Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 18, Issue 10, pp 2809–2821 | Cite as

Habitat and climatic preferences drive invasions of non-native ambrosia beetles in deciduous temperate forests

  • Davide Rassati
  • Massimo Faccoli
  • Andrea Battisti
  • Lorenzo Marini
Original Paper

Abstract

The introduction of non-native ambrosia beetles can cause severe damage in forest ecosystems. Understanding the environmental drivers affecting their invasion at the local scale is of utmost importance to enhancing management strategies. Our objectives were: (1) to determine the influence of forest composition, forest structure, and climate on invasion success of non-native ambrosia beetles in deciduous temperate forests, and (2) to test the effect of host tree species on colonization success by non-native ambrosia beetles. In 2013, we sampled 25 forest stands located in North-East Italy belonging to three forest types dominated respectively by hop hornbeam, chestnut, and beech. Both ethanol-baited traps and trap-logs of five tree species (hop hornbeam, chestnut, beech, manna ash, and black locust) were used to sample non-native and native ambrosia beetle communities. We found a clear effect of forest composition on non-native species richness and activity-density, as measured in ethanol-baited traps, both of which were higher in chestnut-dominated forests. Furthermore, we found a positive effect of temperature on both the number of trapped non-native species and their activity-density, with cold temperatures limiting beetle spread in high-elevation forests. Only Xylosandrus germanus successfully colonized the trap-logs. The number of colonized logs was higher for chestnut and in chestnut-dominated forests. Both trapping and log-baiting indicated that chestnut-dominated forests were at greater risk of invasion than hop hornbeam- and beech-dominated forests. Given the economic and ecological importance of chestnut, ambrosia beetle communities present in chestnut-dominated forests should be monitored to determine where protective measures must be taken.

Keywords

Alien species Colonization success Monitoring Pests Scolytinae Temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Regional Forest Service of the Veneto Region (station of Treviso), Diego Inclán, Giovanni Tamburini, Riccardo Favaro, Marco Pilati, and Raphael Vinot for field assistance and collaboration during research. This study was partially supported by the European project Q-DETECT (Development of detection methods for quarantine plant pests for use by plant health inspection services, Grant No. 245047), by the Italian national project GEISCA (Insects and globalization: sustainable control of non-native species in agro-forest ecosystems, Grant No. 210CXXHJE) of the Italian Ministry of University and Research, and by the University of Padua (ex-60 %). We are also grateful to Robert A. Haack, Giorgio Maresi, Jon Sweeney, Myron Zalucki, and two anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10530_2016_1172_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (88 kb)
Fig. S1 A) Map with the location of the 25 selected forest stands and B) diagram representing how ethanol-baited trap and trap-logs were deployed at each study site. HOP: hop hornbeam-dominated forests; CHE: chestnut-dominated forests; BEE: beech-dominated forests. (JPEG 87 kb)

References

  1. Balachowsky A (1949) Faune de France: Coléoptères Scolytides. Librairie de la Faculté des Sciences, FranceGoogle Scholar
  2. Battisti A, Benvegnù I, Colombari F, Haack RA (2014) Invasion by the chestnut gall wasp in Italy causes significant yield loss in Castanea sativa nut production. Agric For Entomol 16:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaver RA (1979) Host specificity of temperate and tropical animals. Nature 281:139–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benavides R, Montes F, Rubio A, Osoro K (2007) Geostatistical modelling of air temperature in a mountainous region of northern Spain. Agric For Meteorol 146:173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biedermann PH, Klepzig KD, Taborsky M (2009) Fungus cultivation by ambrosia beetles: behavior and laboratory breeding success in three xyleborine species. Environ Entomol 38:1096–1105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Borcard D, Legendre P (2012) Is the Mantel correlogram powerful enough to be useful in ecological analysis? A simulation study. Ecology 93:1473–1481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouget C, Noblecourt T (2005) Short-term development of ambrosia and bark beetle assemblages following a windstorm in French broadleaved temperate forests. J Appl Entomol 129:300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brändle M, Brandl R (2001) Species richness of insects and mites on trees: expanding Southwood. J Anim Ecol 70:491–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brin A, Bouget C, Brustel H, Jactel H (2011) Diameter of downed woody debris does matter for saproxylic beetle assemblages in temperate oak and pine forests. J Insect Conserv 15:653–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brockerhoff EG, Bain J, Kimberley MO, Knizek M (2006a) Interception frequency of non-native bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide. Can J For Res 36:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brockerhoff EG, Jones DC, Kimberley MO, Suckling DM, Donaldson T (2006b) Nationwide survey for invasive wood-boring and bark beetles (Coleoptera) using traps with pheromones and kairomones. For Ecol Manag 228:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bussler H, Bouget C, Brustel H, Brändle M, Riedinger V, Brandl R, Müller J (2011) Abundance and pest classification of scolytid species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) follow different patterns. For Ecol Manag 262:1887–1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castrillo LA, Griggs MH, Vandenberg JD (2012) Brood production by Xylosandrus germanus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and growth of its fungal symbiont on artificial diet based on sawdust of different tree species. Environ Entomol 4:822–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Del Favero R (2006) Carta regionale dei tipi forestali—documento base. Regione del Veneto, Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, MestreGoogle Scholar
  16. Epanchin-Niell RS, Haight RG, Berec L, Kean JM, Liebhold AM (2012) Optimal surveillance and eradication of invasive species in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol Lett 15:803–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans EA, Crane J, Hodges A, Osborne JL (2010) Potential economic impact of laurel wilt disease on the Florida avocado industry. Hort Technol 20:234–238Google Scholar
  18. Faccoli M (2008) First record of Xyleborus atratus Eichhoff from Europe, with an illustrated key to the European Xyleborini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Zootaxa 1772:55–62Google Scholar
  19. Flechtmann CAH, Ottati ALT, Berisford CW (2001) Ambrosia and bark beetles (Scolytidae: Coleoptera) in pine and eucalypt stands in southern Brazil. For Ecol Manag 142:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Francke-Grosmann H (1967) Ectosymbiosis in wood-inhabiting insects. In: Henry SM (ed)  Symbiosis, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 141–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaylord ML, Kolb TE, Wallin KF, Wagner MR (2006) Seasonality and lure preference of bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and associates in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Environ Entomol 35:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham EE, Poland TM (2012) Efficacy of fluon conditioning for capturing cerambycid beetles in different trap designs and persistence on panel traps over time. J Econ Entomol 105:395–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Grégoire JC, Piel F, de Proft M, Gilbert M (2001) Spatial distribution of ambrosia beetle catches: a possibly useful knowledge to improve mass-trapping. Integr Pest Manag Rev 6:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haack RA (2001) Intercepted Scolytidae (Coleoptera) at U.S. ports of entry: 1985–2000. Integr Pest Manag Rev 6:253–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haack RA (2006) Non-native bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States: recent establishments and interceptions. Can J For Res 36:269–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haack RA, Rabaglia RJ (2013) Non-native bark and ambrosia beetles in the USA: potential and current invaders. In: Peña JE (ed) Potential invasive pests of agricultural crops. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 48–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrington TC, McNew D, Mayers C, Fraedrich SW, Reed SE (2014) Ambrosiella roeperi sp. nov. is the mycangial symbiont of the granulate ambrosia beetle, Xylosandrus crassiusculus. Mycologia 106:835–845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Pöyry J (2005) New insights into butterfly-environment relationships using partitioning methods. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:2203–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heiniger U, Rigling D (1994) Biological control of chestnut blight in Europe. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:581–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hofstetter RW, Dempsey TD, Klepzig KD, Ayres MP (2007) Temperature-dependent effects on mutualistic, antagonistic, and commensalistic interactions among insects, fungi and mites. Community Ecol 8:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hulcr J, Dunn R (2011) The sudden emergence of pathogenicity in insect-fungus symbioses threatens naive forest ecosystems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278:2866–2873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hulcr J, Mogia M, Isua B, Novotny V (2007) Host specificity of ambrosia and bark beetles (Col., Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in a New Guinea rainforest. Ecol Entomol 32:762–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hulcr J, Beaver RA, Puranasakul W, Dole SA, Sonthichai S (2008a) A comparison of bark and ambrosia beetle communities in two forest types in Northern Thailand (Coleoptera: Curculionidae; Scolytinae and Platypodinae). Environ Entomol 37:1461–1470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hulcr J, Novotny V, Maurer BA, Cognato AI (2008b) Low beta diversity of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in a lowland rainforest of Papua New Guinea. Oikos 117:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jordal BH, Beaver RA, Kirkendall LR (2001) Breaking taboos in the tropics: incest promotes colonization by wood-boring beetles. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelsey RG (2001) Chemical indicators of stress in trees: their ecological significance and implication for forestry in eastern Oregon and Washington. Northwest Sci 75:70–76Google Scholar
  37. Kirkendall LR (1983) The evolution of mating systems in bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Zool J Linn Soc 77:293–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirkendall LR, Faccoli M (2010) Bark beetles and pinhole borers (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Platypodinae) non-native to Europe. ZooKeys 56:227–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knížek M (2011) Subfamily Scolytinae Latreille, 1804. In: Löbl I, Smetana A (eds) Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, vol 7 part I. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, pp 204–251Google Scholar
  40. La Spina S, De Cannière C, Dekri A, Grégoire JC (2013) Frost increases beech susceptibility to scolytine ambrosia beetles. Agric For Entomol 15:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. Liebhold AM, Tobin PC (2008) Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annu Rev Entomol 53:387–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lowry R (2001) VassarStats: web site for statistical computation. http://www.vassarstats.net/. Accessed 24 Oct 2014
  44. Madoffe SS, Bakke A (1995) Seasonal fluctuations and diversity of bark and wood-boring beetles in lowland forest: implications for management practice. S Afr For J 173:9–15Google Scholar
  45. Marini L, Haack RA, Rabaglia RJ, Petrucco Toffolo E, Battisti A, Faccoli M (2011a) Exploring associations between international trade and environmental factors with establishment patterns of alien Scolytinae. Biol Invasions 13:2275–2288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marini L, Bona E, Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (2011b) Exploring anthropogenic and natural processes shaping fern species richness along elevational gradients. J Biogeogr 38:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martini X, Hughes MA, Smith JA, Stelinski LL (2015) Attraction of redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus, to leaf volatiles of its host plants in North America. J Chem Ecol 41:613–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mayfield AE III, Brownie C (2013) The redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) uses stem silhouette diameter as a visual host-finding cue. Environ Entomol 42:743–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller DR, Rabaglia RJ (2009) Ethanol and (–)-α-pinene: attractant kairomones for bark and ambrosia beetles in the southeastern US. J Chem Ecol 35:435–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller DR, Dodds KJ, Hoebeke ER, Poland TM, Willhite EA (2015) Variation in effects of conophthorin on catches of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera; Curculionidae; Scolytinae) in ethanol-baited traps in the United States. J Econ Entomol 108:183–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Morales NE, Zanuncio JC, Pratissoli D, Fabres AS (2000) Fluctuación poblacional de Scolytidae (Coleoptera) en zonas reforestadas con Eucalyptus grandis (Myrtaceae) en Minas Geraes, Brasil. Rev Biol Trop 48:101–107Google Scholar
  52. Norris DM (1979) The mutualistic fungi of Xyloborini beetles. In: Batra LR (ed) Insect-fungus symbiosis. Wiley, New York, pp 53–64Google Scholar
  53. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Wagner H (2012) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0–3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  54. Oliver JB, Mannion CM (2001) Ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) species attacking chestnut and captured in ethanol-baited traps in Middle Tennessee. Environ Entomol 30:909–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park J, Reid LM (2007) Distribution of a bark beetle, Trypodendron lineatum, in a harvested landscape. For Ecol Manag 242:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peltonen M, Heliövaara K, Vaisanen R, Keronen J (1998) Bark beetle diversity at different spatial scales. Ecography 21:510–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pezzi G, Maresi G, Conedera M, Ferrari C (2011) Woody species composition of chestnut stands in the Northern Apennines: the result of 200 years of changes in land use. Landsc Ecol 26:1463–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pfeffer A (1995) Zentral- und Westpaläarktische Borken- und Kernkäfer (Coleoptera, Scolytidae, Platypodidae). Entomol Basil 17:5–310Google Scholar
  59. Prebble ML, Graham K (1957) Studies of attack by ambrosia beetles in softwood logs on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. For Sci 3:90–112Google Scholar
  60. R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0Google Scholar
  61. Ranger CM, Reding ME, Persad AB, Herms DA (2010) Ability of stress-related volatiles to attract and induce attacks by Xylosandrus germanus and other ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Agric For Entomol 12:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ranger CM, Gorzlancyk AM, Addesso KM, Oliver JB, Reding ME, Schultz PB, Held DW (2014) Conophthorin enhances the electroantennogram and field behavioural response of Xylosandrus germanus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to ethanol. Agric For Entomol 16:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ranger CM, Tobin PC, Reding ME (2015a) Ubiquitous volatile compound facilitates efficient host location by a non-native ambrosia beetle. Biol Invasions 17:675–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ranger CM, Schultz PB, Frank SD, Chong JH, Reding ME (2015b) Non-native ambrosia beetles as opportunistic exploiters of living but weakened trees. PLoS ONE 10:e0131496CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Rassati D, Petrucco Toffolo E, Roques A, Battisti A, Faccoli M (2014) Trapping wood boring beetles in Italian ports: a pilot study. J Pest Sci 87:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rassati D, Lieutier F, Faccoli M (2016) Alien wood-boring beetles in Mediterranean regions. In: Paine TD, Lieutier F (eds) Insects and diseases of Mediterranean forest systems. Springer, Zurich, pp 293–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reding ME, Ranger CM, Oliver JB, Schultz PB (2013) Monitoring attack and flight activity of Xylosandrus spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): the influence of temperature on activity. J Econ Entomol 106:1780–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reed SE, Muzika RM (2010) The influence of forest stand and site characteristics on the composition of non-native dominated ambrosia beetle communities (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Environ Entomol 39:1482–1491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Reich RM, Lundquist JE, Acciavatti R (2014) Influence of climatic conditions and elevation on the spatial distribution and abundance of Trypodendron ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Alaska. For Sci 60:308–316Google Scholar
  70. Rice AV, Thormann MN, Langor DW (2008) Mountain pine beetle-associated blue stain fungi are differentially adapted to boreal temperatures. For Pathol 38:113–123Google Scholar
  71. Sanguansub S, Goto H, Kamata N (2012) Guild structure of ambrosia beetles attacking a deciduous oak tree Quercus serrata in relation to wood oldness and seasonality in three locations in the Central Japan. Entomol Sci 15:42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Oswald H, Piussi P, Radoglou K (2000) Forests of the Mediterranean region: gaps in knowledge and research needs. For Ecol Manag 132:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schmidt O (2006) Wood and tree fungi. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  74. Sittichaya W, Permkam S, Cognato AI (2012) Species composition and flight pattern of xyleborini ambrosia beetles (Col.: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) from agricultural areas in Southern Thailand. Environ Entomol 41:776–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Southwood TRE, Henderson PA (2000) Ecological methods. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  76. Stone WD, Nebeker TE, Gerard PD (2007) Host plants of Xylosandrus mutilatus in Mississippi. Fla Entomol 90:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Strom BL, Goyer RA, Shea PJ (2001) Visual and olfactory disruption of orientation by the western pine beetle to attractant-baited traps. Entomol Exp Appl 100:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ugolini F, Massetti L, Pedrazzoli F, Tognetti R, Vecchione A, Zulini L, Maresi G (2014) Ecophysiological responses and vulnerability to other pathologies in European chestnut coppices, heavily infested by the Asian chestnut gall wasp. For Ecol Manag 314:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. VanDerLaan NR, Ginzel MD (2013) The capacity of conophthorin to enhance the attraction of two Xylosandrus species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to ethanol and the efficacy of verbenone as a deterrent. Agric For Entomol 15:391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Watanabe K, Murakami M, Hirao T, Kamata N (2014) Species diversity estimation of ambrosia and bark beetles in temperate mixed forests in Japan based on host phylogeny and specificity. Ecol Res 29:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weber BC, McPherson JE (1985) Relation between attack by Xylosandrus germanus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and disease symptoms in black walnut. Can Entomol 117:1275–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wood SE, Bright DE (1992) A catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Part 2: taxonomic index, volume A and B. Gt Basin Nat Mem 13:1–1553Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Rassati
    • 1
  • Massimo Faccoli
    • 1
  • Andrea Battisti
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Marini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE)University of PadovaLegnaroItaly

Personalised recommendations