Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 11, pp 2379–2392 | Cite as

Genetic variability modulates the effect of habitat type and environmental conditions on early invasion success of Ailanthus altissima in Mediterranean ecosystems

  • Soraya Constán-Nava
  • Andreu Bonet
Original Paper

Abstract

At the early stages of an invasion by an exotic species, there are diverse environmental and genetic factors that limit its expansion. Ailanthus altissima is a tree from China and northern Vietnam which has become an invasive species in numerous ecosystems around the word. Our objective was to identify the relative effect of both genetic and environmental factors and how they interact with the emergence and early establishment of this invasive tree under Mediterranean conditions. To achieve this, seed germination and early establishment from different maternal sources were analyzed under contrasted environmental conditions in a series of experiments, using both laboratory and field approaches. Seed germination and early survival were affected by environmental factors such as habitat-type, the percentage of bare soil and climatic conditions (rainfall pulses), although the influence of these factors changed depending on the maternal source. Our study reveals that the genetic component affected not only the performance of A. altissima, it also modulated its response to environmental factors, which seemed to be the main drivers of germination and early establishment for this species. Our results highlight the importance of considering both genetic and environmental factors when studying plant invasion risk and success, and may be helpful in predicting and reducing the spread of this species in Mediterranean ecosystems.

Keywords

Climatic factors Early establishment Invasive species Germination Habitat type Temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgments

S. Soliveres and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments and improvements on an early version of this manuscript. We also thank Language Centre (University of Alicante) and C. Beans for improving the English of this manuscript. We are grateful to the staff of the Font Roja Natural Park (Generalitat Valenciana), Alcoy Council and J.L. Ferrándiz (landowner) for the permits provided and their collaboration. We would also like to thank C. Constán, A. Constán, M.J. Nava, G. Plaza, E. Pastor, N. Vizcaíno and the other collaborators who helped during the laboratory and fieldwork. We thank J. Huesca for the technical support, M.J. Baeza and V.M. Santana for their comments and M.J. Anderson for her statistical suggestions. This research and SCN fellowship were supported by the projects GV06/029 founded by the Generalitat Valenciana, the ESTRES (063/SGTB/2007/7.1) RECUVES projects (077/RN08/04.1) founded by the Spanish Ministry for the Environment and BAHIRA CICYT project (CGL2008-03649/BTE) founded by the Spanish Ministry for the Science and Technology. Font Roja Natura UA Scientific Station (ECFRN UA), which depends on the Office of the Pro-Vice-Chancellorship for Research, Development and Innovation (VIDI) of the University of Alicante, also supported this research.

References

  1. Anderson M (2001) A new method for nonparametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, ter Braak CJF (2003) Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. J Stat Comput Simul 73:85–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker HG (1986) Patterns of plant invasion in North America. In: Mooney HA, Drake JA (eds) Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer, New York, pp 44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartuszevige AM, Hrenko RL, Gorchov DL (2007) Effects of leaf litter on establishment, growth and survival of invasive plant seedlings in a deciduous forest. Am Midl Nat 158:472–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  6. Bewley JD, Black M (1994) Seeds. Physiology of development and germination, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, N.YGoogle Scholar
  7. Bischoff A, Vonlanthen B, Steinger T, Müller-Schärer H (2006) Seed provenance matters—effects on germination of four plant species used for ecological restoration on arable land. Basic Appl Ecol 7:347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bochet E, García-Fayos P (2004) Factors controlling vegetation establishment and water erosion on motorway slopes in Valencia, Spain. Restor Ecol 12:166–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bory G, Clair-Maczulajtys D (1980) Production, dissémination et polyphormisme des semences d’Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle, Simarubacées. Rev Gen Bot 88:297–311Google Scholar
  10. Broncano MJ, Vilà M, Boada M (2005) Evidence of Pseudotsuga menziesii naturalization in montane Mediterranean forests. For Ecol Manage 211:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke MJW, Grime JP (1996) An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecol Wash DC 77:776–790Google Scholar
  13. Constán-Nava S, Bonet A, Terrones B, Albors JL (2007) Plan de actuación para el control de la especie Ailanthus altissima en el Parque Natural del Carrascal de la Font Roja, Alicante. Bol Europarc 24:34–38Google Scholar
  14. Constán-Nava S, Bonet A, Pastor E, Lledó MJ (2010) Long-term control of the invasive tree Ailanthus altissima: insights from Mediterranean protected forests. For Ecol Manage 260(6):1058–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dallas JF, Leitch MJB, Hulme PE (2005) Microsatellites for tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima). Mol Ecol Notes 5(2):340–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Danin A (2000) The inclusion of adventive plants in the second edition of Flora Palaestina. Willdenowia 30:305–314Google Scholar
  18. De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delgado JA, Jiménez MD, Gómez A (2009) Seed size versus germination and early seedling establishment in the highly invasive tree Ailanthus altissima (Miller) Swingle. J Environ Biol 30(2):183–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. East TL, Havens KE, Rodusky AJ, Brady MA (1999) Daphnia lumholtzi and Daphnia ambigua: population comparisons of a non-native and a native cladoceran in Lake Okeechobee, Florida. J Plankton Res 21:1537–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Facelli JM (1994) Multiple indirect effects of plant litter affect the establishment of woody seedlings in old fields. Ecology 75:1727–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991) Indirect effects of litter on woody seedlings subject to herb competition. Oikos 62:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Felker-Quinn E, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA (2011) Soil biota drive expression of genetic variation and development of population-specific feedbacks in an invasive plant. Ecology 92:1208–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feret PP (1985) Ailanthus: variation, cultivation, and frustration. J Arboric 11(12):361–368Google Scholar
  26. Fox GA (1993) Failure-time analysis: emergence, flowering, survivorship, and other waiting times. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevich J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 253–289Google Scholar
  27. García-Palacios P, Soliveres S, Maestre FT et al (2010) Dominant plant species modulates responses to hydroseeding, irrigation and fertilization during the restoration of semiarid motorway slope. Ecol Eng 36:1290–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gleadow RM, Rowan KS (1982) Invasion of Pittosporum undulatum of the forests of Central Victoria. III. Effects of temperature and light on growth and drought resistance. Aust J Bot 30:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. González-Muñoz N, Castro-Díez P, Fierro-Brunnenmeister N (2011) Establishment success of coexisting native and exotic trees under an experimental gradient of irradiance and soil moisture. Environ Manage 48(4):764–773Google Scholar
  30. Graves WR (1990) Stratification not required for tree-of-heaven seed germination. Tree Planters’ Notes 41(2):10–12Google Scholar
  31. Hildebrand N (2006) Temperature and substrate effects on the juvenile establishment of the species Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle and Acer negundo L. M.Sc. Thesis, University of GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  32. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6:324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ISTA (1966) International rules for seed testing. International Seed Testing Association, BassersdorfGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaproth MA, McGraw JB (2008) Seed dispersal and seed viability of the wind-dispersed invasive Ailanthus altissima in aqueous environments. For Sci 54(5):490–496Google Scholar
  35. Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. J Veg Sci 3:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koop AL (2004) Differential seed mortality among habitats limits the distribution of the invasive non-native shrub Ardisia elliptica. Plant Ecol 172:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kota N, Landenberger R, McGraw J (2007) Germination and early growth of Ailanthus and tulip poplar in three levels of forest disturbance. Biol Invasions 9(2):197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kowarik I (1983) Colonization by the tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) in the French mediterranean region (Bas-Languedoc) and its phytosociological characteristics. Phytocoenologia 11(3):389–405Google Scholar
  39. Kowarik I (1995) On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In: Pyˇsek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions. General aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 85–103Google Scholar
  40. Kowarik I, Säumel I (2007) Biological flora of Central Europe: Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle. Perspect. Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8(4):207–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kowarik I, Säumel I (2008) Water dispersal as an additional pathway to invasions by the primarily wind-dispersed tree Ailanthus altissima. Plant Ecol 198:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kowarik I, von der Lippe M (2006) Long-distance dispersal of Ailanthus altissima along road corridors through secondary dispersal by wind. BfN-Skripten 184:177Google Scholar
  43. Kowarik I, von der Lippe M (2011) Secondary wind dispersal enhances long-distance dispersal of an invasive species in urban road corridors. NeoBiota 9:49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Landenberger RL, Kota NL, McGraw JB (2007) Seed dispersal of the non-native invasive tree Ailanthus altissima into contrasting environments. Plant Ecol 192(1):55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Little S (1974) Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle. Ailanthus. In: Schopmeyer CS (ed) Seeds of woody plants in the United States. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, pp 201–202Google Scholar
  46. Lloret F, Médail F, Brundu G, Camarda I, Moragues E, Rita J, Lambdon P, Hulme PE (2005) Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. J Ecol 93:512–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz F (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maestre FT, Bautista S, Cortina J, Bellot J (2001) Potential of using facilitation by grasses to establish shrubs on a semiarid degraded steppe. Ecol Appl 11:1641–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McArdle B, Anderson M (2001) Fitting multivariate models to semimetric distances: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mihulka S (1998) The effect of altitude on the pattern of plant invasions: a field test. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I, Williamson M (eds) Plant invasions. Ecological mechanisms and human responses. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 313–320Google Scholar
  51. Moore JE, Lacey EP (2009) A comparison of germination and early growth of four early successional tree species of the southeastern United States in different soil and water regimes. Am Midl Nat 16(2):388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ninyerola M, Pons X, Roure JM (2005) Atlas Climático Digital de la Península Ibérica. Metodología y aplicaciones en bioclimatología y geobotánica. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, BellaterraGoogle Scholar
  53. Oksanen J, Kindt R, O’Hara RB (2005) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R. package Version 1.6–10Google Scholar
  54. Ostfeld RS, Manson RH, Canham CD (1997) Effects of rodents on survival of tree seeds and seedlings invading old fields. Ecology 78:1531–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pérez-Ramos IM, Gómez-Aparicio L, Villar R, García LV, Marañón T (2010) Seedling growth and morphology of three oak species along field resource gradients and seed mass variation: a seedling age-dependent response. J Veg Sci 21:419–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pyke DA, Thompson JN (1986) Statistical analysis of survival and removal rate experiments. Ecology 67:240–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  58. Raich JW (1989) Seasonal and spatial variation in the light environment in a tropical dipterocarp forest and gaps. Biotropica 21:299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rejmánek M (2000) Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Aust Ecol 25:497–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roach DA, Wulff RD (1987) Maternal effects in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:209–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Säumel I, Kowarik I (2010) Urban rivers as dispersal corridors for primarily wind-dispersed invasive tree species. Landsc Urban Plan 94:244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Soil Survey Staff (2006) Keys to soil taxonomy, 10th edn. NRCS, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  64. Traveset A, Brundu G, Carta L, Mprezetou I, Lambdon P et al (2008) Consistent performance of invasive species within and among islands of the Mediterranean basin. Biol Invasions 10:847–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vilà M, Pujadas J (2001) Land-use and socio-economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biol Conserv 100:397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vilà M, Siamantziouras ASD, Brundu G et al (2008) Widespread resistance of Mediterranean island ecosystems to the establishment of three alien species. Divers Distrib 14:839–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams CE, Lipscomb MV, Carter Johnson W, Nilsen ET (1990) Influence of leaf litter and soil moisture regime on early establishment of Pinus pungens. Am Midl Nat 124:142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zamora R, García-Fayos P, Gómez L (2008) Las interacciones planta-planta y planta animal en el contexto de la sucesión ecológica. In: Valladares F (ed) Ecología del bosque mediterráneo en un mundo cambiante, 2nd edn. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, EGRAF, Madrid, pp 373–396Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio Ramón MargalefUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  2. 2.Estación Científica Font Roja Natura UAUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de EcologíaUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  4. 4.Estación Científica Font Roja Natura UAUniversidad de AlicanteAlcoiSpain

Personalised recommendations