Moving Past the Rose-Tinted Lens of Monogamy: Onward with Critical Self-Examination and (Sexually) Healthy Science
- 553 Downloads
Frank’s ( 2018) narrative overview analysis of connections between collective sex and HIV/STI risk explores an increasingly relevant societal issue: shifting the risk-focused dialogue around sexual behaviors to promote sexual health. Frank takes an inclusive analytic approach by uncovering parallels across academic disciplines to understand collective sexual behavior. Through this transdisciplinary analysis, she illuminates the ways in which a risk-centered approach for promoting sexual health falls short and collective sex is unwarrantedly linked with the spread of HIV/STIs. Ultimately, Frank’s thought-provoking path is likely to have researchers question their own positionality and opinions regarding collective sex (e.g., sex at swinger events, bathhouses, private events, rest areas) and HIV/STI risk. As Frank states:
Having sex intentionally in the presence of observers or with multiple partners is widely stigmatized, pathologized, and at times criminalized; places where collective...
- Brewster, M. E., Soderstrom, B., Esposito, J., Breslow, A., Sawyer, J., Geiger, E., & Foster, A. (2017). A content analysis of scholarship on consensual nonmonogamies: Methodological roadmaps, current themes, and directions for future research. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 6(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Cole, E. R., & Sabik, N. J. (2009). Repairing a broken mirror: Intersectional approaches to diverse women’s perceptions of beauty and bodies. In M. T. Berger & K. Guidroz (Eds.), The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class, and gender (pp. 173–192). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Copen, C. E., Daniels, K., Vespa, J., & Mosher, W. D. (2012). First marriages in the United States: Data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth; No. 49. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
- Frank, K. (2013). Plays well in groups: A journey through the world of group sex. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
- Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Newport, F., Jones, J. M., Saad, L., & Carroll, J. (2006). Americans and their pets. Gallup. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.com/poll/25969/americans-their-pets.aspx.
- Perel, E. (2006). Mating in captivity: Reconciling the erotic + the domestic. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Stewart, A. J. (1998). Doing personality research: How can feminist theories help? In B. McVicker Clinchy & J. K. Norem (Eds.), The gender and psychology reader (pp. 54–68). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018