Moving Forward on Hypersexuality
- 543 Downloads
Walton, Cantor, Bhullar, and Lykins (2017) provided a comprehensive review of hypersexuality and in so doing presented myriad issues, such as definitional properties of the construct, prevalence rates, common criticisms surrounding attempts at pathologizing hypersexual behavior, as well as commonly studied features and correlates. Other comprehensive reviews of hypersexuality have been conducted in the last two decades (Gold & Heffner, 1998; Kaplan & Krueger, 2010; Kingston, 2016; Kingston & Firestone, 2008; Montgomery-Graham, 2017). In addition to their general overview, however, Walton et al. introduced the “sexhavior cycle,” a descriptive model outlining the initiation and maintenance of hypersexual behavior. In this Commentary, I focus on the definition and conceptualization of hypersexuality and then I apply core epistemic values in the evaluation of their proposed sexhavior cycle.
Defining and Conceptualizing Hypersexuality
Hypersexuality has proven to be an elusive concept to...
I would like to thank Martin Lalumière and Tony Ward for useful suggestions and comments on a draft of this Commentary.
- Kingston, D. A., Walters, G. D., Olver, M. E., Levaque, E., Sawatsky, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2017b). Understanding the latent structure of hypersexuality: A taxometric investigation. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Tottenham, N., Hare, T. A., Quinn, B. T., McCarry, T. W., Nurse, M., Gilhooly, T., & Casey, B. J. (2010). Prolonged institutional rearing is associated with atypically large amygdala volume and difficulties in emotion regulation. Developmental Science, 13, 46–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00852.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Beech, A. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar