Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 8, pp 2275–2277 | Cite as

In Search of a Parsimonious Model to Explain Hypersexual Behavior

  • Rory C. ReidEmail author
  • Jon E. Grant

Efforts to model biological processes and their associated mechanisms are an essential part of cultivating scientific understanding in the study of hypersexual behavior. An invitation for sex researchers to “transcend existent knowledge and attempt to enhance our theoretical understanding by formulating new or improved model accounts of the topic under scrutiny” has been previously offered (van Lankveld, 2011, p. 2). Subsequently, the review by Walton, Cantor, Bhullar, and Lykins (2017) of the hypersexuality literature and their proposed model—the sexhavior cycle—are to be applauded. Their work nicely captures and explains existing models with respective strengths and limitations. They correctly conclude that, presently, “multiple etiologies and theoretical conceptualizations” exist to predict hypersexuality.

Although there are various theoretical approaches to conceptualizing hypersexual behavior (compulsivity, impulsivity, addiction, etc.), sadly there is a lack of rigorous research...



Rory Reid was the Principal Investigator for the Field Trial of the Hypersexual Disorder criteria proposed for consideration in the DSM-5. The authors report no conflicts of interest and received no financial support directly related to the authorship, and/or publication of this commentary.


  1. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 114–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kafka, M. P. (2010). Hypersexual disorder: A proposed diagnosis for DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 377–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Levin, R. J. (2017). The human sexual response cycle. In W. W. Ishak (Ed.), Textbook of clinical sexual medicine (pp. 39–51). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Reid, R. C. (2015). How should severity be determined for the DSM-5 proposed classification of Hypersexual Disorder? Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4, 221–225.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Reid, R. C., Berlin, H. A., & Kingston, D. A. (2015). Sexual impulsivity in hypersexual men. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Reid, R. C., Carpenter, B. N., Hook, J. N., Garos, S., Manning, J. C., Gilliland, R., & Fong, T. (2012). Report of findings in a DSM-5 field trial for hypersexual disorder. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 2868–2877.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Reid, R. C., Cyders, M. A., Moghaddam, J. F., & Fong, T. W. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale in patients with gambling disorders, hypesexuality, and methamphetamine dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 1640–1645.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Reid, R. C., Davtian, M., Lenartowicz, A., Torrevillas, R. M., & Fong, T. W. (2013). Perspectives on the assessment and treatment of adult ADHD in hypersexual men. Neuropsychiatry, 3, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reid, R. C., Garos, S., & Carpenter, B. N. (2011). Reliability, validity, and psychometric development of the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory in an outpatient sample of men. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 18, 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Steele, V. R., Staley, C., Fong, T., & Prause, N. (2013). Sexual desire, not hypersexuality is related to neurophysiological responses elicited by sexual images. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 3, 20770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. van Lankveld, J. (2011). ARSR: Committed to quality and breaking new ground. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 103–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Walton, M. T., Cantor, J. M., Bhullar, N., & Lykins, A. D. (2017). Hypersexuality: A critical review and introduction to the “sexhavior cycle”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0991-8.Google Scholar
  14. Walton, M. T., Lykins, A. D., & Bhullar, N. (2016). Sexual arousal and sexual activity frequency: Implications for understanding hypesexuality [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 777–782.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Winters, J., Christoff, K., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2010). Dysregulated sexuality and high sexual desire: Distinct constructs? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1029–1043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral SciencesUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations