, Ricciardi A (2012) Impacts of the Eurasian round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) on benthic communities in the upper St. Lawrence River. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69:469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Konishi M, Nakano S, Iwata T (2001) Trophic cascading effects of predatory fish on leaf litter processing in a Japanese stream. Ecol Res 16:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kornis MS, Vander Zanden MJ (2010) Forecasting the distribution of the invasive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Wisconsin tributaries to Lake Michigan. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krakowiak PJ, Pennuto CM (2008) Fish and macroinvertebrate communities in tributary streams of Eastern Lake Erie with and without round gobies (Neogobius melanostomas, Pallas 1814). J Gt Lakes Res 34:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lauer TE (2004) Changes in mottled sculpin and Johnny darter trawl catches after the appearance of round gobies in the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McPeek MA (1990) Behavioral differences between Enallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators. Ecology 71:1714–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mikl L, Adámek Z, Všetičková Janáč M, Roche K, Šlapansky L, Jurajda P (2017) Response of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages to round (Neogobius melanostomus, Pallas 1814) and tubenose (Proterorhinus semilunaris, Heckel 1837) goby predation pressure. Hydrobiologia 785:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nilsson E, Olsson K, Persson A, Nyström P, Svensson G, Nilsson U (2008) Effects of stream predator richness on the prey community and ecosystem attributes. Oecologia 157:641–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pagnucco KS, Yasmina R, Ricciardi A (2016) An invasive benthic fish magnifies trophic cascades and alters pelagic communities in an experimental freshwater system. Freshw Sci 35:654–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peckarsky BL, McIntosh AR (1998) Fitness and community consequences of avoiding multiple predators. Oecologia 113:565–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Peckarsky BL, Cowan CA, Anderson CR (1994) Consequences and plasticity of the specialized predatory behavior of stream-dwelling stonefly larvae. Ecology 75:166–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pennuto CM (2003) Seasonal differences in predator–prey behavior in experimental streams. Am Midl Nat 150:254–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pennuto CM, Keppler DA (2008) Short-term predator avoidance behavior by invasive and native amphipods in the Great Lakes. Aquat Ecol 42:629–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pennuto CM, Krakowiak PJ, Janik CE (2010) Diet, energy consumption, and seasonal abundance of round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) in Lake Erie, USA tributary streams. Ecol Freshw Fish 19:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Poos M, Dextrase A, Schwalb A, Ackerman J (2010) Secondary invasion of the round goby into high diversity Great Lakes tributaries and species at risk hotspots: potential new concerns for endangered freshwater species. Biol Invasions 12:1269–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Benard MF (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ruetz CR III, Newman RM, Vondracek B (2002) Top-down control in a detritus-based food web: fish, shredders, and leaf breakdown. Oecologia 132:307–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmitz OJ (2010) Resolving ecosystem complexity. Monographs in population biology, No. 47. Princeton Univeristy Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  52. Shurin JB, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Anderson K, Blanchette CA, Broitman B, Cooper SD, Halpern BS (2002) A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecol Lett 5:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sih A, Bolnick DI, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SD, Pintor LM, Preisser E, Rehage JS, Vonesh JR (2010) Predator–prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 119:610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simon KS, Townsend CR (2003) Impacts of freshwater invaders at different levels of ecological organisation, with emphasis on salmonids and ecosystem consequences. Freshw Biol 48:982–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steinman AD, Lamberti GA, Leavitt PR (2007) Biomass and pigments of benthic algae. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 357–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tomba AM, Keller TA, Moore PA (2001) Foraging in complex odor landscapes: chemical orientation strategies during stimulation by conflicting chemical cues. J North Am Benthol Soc 20:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turner AM (1996) Freshwater snails alter habitat use in response to predation. Anim Behav 51:747–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turner AM, Bernot RJ, Boes CM (2000) Chemical cues modify species interactions: the ecological consequences of predator avoidance by freshwater snails. Oikos 88:148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Beek CW (2006) The round goby Neogobius melanostomus first recorded in the Netherlands. Aquat Invasions 1:42–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wallach AD, Ripple WJ, Carroll SP (2015) Novel trophic cascades: apex predators enable coexistence. Trends Ecol Evol 30:146–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Weimer MT (2003) The distribution of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Eighteenmile Creek, Erie County, New York. Aquat Invader 14:2–4Google Scholar
  62. Woodward G, Papantoniou G, Edwards F, Lauridsen RB (2008) Trophic trickles and cascades in a complex food web: impacts of a keystone predator on stream community structure and ecosystem processes. Oikos 117:683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology Department, Great Lakes CenterBuffalo State CollegeBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.University at BuffaloAmherstUSA
  3. 3.Niagara County Community CollegeNiagara FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations