Skip to main content
Log in

Iterative design of robust controllers under unknown bounded perturbation norms

  • Adaptive and Robust Systems
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A suboptimal robust controller for a multidimensional linear stationary nominal system with output- and control-operator perturbations and a bounded external perturbation is designed. Perturbation norms (weights) are assumed to be unknown and estimated from measurement data. The quality index of the closed-loop control system is taken to be the worst ℓ-norm for the output of the system in the class of admissible perturbations. The quality index for systems in the class of linear stationary stabilizing controllers is a fractional linear function of induced norms of transfer matrices of the closed-loop system and perturbation norms. The classical design of suboptimal robust controllers under known perturbation norms is reduced to a standard ℓ1-optimization problem, and optimal estimation of unknown perturbation norms is reduced to a linear programming problem. Therefore, the iterative sequential method of controller design and perturbation norm estimation is used as a heuristic method for designing suboptimal robust controllers under unknown perturbation norms. Modeling results corroborate the effectiveness of this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Khammash, M. and Pearson, J.B., Analysis and Design for Robust Performance with Structured Uncertainty, Syst. Control Lett., 1993, vol. 20, pp. 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khammash, M.H., Salapaka, M.V., and Vanvoorhis, T., Robust Synthesis in ℓ1: A Globally Optimal Solution, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2001, vol. 46, no.11, pp. 1744–1754.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A Special Issue on System Identification for Robust Control Design, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1992, vol. 37, no.7.

  4. A Special Issue on System Identification, Automatica, 1995, vol. 31, no.12.

  5. Poola, K., Khargonekar, P., Tikku, A., et al., A Time-Domain Approach to Model Validation, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1994, vol. 39, no.5, pp. 951–959.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, R.C. and Doyle, J.C., Model Validation: A Connection Between Robust Control and Identification, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1992, vol. 37, pp. 942–951.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dullerud, G. and Smith, R., A Nonlinear Functional Approach to LFT Model Validation, Syst. Control Lett., 2002, vol. 47, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, R., Dullerud, G., and Miller, S., Model Validation for Nonlinear Feedback Systems, Proc. 39 IEEE Conf. Decision Control, Sydney, 2000, pp. 1232–1236.

  9. Sokolov, V.F., Robust Control in ℓ1-Formulation: Model Validation and Perturbation Weight Estimation, Avtom. Telemekh., 2003, no. 11, pp. 138–151.

  10. Reinelt, W., Garulli, A., and Ljung, L., Comparing Different approaches to Model Error Modeling in Robust Identification, Automatica, 2002, vol. 38, pp. 787–803.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sokolov, V.F., Design of an ℓ1-Suboptimal Robust Controller for a Linear Scalar System with Unstructured Uncertainty, Avtom. Telemekh., 2001, no. 1, pp. 150–163.

  12. Sokolov, V.F., Design of an ℓ1-Suboptimal Robust Controller for a Linear Discrete Scalar System with Structured Uncertainty, Avtom. Telemekh., 1999, no. 11, pp. 80–99.

  13. Yamada, M. and Funahashi, Y., Minimization of the Worst-Case Steady-State Error for Multivariable Deadbeat Control Systems with Time-Varying Uncertainty, Proc. 41 IEEE Conf. Decision Control, Las Vegas, 2002, pp. 3324–3329.

  14. Polyak, B.T. and Halpern, M.E., Optimal Design for Discrete-Time Linear Systems via A New Performance Index, Int. J. Adaptive Control Signal Proc., 2001, vol. 15, no.2, pp. 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khammash, M. and Pearson, J.B., Performance Robustness of Discrete-Time Systems with Structured Uncertainty, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1991, vol. 36, no.4, pp. 398–412.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dahleh, M.A. and Diaz-Bobillo, I.J., Control of Uncertain Systems: A Linear Programming Approach, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barabanov, A.E., Sintez minimaksnykh regulyatorov (Synthesis of Minimax Controllers), St. Petersburg: S.-Peterburg. Gos. Univ., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schaible, S., Parameter-free Convex Equivalent and Dual Programs of Fractional Programming Problems, Zeitschrift Oper. Res., 1974, vol. 18, pp. 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gavurin, M.K. and Malozemov, V.N., Ekstremal’nye zadachi s lineinymi ogranicheniyami (Extremal Problems under Linear Constraints), Leningrad: Leningrad. Gos. Univ., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sokolov, V.F., Asymmetric Robust Quality of a Discrete-Time System for Tracking in ℓ1-Metric, Avtom. Telemekh., 1999, no. 1, pp. 101–112.

  21. Khammash, M.H., Robust Steady-State Tracking, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 40, pp. 1872–1880.

  22. Khammash, M.H., A New Approach to the Solution of the ℓ1 Control Problem: The Scaled-Q Method, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2000, vol. 45, pp. 180–187.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boyd, S. and Barratt, C., Linear Controller Design—Limits for Performance, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, No. 4, 2005, pp. 110–126.

Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Sokolov.

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 02-01-00474.

This paper was recommended for publication by A.P. Kurdyukov, a member of the Editorial Board

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sokolov, V.F. Iterative design of robust controllers under unknown bounded perturbation norms. Autom Remote Control 66, 606–619 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10513-005-0104-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10513-005-0104-3

Keywords

Navigation