Biological Invasions

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 757–776 | Cite as

Low-head dams facilitate Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus invasion

  • Dustin Raab
  • Nicholas E. Mandrak
  • Anthony Ricciardi
Original Paper


Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus invasion of the Grand River (Ontario, Canada) presents an opportunity to assess the role of abiotic gradients in mediating the establishment and impact of nonnative benthic fishes in rivers. In this system, sequential low-head dams delineate uninvaded and invaded river reaches and create upstream gradients of increasing water velocity. We hypothesized that flow refugia created by impounded reservoirs above low-head dams enhance local Round Goby abundance. Round Goby influence on the native fish community was determined by variance partitioning, and we used generalized additive models to identify small-bodied benthic fish species most likely to be impacted by Round Goby invasion. Round Goby abundance declined as the degree of reservoir effect decreased upstream. The distributions of four species (including the endangered Eastern Sand Darter Ammocrypta pellucida) in invaded reaches were best explained by inclusion of both reservoir-associated abiotic variables and Round Goby abundance as model terms. To determine establishment potential of the uninvaded reach immediately upstream, four environmental habitat characteristics were used in discriminant function analysis (DFA) to predict three potential outcomes of introduction: non-invaded and either lower or higher Round Goby abundance (low and high invasion status, respectively) than the median number of Round Goby at invaded sites. Our DFA function correctly classified non-invaded and high-abundance invasion status sites > 85% of the time, with lower (73%) success in classifying low-abundance invasion status sites, and the spatial pattern of our results suggest that likelihood of establishment is greatest in impounded habitat.


Establishment Impact Laurentian Great Lakes Tributary impoundment 



We thank the Fisheries and Oceans Canada Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, in particular J. Barnucz and L. Bouvier for field support and provision of historical data. We also thank G. Larocque at the Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science for statistical advice. Thorough critique by two anonymous reviewers significantly improved an early version of this manuscript. The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Species at Risk Research Fund, the Invasive Species Centre, the Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada funded this work through grants to D.R., A.R., and N.E.M.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Animal handling by D.R. was conducted in accordance to McGill University Animal Care Committee guidelines for field studies to minimize discomfort to animals, under animal care protocol 2014-7493.


  1. Aadland LP (1993) Stream habitat types: their fish assemblages and relationship to flow. N Am J Fish Manag 13:790–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbett R, Waldt EM, Johnson JH, McKenna JE, Dittman DE (2013) Interactions between invasive round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) and fantail darters (Etheostoma flabellare) in a tributary of the St. Lawrence River, New York, USA. J Freshwat Ecol 28:529–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexandre CM, Almeida PR (2010) The impact of small physical obstacles on the structure of freshwater fish assemblages. River Res Appl 26:977–994Google Scholar
  4. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  5. Balshine S, Verma A, Chant V, Theysmeyer T (2005) Competitive interactions between round gobies and logperch. J Great Lakes Res 31:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer CR, Bobeldyk AM, Lamberti GA (2007) Predicting habitat use and trophic interactions of Eurasian ruffe, round gobies, and zebra mussels in nearshore areas of the Great Lakes. Biol Invasions 9:667–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bednarek AT (2001) Undamming rivers: a review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environ Manag 27:803–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beneteau CL, Mandrak NE, Heath DD (2009) The effects of river barriers and range expansion of the population genetic structure and stability in Greenside Darter (Etheostoma blennioides) populations. Conserv Genet 10:477–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandner J, Cerwenka AF, Schliewen UK, Geist J (2013) Bigger Is better: characteristics of round gobies forming an invasion front in the Danube River. PLoS ONE 8:e73036CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bronnenhuber JE, Dufour BA, Higgs DM, Heath DD (2011) Dispersal strategies, secondary range expansion and invasion genetics of the nonindigenous round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, in Great Lakes tributaries. Mol Ecol 20:1845–1859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Byers JE (2002) Physical habitat attribute mediates biotic resistance to non-indigenous species invasion. Oecologia 130:146–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell TB, Tiegs SD (2012) Factors governing the distribution and fish-community associations of the round goby in Michigan tributaries of the Laurentian Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 38:569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clavero M, Hermoso V, Aparicio E, Godinho FN (2013) Biodiversity in heavily modified waterbodies: native and introduced fish in Iberian reservoirs. Freshw Biol 58:1190–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corkum LD, Sapota MR, Skora KE (2004) The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Biol Invasions 6:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cumming GS (2004) The impact of low-head dams on fish species richness in Wisconsin, USA. Ecol Appl 14:1495–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dextrase AJ (2013) Modelling occupancy and abundance of eastern sand darter (Ammocrypta pellucida) while accounting for imperfect detection. Environmental and Life Sciences Department. Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, pp 352Google Scholar
  17. Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Gemmell NJ, Rand TA, Ewers RM (2007) Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol Evol 22:489–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dodd HR, Hayes DB, Baylis JR, Carl LM, Goldstein JD, McLaughlin RL, Noakes DLG, Porto LM, Jones ML (2003) Low-head sea lamprey barrier effects on stream habitat and fish communities in the Great Lakes basin. J Great Lakes Res 29:386–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dopazo SN, Corkum LD, Mandrak NE (2008) Fish assemblages and environmental variables associated with Gobiids in nearshore areas of the lower Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 34:450–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drake DAR, Mandrak NE (2014) Bycatch, bait, anglers, and roads: quantifying vector activity and propagule introduction risk across lake ecosystems. Ecol Appl 24:877–894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Drake DAR, Power M, Koops MA, Doka SE, Mandrak NE (2008) Environmental factors affecting growth of eastern sand darter (Ammocrypta pellucida). Can J Zool 86:714–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dubs DOL, Corkum LD (1996) Behavioral interactions between round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) and mottled sculpins (Cottus bairdi). J Great Lakes Res 22:838–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falke JA, Gido KB (2006) Spatial effects of reservoirs on fish assemblages in great plains streams in Kansas, USA. River Res Appl 22:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fausch KD, Rieman BE, Dunham JB, Young MK, Peterson DP (2009) Invasion versus isolation: trade-offs in managing native salmonids with barriers to upstream movement. Conserv Biol 23:859–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Floerl O, Inglis GJ, Dey K, Smith A (2009) The importance of transport hubs in stepping-stone invasions. J Appl Ecol 46:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillette DP, Tiemann JS, Edds DR, Wildhaber ML (2005) Spatiotemporal patterns of fish assemblage structure in a river impounded by low-head dams. Copeia 2005:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Google Earth (2017) CNES, Airbus, DigitalGlobe, United States Geological Survey, First Base Solutions 2017 imagery. (June 19, 2017)
  28. GRASS Development Team (2012) Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software v6.4. Open Source Geospatial Foundation ProjectGoogle Scholar
  29. Harford WJ, McLaughlin RL (2007) Understanding uncertainty in the effect of low-head dams on fishes of great lakes tributaries. Ecol Appl 17:1783–1796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Havel JE, Lee CE, Vander Zanden MJ (2005) Do reservoirs facilitate invasions into landscapes? Bioscience 55:518–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hermoso V, Clavero M, Blanco-Garrido F, Prenda J (2011) Invasive species and habitat degradation in Iberian streams: an analysis of their role in freshwater fish diversity loss. Ecol Appl 21:175–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Herzog DP, Ostendorf DE, Hrabik RA, Barko VA (2009) The mini-Missouri trawl: a useful methodology for sampling small-bodied fishes in small and large river systems. J Freshw Ecol 24:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Husson F, Josse J, Le S, Mazet J (2013) FactoMineR: multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining with R. R Package, 1.15 edn.Google Scholar
  34. Inman DL (1952) Measures for describing the size distribution of sediments. J Sediment Res 22:125–145Google Scholar
  35. Janssen J, Jude DJ (2001) Recruitment failure of mottled sculpin Cottus bairdi in Calumet Harbor, southern Lake Michigan, induced by the newly introduced round goby Neogobius melanostomus. J Great Lakes Res 27:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson PTJ, Olden JD, Vander Zanden MJ (2008) Dam invaders: impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Front Ecol Environ 6:359–365Google Scholar
  37. Josse J, Husson F (2012) Selecting the number of components in principal component analysis using cross-validation approximations. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:1869–1879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kestrup AM, Ricciardi A (2009) Environmental heterogeneity limits the local dominance of an invasive freshwater crustacean. Biol Invasions 11:2095–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kocovsky PM, Chapman DC, McKenna JE (2012) Thermal and hydrologic suitability of Lake Erie and its major tributaries for spawning of Asian carps. J Great Lakes Res 38:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kornis MS, Mercado-Silva N, Vander Zanden MJ (2012) Twenty years of invasion: a review of round goby Neogobius melanostomus biology, spread and ecological implications. J Fish Biol 80:235–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kornis MS, Sharma S, Vander Zanden MJ (2013) Invasion success and impact of an invasive fish, round goby, in Great Lakes tributaries. Divers Distrib 19:184–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kornis M, Carlson J, Lehrer-Brey G, Vander Zanden MJ (2014) Experimental evidence that ecological effects of an invasive fish are reduced at high densities. Oecologia 175:325–334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Krakowiak PJ, Pennuto CM (2008) Fish and macroinvertebrate communities in tributary streams of Eastern Lake Erie with and without Round Gobies (Neogobius melanostomus, Pallas 1814). J Great Lakes Res 34:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lavis DS, Hallett A, Koon EM, McAuley TC (2003) History of and advances in barriers as an alternative method to suppress sea lampreys in the Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 29:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Legendre P, Legendre LFJ (2012) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  47. Leino JR, Mensinger AF (2016) The benthic fish assemblage of the soft-bottom community of the Duluth-Superior Harbor before and after round goby invasion (1989–2011). J Great Lakes Res 42:829–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leino JR, Mensinger AF (2017) Interspecific competition between the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, and the logperch, Percina caprodes, in the Duluth-Superior Harbour. Ecol Freshw Fish 26:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lynch MP, Mensinger AF (2012) Seasonal abundance and movement of the invasive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) on rocky substrate in the Duluth-Superior Harbor of Lake Superior. Ecol Freshwat Fish 21:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacInnis AJ, Corkum LD (2000) Age and growth of Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus in the upper Detroit River. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:852–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marchetti MP, Light T, Moyle PB, Viers JH (2004) Fish invasions in California watersheds: testing hypotheses using landscape patterns. Ecol Appl 14:1507–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marks JC, Haden GA, O’Neill M, Pace C (2010) Effects of flow restoration and exotic species removal on recovery of native fish: lessons from a dam decommissioning. Restor Ecol 18:934–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McLaughlin RL, Marsden JE, Hayes DB (2003) Achieving the benefits of sea lamprey control while minimizing effects on nontarget species: Conceptual synthesis and proposed policy. J Great Lakes Res 29:755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McLaughlin RL, Smyth ERB, Castro-Santos T, Jones ML, Koops MA, Pratt TC, Velez-Espino LA (2013) Unintended consequences and trade-offs of fish passage. Fish Fish 14:580–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mills EL, Leach JH, Carlton JT, Secor CL (1993) Exotic species in the Great Lakes: a history of biotic crises and anthropogenic introductions. J Great Lakes Res 19:1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moyle PB, Marchetti MP (2006) Predicting invasion success: freshwater fishes in California as a model. Bioscience 56:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Murphy EA, Jackson PR (2013) Hydraulic and water-quality data collection for the investigation of Great Lakes tributaries for Asian carp spawning and egg-transport suitability In: Survey USG (ed). pp 30Google Scholar
  58. Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308:405–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Noakes DLG, McLaughlin RL, Baylis JR, Carl LM, Hayes DB, Randall RG (2000) Biological impact of low-head barrier dams (BILD) Project completion report (1999) to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  60. Oksanen J, Blanchet B, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2011) VEGAN: Community ecology package. R Package, 1.17-0 edn.Google Scholar
  61. Orr CH, Kroiss SJ, Rogers KL, Stanley EH (2008) Downstream benthic responses to small dam removal in a coldwater stream. River Res Appl 24:804–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Paine MD, Dodson JJ, Power G (1982) Habitat and food resource partitioning among four species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma) in a southern Ontario stream. Can J Zool 60:1635–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pennuto CM, Krakowiak PJ, Janik CE (2010) Seasonal abundance, diet, and energy consumption of round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) in Lake Erie tributary streams. Ecol Freshw Fish 19:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Phillips EC, Washek ME, Hertel AW, Niebel BM (2003) The round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Pennsylvania tributary streams of Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 29:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Poos M, Dextrase AJ, Schwalb AN, Ackerman JD (2010) Secondary invasion of the round goby into high diversity Great Lakes tributaries and species at risk hotspots: potential new concerns for endangered freshwater species. Biol Invasions 12:1269–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Porto LM, McLaughlin RL, Noakes DLG (1999) Low-head barrier dams restrict the movements of fishes in two Lake Ontario streams. N Am J Fish Manag 19:1028–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pratt AE, Lauer TE (2013) Habitat use and separation among congeneric darter species. Trans Am Fish Soc 142:568–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. R Core Development Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  69. Rahel FJ (2002) Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:291–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rahel RF, Rahel FJ, Hubert WA (2009) Complex influences of low-head dams and artificial wetlands on fishes in a Colorado River tributary system. Fish Manag Ecol 16:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ray WJ, Corkum LD (2001) Habitat and site affinity of the round goby. J Great Lakes Res 27:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reid SM, Mandrak NE (2008) Historical changes in the distribution of threatened channel darter (Percina copelandi) in Lake Erie with general observations on the beach fish assemblage. J Great Lakes Res 34:324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reid SM, Mandrak NE, Carl LM, Wilson CC (2008) Influence of dams and habitat condition on the distribution of redhorse (Moxostoma) species in the Grand River watershed, Ontario. Environ Biol Fish 81:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ricciardi A (2006) Patterns of invasion in the Laurentian Great Lakes in relation to changes in vector activity. Divers Distrib 12:425–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ripley B, Venables R, Bates DM, Hornik K, Gebhardt A, Firth D (2015) Support functions and datasets for Venables and Ripley’s MASS. 7.3-43 edn.Google Scholar
  76. Rosenberger AE, Angermeier PL (2002) Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) population structure and habitat use. Final Report submitted to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Blacksburg, VA:110Google Scholar
  77. Santucci VJ, Gephard SR, Pescitelli SM (2005) Effects of multiple low-head dams on fish, macroinvertebrates, habitat, and water quality in the fox river, Illinois. N Am J Fish Manag 25:975–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Scott DC, Arbeider M, Gordon J, Moore JW (2016) Flood control structures in tidal creeks associated with reduction in nursery potential for native fishes and creation of hotspots for invasive species. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 73:1138–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith BR, Tibbles JJ (1980) Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in Lakes Huron, Michigan, and Superior: history of invasion and control, 1936–78. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1780–1801Google Scholar
  80. Smith BR, Edds DR, Goeckler JM (2015) Lowhead dams and the downstream dispersal of zebra mussels. Hydrobiologia 755:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Staton SK, Mandrak NE (2005) Focusing conservation efforts for freshwater biodiversity. Protected areas and species and ecosystems at risk: research and planning challenges. In: Proceedings of the parks research forum of ontario annual meeting. pp 197–204Google Scholar
  82. Stauffer JR, Boltz JM, Kellogg KA, van Snik ES (1996) Microhabitat partitioning in a diverse assemblage of darters in the Allegheny River system. Environ Biol Fish 46:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taraborelli AC, Fox MG, Johnson TB, Schaner T (2010) Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) population structure, biomass, prey consumption and mortality from predation in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 36:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thompson B, Stallsmith B (2016) Microhabitat partitioning of an assemblage of darter species within two tributaries of the Tennessee River in Alabama. River Res Appl 32:1232–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tiemann JS, Gillette DP, Wildhaber ML, Edds DR (2004) Effects of lowhead dams on riffle-dwelling fishes and macroinvertebrates in a midwestern river. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:705–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tierney KB, Kasurak AV, Zielinski BS, Higgs DM (2011) Swimming performance and invasion potential of the round goby. Environ Biol Fish 92:491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vélez-Espino LA, Koops MA, Balshine S (2010) Invasion dynamics of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario. Biol Invasions 12:3861–3870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wang LZ, Infante D, Lyons J, Stewart J, Cooper A (2011) Effects of dams in river networks on fish assemblages in non-impoundment sections of rivers in Michigan and Wisconsin, USA. River Res Appl 27:473–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dustin Raab
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nicholas E. Mandrak
    • 3
  • Anthony Ricciardi
    • 1
  1. 1.Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.University of Toronto ScarboroughTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations