Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 1177–1186 | Cite as

Rapid species displacement during the invasion of Florida by the tropical house gecko Hemidactylus mabouia

  • Kristen Harfmann Short
  • Kenneth Petren
Original Paper


There is considerable interest in understanding how invasive species disperse across landscapes, and how they affect resident species. However, quantifying these processes using mark recapture or manipulative experiments can be time consuming and costly. A different approach is to study density changes across a broader landscape, and take advantage of naturally existing replicate locations that are imperfect, but plentiful. We documented sites of recent colonization and measured density changes in the invasive gecko Hemidactylus mabouia and the prior resident gecko Hemidactylus garnotii in Florida. We surveyed geckos at 398 locations from 19 regional sites distributed across central and southern Florida. We documented changes in abundance through repeated censuses of 56 locations in areas of sympatry between 2001 and 2009. Complete displacement occurred in <7 years at several locations, and overall there was a >10% increase in H. mabouia per year. There was evidence that H. mabouia reaches a higher carrying capacity than H. garnotii, which likely contributes to its competitive dominance. Changes in relative abundance within patches were consistent with a density dependent mechanism of displacement, suggesting the decline of H. garnotii is functionally linked to increases in H. mabouia abundance, which allows us to rule out coincidental factors not directly associated with H. mabouia. However, simulations showed that even highly asymmetric differences in carrying capacity and competitive ability were not sufficient to account for the rapid displacement we observed. We conclude that mechanisms other than resource competition must be at work to drive species displacement in this system.


Competition Urban ecology Lizard Occupied niche Census Population survey 



The authors wish to thank Liz Dame, Ashley Allemang, John Niedzwiecki, Ninnia Lescano, Andrew Clack, Jeff Olberding, and Phoebe Richgels for help with field censuses in Florida. We also thank Gisela Garcia-Ramos, Stephen Matter, Eric Maurer, Michal Polak, George Uetz and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions. Funding was provided by the University Research Council and the Weiman Wendel Benedict Fund.


  1. Agrawal AA, Ackerly DD, Adler F, Arnold AE, Caceres C, Doak DF, Post E, Hudson PJ, Maron J, Mooney KA, Power M, Schemske D, Stachowicz J, Strauss S, Turner MG, Werner E (2007) Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohn T, Amundsen P, Sparrow A (2008) Competitive exclusion after invasion? Biol Invasions 10:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butterfield BP, Hauge B, Meshaka WE (1993) The occurrence of Hemidactylus mabouia on the United States mainland. Herpetol Rev 24:111–112Google Scholar
  4. Byers JE (2000) Competition between two estuarine snails: implications for invasions of exotic species. Ecology 81:1225–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byers JE, Goldwasser L (2001) Exposing the mechanism and timing of impact of nonindigenous species on native species. Ecology 82:1330–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Case TJ, Bolger DT, Petren K (1994) Invasions and competitive displacement among house geckos in the tropical Pacific. Ecology 75:464–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng X, Xie P, Cheng F, Xu R, Xie B (2009) Competitive displacement of the native species Bursaphelenchus mucronatus by an alien species Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchida: Aphelenchoididae): a case of successful invasion. Biol Invasions 11:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clavero M, Garcia-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dame EA, Petren K (2006) Behavioural mechanisms of invasion and displacement in Pacific island geckos (Hemidactylus). Anim Behav 71:1165–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diamond J (1986) Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiments, and natural experiments. In: Diamond J, Case T (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Dick JTA, Montgomery WI, Elwood RW (1999) Intraguild predation may explain an amphipod replacement: evidence from laboratory populations. J Zool Lond 249:463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekesi S, Billah MK, Nderitu PW, Lux SA, Rwomushana I (2009) Evidence for competitive displacement of Ceratitis cosyra by the invasive fruit fly Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) on mango and mechanisms contributing to the displacement. J Econ Entomol 102:981–991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eubanks MD, Blackwell SA, Parrish CJ, Delamar ZD, Hull-Sanders H (2002) Intraguild predation of beneficial arthropods by red imported fire ants in cotton. Environ Entomol 31:1168–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frankenberg E (1982) Social-behavior of the parthenogenetic Indo-Pacific Gecko, Hemidactylus-Garnotii. Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie—J Comp Ethol 59:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerber GP, Echternacht AC (2000) Evidence for asymmetrical intraguild predation between native and introduced Anolis lizards. Oecologia 124:599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM, Dean CA, Shirley KA, Maron JL, Connors PG (2000) The impacts of a nonindigenous marine predator in a California bay. Ecology 81:1206–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holway DA (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2006) Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Glob Change Biol 12:1608–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Juliano SA (1998) Species introduction and replacement among mosquitoes: Interspecific resource competition or apparent competition? Ecology 79:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaplan L, Kendell D, Robertson D, Livdahl T, Khatchikian C (2010) Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Bermuda: extinction, invasion, invasion and extinction. Biol Invasions 12:3277–3288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King W, Krakauer T (1966) The exotic herpetofauna of southeast Florida. Q J Fla Acad Sci 29:144–154Google Scholar
  22. Kuno E (1992) Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res Popul Ecol 34:275–284Google Scholar
  23. Lohrer AM, Whitlatch RB (2002) Interactions among aliens: apparent replacement of one exotic species by another. Ecology 83:719–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacNeil C, Dick JT, Johnson MP (2004) A species invasion mediated through habitat structure, intraguild predation, and parasitism. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1848–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maynard Smith J (1978) The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conserv 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meshaka WE (1995) Reproductive cycle and colonization ability of the Mediterranean gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus) in south-central Florida. Fla Sci 58:10–15Google Scholar
  29. Meshaka WE (2000) Colonization dynamics of two exotic geckos (Hemidactylus garnotii and H. mabouia) in Everglades National Park. J Herpetol 34:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meshaka WE, Butterfield BP, Hauge JB (2004) The exotic amphibians and reptiles of Florida. Krieger Publishing Company, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  31. Meshaka WE, Ferster B, Meshaka ML, Meshaka ML (2008) Exotic species dominance in the herpetofaunal community of a new residential development in southern Florida: implications for faunal turnover rates. Fla Sci 71:65–75Google Scholar
  32. Moyer GR, Osborne M, Turner TF (2005) Genetic and ecological dynamics of species replacement in an arid-land river system. Mol Ecol 14:1263–1273Google Scholar
  33. Murphy-Walker S (1990) Sperm storage in female Hemidactylus frenatus lizards family gekkonidae. Am Zool 30:77Google Scholar
  34. Paini DR, Funderburk JE, Reitz SR (2008) Competitive exclusion of a worldwide invasive pest by a native. Quantifying competition between two phytophagous insects on two host plant species. J Animal Ecol 77:184–190Google Scholar
  35. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodwell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Petren K, Case TJ (1996) An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77:118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Petren K, Case TJ (1998) Habitat structure determines competition intensity and invasion success in gecko lizards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11739–11744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petren K, Bolger DT, Case TJ (1993) Mechanisms in the competitive success of an invading sexual gecko over an asexual native. Science 259:354–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter SD, Savignano DA (1990) Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. Ecology 71:2095–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prenter J, MacNeil C, Dick JT, Dunn AM (2004) Roles of parasites in animal invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 19:385–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Punzo F (2001) A comparative study of digestive function in three species of Hemidactyline geckos from Florida. Fla Sci 64:124–130Google Scholar
  42. Punzo F (2005) The introduction of hemidactyline geckos in Florida: colonization and impact on native fauna. In: Meshaka WE Jr, Babbitt KJ (eds) Amphibians, reptiles: status, conservation in Florida. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, pp 231–237Google Scholar
  43. Regaldo R (2003) Roles of visual, acoustic, and chemical signals in social interactions of the tropical house Gecko (Hemidactylus mabouia). Caribb J Sci 39:307–320Google Scholar
  44. Rehage JS, Barnett BK, Sih A (2005) Foraging behaviour and invasiveness: do invasive Gambusia exhibit higher feeding rates and broader diets than their noninvasive relatives? Ecol Freshw Fish 14:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ricciardi A, Whoriskey FG (2004) Exotic species replacement: shifting dominance of dreissenid mussels in the Soulanges Canal, upper St. Lawrence River, Canada. J North Am Benthol Soc 23:507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ricciardi A, Neves RJ, Rasmussen JB (1998) Impending extinctions of North American freshwater mussels (Unionoida) following the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. J Anim Ecol 67:613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rilov G, Benayahi Y, Gasith A (2004) Prolonged lag in population outbreak of an invasive mussel: a shifting-habitat model. Biol Invasions 6:347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Settle WH, Wilson LT (1990) Invasion by the variegated leafhopper and biotic interactions: parasitism, competition, and apparent competition. Ecology 71:1461–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shine RL, Schwartzkopf L (1992) The evolution of reproductive effort in lizards and snakes. Evolution 46:62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Short KH, Petren K (2008) Boldness underlies foraging success of invasive Lepidodactylus lugubris geckos in the human landscape. Anim Behav 76:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Short KH, Petren K (2011a) Fine-scale genetic structure arises during range expansion of an invasive gecko. PLoS One 6(10):e26258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026258 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Short KH, Petren K (2011b) Multimodal dispersal during the range expansion of the tropical house gecko Hemidactylus mabouia. Ecol Evol 1(2):181–190. doi: 10.1002/ece3.18 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snyder WE, Clevenger GM, Eigenbrode SD (2004) Intraguild predation and successful invasion by introduced ladybird beetles. Oecologia 140:559–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tompkins DM, White AR, Boots M (2003) Ecological replacement of native red squirrels by invasive greys driven by disease. Ecol Lett 6:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Townsend JH, Krysko KL (2003) The distribution of Hemidactylus (sauria: gekkonidae) in northern peninsular Florida. Fla Sci 66:204–208Google Scholar
  57. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5948–5953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wiles GJ, Bart J, Beck RE, Aguon CF (2003) Impacts of the brown tree snake: Patterns of decline and species persistence in Guam’s avifauna. Conserv Biol 17:1350–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ and Richardson DM (2009) Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol Evol 24(3). doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.0007
  60. Zamprogno C, Teixeira RL (1998) Food habits of the tropical house gecko Hemidactylus mabouia (Reptilia, Gekkonidae) from a sandy coastal plain of Espirito Santo, Eastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira De Zoologia 58:143–150Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Manchester CollegeNorth ManchesterUSA

Personalised recommendations