Different dispersal histories of lineages of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa (Lumbricidae, Annelida) in the Palearctic
- 188 Downloads
Earthworms are among the most abundant and ecologically important invasive species, and are therefore a good object for studying genetic processes in invasive populations. Aporrectodea caliginosa is one of the most widespread invasive earthworms in the temperate zone. It is believed to have dispersed from Europe to all continents except Antarctica. It is known that A. caliginosa consists of three genetic lineages, and genetic diversity is high both among and between them. We attempted to use that high genetic diversity to study A. caliginosa dispersal in the Palearctic based on a sample of 40 localities ranging from eastern Europe to the Russian Far East, and to compare our data to other studies on this species in western Europe and North America. Two genetic lineages were found in the studied sample. Only negligible decrease in genetic diversity was observed for the lineage 2 of A. caliginosa from West Europe to the Far East, suggesting multiple human-mediated introductions. In contrast, lineage 3 is abundant in West Europe and Belarus, but is absent from the East European Plain, the Urals, and the Far East. However, it is present in West Siberia, where it has greatly reduced genetic diversity, indicating long-distance dispersal accompanied by a bottleneck event. Thus, although these two lineages of A. caliginosa are morphologically indistinguishable, they have dramatic differences in their distributions and dispersal histories.
KeywordsAporrectodea caliginosa Cosmopolite Earthworms cox1 Palearctic Genetic lineages
We would like to thank all anonymous reviewers that helped to improve this and earlier versions of the manuscript. We are grateful to V. Ustinov and V. Gochakov for help with the collection of material and to O. Kosterin and O. Zaitseva for helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the 14-04-01121 Grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, the MK-6685.2015.4 Grant of the President of the Russian Federation, and the State Contract 6.1957.2014/K.
- Fernández R, Almodóvar A, Novo M, Simancas B, Díaz Cosín DJ (2012) Adding complexity to the complex: new insights into the phylogeny, diversification and origin of parthenogenesis in the Aporrectodea caliginosa species complex (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 64(2):368–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fernández R, Almodóvar A, Novo M, Gutiérrez M, Díaz Cosín DJ (2013) Earthworms, good indicators for palaeogeographical studies? Testing the genetic structure and demographic history in the peregrine earthworm Aporrectodea trapezoides (Dugès, 1828) in southern Europe. Soil Biol Biochem 58:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- James SW (2011) Earthworms. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Evolutionary Biology Centre. Uppsala University, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
- Paoletti MG (1999) The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:133–155Google Scholar
- Perel TS (1979) Range and regularities in the distribution of earthworms of the USSR fauna. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
- Saltonstall K (2011) Invasive Genotypes. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Striganova BR, Porjadina NM (2005) Soil animal population in boreal forests of West-Siberian plain. KMK Scientific Press Ltd., MoscowGoogle Scholar
- Tarasov PE, Volkova VS, Webb T III, Guiot J, Andreev AA, Beszusko LG, Bezusko TV, Bykova GV, Dorofeyuk NI, Kvavadze EV, Osipova IM, Panova NK, Sevastyanov DV (2000) Last glacial maximum biomes reconstructed from pollen and plant macrofossil data from northern Eurasia. J Biogeogr 27:609–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vsevolodova-Perel TS (1997) The earthworms of the fauna of Russia. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar