Skip to main content
Log in

Process Optimization under Insufficient Experimental Information in the Phase of Service

  • Determinate Systems
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existing methods of process optimization under uncertain initial information are based on the assumption that in the phase of service known are the exact values of all parameters, which in the phase of design were regarded as partially uncertain. This assumption is too rigid and in practice often is not true. The paper presented new flexibility conditions and a new two-phase problem of optimization with the assumption that in the phase of service the precise values are known only for part of the uncertain parameters. An algorithm was developed to solve the two-phase problem for the case of insufficient experimental information in the process service phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, I.E., and Westerberg, A.W., Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Polak, E., An Implemented Algorithm for the Optimal Design Centering, Tolerancing, and Tuning, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 1982, vol. 37, pp. 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yudin, D.B., Zadachi i metody stokhasticheskogo programmirovaniya (Problems and Methods of Stochastic Programming), Moscow: Sovetskoe Radio, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Birge, J.R. and Louveaux, F., Introduction to Stochastic Programming, New York: Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Halemane, K.P. and Grossmann, I.E., Optimal Process Design under Uncertainty, AIChE J., 1983, vol. 29, no.3, pp. 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakhvalov, N.S., Zhidkov, N.P., and Kobel’kov, G.M., Chislennye Methody (Numerical Methods), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Swaney, R.E. and Grossmann, I.E., An Index for Operational Flexibility in Chemical Process Design, AIChE J., 1985, vol. 31, no.4, pp. 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reemtsen, R. and Gorner, S., Numerical Methods for Semi-infinite Programming: A Survey, in Semi-infinite Programming, Reemtsen, R. and Ruckman, J.-J., Eds., Boston: Kluwer, 1998, pp. 195–275.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pistikopoulos, E.N. and Grossmann, I.E., Optimal Retrofit Design for Improving Process Flexibility in Non-linear Systems-1, Fixed Degree of Flexibility, Comput. Chemical Eng., 1989, vol. 12, pp. 1003–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grossmann, I.E. and Floudas, C.A., Active Constraint Strategy for Flexibility Analysis in Chemical Processes, Comput. Chemical Eng., 1987, vol. 11, no.6, pp. 675–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pistikopoulos, E.N. and Ierapetritou, M.G., Novel Approach for Optimal Process Design under Uncertainty, Comput. Chemical Eng., 1995, vol. 19, p. 1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Volin, Yu.M. and Ostrovskii, G.M., Process Optimization under Partial Uncertainty if the Source Information, Avtom. Telemekh., 1995, no. 12, pp. 85–98.

  13. Volin, Yu.M. and Ostrovskii, G.M., Flexibility Analysis of Complex Engineering Systems under Uncertainty, Avtom. Telemekh., 2002, no. 17, pp. 92–106.

  14. Paules, G.E. and Floudas, C.A., Stochastic Programming in Process Synthesis: A Two-stage Model with MINLP Recourse for Multiperiod Heat-integrated Distillation Sequences, Comput. Chemical Eng., 1992, vol. 16, p. 192.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bernardo, F.P., Pistikopoulos, E.N., and Saraiva, P.M., Integration and Computational Issues in Stochastic Design and Planning Optimization Problems, Ind. Eng. Chem., 1999, vol. 38, p. 3056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahri, P.A., Bandoni, J.A., and Romagnoli, J.A., Effect of Disturbances in Optimizing Control: Steady-state Open-loop Back off Problem, AIChE J., 1996, vol. 42, pp. 983–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walsh, S. and Perkins, J., Operability and Control in Process Synthesis and Design, in Process Synthesis, Anderson, J.L., Ed., New York: Academic, 1996, pp. 301–375.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Powell, M.J.D., A Fast Algorithm for Nonlinearly Constrained Optimization Calculations, in Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Watson, G.A., Ed., Berlin: Springer, 1978, pp. 630–635.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bird, R.H., Hribar, M.E., and Nocedal, J., An Interior Point Algorithm for Large-scale Nonlinear Programming, Siam J. Optim., 1999, vol. 9, pp. 877–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fogler, H.S., Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McKinsey, J.C.C., Introduction to the Theory of Games, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952. Translated under the title Vvedenie v teoriyu igr, Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, No. 8, 2005, pp. 3–21.

Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Volin, Ostrovskii.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volin, Y.M., Ostrovskii, G.M. Process Optimization under Insufficient Experimental Information in the Phase of Service. Autom Remote Control 66, 1195–1211 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10513-005-0160-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10513-005-0160-8

Keywords

Navigation