A Latent Profile Analysis of Bisexual Identity: Evidence of Within-Group Diversity
Bisexual people experience unique psychosocial vulnerabilities and their mental health needs and social identity remain underserved and understudied, respectively. We report results from a latent profile analysis where we identified a preliminary typology of bisexual identity subgroups and its association with demographic and mental health variables. Bisexual+ adults (N = 292) residing in the U.S. were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and administered a demographic survey, indicators of bisexual identity, and measures of internalizing symptoms and self-esteem. Joint consideration of statistical and substantive criteria in the modeling process yielded a well-differentiated and qualitatively distinctive three-profile solution comprised of Affirmative (e.g., having a positive orientation towards one’s bisexuality), Vigilant (e.g., being significantly concerned about others’ reactions to one’s bisexuality), and Ambivalent (e.g., endorsing mixed but generally negative attitudes and beliefs about one’s bisexuality) profiles of bisexual identity. Auxiliary analyses revealed conceptually and statistically significant associations among profile membership, demographic covariates, and mental health outcomes. Some key findings included that compared to the Affirmative profile, men and people of color were overrepresented in the Ambivalent profile, whereas men were overrepresented in the Vigilant profile. Bisexuals with a Vigilant profile displayed the poorest mental health constellation. Our findings highlight the categorically heterogeneous nature of bisexual identity, support the relevance of social identity to mental health among bisexuals, and represent the first attempt to model bisexual identity using mixture techniques. Future studies should consider larger and more demographically diverse samples, address replicability and generalizability, examine additional auxiliary variables, and investigate longitudinal developments in profiles.
KeywordsBisexuality Bisexual identity Latent profile analysis Mixture modeling Typology Sexual orientation
Data collection for this article was financially supported by the University of California, Santa Barbara Academic Senate Grant awarded to Tania Israel. We thank Andrew Maul, Matthew Quirk, and the University of California, Santa Barbara Latent Variable Research Group for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. Findings from this article were previously presented at the 10th Biennial Meeting of the National Multicultural Conference and Summit.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6126.96.36.1996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baldwin, A., Dodge, B., Schick, V., Hubach, R. D., Bowling, J., Malebranche, D., … Fortenberry, J. D. (2015). Sexual self-identification among behaviorally bisexual men in the Midwestern United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(7), 2015–2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0376-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Copen, C. E., Chandra, A., & Febo-Vazquez, I. (2016). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual orientation among adults aged 18–44 in the United States: Data from the 2011–2013 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, 88, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Eisner, S. (2013). Bi: Notes for a bisexual revolution. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
- Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Flanders, C. E., Tarasoff, L. A., Legge, M. M., Robinson, M., & Gos, G. (2017b). Positive identity experiences of young bisexual and other nonmonosexual people: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(8), 1014–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1236592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedman, M. R., Dodge, B., Schick, V., Herbenick, D., Hubach, R. D., Bowling, J., … Reece, M. (2014a). From bias to bisexual health disparities: Attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. LGBT Health, 1(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Friedman, M. R., Wei, C., Klem, M. L., Silvestre, A. J., Markovic, N., & Stall, R. D. (2014b). HIV infection and sexual risk among men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galupo, M. P., Davis, K. S., Grynkiewicz, A. L., & Mitchell, R. C. (2014). Conceptualization of sexual orientation identity among sexual minorities: Patterns across sexual and gender identity. Journal of Bisexuality, 14(3–4), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2014.933466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gates, G. J. (2011). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender?. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.Google Scholar
- Göritz, A. S. (2006). Incentives in web studies: Methodological issues and a review. International Journal of Internet Science, 1, 58–70.Google Scholar
- Helms, J. E. (1995). An update of Helms’s White and people of color racial identity models. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (pp. 181–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Israel, T., Lin, Y.-J., Goodman, J. A., Matsuno, E., Choi, A. Y., Kary, K. G., et al. (2016). Reducing LGBTQ stigma through online interventions. In H. M. Levitt and B. L. Velez (Co-chairs), Psychotherapy and intervention research with LGBTQ populations. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
- Kertzner, R. M., Meyer, I. H., Frost, D. M., & Stirratt, M. J. (2009). Social and psychological well-being in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: The effects of race, gender, age, and sexual identity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(4), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016848.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Konstan, J. A., Rosser, B. R. S., Ross, M. W., Stanton, J., & Edwards, W. M. (2005). The story of subject naught: A cautionary but optimistic tale of internet survey research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00248.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (Vol. 2: Statistical analysis) (pp. 551–611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Morovati, D. (2014). The intersection of sample size, number of indicators, and class enumeration in LCA: A Monte Carlo study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
- Nylund, K. L. (2007). Latent transition analysis: Modeling extensions and an application to peer victimization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Nylund-Gibson, K., & Hart, S. R. (2014). Latent class analysis in prevention science. In Z. Sloboda & H. Petras (Eds.), Defining prevention science (pp. 498–511). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ochs, R. (2005). What is bisexuality? In R. Ochs & S. E. Rowley (Eds.), Getting bi: Voices of bisexuals around the world (pp. 7–15). Boston, MA: Bisexual Resource Center.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2013). A survey of LGBT Americans. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
- Ponterotto, J. G., Casas, J. M., Suzuki, L. M., & Alexander, C. M. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of multicultural counseling (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sinclair, S. J., Blais, M. A., Gansler, D. A., Sandberg, E., Bistis, K., & LoCicero, A. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Overall and across demographic groups living within the United States. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 33(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278709356187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2008). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317–341). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Toomey, R. B., Huynh, V. W., Jones, S. K., Lee, S., & Revels-Macalinao, M. (2017). Sexual minority youth of color: A content analysis and critical review of the literature. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Mental Health, 21(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2016.1217499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Pryor, D. W. (1994). Dual attraction: Understanding bisexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wong, Y. J., Nguyen, C. P., Wang, S.-Y., Chen, W., Steinfeldt, J. A., & Kim, B. S. K. (2012a). A latent profile analysis of Asian American men’s and women’s adherence to cultural values. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar