David Hitchcock (2017): On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking

Cham (CH), Springer, (= Argumentation Library, 30) pp, xxvi, 1–553. Foreword by J. Anthony Blair
  • Christopher W. Tindale
Book review

It is a daunting task facing any reviewer who looks to appraise what amounts to the oeuvre of a scholar of David Hitchcock’s stature. His output, of course, exceeds what is gathered in this collection, and includes a critical thinking textbook (1983), a coauthored text (with Milos Jenicek) on medical argumentation (2005), and a collection with Bart Verheij on the Toulmin model (2006). But the book under review, boasts over thirty essays from nearly four decades of work and represents the cream of Hitchcock’s thinking on issues that reside at the heart of argumentation theory. J. Anthony Blair’s foreword explains the organization and inclusions of the book, while highlighting the value of the postscripts that close each Part. The foreword also stresses the underlying issues in informal logic that characterize virtually all of the chapters, along with the high quality of the philosophical thinking involved.

On Reasoning and Argumentfits easily into the company of other recent...


  1. Blair, J.A. 2012. Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair. Cham (CH): Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Freeman, J.B. 2010. “Commentary on Geoffrey C. Goddu’s “Refining Hitchcock’s Definition of ‘Argument’”. In Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09, CD-ROM, ed. J. Ritola, 1–13. Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
  3. Goddu, G.C. 2010. Refining Hitchcock’s Definition of ‘Argument’. In Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09, CD-ROM, ed. J. Ritola, 1–10. Windsor: OSSA.Google Scholar
  4. Hitchcock, D. 1983. Critical Thinking: A Guide to Evaluating Information. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
  5. Hitchcock, D., and B. Verheij. 2006. Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jenicek, M., and D. Hitchcock. 2005. Evidence-Based Practice: Logic and Critical Thinking in Medicine. Chicago: AMA Press.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, R. 2000. Manifest Rationality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Kock, C. 2017. Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing About Doing. Windsor, ON: Windsor Studies. (in Argumentation).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wohlrapp, H. 2014. The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation. German original 2008. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zarefsky, D. 2014. Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky. Cham (CH): Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation & RhetoricUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations