Chinese management research aims to contribute to global management knowledge by offering rigorous and innovative theories and practical recommendations both for managing in China and outside. However, two seemingly opposite directions that researchers are taking could prove detrimental to the healthy development of Chinese management research. We argue that the two directions share a common ground that lies in the mindset regarding the confidence in the work on and from China. One direction of simply following the American mainstream on academic rigor demonstrates a lack of self-confidence, limiting theoretical innovation and practical relevance. Yet going in the other direction of overly indigenous research reflects over-confidence, often isolating the Chinese management research from the mainstream academia and at times, even becoming anti-science. A more integrated approach of conducting Chinese management research is recommended. Specifically, it is recommended that researchers can focus on phenomena salient in China and follow rigorous scientific methods, as illustrated by a few exemplary studies using the Chinese context. In this way, Chinese management research can advance if it becomes more self-confident in its study and application but not over-confident.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Abrahamson, E. 2008. 22 things I hate: Mini rants on management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4): 422–425.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. 2012. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.
Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 11–24.
Ahlstrom, D. 2015. From the Editors: Publishing in the Journal of World Business. Journal of World Business, 50(2): 251–255.
Ahlstrom, D. 2017. How to publish in academic journals: Writing a strong and organized introduction section. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 4(2): 1–9.
Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Lui, S. S. Y. 2000. Navigating China’s changing economy: Strategies for private firms. Business Horizons, 43(1): 5–15.
Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Zhao, L. 2013. Turning good research into good publications. Nankai Business Review International, 4(2): 92–106.
Ahlstrom, D., Chen, S.-j., & Yeh, K. S. 2010. Managing in ethnic Chinese communities: Culture, institutions, and context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3): 341–354.
Ahlstrom, D., Lamond, D., & Ding, Z. 2009. Reexamining some management lessons from military history. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(4): 617–642.
Ahlstrom, D., Levitas, E., Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., & Zhu, H. 2014. The three faces of China: Strategic alliance partner selection in three ethnic Chinese economies. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 572–585.
Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A., Young, M. N., & Wang, L. C. 2006. China: Competitive myths and realities. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 71(4): 4–10.
Ahlstrom, D., & Wang, L. C. 2010. Entrepreneurial capitalism in East Asia: How history matters. In H. Landstrom, & F. Lohrke (Eds.). Historical foundations of entrepreneurship research: 406–427. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Au, E. W. M., Chiu, C.-Y., Chaturvedi, A., Mallorie, L. A., Viswanathan, M., Zhang, Z.-X., & Savani, K. 2011. Maintaining faith in agency under immutable constraints: Cognitive consequences of believing in negotiable fate. International Journal of Psychology, 46(6): 463–474.
Au, E. W. M., Chiu, C.-Y., Zhang, Z.-X., Mallorie, L. A., Chaturvedi, A., Viswanathan, M., & Savani, K. 2012. Negotiable fate: Social ecological foundation and psychological functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(6): 931–942.
Au, E. W. M., Qin, X., & Zhang, Z.-X. 2018. Beyond personal control: When and how executives’ beliefs in negotiable fate foster entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143(5): 69–84.
Bartha, P. 2016. Analogy and analogical reasoning. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Winter ed. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
Berggren, D. 1962. The use and abuse of metaphor, I. Review of Metaphysics, 16(2): 237–258.
Berggren, D. 1963. The use and abuse of metaphor, II. Review of Metaphysics, 16(3): 450–472.
Bernstein, E. S. 2012. The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2): 181–216.
Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. 2015. State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 92–114.
Bruton, G. D., Zahra, S. A., & Cai, L. 2017. Examining entrepreneurship through indigenous lenses. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717741129.
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. 2015. What is disruptive innovation?. Harvard Business Review, 93(12): 44–53.
Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. 2007. Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1281–1303.
Danesi, M. 1993. Vico, metaphor, and the origin of language. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.
Domar, E. 1946. Capital expansion, rate of growth, and employment. Econometrica, 14(2): 137–147.
Donaldson, L. 1995. American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fang, T. 2003. A critique of Hofstede’s fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross-cultural Management, 3(3): 347–368.
Fang, T. 2010. Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 155–170.
Fang, T. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and organization Review, 8(1): 25–50.
Garud, R., & Ahlstrom, D. 1997. Technology assessment: A socio-cognitive perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(1): 25–48.
Gentner, D. 2003. Analogical reasoning, Psychology of: vol. 1: Encyclopedia of cognitive science: 106–112. London: Nature Publishing.
Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. 1993. The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and thought, 2nd ed.: 447–480. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 209–226.
Hambrick, D. C. 1994. 1993 Presidential address: What if the Academy actually mattered?. Academy of Management Review, 19(1): 11–16.
Harrod, R. F. 1939. An essay in dynamic theory. Economic Journal, 49(193): 14–33.
Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. 1999. Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 825–842.
Hong, Y.-Y., & Chiu, C.-Y. 2001. Toward a paradigm shift: From cross-cultural differences in social cognition to social-cognitive mediation of cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19: 181–196.
Hong, Y.-Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. 2000. Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7): 709–720.
Huang, Y. 2010. Debating China’s economic growth: The Beijing Consensus or the Washington Consensus. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2): 31–47.
Huang, X., & Bond, M. H. (Eds.). 2012. Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Isaacson, W. 2011. Steve Jobs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Jia, L., You, S., & Du, Y. 2012. Chinese context and theoretical contributions to management and organization research: A three-decade review. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 173–209.
Jia, N. 2016. Political strategy and market capabilities: Evidence from the Chinese private sector. Management and Organization Review, 12(1): 75–102.
Jing, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. 2014. A Yin-Yang model of organizational change: The case of Chengdu bus group. Management and Organization Review, 10(1): 29–54.
Knowles, E. D., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-y., & Hong, Y.-Y. 2001. Culture and process of person perception: Evidence for automaticity among East Asians in correcting for situational influences on behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 1344–1356.
Lai, J. Y., Lam, L. W., & Liu, Y. 2010. Do you really need help? A study of employee supplication and job performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3): 541–559.
Leung, K., & Brew, F. P. 2009. A cultural analysis of harmony and conflict: Toward an integrative model of conflict styles. In R. S. Wyer, C.-y. Chiu, & Y.-y. Hong (Eds.). Understanding culture: Theory, research and application: 411–428. New York: Psychology Press.
Leung, K., Brew, F. P., Zhang, Z. X., & Zhang, Y. 2011. Harmony and conflict: A cross-cultural investigation in China and Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5): 795–816.
Leung, K., Koch, P. T., & Lu, L. 2002. A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 201–220.
Lewis, W. A. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. Manchester School, 22(2): 139–191.
Li, H., Meng, L., & Zhang, J. 2006. Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 44(3): 559–578.
Li, H., & Zhang, Y. 2016. Integrating contextual knowledge and generalizable theory: How can Chinese management research make theoretical contributions? [情境化知识与普适化理论的有机结合—探索中国管理学研究的理论创新之道]. Quarterly Journal of Management [管理学季刊], 1(4): 1–17 (in Chinese).
Li, P. P. 2012. Exploring the unique roles of trust and play in private creativity: From the complexity-ambiguity-metaphor link to the trust-play-creativity link. Journal of Trust Research, 2(1): 71–97.
Li, P. P. 2013. Indigenous research on Chinese management and Chinese traditional philosophies [中国本土管理研究与中国传统哲学]. Chinese Journal of Management [管理学报], 10(9): 1249–1261 (in Chinese).
Li, P. P. 2014a. The unique value of Yin-Yang balancing: A critical response. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 321–332.
Li, P. P. 2016a. Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: How to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(1): 42–77.
Li, P. P. 2018. The epistemology of Yin-Yang balancing as the root of Chinese cultural traditions: The indigenous features and geocentric implications. In J. Spencer-Rodgers, & K. Peng (Eds.). The psychological and cultural foundations of dialectical thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J. D. 2012a. Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 7–24.
Li, P. P., Sekiguchi, T., & Zhou, K. 2016. The emerging research on indigenous management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3): 583–594.
Li, X. 2014b. Can Yin-Yang guide Chinese indigenous management research?. Management and Organization Review, 10(1): 7–27.
Li, X. 2016b. The danger of Chinese exceptionalism. Management and Organization Review, 12(4): 815–816.
Li, X. H., & Liang, X. 2015. A Confucian social model of political appointments among Chinese private-firm entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2): 592–617.
Li, Y., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Ahlstrom, D. 2014. The rationality of emotions: A hybrid process model of decision-making under uncertainty. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1): 293–308.
Li, Y., Chun, H., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Ahlstrom, D. 2012b. A multi-level study of emergent group leadership: Effects of emotional stability and group conflict. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2): 351–366.
Liden, R. C. 2012. Leadership research in Asia: A brief assessment and suggestions for the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2): 205–212.
Luo, Y., & Child, J. 2015. A composition-based view of firm growth. Management and Organization Review, 11(3): 379–411.
Ma, L., & Tsui, A. S. 2015. Traditional Chinese philosophies and contemporary leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 26(1): 13–24.
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. 2008. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1): 351–398.
McCloskey, D. N. 2010. Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCloskey, D. N. 2013. Tunzelmann, Schumpeter, and the hockey stick. Research Policy, 42(10): 1706–1715.
Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2): 119–137.
Meyer, K. E. 2014. What the fox says, how the fox works: Deep contextualization as a source of new research agendas and theoretical insights. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 373–380.
Mintzberg, H. 2004. Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Nair, A., & Ahlstrom, D. 2003. Delayed creative destruction and the coexistence of technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(4): 345–365.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. 2013. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4): 324–338.
Ortony, A. 1975. Why metaphors necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25: 45–53.
Peng, M. W. 2005. Perspectives—From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(2): 123–141.
Peng, M. W. 2007. Celebrating 25 years of Asia Pacific management research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 385–393.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. 1993. Metaphorical imprecision and the “top-down” research strategy. In A. Ortony (Ed.). Metaphor and thought, 2nd ed.: 543–558. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Romer, P. M. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002–1037.
Romer, P. M. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2): S71–S102.
Scott, W. R. 2013. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Shenkar, O. 2017. Management research with Chinese characteristics [具有中国特色的管理学研究]. Quarterly Journal of Management [管理学季刊], 2(1): 1–11.
Singh, K. 2007. The limited relevance of culture to strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 421–428.
Solow, R. M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65–94.
Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312–320.
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371–384.
Tsang, E. W. K. 2004. Superstition and decision-making: Contradiction or complement?. Academy of Management Executive, 18(4): 92–104.
Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.
Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.
Tsui, A. S., & Lyu, L. 2015. The theoretical and practical issues in Chinese indigenous management research [中国本土管理研究的理论与实践问题:对徐淑英的访谈]. Chinese Journal of Management [管理学报], 12(3): 313–321 (in Chinese).
Van de Ven, A. H. 1989. Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 486–489.
Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, X., & Li, P. P. 2017. A conceptual framework of “Wu”-based innovation at the team level: A case study on indigenous innovation in the context of aerospace projects [团队悟性创新理论框架:中国航天工程情境下的本土创新案例研究]. Foreign Economics & Management [外国经济与管理], 39(3): 3–23 (in Chinese).
Weber, M. 1978. The nature of social action. In W. G. Runciman, & E. Mathews (Eds.). Max Weber: Selections in translation: 7–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weick, K. E. 1989. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 516–531.
White, S. 2002. Rigour and relevance in Asian management research: Where are we and where can we go?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3): 287–352.
Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 1–31.
Yang, H., & Zhao, D. 2015. Performance legitimacy, state autonomy and China’s economic miracle. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(91): 64–82.
Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2003. Principal-principal agency. Web Journal of Chinese Management Review, 6(1): 18–45.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. 2015. Paradoxical leader behavior in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 538–566.
Zhang, Z.-X., Ju, D., & Ma, L. 2014. State of the science of organizational behavior research: A brief review and future direction for Chinese research [张志学,鞠冬,马力: 组织行为学研究的现状: 意义与建议]. Acta Psychologica Sinica [心理学报], 46(2): 265–284.
Zhao, D. 2009. The mandate of heaven and performance legitimation in historical and contemporary China. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3): 416–433.
Zhao, L., Gu, H., Yue, C., & Ahlstrom, D. 2013. Consumer welfare and GM food labeling: A simulation using an adjusted Kumaraswamy distribution. Food Policy, 42(C): 58–70.
Zheng, L. 2012. How far are Chinese economists from winning a Noble Prize?. Changjiang Business Newspaper: Oct. 15. [郑良中. 中国经济学家离诺贝尔奖有多远,长江商报], available: http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2012-10/15/c_123824737.htm (in Chinese).
Zhou, X., & Wei, Q. 2015. Zhou Xueguang: The logic of Chinese state governance [周雪光:中国国家治理的逻辑], cnpolitics.org, available at: http://cnpolitics.org/2015/08/logic_of_chinese_governing/ (in Chinese).
We thank Professor David Ahlstrom and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Any errors that may remain are our own.
The research was partially supported by the Carlsberg Foundation’s Postdoctoral Fellowship in Denmark grant (No. CF15-0270), a project granted to the first author, and Chinese Natural Science Foundation Committee grant (No. 71372021), a project granted to the second author.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Ma, L. Chinese management research needs self-confidence but not over-confidence. Asia Pac J Manag 37, 481–498 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9562-3
- Scientific method