Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 31–34 | Cite as

Monogamous Halo Effects: The Stigma of Non-Monogamy within Collective Sex Environments

  • Terri D. ConleyEmail author
  • Morgan Perry
  • Staci Gusakova
  • Jennifer L. Piemonte
Commentary

The assessment and curtailment of sexual risk, with an eye toward reduction of sexual disease, is a worthy endeavor, and the pathways for achieving this goal are not always clear. We commend those who research these topics and implement policies based on the best research available to keep the public healthy.

Frank (2018) elucidates the ways in which collective sex environments are maligned, and argues that the unilateral condemnation of these environments is facile. We concur with her assessment. In this Commentary, we extend her analysis to identify the ways in which stigma about non-monogamy influences both the public’s perceptions of, and public health officials’ messages about, sex in general and STDs specifically. Moreover, as Frank’s target article demonstrates, people who direct scholarship and make public health recommendations about risk are themselves embedded in a culture that stigmatizes sexuality (Banaji & Greenwald, 2013). We discuss how they are subject to the biases...

References

  1. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cates, J. R., Herndon, N. L., Schulz, S. L., & Darroch, J. E. (2004). Our voices, our lives, our futures: Youth and sexually transmitted diseases. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Journalism and Mass Communication.Google Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Seasonal flu death estimate increases worldwide [Press Release]. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1213-flu-death-estimate.html.
  4. Conley, T. D., Matsick, J. L., Moors, A. C., Ziegler, A., & Rubin, J. D. (2015). Re-examining the effectiveness of monogamy as an STI-preventive strategy. Preventive Medicine, 78, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2015). Sexuality-related risks are judged more harshly than comparable health risks. International Journal of Sexual Health, 27, 508–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Ziegler, A., & Karathanasis, C. (2012). Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly nonmonogamous individuals. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9(6), 1559–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crosby, R. A., Milhausen, R. R., Sanders, S., Graham, C. A., & Yarber, W. L. (2014). Being drunk and high during sex is not associated with condom use behaviours: A study of high-risk young Black males. Sexual Health, 11(1), 84–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, S. D., Kerrigan, D. L., Jennings, J. M., & Ellen, J. M. (2009). Relationships between perceived STD-related stigma, STD-related shame and STD screening among a household sample of adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(4), 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreachslin, J. L., Gilbert, M. J., & Malone, B. (2013). Diversity and cultural competence in health care a systems approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, K. (2018). Rethinking risk, culture, and intervention in collective sex environments. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1153-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hays, P. A. (2013). Connecting across cultures: The helper’s toolkit. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Lehmiller, J. J. (2015). A comparison of sexual health history and practices among monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous sexual partners. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(10), 2022–2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levy, M. E., Wilton, L., Phillips, G., Glick, S. N., Kuo, I., Brewer, R. A., … Magnus, M. (2014). Understanding structural barriers to accessing HIV testing and prevention services among Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in the United States. AIDS and Behavior, 18(5), 972–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liamputtong, P. (2013). Stigma, discrimination and living with HIV/AIDS: A cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris, J. L., Lippman, S. A., Philip, S., Bernstein, K., Neilands, T. B., & Lightfoot, M. (2014). Sexually transmitted infection related stigma and shame among African American male youth: Implications for testing practices, partner notification, and treatment. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 28(9), 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rueda, S., Mitra, S., Chen, S., Gogolishvili, D., Globerman, J., Chambers, L., … Rourke, S. B. (2016). Examining the associations between HIV-related stigma and health outcomes in people living with HIV/AIDS: A series of meta-analyses. British Medical Journal Open, 6(7), e011453.Google Scholar
  18. Santelli, J. S., Kantor, L. M., Grilo, S. A., Speizer, I. S., Lindberg, L. D., Heitel, J., … Ott, M. A. (2017). Abstinence-only-until-marriage: An updated review of U.S. policies and programs and their impact. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. (2009). What the research says… Abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. Retrieved from http://www.siecus.org/_data/global/images/What%20the%20Research%20Says-Ab-Only-1.pdf.
  20. Spieldenner, A. (2016). PrEP whores and HIV prevention: The queer communication of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Journal of Homosexuality, 63(12), 1685–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stanger-Hall, K. F., & Hall, D. W. (2011). Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: Why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e24658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. The Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. (2017). Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: A collaborative analysis of cohort studies. Lancet HIV, 4, e349–e356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terri D. Conley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Morgan Perry
    • 2
  • Staci Gusakova
    • 1
  • Jennifer L. Piemonte
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Michigan-FlintFlintUSA

Personalised recommendations