Abstract
Lack of condom use among youth is a major contributor to the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV/AIDS, which has lifelong deleterious health consequences. College students (N = 262) completed the Sexual Probability Discounting Task in which participants reported their likelihood of condom use under various probabilities of contracting an STI. Each participant completed the task in regard to different STIs including HIV/AIDS and different partners. Results showed that the likelihood of condom-protected sex generally decreased as HIV/AIDS and other STI contraction became less probable. Moreover, condom-protected sex likelihood was related to STI type (e.g., decreased condom-protected sex in chlamydia relative to HIV/AIDS condition) and partner desirability (decreased condom-protected sex with more desirable partners). Results are the first to show that compared to other STIs, HIV/AIDS had the most influence on condom-protected sex. Results showed probability discounting contributed to lack of condom-protected sex and offers a novel framework for examining determinants of within-subject variability in condom use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bontempi, J. B., Mugno, R., Bulmer, S. M., Danvers, K., & Vancour, M. L. (2009). Exploring gender differences in the relationship between HIV/STD testing and condom use among undergraduate college students. American Journal of Health Education, 40(2), 97–105.
Buhi, E. R., & Goodson, P. (2007). Predictors of adolescent sexual behavior and intention: A theory-guided systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.027.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Control HIV/STD behavioral surveillance working group. CDC Sexual behavior questions (CSBQ). Retrieved from http://chipts.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/01/CDC-Sexual-Behavior-Questions-_CSBQ_.pdf.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Trends in HIV-related risk behaviors among high school students–United States, 1991–2011. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6129a4.htm?s_cid=mm6129a4_w.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Incidence, prevalence, and cost of sexually transmitted infections in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.Cdc.gov/std/stats/sti-Estimates-Fact-Sheet-Feb-2013.pdf.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Likely female-to-female sexual transmission of HIV. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 209-210-209-210.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015a). Chlamydia – CDC fact sheet (detailed). Retrieved from http://www.Cdc.gov/std/chlamydia/stdfact-Chlamydia-Detailed.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015b). Genital herpes–CDC fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.Cdc.gov/std/herpes/stdfact-Herpes.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). HIV/AIDS basic statistics. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/statistics.html.
Collado, A., Johnson, P. S., Loya, J. M., Johnson, M. W., & Yi, R. (2017). Discounting of condom-protected sex as a measure of high risk for sexually transmitted infection among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(7), 2187–2195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0836-x.
Crosby, R. A., Milhausen, R. R., Graham, C. A., Yarber, W. L., Sanders, S. A., Charnigo, R., & Shrier, L. A. (2014). Likelihood of condom use when sexually transmitted diseases are suspected: Results from a clinic sample. Health Education & Behavior, 41(4), 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198114529588.
Dariotis, J. K., & Johnson, M. W. (2015). Sexual discounting among high-risk youth ages 18–24: Implications for sexual and substance use risk behaviors. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 23(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038399.
de Visser, R., & Smith, A. (2001). Relationship between sexual partners influences rates and correlates of condom use. AIDS Education and Prevention, 13(5), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.13.5.413.24146.
Dick, B., Ferguson, J., & Ross, D. A. (2006). Preventing HIV/AIDS in young people. A systematic review of the evidence from developing countries. Introduction and rationale. World Health Organization Technical Report Series, 938, 1–13. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=16921915&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Douglas, K. A., Collins, J. L., Warren, C., Kann, L., Gold, R., Clayton, S., & Kolbe, L. J. (1997). Results from the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey. Journal of American College Health, 46(2), 55–67.
Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Record, 52(4), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395199.
Fehr, S., Vidourek, R., & King, K. (2015). Intra- and interpersonal barriers to condom use among college students: A review of the literature. Sexuality and Culture, 19(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9249-y.
Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769.
Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: Age differences in individual discounting functions. Behavioural Processes, 46(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00021-2.
Haque, M. R., & Soonthorndhada, A. (2009). Risk perception and condom-use among Thai youths: Findings from Kanchanaburi demographic surveillance system site in Thailand. Journal of Health, Population & Nutrition, 27(6), 772–783. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=49119034&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Herrmann, E., Johnson, P., & Johnson, M. (2015). Examining delay discounting of condom-protected sex among men who have sex with men using crowdsourcing technology. AIDS and Behavior, 19(9), 1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1107-x.
Holt, D. D., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2003). Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students. Behavioural Processes, 64(3), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00141-4.
Holt, D. D., Newquist, M. H., Smits, R. R., & Tiry, A. M. (2014). Discounting of food, sex, and money. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 794–802. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0557-2.
Jarmolowicz, D. P., Bickel, W. K., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2013). Alcohol-dependent individuals discount sex at higher rates than controls. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 131(3), 320–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.12.014.
Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2008). An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.264.
Johnson, M. W., & Bruner, N. R. (2012). The sexual discounting task: HIV risk behavior and the discounting of delayed sexual rewards in cocaine dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 123(1–3), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.032.
Johnson, M. W., & Bruner, N. R. (2013). Test-retest reliability and gender differences in the sexual discounting task among cocaine-dependent individuals. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(4), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033071.
Johnson, P. S., Herrmann, E. S., & Johnson, M. W. (2015a). Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.110.
Johnson, M. W., Johnson, P. S., Herrmann, E. S., & Sweeney, M. M. (2015b). Delay and probability discounting of sexual and monetary outcomes in individuals with cocaine use disorders and matched controls. PLoS ONE, 10(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128641.
Kirby, D. B., Laris, B. A., & Rolleri, L. A. (2007). Sex and HIV education programs: Their impact on sexual behaviors of young people throughout the world. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(3), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.11.143.
Ku, L. C., Sonenstein, F. L., & Pleck, J. H. (1992). The association of AIDS education and sex education with sexual behavior and condom use among teenage men. Family Planning Perspectives, 24(3), 100–106.
Lammers, J., van Wijnbergen, S. J., & Willebrands, D. (2013). Condom use, risk perception, and HIV knowledge: A comparison across sexes in Nigeria. HIV/AIDS, 5, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.2147/hiv.s31687.
Lawyer, S. R. (2008). Probability and delay discounting of erotic stimuli. Behavioural Processes, 79(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.04.009.
Lawyer, S. R., & Schoepflin, F. J. (2013). Predicting domain-specific outcomes using delay and probability discounting for sexual versus monetary outcomes. Behavioural Processes, 96, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.001.
Lawyer, S. R., Williams, S. A., Prihodova, T., Rollins, J. D., & Lester, A. C. (2010). Probability and delay discounting of hypothetical sexual outcomes. Behavioural Processes, 84(3), 687–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.002.
Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., & Johnson, P. S. (2009). Pathological gamblers discount probabilistic rewards less steeply than matched controls. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(5), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016806.
Maharaj, P., & Cleland, J. (2005). Risk perception and condom use among married or cohabiting couples in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. International Family Planning Perspectives, 31(1), 24–29.
Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235.
Orr, D. P., & Langefeld, C. D. (1993). Factors associated with condom use by sexually active male adolescents at risk for sexually transmitted disease. Pediatrics, 91(5), 873–879.
Owusu-Edusei, K., Jr., Chesson, H. W., Gift, T. L., Tao, G., Mahajan, R., Ocfemia, M. C. B., & Kent, C. K. (2013). The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 40(3), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318285c6d2.
Poltavski, D. V., & Weatherly, J. N. (2013). Delay and probability discounting of multiple commodities in smokers and never-smokers using multiple-choice tasks. Behavioural Pharmacology, 24(8), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000010.
Prata, N., Morris, L., Mazive, E., Vahidnia, F., & Stehr, M. (2006). Relationship between HIV risk perception and condom use: Evidence from a population-based survey in Mozambique. International Family Planning Perspectives, 32(4), 192–200.
Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233.
Rimsza, M. E. (2005). Sexually transmitted infections: New guidelines for an old problem on the college campus. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 52(1), 217–228.
Rosengard, C., Clarke, J. G., DaSilva, K., Hebert, M., Rose, J., & Stein, M. D. (2005). Correlates of partner-specific condom use intentions among incarcerated women in Rhode Island. Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health, 37(1), 32–38.
Stanger-Hall, K., & Hall, D. W. (2011). Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: Why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. PLoS ONE, 6(10), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024658.
van Empelen, P., Schaalma, H. P., Kok, G., & Jansen, M. W. J. (2001). Predicting condom use with casual and steady sex partners among drug users. Health Education Research, 16(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.3.293.
Widman, L., Noar, S. M., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Francis, D. B. (2014). Adolescent sexual health communication and condom use: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 33(10), 1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000112.
Wongsomboon, V., & Robles, E. (2017). Devaluation of safe sex by delay or uncertainty: A within-subjects study of mechanisms underlying sexual risk behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(7), 2131–2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0788-1.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Grants R01DA032363, T32DA07209 and R01DA11692.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berry, M.S., Johnson, P.S., Collado, A. et al. Sexual Probability Discounting: A Mechanism for Sexually Transmitted Infection Among Undergraduate Students. Arch Sex Behav 48, 495–505 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1155-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1155-1