Biological Invasions

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 269–281 | Cite as

Lack of superiority of invasive over co-occurring native riparian tree seedling species

  • N. González-Muñoz
  • P. Castro-Díez
  • O. Godoy
Original Paper


The invasive tree species Acer negundo, Ailanthus altissima, Elaeagnus angustifolia and Robinia pseudoacacia are nowadays spreading in inner Spain riparian forests, where they co-occur with the natives Fraxinus angustifolia, Populus alba and Ulmus minor. In these forests, the natural light and soil moisture conditions are being altered by different human activities, as river channelization and regulation. These new environmental conditions may favor invasive species to the detriment of natives. In order to predict potential shifts of species composition in inner Spain riparian forests, we experimentally compared seedling and sapling performance across the four invasive and the three native mentioned species. Seeds were sown along an experimental gradient with four levels of light (100, 65, 35, 7 % of full irradiance) factorially combined with two levels of soil moisture (61 and 40 % of soil gravimetric water content). We compared plant biomass at the end of the first and second growing seasons, relative growth rates, biomass allocation to roots (RWR), stems (SWR) and leaves (LWR), time to emergence (Temerg) and net assimilation rate per unit of leaf mass (NARm) between origins and across species. Biomass accumulation greatly varied across species. However, invaders did not grow on average more than natives. Under high resource conditions, all species tended to grow more and similarly. Only the native U. minor and the invader A. negundo were not hampered by low moisture and/or low light availabilities. The absence of superiority of invaders over natives suggests that the former will not displace the latter in inner Spain riparian forests. However, human activities promoting shade and drought stress in floodplains may benefit the invasive A. negundo in the long term, as the growth of its seedlings is less declined by these conditions than the growth of the rest of the studied species. Thus, management effort should be focused in monitoring and preventing this species spread.


Invasive species Biomass Allocation Relative growth rate Seedling niche 



We acknowledge R. Elvira and the staff of the Alcalá University Botanical Garden for their support to perform this experiment. We thank E. Varas and A. Ballesteros for her valuable help with the plant measurements. We are thankful to J. Levine and E. Mordecai for their comments in previous versions of this work. Funds were provided by the projects CGL2007-61873/BOS, CGL2010-16388/BOS of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and POII10-0179-4700 of the Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha. N.G.M. was supported by a grant of the SMSI (FPI fellowship, BES-2008-002457) and by a grant of Alcalá University. O.G. acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science and Fulbright Commission (FU-2009-0039). We are grateful to the support of the REMEDINAL-2 network (Comunidad de Madrid).

Supplementary material

10530_2013_516_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)
10530_2013_516_MOESM2_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 18 kb)
10530_2013_516_MOESM3_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 14 kb)


  1. Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Baraloto C, Goldberg DE, Bonal D (2005) Performance trade-offs among tree seedlings in contrasting microhabitats. Ecology 86(9):2461–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baruch Z, Goldstein G (1999) Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii. Oecologia 121(2):183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellingham PJ, Duncan RP, Lee WG, Buxton RP (2004) Seedling growth rate and survival do not predict invasiveness in naturalized woody plants in New Zealand. Oikos 106:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco Castro E, Casado González MA, Costa Tenorio M, Escribano Bombín R, García Antón M, Génova Fuster M, Gómez Manzaneque MA, Gómez Manzaneque F, Moreno Saiz JC, Morla Juaristi C, Regato Pajares P, Sainz Ollero H (2005) Los bosques ibéricos: una interpretación geobotánica. Editorial Planeta, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumenthal DM, Hufbauer RA (2007) Increased plant size in exotic populations: a common garden test with 14 invasive species. Ecology 88(11):2758–2765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brasier CM, Buck K, Paoletti M, Crawford L, Kirk S (2004) Molecular analysis of evolutionary changes in populations of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Inv Agr: Sist y Rec For 13:93–103Google Scholar
  8. Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbours: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290:521–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro J (2006) Short delay in timing of emergence determines establishment success in Pinus sylvestris across microhabitats. Ann Bot 98:1233–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro-Díez P, Navarro J, Pintado A, Sancho LG, Maestro M (2006) Interactive effects of shade and watering on the performance of seedlings of three Mediterranean Quercus species. Tree Physiol 26:389–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castro-Díez P, Navarro J, Maestro M (2007) Effects of moderate shade and irrigation with eutrophicated water on the nitrogen economy of Mediterranean oak seedlings. Flora 203(3):243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castro-Díez P, Godoy O, Saldaña A, Richardson DM (2011) Predicting invasiveness of Australian acacias on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life history traits and human use. Divers Distrib 17:934–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chmura DJ, Rahman MS, Tjoelker MG (2007) Crown structure and biomass allocation patterns modulate aboveground productivity in young loblolly pine and slash pine. For Ecol Manag 243(2–3):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chytrý M, Maskell LC, Pino J, Pyšek P, Vilà M, Font X, Smart SM (2008) Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, sub continental and oceanic regions of Europe. J Appl Ecol 45:448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chytrý M, Pyšek P, Wild J, Pino J, Maskell LC, Vilà M (2009) European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. J Appl Ecol 15(1):98–107Google Scholar
  16. Closset-Kopp D, Saguez R, Decocq G (2011) Differential growth patterns and fitness may explain contrasted performances of the invasive Prunus serotina in its exotic range. Biol Invasions 13:1341–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptative? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14(4):419–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Feo V, de Martino L, Santoro A, Leone A, Pizza C, Franceschelli S, Pascale M (2005) Antiproliferative effects of tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima Swingle). Phytother Res 19:226–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deka RN, Wairiu M, Mtakwa PW, Mullins CE, Veenendaal EM, Townend J (1995) Use and accuracy of the filter paper technique for measurement of soil matric potential. Eur J Soil Sci 46:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeWine JM, Cooper DJ (2007) Effects of river regulation on riparian box elder (Acer negundo) forest in canyons of the upper Colorado River basin, USA. Wetlands 27:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DeWine JM, Cooper DJ (2008) Canopy shade and the successional replacement of tamarisk by native box elder. J Appl Ecol 45:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6(6):503–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feng YL, Fu GL (2008) Nitrogen allocation, partitioning and use efficiency in three invasive plant species in comparison with their native congeners. Biol Invasions 10:891–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feng Y, Wang J, Sang W (2007) Biomass allocation, morphology and photosynthesis of invasive and non invasive exotic species at four irradiance levels. Acta Oecol 31:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446:1079–1081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glenn EW, Nagler PL (2005) Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western US riparian zones. J Arid Environ 61:419–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Godoy O, Castro-Díez P, Valladares F, Costa-Tenorio M (2009) Different flowering phenology of alien invasive species in Spain: evidence for the use of an empty temporal niche? Plant Biol 11(6):803–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. González E, González-Sanchís M, Cabezas A, Comín FA, Muller E (2010) Recent changes in the riparian forest of a large regulated Mediterranean river: implications for management. Environ Manage 45:669–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. González-Muñoz N, Castro-Díez P, Fierro-Brunnenmeister N (2011) Establishment success of coexisting native and exotic trees under an experimental gradient of irradiance and soil moisture. Environ Manage 48:764–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Rost TL (2002) Towards a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am Nat 159(4):396–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gurevitch J, Howard TG, Ashton IW, Leger EA, Howe KM, Woo E, Lerdau M (2008) Effects of experimental manipulation of light and nutrients on establishment of seedlings of native and invasive woody species in Long Island, NY forests. Biol Invasions 10:821–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton MA, Murray BR, Cadotte MW, Hose GC, Baker AC, Harris CJ, Licari D (2005) Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol Lett 8:1066–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heisey RM (1990) Evidence for allelopathy by tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima). J Chem Ecol 16(6):2039–2055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heisey RM (1996) Identification of an allelopathic compound from Ailanthus altissima (Simaroubaceae) and characterization of its herbicidal activity. Am J Bot 83(2):192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heisey RM, Heisey TK (2003) Herbicidal effects under field conditions of Ailanthus altissima bark extract which contains ailanthone. Plant Soil 256:85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Howe HF (1990) Survival and growth of juvenile Virola surinamensis in Panama: effects of herbivory and canopy closure. J Trop Ecol 6:259–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Howe HF, Richter W (1982) Effects of seed size on seedling size in Virola surinamensis: a within and between tree analysis. Oecologia 53:347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones RH, Sharitz RR (1989) Potential advantages and disadvantages of germinating early for trees in floodplain forests. Oecologia 81:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Katz GL, Shafroth PB (2003) Biology, ecology and management of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. (Russian olive) in western North America. Wetlands 23(4):763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knapp LB, Canham CD (2000) Invasion of an old growth forest in New York by Ailanthus altissima: sapling growth and recruitment in canopy gaps. J Torrey Bot Soc 127:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kobe RK, Coates KD (1997) Models of sapling mortality as a function of growth to characterize interspecific variation in shade tolerance of eight tree species in northwestern British Columbia. Can J For Res 27(2):227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kowarik I, Säumel I (2007) Biological flora of central Europe: Ailanthus altissima (Mill) Swingle. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:207–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lamarque JL, Delzon S, Lortie CJ (2011) Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits. Biol Invasions 13:1969–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (2008) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lara F, Garillete R, Ramírez P (1996) Estudio de la vegetación de los ríos carpetanos de la cuenca del Jarama. Centro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas. Ministerio de Fomento, MadridGoogle Scholar
  48. Leishman MR, Haslehurst T, Ares A (2007) Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: community and global-scale comparisons. New Phytol 176(3):635–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marañón T, Grubb PJ (1993) Physiological-basis and ecological significance of the seed size and relative growth rate relationship in Mediterranean annuals. Funct Ecol 7(5):591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martín JA, Solla A, Burón M, López-Almansa JC, Gil L (2006) Caracterización histórica, ecológica, taxonómica y fitosanitaria de una olmeda en Rivas-Vaciamadrid (Madrid). Inv Agr: Sist y Rec For 15(2):208–217Google Scholar
  51. Masaka K, Yamada K (2009) Variation in germination character of Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Leguminosae) seeds at individual tree level. J For Res 14:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moles AT, Westoby M (2004) Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. J Ecol 92:372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moles AT, Gruber MAM, Bonser SP (2008) A new framework for predicting invasive plant species. J Ecol 96:13–17Google Scholar
  54. Niinemets Ü, Valladares F (2006) Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr 76:521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pacala SW, Canham CD, Saponara J, Silander JA, Kobe RK, Ribbens E (1996) Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecol Monogr 66(1):1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pattison RR, Goldstein G, Ares A (1998) Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rainforest species. Oecologia 117(4):449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pearcy RW, Valladares F, Wright SJ, de Paulis EL (2004) A functional analysis of the crown architecture of tropical forest Psychotria species: do species vary in light capture efficiency and consequently in carbon gain and growth? Oecologia 139:163–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Llusià J, Owen SM, Carnicer J, Giambelluca TW, Rezendes E, Waite M, Niinemets U (2010) Faster returns on “leaf economics” and different biogeochemical niche in invasive compared with native plant species. Global Change Biol 16:2171–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Porté AJ, Lamarque LJ, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Delzon S (2011) Invasive Acer negundo outperforms native species in non-limiting resource environments due to its higher phenotypic plasticity. BMC Ecol 11(28):1–12Google Scholar
  60. Pyšek P, Prach D, Smilauer P (1995) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  61. Quero JL, Villar R, Marañón T, Zamora R, Poorter L (2007) Seed-mass effects in four Mediterranean Quercus species (Fagaceae) growing in contrasting light environments. Am J Bot 94(11):1795–1803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Walters MB, Vander Klein DW, Buschena C (1998) Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light. Funct Ecol 12:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9:981–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2006) Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Prog Phys Geogr 30:409–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roy J (1990) In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. In: Di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Debussche M (eds) Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  67. Sanz Elorza M, Dana Sánchez ED, Sobrino Vespertinas E (2004) Atlas de plantas alóctonas invasoras en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, MadridGoogle Scholar
  68. Schupp EW (1988) Seed and early seedling predation in the forest understory and in treefall gaps. Oikos 51:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schupp EW (1995) Seed-seedling conflicts, habitat choice, and patterns of plant recruitment. Am J Bot 82:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sher AA, Marshall DL (2003) Seedling competition between native Populus deltoides (Salicaceae) and exotic Tamarix ramosissima (Tamaricaceae) across water regimes and substrate types. Am J Bot 90:413–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Swanborough P, Westoby M (1996) Seedling relative growth rate and its components in relation to seed size: phylogenetically independent contrasts. Funct Ecol 10:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Valladares F (2004a) Ecología del bosque mediterráneo en un mundo cambiante. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Organismo Autónomo de Parques Naturales, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  73. Valladares F (2004b) Global change and radiation in Mediterranean forest ecosystems: a meeting point for ecology and management. In: Arianoutsou M, Papanastasis V (eds) Ecology, conservation and sustainable managements of Mediterranean type ecosystems of the world. Mill press, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  74. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Verdú M, Traveset A (2005) Early emergence enhances plant fitness: a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis. Ecology 86:1385–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vilà M, Weiner J (2004) Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? Evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weber E (2003) Invasive plant species of the world. A reference guide to environmental weeds. CABI, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  78. Weiner J (2004) Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6(4):207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. González-Muñoz
    • 1
  • P. Castro-Díez
    • 1
  • O. Godoy
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de EcologíaUniversidad de AlcaláMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations