Biological Invasions

, Volume 15, Issue 12, pp 2609–2625 | Cite as

Plant-soil feedbacks do not explain invasion success of Acacia species in introduced range populations in Australia

Original Paper


Legumes, especially acacias, are considered amongst the most successful invaders globally. However there is still very little known about the role of soil microbial communities in their invasion success in novel ranges. We examined the role of the soil microbial community in the invasion success of four Acacia species (A. cyclops, A. longifolia, A. melanoxylon and A. saligna) and a close relative Paraserianthes lophantha, introduced into novel regions within Australia using a “black-box” approach. Seed and soil material were collected from multiple populations within each species’ native and introduced range within Australia and used in a plant-soil feedback experiment to assess the effect of the soil microbial community on plant growth and nodulation. We found no effect, either positive or negative, of soil origin on species’ performance, however there was a significant interaction between species and seed origin. Seed origin had a significant effect on the biomass of two species, A. cyclops and A. saligna. A. cyclops plants from the native range performed better across all soils than plants from the introduced range. The opposite trend was observed for A. saligna, with plants from the introduced range performing better overall than plants from the native range. Seed or soil origin did not have a significant effect on the presence and number of nodules suggesting that rhizobia do not constrain the invasion success of these legumes. Our results suggest that plant-soil feedbacks are unlikely to have played a significant role in the invasion success of these five species introduced into novel regions within Australia. This may be due to the widespread occurrence of acacias and their associated soil microbial communities throughout the Australian continent.


Invasive species Legumes Novel ranges Plant-soil interactions Rhizobia 



We would like to thank three anonymous referees for constructive comments that improved the manuscript. We would also like to thank John Klironomos, Alexander Koch and Jeri Parrent for helpful insights and discussions on the experimental design at the early stages of this study. We thank Carla Harris and Paweł Waryszak for extensive help in the field and Rachael Gallagher for providing the map. We also wish to thank Ian Davidson, Anthony Manea, Paweł Waryszak, Felix Servane and Lars Roth for their help in the glasshouse. This work was supported by Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship to CB and by an Australian Research Council Discovery grant (DP0879494) to ML.


  1. Andonian K, Hierro JL, Khetsuriani L, Becerra P, Janoyan G, Villarreal D, Cavieres L, Fox LR, Callaway RM (2011a) Range-expanding populations of a globally introduced weed experience negative plant-soil feedbacks. PLoS ONE 6:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andonian K, Hierro JL, Khetsuriani L, Becerra PI, Janoyan G, Villareal D, Cavieres LA, Fox LR, Callaway RM (2011b) Geographic mosaics of plant–soil microbe interactions in a global plant invasion. J Biogeogr 39:600–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bever JD, Westover KM, Antonovics J (1997) Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. J Ecol 85:561–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bever JD, Dickie IA, Facelli E, Facelli JM, Klironomos J, Moora M, Rillig MC, Stock WD, Tibbett M, Zobel M (2010) Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 25:468–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birnbaum C, Barrett LG, Thrall PH, Leishman MR (2012) Mutualisms are not constraining cross-continental invasion success of Acacia species in Australia. Divers Distrib 18:962–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown GK, Murphy DJ, Miller JT, Ladiges PY (2008) Acacia s.s. and its relationship among tropical legumes, tribe Ingeae (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Syst Bot 33:739–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE (2004) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427:731–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callaway RM, Bedmar EJ, Reinhart KO, Silvan CG, Klironomos J (2011) Effects of soil biota from different ranges on Robinia invasion: acquiring mutualists and escaping pathogens. Ecology 92:1027–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen W, James E, Chou J, Sheu S, Yang S, Sprent J (2005) β-Rhizobia from Mimosa pigra, a newly discovered invasive plant in Taiwan. New Phytol 168:661–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbin E, Brockwell J, Gault R (1977) Nodulation studies on chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Aust J Exp Agr 17:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowan RS (2001) In: Orchard AE, Wilson AJG (eds) Flora of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  12. Doran JC, Turnbull JW (1997) Australian trees and shrubs. ACIAR Monogr 24:320–323Google Scholar
  13. Dostál P, Palečková M (2010) Does relatedness of natives used for soil conditioning influence plant-soil feedback of exotics? Biol Invasions 13:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elgersma K, Ehrenfeld J (2011) Linear and non-linear impacts of a non-native plant invasion on soil microbial community structure and function. Biol Invasions 13:757–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelkes T, Morrien E, Verhoeven KJF, Bezemer TM, Biere A, Harvey JA, McIntyre LM, Tamis WLM, van der Putten WH (2008) Successful range-expanding plants experience less above-ground and below-ground enemy impact. Nature 456:946–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Entwisle T, Maslin BR, Cowan R, Court A (1996) Mimosaceae. In: Walsh N, Entwistle T (eds) Flora of Victoria. Inkata Press, Melbourne, pp 585–656Google Scholar
  17. Eppinga MB, Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, De Ruiter PC, Van der Putten WH (2006) Accumulation of local pathogens: a new hypothesis to explain exotic plant invasions. Oikos 114:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris CJ, Dormontt EE, Le Roux JJ, Lowe A, Leishman MR (2012) No consistent association between changes in genetic diversity and adaptive responses of Australian acacias in novel ranges. Evol Ecol 26:1345–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hierro J, Maron JL, Callaway RM (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol 93:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hussey BMJ, Keighery GJ, Cousens RD, Dodd J, Lloyd SG (2007) Western weeds: a guide to the weeds of Western Australia, 2nd edn. The Weed Society of WA, PerthGoogle Scholar
  21. Inderjit, van der Putten WH (2010) Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 25:512–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobs S, Wilson K (1996) A biogeographical analysis of the freshwater plants of Australasia. Aust Syst Bot 9:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kodela PG, Harden GJ (2002) Flora of NSW, vol 2Google Scholar
  25. Kulmatiski A, Beard KH, Stevens JR, Cobbold SM (2008) Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecol Lett 11:980–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Le Roux JJ, Brown GK, Byrne M, Ndlovu J, Richardson DM, Thompson GD, Wilson JRU (2011) Phylogeographic consequences of different introduction histories of invasive Australian Acacia species and Paraserianthes lophantha (Fabaceae) in South Africa. Divers Distrib 17:861–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levine JM, Pachepsky E, Kendall BE, Yelenik SG, Lambers JHR (2006) Plant-soil feedbacks and invasive spread. Ecol Lett 9:1005–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mangan SA, Schnitzer SA, Herre EA, Mack KML, Valencia MC, Sanchez EI, Bever JD (2010) Negative plant-soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 466:752–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marchante H, Marchante E, Freitas H (2003) Invasion of the Portuguese dune ecosystems by the exotic species Acacia longifolia (Andrews) Willd: effects at the community level. In: Child LE, Brock JH, Brundu G, Prach K, Pyšek P, Wade PM, Williamson M (eds) Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 75–85Google Scholar
  30. Marchante E, Kjøller A, Struwe S, Freitas H (2008a) Short- and long-term impacts of Acacia longifolia invasion on the belowground processes of a Mediterranean coastal dune ecosystem. Appl Soil Ecol 40:210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchante E, Kjøller A, Struwe S, Freitas H (2008b) Invasive Acacia longifolia induce changes in the microbial catabolic diversity of sand dunes. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2563–2568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maslin BR, George AS, Kodela PG, Ross JH, Wilson AJG (2001a) Flora of Australia. Acacia Part 1. ABRS/CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  33. Maslin BR, George AS, Kodela PG, Ross JH, Wilson AJG (2001b) Flora of Australia. Acacia Part 2. ABRS/CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller JT, Murphy DJ, Brown GK, Richardson DM, González-Orozco CE (2011) The evolution and phylogenetic placement of invasive Australian Acacia species. Divers Distrib 17:848–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morris TL, Esler KJ, Barger NN, Jacobs SM, Cramer MD (2011) Ecophysiological traits associated with the competitive ability of invasive Australian acacias. Divers Distrib 17:898–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Owen SJ (1997) Ecological weeds on conservation land in New Zealand: a database. Department of Conservation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. Pacovsky R, Fuller G, Stafford A, Paul E (1986) Nutrient and growth interactions in soybeans colonized with Glomus fasciculatum and Rhizobium japonicum. Plant Soil 92:37–45Google Scholar
  39. Parker MA (2001) Mutualism as a constraint on invasion success for legumes and rhizobia. Divers Distrib 7:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker MA, Spoerke JM (1998) Geographic structure of lineage associations in a plant-bacterial mutualism. J Evol Biol 11:549–562Google Scholar
  41. Parker M, Wurtz A, Paynter Q (2007) Nodule symbiosis of invasive Mimosa pigra in Australia and in ancestral habitats: a comparative analysis. Biol Invasions 9:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  43. Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2006) Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytol 170:445–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson DM, Kluge RL (2008) Seed banks of invasive Australian Acacia species in South Africa: role in invasiveness and options for management. Perspect Plant Ecol 10:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D’Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmanek M (2000) Plant invasions - the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75:65–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Richardson DM, Carruthers J, Hui C, Impson FAC, Miller JT, Robertson MP, Rouget M, Le Roux JJ, Wilson JRU (2011) Human-mediated introductions of Australian acacias—a global experiment in biogeography. Divers Distrib 17:771–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodríguez-Echeverria S (2010) Rhizobial hitchhikers from down under: invasional meltdown in a plant-bacteria mutualism? J Biogeogr 37:1611–1622Google Scholar
  48. Rodríguez-Echeverria S, Crisostomo JA, Nabais C, Freitas H (2009) Belowground mutualists and the invasive ability of Acacia longifolia in coastal dunes of Portugal. Biol Invasions 11:651–661Google Scholar
  49. Rodríguez-Echeverria S, Le Roux JJ, Crisóstomo JA, Ndlovu J (2011) Jack-of-all-trades and master of many? How does associated rhizobial diversity influence the colonization success of Australian Acacia species? Divers Distrib 17:946–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roux ER (1961) History of the introduction of Australian acacias on the Cape Flats. S Afr J Sci 57:99–102Google Scholar
  51. Scharfy D, Güsewell S, Gessner MO, Venterink HO (2010) Invasion of Solidago gigantea in contrasting experimental plant communities: effects on soil microbes, nutrients and plant–soil feedbacks. J Ecol 98:1379–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scharfy D, Funk A, Olde Venterink H, Güsewell S (2011) Invasive forbs differ functionally from native graminoids, but are similar to native forbs. New Phytol 189:818–828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK, Fischer DG, LeRoy CJ, Lonsdorf EV, Whitham TG, Hart SC (2008) Plant-soil microorganim interactions: heritable relationship between plant genotype and associated soil microorganisms. Ecology 89:773–781Google Scholar
  54. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith L, Reynolds H (2012) Positive plant-soil feedback may drive dominance of a woodland invader, Euonymus fortunei. Plant Ecol 213:853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spoerke JM, Wilkinson HH, Parker MA (1996) Nonrandom genotypic associations in a legume-Bradyrhizobium mutualism. Evolution 50:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sprent JI, Parsons R (2000) Nitrogen fixation in legume and non-legume trees. Field Crop Res 65:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Hallett SG, Prati D, Klironomos JN (2006) Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol 4:e140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tame T (1992) Acacias of Southeast Australia. Kangaroo Press, KenthurstGoogle Scholar
  60. te Beest M, Stevens N, Olff H, van der Putten WH (2009) Plant-soil feedback induces shifts in biomass allocation in the invasive plant Chromolaena odorata. J Ecol 97:1281–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thrall PH, Slattery JF, Broadhurst LM, Bickford S (2007) Geographic patterns of symbiont abundance and adaptation in native Australian Acacia-rhizobia interactions. J Ecol 95:1110–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Grunsven RHA, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM, Berendse F, Veenendal EM (2009) Plant-soil interactions in the expansion and native range of a poleward shifting plant species. Glob Change Biol 16:380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Virtue JG, Melland RL (2003) The environmental weed risk of revegetation and forestry plants. South Australia. Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, Report, DWLBC 2003/02Google Scholar
  64. Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH (1999) Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii. Revised edition. Bernice P. Bishop Museum special publication. University of Hawai‘i Press/Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, 1919 ppGoogle Scholar
  65. Wagner V, Antunes PM, Ristow M, Lechner U, Hensen I (2011) Prevailing negative soil biota effect and no evidence for local adaptation in a widespread Eurasian grass. PLoS ONE 6:e17580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolfe BE, Klironomos JN (2005) Breaking new ground: soil communities and exotic plant invasion. Bioscience 55:477–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yelenik SG, Stock W, Richardson DM (2007) Functional group identity does not predict invader impacts: differential effects of nitrogen-fixing exotic plants on ecosystem function. Biol Invasions 9:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia

Personalised recommendations