Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale Among Members of an Alternative Sexuality Special Interest Group

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study contributes to a growing body of literature developing psychometrically and theoretically grounded measures of sexual orientation minority identity. We tested psychometric properties and construct validity of a 27-item measure, the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS). The sample consisted of 475 adult (178 male, 237 female, 16 male-to-female, 14 female-to-male, and 30 gender queer persons) members of a special interest group, the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. Participants completed a health needs questionnaire. Prominent findings included (1) confirmatory factor-analytic, internal consistency, and inter-correlation patterns support two LGBIS factor structures; (2) men, compared primarily to women, reported elevated scores on Acceptance Concerns, Concealment Motivation, Difficulty Process, and Negative Identity; (3) queer-identifying persons tended to report low Concealment Motivation, and high Identity Affirmation and Identity Centrality scores; (4) experimenting/fluid-identifying individuals tended toward higher Identity Uncertainty and Negative Identity, and lower Identity Centrality scores; (5) LGB community involvement was negatively associated with Concealment Motivation, Identity Uncertainty, and Negative Identity, and positively associated with Identity Superiority, Identity Affirmation, and Identity Centrality scores; and (6) Acceptance Concerns, Identity Uncertainty, and Internalized Homonegativity displayed significant positive associations with such mental health symptoms as general anxiety and posttraumatic stress. The LGBIS represents a useful approach to evaluating sexual orientation minority identity. Implications for identity theory, research, and practice are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this section, we highlight only basic factor structures. The online supplement summarizes detailed factor-analytic strategies and adaptation of LGBIS measures over the series of studies.

  2. For item changes from LGBIS, see online supplement.

  3. Cramer et al. imposed more stringent model estimates in the test of the eight-factor model (online supplement for details).

  4. A total of 521 sexual orientation minority-identifying persons started the survey, but a total of 46 dropped out prior to completion of the LGBIS and other measures of interest (with most ceasing participation prior to providing sufficient demographic information for basic between-groups analyses between the analyzed group and those who dropped out).

  5. For exact items, subscales, and analytic approaches for each model, see online supplement.

  6. Only significant between-groups analyses are reported for categorical correlates for H2, H3, and H5; full set of statistical tests are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Cramer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animals Rights

The study was approved by a university Human Subjects Institution Review Board (IRB).

Informed Consent

All participants electing to participate clicked an electronic consent agreement after being provided information concerning participant rights, study description and contact information for the IRB and study team.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cramer, R.J., Golom, F.D., Gemberling, T.M. et al. Examining the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale Among Members of an Alternative Sexuality Special Interest Group. Arch Sex Behav 47, 1251–1264 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1120-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1120-4

Keywords

Navigation