Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 63–67 | Cite as

Collective Sex Environments Without the Sex? Insights from the BDSM Community

  • Brad J. SagarinEmail author
  • Ellen M. Lee
  • Jennifer M. Erickson
  • Kevin G. Casey
  • Joy S. Pawirosetiko
Commentary

As researchers who study BDSM (an umbrella term encompassing a wide range of activities related to bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, and sadism and masochism), we were excited to read Frank’s (2018) examination of research on collective sex environments. We concur with Frank that models that attempt to universalize such environments are inaccurate and potentially counterproductive to the effort to develop interventions to serve participants in these environments. We also agree with Frank that ignoring commonalities can be equally counterproductive, as the strategies used by participants in one collective sex environment to navigate risk might profitably be adopted by participants in other environments.

In this Commentary, we argue for expanding the definition of collective sex environments to fully embrace BDSM. As we describe below, BDSM practitioners share many characteristics with participants in other collective sex environments, and BDSM parties, events, and...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding the material in this Commentary.

References

  1. Alison, L., Santtila, P., Sandnabba, N. K., & Nordling, N. (2001). Sadomasochistically-oriented behavior: Diversity in practice and meaning. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambler, J. K., Lee, E. M., Klement, K. R., Loewald, T., Comber, E. M., Hanson, S., et al. (2017). Consensual BDSM facilitates role-specific altered states of consciousness: A preliminary study. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 75–91.Google Scholar
  3. Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F. (1988). Masochism as escape from self. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 28–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faccio, E., Casini, C., & Cipolletta, S. (2014). Forbidden games: The construction of sexuality and sexual pleasure by BDSM “players”. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16, 752–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank, K. (2018). Rethinking risk, culture, and intervention in collective sex environments. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1153-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Graham, B. C., Butler, S. E., McGraw, R., Cannes, S. M., & Smith, J. (2015). Member perspectives on the role of BDSM communities. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 895–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holt, K. (2016). Blacklisted: Boundaries, violations, and retaliatory behavior in the BDSM community. Deviant Behavior, 37, 917–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holvoet, L., Huys, W., Coppens, V., Seeuws, J., Goethals, K., & Morrens, M. (2017). Fifty shades of Belgian gray: The prevalence of BDSM-related fantasies and activities in the general population. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14, 1152–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klement, K. R., Lee, E. M., Ambler, J. K., Hanson, S. A., Comber, E., Wietting, D., et al. (2017). Extreme rituals in a BDSM context: The physiological and psychological effects of the “Dance of Souls”. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 19, 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klement, K. R., Sagarin, B. J., & Lee, E. M. (2017). Participating in a culture of consent may be associated with lower rape-supportive beliefs. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, E. M., Klement, K. R., Ambler, J. K., Loewald, T., Comber, E., Hanson, S. A., et al. (2016). Altered states of consciousness during an extreme ritual. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0153126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, E. M., Klement, K. R., Sagarin, B. J., & Finkelstein, L. (2017). Stereotypical BDSM practitioners? Depends on role, gender, and who you ask. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association’s annual meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, P., & Devon, M. (1995). Screw the roses, send me the thorns: The romance and sexual sorcery of sadomasochism. Fairfield, CT: Mystic Rose Books.Google Scholar
  15. Newmahr, S. (2010). Rethinking kink: Sadomasochism as serious leisure. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pitagora, D. (2013). Consent vs. coercion: BDSM interactions highlight a fine but immutable line. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 10, 27–36.Google Scholar
  17. Richters, J., de Visser, R. O., Rissel, C. E., Grulich, A. E., & Smith, A. M. A. (2008). Demographic and psychosocial features of participants in bondage and discipline, “sadomasochism” or dominance and submission (BDSM): Data from a national survey. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 1660–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sagarin, B. J., Cutler, B., Cutler, N., Lawler-Sagarin, K. A., & Matuszewich, L. (2009). Hormonal changes and couple bonding in consensual sadomasochistic activity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simula, B. L. (2017). A “different economy of bodies and pleasures”?: Differentiating and evaluating sex and sexual BDSM experiences. Journal of Homosexuality.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1398017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams, D. J. (2006). Different (painful!) strokes for different folks: A general overview of sexual sadomasochism (SM) and its diversity. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 12, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams, D. J., Prior, E. E., Alvarado, T., Thomas, J. N., & Christensen, M. C. (2016). Is bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, and sadomasochism recreational leisure? A descriptive exploratory investigation. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 1091–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams, D. J., Thomas, J. N., Prior, E. E., & Christensen C. M. (2014). From “ssc” and “rack” to the “4cs”: Introducing a new framework for negotiating BDSM participation. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 17.Google Scholar
  23. Wiseman, J. (1998). SM 101: A realistic introduction (2nd ed.). Gardena, CA: Greenery Press.Google Scholar
  24. Wright, S. (2006). Discrimination of SM-identified individuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 50, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wright, S., Stambaugh, R. J., & Cox, D. (2015). Consent violations survey. Technical report. Downloaded May 15, 2018 from https://ncsfreedom.org/images/stories/2015_Survey_PDFs_ETC/Consent%20Violations%20Survey%20Analysis%20final.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brad J. Sagarin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ellen M. Lee
    • 1
  • Jennifer M. Erickson
    • 1
  • Kevin G. Casey
    • 1
  • Joy S. Pawirosetiko
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations