Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 8, pp 2257–2259 | Cite as

Moving Forward on Hypersexuality

  • Drew A. KingstonEmail author
Commentary

Walton, Cantor, Bhullar, and Lykins (2017) provided a comprehensive review of hypersexuality and in so doing presented myriad issues, such as definitional properties of the construct, prevalence rates, common criticisms surrounding attempts at pathologizing hypersexual behavior, as well as commonly studied features and correlates. Other comprehensive reviews of hypersexuality have been conducted in the last two decades (Gold & Heffner, 1998; Kaplan & Krueger, 2010; Kingston, 2016; Kingston & Firestone, 2008; Montgomery-Graham, 2017). In addition to their general overview, however, Walton et al. introduced the “sexhavior cycle,” a descriptive model outlining the initiation and maintenance of hypersexual behavior. In this Commentary, I focus on the definition and conceptualization of hypersexuality and then I apply core epistemic values in the evaluation of their proposed sexhavior cycle.

Defining and Conceptualizing Hypersexuality

Hypersexuality has proven to be an elusive concept to...

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Martin Lalumière and Tony Ward for useful suggestions and comments on a draft of this Commentary.

References

  1. Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 763–784. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00024-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gold, S. N., & Heffner, C. L. (1998). Sexual addiction: Many conceptions, minimal data. Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 367–381. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00051-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Graham, F. J., Walters, G. D., Harris, D. A., & Knight, R. A. (2016). Is hypersexuality dimensional or categorical? Evidence from male and female college samples. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 224–238. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.1003524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaplan, M. S., & Krueger, R. B. (2010). Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of hypersexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 181–198. doi: 10.1080/00224491003592863.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kastner, R. M., & Sellbom, M. (2012). Hypersexuality in college students: The role of psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 644–649. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kingston, D. A. (2016). Hypersexual disorders and sexual offending. In A. Phenix & H. M. Hoberman (Eds.), Sexual offending: Predisposing antecedents, assessments, and management (pp. 103–118). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kingston, D. A., & Firestone, P. (2008). Problematic hypersexuality: A review of conceptualization and diagnosis. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 15, 284–310. doi: 10.1080/10720160802289249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kingston, D. A., Graham, F. J., & Knight, R. A. (2017a). Relations between self-reported adverse events in childhood and hypersexuality in adult male sexual offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 707–720. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0873-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kingston, D. A., Walters, G. D., Olver, M. E., Levaque, E., Sawatsky, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2017b). Understanding the latent structure of hypersexuality: A taxometric investigation. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  10. Långström, N., & Hanson, R. K. (2006). High rates of sexual behavior in the general population: Correlates and predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 37–52. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-8993-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Montgomery-Graham, S. (2017). Conceptualization and assessment of hypersexual disorder: A systematic review of the literature. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 5, 146–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Reid, R. C., Berlin, H. A., & Kingston, D. A. (2015). Sexual impulsivity in hypersexual men. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Teicher, M. H., Tomoda, A., & Andersen, S. L. (2006). Neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment: Are results from human and animal studies comparable? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1071, 313–323. doi: 10.1196/annals.1364.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tottenham, N., Hare, T. A., Quinn, B. T., McCarry, T. W., Nurse, M., Gilhooly, T., & Casey, B. J. (2010). Prolonged institutional rearing is associated with atypically large amygdala volume and difficulties in emotion regulation. Developmental Science, 13, 46–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00852.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Walters, G. D., Knight, R. A., & Långström, N. (2011). Is hypersexuality dimensional? Evidence for the DSM-5 from general population and clinical samples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1309–1321. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9719-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Walton, M. T., Cantor, J. M., Bhullar, N., & Lykins, A. D. (2017). Hypersexuality: A critical review and introduction to the “sexhavior cycle”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0991-8.Google Scholar
  17. Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Beech, A. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Integrated Forensic ProgramRoyal Ottawa Health Care GroupBrockvilleCanada
  2. 2.School of Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations