Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of environmentally-specific servant leadership on green performance via green climate and green crafting

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of our inquiry is to assess the impacts of environmentally-specific servant leadership (ESS leadership) on green performance at both team and individual levels. Participants from tour companies based in Vietnam provided the data for our inquiry. The results demonstrated the mediating role of green climate for the effects of ESS leadership on team and individual green performance. Green crafting functioned as a mediator for the relationship between green climate and individual green performance. Green climate also served as a moderator to strengthen the relationship between green crafting and green performance among employees. Implications from these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addison, J. T., Teixeira, P., Pahnke, A., & Bellmann, L. 2017. The demise of a model? The state of collective bargaining and worker representation in Germany. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(2): 193–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Kiani, U. S. 2016. Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. 2018. Activating employee’s pro-environmental behaviors: The role of CSR, organizational identification, and environmentally specific servant leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5): 904–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovations in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior, 10: 123–167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2010. Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: Idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5): 970–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ando, K., Ohnuma, S., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Sugiura, J. 2010. Determinants of individual and collective pro-environmental behaviors: Comparing Germany and Japan. Journal of Environmental Information Science, 38(5): 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. 1988. On the evaluation for structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1): 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Vergel, A. I. S. 2016. Modelling job crafting behaviours: Implications for work engagement. Human Relations, 69(1): 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavik, A., Bavik, Y. L., & Tang, P. M. 2017. Servant leadership, employee job crafting, and citizenship behaviors: A cross-level investigation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(4): 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi, L. 2017. Network characteristics: When an individual’s job crafting depends on the jobs of others. Human Relations, 70(4): 436–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O., & Paillé, P. 2012. Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: Measurement and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4): 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. 2013. The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1): 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Zhu, J., & Zhou, M. 2015. How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self-identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2): 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C., Bartram, T., Karimi, L., & Leggat, S. G. 2013. The role of team climate in the management of emotional labour: Implications for nurse retention. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(12): 2812–2825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. J., Mackey, A., & Whetten, D. 2014. Taking responsibility for corporate social responsibility: The role of leaders in creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2): 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, J. U., Cho, K., & Sosik, J. J. 2016. A multilevel study of group-focused and individual-focused transformational leadership, social exchange relationships, and performance in teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3): 374–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. 1983. Comparing regression coefficients across subsamples: A study of the statistical test. Sociological Methods & Research, 12(1): 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangelico, R. M. 2015. Improving firm environmental performance and reputation: The role of employee green teams. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8): 735–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. 2017. Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4): 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. 2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G. 2004. Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1): 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. 2019. Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research: The leadership quarterly yearly review for 2019. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1): 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S., Liu, J., & Li, L. 2010. Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders' transformational behaviors and personal values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2): 222–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, W. H. 1985. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3): 601–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A., Foo, S. C., Groth, M., & Goodwin, R. E. 2012. Free to be you and me: A climate of authenticity alleviates burnout from emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. 1970. The servant as leader. Newton Centre, MA:The Robert K. Greenleaf Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. 1977. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York, NY: Paulist Press.

  • Groen, B. A., Wilderom, C. P., & Wouters, M. J. 2017. High job performance through co-developing performance measures with employees. Human Resource Management, 56(1): 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, X., & Frenkel, S. J. 2018. Explaining supervisor–subordinate guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens. Human Relations, in press: 001872671881371.

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. 2010. Multivariate data analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. 2014. Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5): 1334–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R., & Wheeler, A. R. 2015. To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior. Journal of Management, 41(6): 1628–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. 2018. Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1): 4–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., Montoya, A. K., & Rockwood, N. J. 2017. The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 25(1): 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. 2009. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2): 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. 1989. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3): 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. 2001. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3): 337–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. 2002. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4): 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. 2018. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1): 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. 2018. Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2): 501–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Y. C. 2012. Hotel companies’ environmental policies and practices: A content analysis of their web pages. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(1): 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2): 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1): 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakas, F., & Sarigollu, E. 2013. The role of leadership in creating virtuous and compassionate organizations: Narratives of benevolent leadership in an Anatolian tiger. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4): 663–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasl, S. V., & Jones, B. A. 2003. An epidemiological perspective on research design, measurement and surveillance strategies. In J. C. Quick, & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.). Handbook of occupational health psychology: 379–398. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E., & Ployhart, R. E. 2017. Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5): 1335–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., Bliese, P. D., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M. B., Griffin, M., & Bligh, M. C. 2000. Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 512–553. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, H., & Park, C. 2018. Foundation of leadership in Asia: Leader characteristics and leadership styles review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3): 697–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, L., Huang, X., & Lau, D. C. 2012. Leadership research in Asia: Taking the road less traveled? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2): 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, H., Polonsky, M., & Arambewela, R. 2015. Social inclusion through cultural engagement among ethnic communities. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 24(4): 375–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. H., Lin, C., Lin, C. K., & Lu, W. Y. 2014. Moderating effect of institutional responsiveness on the relationship between green leadership and green competitiveness. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 42(9): 1483–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. 2014. Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5): 1434–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. 2015. Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2): 254–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. 2008. Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2): 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. P., Liu, C. M., Liu, N. T., & Huang, H. T. 2018. Being excellent teams: Managing innovative climate, politics, and team performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, in press: 1–20.

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luu, T. T. 2017. Reform in public organizations: The roles of ambidextrous leadership and moderating mechanisms. Public Management Review, 19(4): 518–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luu, T. T. 2018. Activating tourists’ citizenship behavior for the environment: The roles of CSR and frontline employees’ citizenship behavior for the environment. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7): 1178–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., & Tsui, A. S. 2015. Traditional Chinese philosophies and contemporary leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruping, L. M., & Magni, M. 2012. What’s the weather like? The effect of team learning climate, empowerment climate, and gender on individuals’ technology exploration and use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(1): 79–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijerink, J., Bos-Nehles, A., & de Leede, J. (2018). How employees’ pro-activity translates high-commitment HRM systems into work engagement: The mediating role of job crafting. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, in press.

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. 1983. Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3): 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moxen, J., & Strachan, P. (Eds.) 2017. Managing green teams: Environmental change in organisations and networks, 2nd ed. New York, NY:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. 2010. Mplus user’s guide, 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA:Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, A., Miao, Q., Hofman, P. S., & Zhu, C. J. 2016. The impact of socially responsible human resource management on employees' organizational citizenship behaviour: The mediating role of organizational identification. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(4): 440–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. S. 2017. Involving multiple stakeholders to solve water pollution issues in industrial zones in Vietnam after the Doimoi process. In Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Tsukuba. Tsukuba, Ibaraki: Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, T. A., Zacher, H., Parker, S. L., & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2017. Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7): 996–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opute, A. P., & Madichie, N. O. 2017. Accounting-marketing integration dimensions and antecedents: Insights from a frontier market. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, in press, 32(8): 1144–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2012. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1): 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pornpitakpan, C. 2002. The environmental concern in Thailand: Managerial implications. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14(2–3): 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. 2006. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4): 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. 2010. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3): 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priyankara, H. P. R., Luo, F., Saeed, A., Nubuor, S. A., & Jayasuriya, M. P. F. 2018. How does Leader’s support for environment promote organizational citizenship behaviour for environment? A multi-theory perspective. Sustainability, 10(1): 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raineri, N., & Paillé, P. 2016. Linking corporate policy and supervisory support with environmental citizenship behaviors: The role of employee environmental beliefs and commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1): 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. 2013. Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2): 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. 2015. Introduction. In J. L. Robertson, & J. Barling (Eds.). The psychology of green organizations: 3–11. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. 2017. Contrasting the nature and effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(1): 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. L., & Carleton, E. 2018. Uncovering how and when environmental leadership affects employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(2): 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, B. S., & Riordan, C. M. 2003. A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2): 169–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. C. 2011. Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4): 863–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. 2013. Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1): 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendjaya, S. 2015. Personal and organizational excellence through servant leadership: Learning to serve, serving to lead, leading to transform. Cham, Switzerland:Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4): 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. 2010. Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3): 456–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siponen, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Pahnila, S. 2014. Employees’ adherence to information security policies: An exploratory field study. Information & management, 51(2): 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, R. S., & Tseng, C. S. 2003. Images of the virtuous employee in China's transitional economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(3): 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sony, A., & Ferguson, D. 2017. Unlocking consumers’ environmental value orientations and green lifestyle behaviors: A key for developing green offerings in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9(1): 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. L., Fulmer, I. S., & Barrick, M. R. 2005. An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58(2): 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoverink, A. C., Chiaburu, D. S., Li, N., & Zheng, X. 2018. Supporting team citizenship: The influence of team social resources on team-level affiliation-oriented and challenge-oriented behaviour. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(2): 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W., Xu, A., & Shang, Y. 2014. Transformational leadership, team climate, and team performance within the NPD team: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1): 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. 2012. Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1): 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D., & van Rhenen, W. 2013. Job crafting at the team and individual level: Implications for work engagement and performance. Group & Organization Management, 38(4): 427–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dierendonck, D. 2011. Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4): 1228–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., De Windt, N., & Alkema, J. 2014. Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3): 544–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Wu, C., & Orwa, B. 2008. Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3): 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Kwan, H. K., & Zhou, A. 2017. Effects of servant leadership on work–family balance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55(4): 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. F. 2016. Modeling predictors of restaurant employees’ green behavior: Comparison of six attitude-behavior models. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 58(7): 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, J. L. 2017. Creating a positive organization through servant leadership. In C. J. Davis (Ed.). Servant leadership and followership: 51–79. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, B. E., & Ryan, B. 2008. Servant leadership as a humane orientation: Using the GLOBE study construct of humane orientation to show that servant leadership is more global than western. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(2): 212–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. 2001. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H., & Parker, S. K. 2017. The role of leader support in facilitating proactive work behavior: A perspective from attachment theory. Journal of Management, 43(4): 1025–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W. Y., Yang, X. B., Deng, H., Long, S. Q., Sun, L. S., He, W. F., Zhou, Y. S., Liao, G. Y., Chan, S. M., & Shan, S. P. 2010. Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with extracorporeal high frequency thermotherapy combined with Chinese medicine. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 16(5): 406–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y., Lyu, Y., & He, Y. 2019. Servant leadership and proactive customer service performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3): 1330–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Chen, Y., & Liu, J. 2016. Ethical leadership and OCBE: The influence of prosocial motivation and self accountability. In J. Humphreys (Ed.), Academy of Management Proceedings (meeting abstract supplement) (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 15588). Academy of Management.

  • Zientara, P., & Zamojska, A. 2018. Green organizational climates and employee pro-environmental behaviour in the hotel industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7): 1142–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luu Trong Tuan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Measurement items and loadings

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tuan, L.T. Effects of environmentally-specific servant leadership on green performance via green climate and green crafting. Asia Pac J Manag 38, 925–953 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09687-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09687-9

Keywords

Navigation