Towards a Direct Numerical Simulation of a Simplified Pressurized Thermal Shock

Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this research work is to perform high quality direct numerical simulations (DNS) of a simplified single phase pressurized thermal shock (PTS) scenario with and without buoyancy effects. In that context, the objectives of this paper are (i) to present the road towards the DNS of a PTS design without buoyancy effects and (ii) to demonstrate that the code NEK5000 is adequate for true DNS analyses. This DNS of the PTS design will serve as a reference to validate low order CFD approaches. The higher order spectral element code NEK5000 is selected to perform the high quality DNS computations. The capabilities of this code, in order to perform the DNS for PTS like geometries, have been extensively assessed for a well-known turbulent channel flow configuration with Re τ = 180 (turbulent Reynolds number based on the wall friction velocity). Different numerical parameters of NEK5000 have been thoroughly tested and their influence has been studied to obtain high quality turbulence statistics. This assessment of NEK5000 is further extended for the application of highly skewed hexahedral (non-orthogonal) meshes in a turbulent channel flow. The obtained results have shown that NEK5000 is capable of producing high quality DNS solution for a PTS like complex flow configuration for skewed elements (meshes) up to 60 degrees. Finally, this tested numerical framework is adopted to perform the targeted DNS computations of the simplified PTS design.

Keywords

Pressurized thermal shock DNS NEK5000 Non-orthogonal meshes Spectral element methods 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to D. Rosa, P.M.K Prasad and D. De Santis for their contribution in running various channel flow simulations considered in this article. The work described in this paper is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. The N3 computations presented in this paper are performed at Swierk Computing Centre in the framework of the EU and MSHE grant no. POIG.02.03.00-00-013/09.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Shams, A., Damiani, G., Rosa, D., Komen, E.M.J.: Design of a single-phase PTS numerical experiment for a reference direct numerical simulation. Nucl. Eng. Des. 300, 282–296 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Damerell, P.S., Simonis, J.W.: 2D/3D program work summary report. In: Technical Report GRS (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kliem, S., Suhnel, T., Rohde, U., Hohne, T., Prasser, H.M., Weiss, F.P.: Experiments at the mixing test facility ROCOM for benchmarking of CFD codes. Nucl. Eng. Des. 238, 566–576 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prasser, H.M., Grunwald, G., Hohne, T., Kliem, S., Rohde, U., Weiss, F.P.: Coolant mixing in a pressurized water reactor: deboration transients, steamline breaks, and emergency core cooling injection. Nucl. Technol. 143, 37–56 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shams, A., Komen, E.M.J.: Direct numerical simulation of a single phase PTS. In: International conference on topical issues in nuclear installation safety: safety demonstration of advanced water cooled nuclear power plants. IAEA-CN-251, Vienna (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Damiani, G., Rosa, D., Shams, A., Komen, E.M.J., Merzari, E., Obabko, A., Fischer, P.: Calibration and optimization of pressurized thermal shock for benchmarking direct numerical simulations. NURETH-16, Chicago (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosa, D., Shams, A., Komen, E.M.J.: Towards the benchmarking direct numerical simulations of a single phase pressurized thermal shock. CFD4NRS-6, Boston (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vreman, A.W., Kuerten, J.G.M.: Comparison of direct numerical simulation databases of turbulent channel flow at Reτ = 180. Phys. Fluids 015102, 26 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tiselj, I., Cizelj, L.: DNS Of turbulent channel ow with conjugate heat transfer at Prandtl number 0.01. Nuclear Engineering and Design (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoyas, S., Jimenez, J.: Reynolds number effects on the Reynolds-stress budgets in turbulent channels. Phys. Fluids 20, 101511 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moser, R.D., Kim, J., Mansour, N.N.: DNS of turbulent channel flow up to r e τ = 590. Phys. Fluids 11, 943–945 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, J., Moin, P., Moser, R.D.: Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel low at low reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166 (1987)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Pinelli, A., Uhlmann, M., Sekimoto, A., Kawahara, G.: Reynolds number dependence of mean flow structure in square duct turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 644, 107–122 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uhlmann, M., Pinelli, A., Kawahara, G., Sekimoto, A.: Marginally turbulent flow in a square duct. J. Fluid Mech. 588, 153–162 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NRG)PettenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations