A Dissenting Opinion on DSM-5 Pedophilic Disorder

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    DSM-IV-TR lists three diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. The one relevant to this Letter is Criterion A, which describes the nature of the paraphilia: “Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger)” (American Psychiatric Association, 2000, p. 572).

  2. 2.

    There are five Tanner stages of physical development, with Tanner Stage 1 indicating prepuberty and Tanner Stage 5 indicating full maturation (Marshall & Tanner, 1969, 1970; Tanner, 1978). Tanner stages pertain to breast development and pubic hair growth in females, and to genital development and pubic hair growth in males. The stages of present relevance may be briefly described as follows. Tanner Stage 1: girls, no palpable breast tissue; boys, genitals similar to early childhood; both sexes, no pubic hair at all. Tanner Stage 2: girls, breast bud stage; boys, enlargement of scrotum and testes, with change in the color and texture of scrotal skin; both sexes, sparse growth of long, slightly pigmented downy hair, appearing mainly along the labia or base of the penis. Tanner Stage 3: girls, further enlargement of breast and areola with no separation of their contours; boys, growth of the penis and testes to half adult size or less; both sexes, pubic hair is darker and coarser, but lesser in quantity and different in quality from adult type.

  3. 3.

    The average age at which the onset of puberty occurs has been dropping for at least 150 years, and research indicates that it has continued to drop over the last few decades (e.g., Biro et al., 2010). In a multi-site study, for example, Biro et al. found that 18.3 % of white girls, 42.9 % of Black non-Hispanic girls, and 30.9 % of Hispanic girls had started puberty by the age of 8 years. A study on boys (Herman-Giddens et al., 2012) found comparable results for boys at age 9. By this age, 26.1 % of white boys, 43.4 % of African-American boys, and 44.4 % of Hispanic boys had started puberty, as indicated by Tanner Stage 2 (or higher) of genital development.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

  2. Beier, K. M., Amelung, T., Kuhle, L., Grundmann, D., Scherner, G., & Neutze, J. (2013). Hebephilie als sexuelle Störung [Hebephilia as a sexual disorder]. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 81, 128–137.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biro, F. M., Galvez, M. P., Greenspan, L. C., Succop, P. A., Vangeepuram, N., Pinney, S. M.,…Wolff, M. S. (2010). Pubertal assessment method and baseline characteristics in a mixed longitudinal study of girls. Pediatrics, 126, e583–e590.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanchard, R. (2010a). The DSM diagnostic criteria for Pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 304–316.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanchard, R. (2010b). The fertility of hebephiles and the adaptationist argument against including hebephilia in DSM-5 [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 817–818.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanchard, R. (2012). [Letter to the Editor]. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40, 157–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T.,…Klassen, P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DeClue, G. (2009). Should hebephilia be a mental disorder? A reply to Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 317–318.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frances, A. (2011, December 15). Hebephilia is a crime, not a mental disorder. Available at http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/blog/frances/content/article/10168/2006997.

  10. Franklin, K. (2009). The public policy implications of “hebephilia”: A response to Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 319–320.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freund, K., McKnight, C. K., Langevin, R., & Cibiri, S. (1972). The female child as a surrogate object. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2, 119–133.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freund, K., Seeley, H. R., Marshall, W. E., & Glinfort, E. K. (1972). Sexual offenders needing special assessment and/or therapy. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 14, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glueck, B. C., Jr. (1955). Final report: Research project for the study and treatment of persons convicted of crimes involving sexual aberrations, June 1952 to June 1955. New York: New York State Department of Mental Hygiene.

  14. Hames, R., & Blanchard, R. (2012). Anthropological data regarding the adaptiveness of hebephilia [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 745–747.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herman-Giddens, M. E., Steffes, J., Harris, D., Slora, E., Hussey, M., Dowshen, S. A.,…Reiter, E. O. (2012). Secondary sexual characteristics in boys: Data from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings Network. Pediatrics, 130, e1058–e1068.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Janssen, D. F. (2009). Hebephilia plethysmographica: A partial rejoinder to Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 321–322.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lykins, A. D., Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., & Blanchard, R. (2010). Sexual arousal to female children in gynephilic men. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marshall, V. A., & Tanner, J. M. (1969). Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 44, 291–303.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marshall, V. A., & Tanner, J. M. (1970). Variation in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 45, 13–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moser, C. (2009). When is an unusual sexual interest a mental disorder? [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 323–325.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rind, B., & Yuill, R. (2012). Hebephilia as mental disorder? A historical, cross-cultural, sociological, cross-species, non-clinical empirical, and evolutionary review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 797–829.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanner, J. M. (1978). Foetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tromovitch, T. (2009). Manufacturing mental disorder by pathologizing erotic age orientation: A comment on Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 328.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization. (1992). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th rev., Vol. 1). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Blanchard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanchard, R. A Dissenting Opinion on DSM-5 Pedophilic Disorder. Arch Sex Behav 42, 675–678 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0117-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sexual Preference
  • Sexual Attraction
  • Tanner Stage
  • Prepubertal Child
  • Sexual Object